戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 .g., lack of transport or mismatched patient expectations).
2 was retained significantly above the neutral expectation.
3  freezing as a marker of crossmodal temporal expectation.
4  random current spikes, just opposite to the expectation.
5 ter 1940 did the SR variation drop below the expectation.
6 est that the BLA supports choices and reward expectation.
7 C's role in mediating taste palatability and expectation.
8 les neural responses to violations in reward expectation.
9 at increased tonic dopamine amplifies reward expectation.
10 rence, integrating sensory inputs with prior expectations.
11 notated data to be able to match the highest expectations.
12 omic regions which do not conform to neutral expectations.
13 n pupil-linked arousal systems and cognitive expectations.
14 l index, consistent with generic theoretical expectations.
15 upling, which has a central role in temporal expectations.
16 sponses are measured and lack of robust null expectations.
17 but also strongly by our prior knowledge and expectations.
18 sunderstanding of our goals, and unrealistic expectations.
19 ly data-based forest simulator confirm these expectations.
20  example, inferences they make about others' expectations.
21 ll as plausible physiological and ecological expectations.
22 chanism reflecting the correctness of weight expectations.
23 Moriya (DM) interactions adhere to classical expectations.
24 eive the world is strongly influenced by our expectations.
25 eural responses as the music confronts these expectations.
26 signal is then used to update the observer's expectations.
27 ed by providers to manage patients' recovery expectations.
28  decisions, and establish sensible treatment expectations.
29 st few solid additives reported to meet such expectations.
30 was the best combination to meet nutritional expectations.
31                 PC meets FAO protein quality expectations.
32 over region in a way that is consistent with expectations.
33               However, we still lack a clear expectation about future trends in alien species numbers
34 ntegration processes, enabling the spread of expectations about cognitive control demands to items as
35 ility is easily suppressed by the observer's expectations about object weight and that this suppressi
36 f 22-month-old infants (N = 32) already held expectations about others' choices in a violation-of-exp
37 ic and real cigarette smoke, consistent with expectations about perceptual similarity arising from sh
38 and structural approaches, to establish null expectations about switches of interaction classes acros
39 otheses, clear predictions, and quantifiable expectations about the context-dependency of species int
40 ongest effects on reinforcement learning and expectations about the future.
41 allenges are met through mechanisms that use expectations about the likely state of the world to shap
42                               We manipulated expectations about the onset of a dim visual target usin
43 ia circuits should incorporate the subject's expectations about the spatial location of upcoming even
44                 Specifically, infants formed expectations about the task, their own ability to solve
45 h ESKD may harbor unrealistically optimistic expectations about their prognoses.
46 ts, demonstrating the implicit nature of the expectations acquired.
47                     This suggests that prior expectations affected sensory processing at early stages
48                          To investigate when expectations affected sensory representations, we used i
49                              Lastly, patient expectations after IR were also evaluated.
50   These results support the view that reward expectation and contingency drive distinct motivational
51 on a subject-by-subject basis confirmed this expectation and led to specific predictions linking chun
52 ght crossmodal link between tactile temporal expectation and oculomotor action.
53                   This link between auditory expectation and oculomotor behavior reveals a multimodal
54 to alter decision-making by influencing both expectation and valuation of decision-outcomes in a doma
55 ta sharing anchors reproducible science, but expectations and best practices are often nebulous.
56  We argue that these early social-relational expectations and emotions may form the base of obligatio
57         We step back from presuming rational expectations and entertain potential belief distortions
58 e diversity of social machines, individuals' expectations and experiences, and the structure and func
59 s (RPEs), defined as the discrepancy between expectations and outcomes.
60                      These results establish expectations and provide practical recommendations for u
61 dered a marker for the formation of temporal expectations and the allocation of temporal attention in
62 urgeons and patients regarding post-surgical expectations and the impact of surgery on patients' live
63 , a strong mismatch still exists between our expectations and the reality of social robots.
64  from both internal processes (attention and expectations) and external constraints (available sensor
65                     Performance on learning, expectation, and persistence tasks each loaded on unique
66 cts of transition network structure on human expectations, and (iii) quantitatively predicts human re
67 s) to growing collaborative skills, fairness expectations, and fidelity to social norms.
68 tomato ketchup on visual perception, flavour expectations, and the ensuing taste experience.
69                                      Despite expectations, antheridiogens may be beneficial to polypl
70  consider the manner in which the underlying expectations are formed and how they are applied to the
71           Alternatively, others suggest that expectations are integrated only at later, postperceptua
72                                    When such expectations are met by a following social stimulus - an
73 determine how spatial and feature distractor expectations are neurally implemented and reduce distrac
74 are in early-phase clinical trial, realistic expectations are that successful intervention will be mo
75                                        These expectations arise from a significant number of both tra
76 xtracellular vesicles (EVs) have raised high expectations as a novel class of diagnostics and therape
77  these violations to update their subsequent expectations, as reflected in the complexity of their up
78                             Contrary to this expectation, associations between AGO and RNA are poorly
79                              Contrary to our expectations, 'Avoidance' (latencies to approach and eat
80 asks or combinations of them, correcting for expectations based on aging; and trained FCD-based class
81 te had a lower BDFE(OH), which is counter to expectations based on known mononuclear BDFE(OH)s which
82                Climate responses agreed with expectations based on optimality principles.
83            We suggest an emphasis on setting expectations based on prior findings while avoiding the
84 bout 10(5) s(-1), about 100-fold slower than expectations based on simplified theory.
