コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s, dispersers, and a new class that we call "expanders".
2 ation (149 immediate implants and 116 tissue expanders).
3 ich the Cayley graph Cay(G; S) is an epsilon-expander.
4 dendritic cells were the most potent Vdelta2 expanders.
5 ss II(+) but not negative cells into Vdelta2 expanders.
6 this limitation by presenting neural etendue expanders.
7 te immune functions of CD8(+) T cells in non-expanders.
8 y breast procedures were most frequent after expander (2021/1000 discharges) and least frequent after
11 d expansion (expanders) or no expansion (non-expanders) after in vitro stimulation identified increas
12 sible by laser beam shaping using a 4:1 beam expander and a circular aperture for spatial mode filter
14 Ninety-day complications were lowest after expander and highest after AT breast reconstruction (TE
15 hemodilutents: a non-oxygen-carrying plasma expander and two hemoglobin solutions with different oxy
16 r method at least matches quantum randomness expanders and classical world empirical extractors as me
18 tion was performed with a subpectoral tissue expander, and in 6 breasts, reconstruction was performed
22 ction-breast reconstruction with implants or expanders at the time of mastectomy-but there is a lack
23 compare short- and long-term outcomes after expander, autologous (AT), and direct-to-implant (DI) br
26 crews used for a tissue bone borne maxillary expander (C-expander) can fail if they contact tooth roo
28 or a tissue bone borne maxillary expander (C-expander) can fail if they contact tooth roots or perfor
29 nned revisions were highest among the tissue expander cohort (TE = 59.2% vs AT = 34.4% vs DI = 45.9%,
36 sent a new java-based graphical tool, called EXPANDER, for gene expression analysis and visualization
39 gistic regression analysis, radiation to the expander had a higher risk of reconstruction failure tha
40 comparing reconstructive outcomes, radiated expanders had a higher failure rate (21.6% vs 11.4%; P =
43 explored a novel, shapeable hydrogel tissue expander (HTE) in intraoral sites that had undergone pre
44 iotherapy on direct-to-implant versus tissue expander-implant reconstruction has not been examined.
50 roduction of human serum albumin as a plasma expander in the 1940s, considerable research has allowed
52 ndicate that mechanical forces from a tissue expander induce broad molecular changes in gene expressi
53 r-particularly in terms of implanted orbital expanders-is the recent spate of long-term complications
54 le and controllable self-expansion, hydrogel expanders may offer yet another alternative or adjunctiv
55 ng miniscrews in a tissue bone borne palatal expander occurred due to certain risk factors, even when
56 PRACTICE ADVICE 8: IV albumin is the volume expander of choice in hospitalized patients with cirrhos
57 or older undergoing mastectomy and immediate expander or implant reconstruction for breast cancer (Ti
58 nt loss (defined as unplanned removal of the expander or implant), infection requiring treatment with
60 atment should be directed towards the tissue expander or the implant for women who opt for a two-stag
61 D8(+) T cells from donors who had expansion (expanders) or no expansion (non-expanders) after in vitr
63 of botulinum toxin for mastectomy and tissue expander placement significantly reduced postoperative p
66 le-sparing mastectomies (SPrNSM) with tissue expander reconstruction from February 1, 2020, through J
67 95% CI, 0.51-0.73) and the immediate tissue expander reconstruction subgroup (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30
69 ts had chest wall reconstructions; three had expanders removed for infection before radiation therapy
71 0.09 to 0.04]), hypotension requiring volume expanders (RR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.25]; RD, -0.09 [9
72 anchoring miniscrews on 70 patients whose C-expanders showed sufficient stability after palatal expa
73 ize (2 +/- 2 cm versus 2 +/- 3 cm; P = 0.4), expander size and volume (429 +/- 119 mL versus 510 +/-
77 4 women who underwent mastectomy with tissue expander (TE: 70.5%), autologous (AT: 18.1%), or direct
78 oup analyses versus each of the other volume expanders tested (e.g., dextran, gelatin, hydroxyethyl s
79 tic gradient scaling, that model requires an expander that spreads with minimal loss throughout a mor
81 lution of succinylated gelatin (SG, a plasma expander used for nephroprotection) in a random crossove
85 of the current macromolecular plasma volume expanders, we found that it filtered readily into lymph,
88 on the granule cell layer as a combinatorial expander, where each granule cell represents a unique co
90 d several mechanisms that could provide slow expanders with a local competitive advantage and showed