85  5) TC intensities, which is consistent with expectations based on theoretical understanding and tren
86 onance is altered when the observer's weight expectations, based on visual information, do not match
87                            Can the impact of expectations be flexibly modulated based on the outcome
88  and introduces potential for user-dependent expectation bias.
89 ry information but can also be influenced by expectations built from recent experiences.
90 ewards that accorded with the average reward expectation but that rarely occurred.
91  whether they followed average reward amount expectations, but only in learnable reward environments.
92 y participant either saved one human life in expectation by triggering a targeted donation of 350 eur
93      We now show that, indeed, spatial prior expectations can be learned without awareness; in fact,
94 field functional-MRI data show that abstract expectations can drive the response amplitude to tones i
95 on as a confrontation of current theoretical expectations clarifies its important, exciting, and gene
96                                  Contrary to expectations, controls performed as well on novel as exp
97 e of the Americas is largely concordant with expectations derived from documentation of slave voyages
98  and recollection feelings and the fact that expectations determine how one recognizes previously enc
99 genomic regions underlying variation in this expectation-deviation tolerance (the magnitude and direc
100 nditions, were most strongly correlated with expectation-deviation tolerance.
101                           Spatial distractor expectations did not induce changes in preparatory neura
102                    Critically, there were no expectation-driven differences for targets and low simil
103 acking, these results demonstrate endogenous expectation-driven shifts of spatial attention.
104 algorithms and tools are often not up to the expectation due to a large number of false positives.
105 fs may differ from those implied by rational expectations due to behavioral/psychological biases of i
106 ct cortical encoding of pitch and note-onset expectations during naturalistic music listening.
107  analysis and punishment learning and future expectations each accounted for unique variance in predi
108 cueing paradigm, and probed the locus of the expectation effect with two complementary approaches: dr
109  neural modulation was related to perceptual expectation effects: participants with a stronger percep
110                             Experience-based expectations enable adjustments of control, leading to i
111                                     Temporal expectations enable anticipatory brain states that prepa
112 ugh there is growing consensus that temporal expectations enhance the speed and accuracy of perceptua
113 nsory events.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Temporal expectation enhances performance, but the locus of this
114 ese relationships does not always conform to expectations, especially for invertebrates.
115 esonance imaging (fMRI) to reveal that prior expectations evoke stimulus-specific activity selectivel
116 ngle-MN electrophysiology, that, contrary to expectations, excitatory responses evoked by sensory and
117 G/CA3 underlies the effect that violation of expectation exerts on memory.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT What
118                                  Contrary to expectation, female plains spadefoot toads (Spea bombifr
119 e core mission of our institutions and is an expectation for all of us.
120  Like kalkitoxin, and contrary to the common expectation for hydroxylamines, 10-aza-9-oxakalkitoxin i
121 aracteristics exactly match with theoretical expectations for a topological edge state, having one Kr
122 ocessing preference for simple gist explains expectations for antibiotics, the spread of misinformati
123 he treatment approach with patient goals and expectations for care, including an assessment of patien
124 t strongly amplified relative to theoretical expectations for communities, both among (Ep(among) = 0.
125 el, theory has delineated a number of formal expectations for contexts in which such a feature would
126                                     However, expectations for ethically sound practices can evolve ov
127           Outcomes for success involve clear expectations for fellows to produce manuscripts, present
128                              We tested these expectations for fludioxonil, cyprodinil, and dimethomor
129 eptual challenges are considered, along with expectations for future applications of these techniques
130 es effective brain connectivity for updating expectations for future decision-making remains unexplor
131 d after a single visual experience establish expectations for future experience within neocortical-me
132 t autonomy has been compromised secondary to expectations for increased supervision without defined p
133               Our memories enable us to form expectations for our future experiences, yet the precise
134       The safety profile was consistent with expectations for ruxolitinib and this patient population
135 e review the current theory and identify six expectations for scale dependence in the BEF relationshi
136 m complications is useful, M&M does not meet expectations for system-wide improvement.
137  drowsiness management, and, preferences and expectations for technological mitigations.
138  This comment summarizes recent advances and expectations for the near future.
139 -1) over the other variants, consistent with expectations for the strength of a salt bridge.
140 uring the shift and commute, preferences and expectations for training on drowsiness management, and,
141  and the short filament were consistent with expectation from models based on crystallography, x-ray
142 pring of dual-affected parents, in line with expectations from a polygenic model of liability to dise
143 ance with measurements in old stars and with expectations from Big Bang nucleosynthesis.
144 ement of benzobarrelene fit with statistical expectations from heavy-atom tunneling when a low-energy
145 ation that was qualitatively consistent with expectations from laboratory experiments and reactive tr
146  gliders, induce optomotor behavior matching expectations from natural scene analyses.
147 sport proteins and metabolic enzymes matched expectations from prior localization studies, demonstrat
148 tic emission, however, do not agree with the expectations from standard neutron-star merger models.
149 se memory.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Contrary to expectations from systems memory consolidation, we find
150           This behaviour is in contrast with expectations from the linear-response regime and raises
151 nce about investor beliefs using a nonlinear expectation function deduced using model-implied moment
152           We provide examples of cases where expectations give rise to unexpected and unlikely percep
153 ictions of future ENSO states as conditional expectations, given noisy and potentially incomplete dat
154 ing of forthcoming events, known as temporal expectation, has a strong impact on human information pr
155 confirmed and extended this result: temporal expectations hastened the onset of a neural signature of
156 ated behavior in conditions in which outcome expectations have to be mentally inferred.
157                              Contrary to our expectations, host genotype effects were not any stronge
158                                      Despite expectations, immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) are poor
159                  Here we examine the role of expectation in shifting the hippocampus to perform patte
160 lts suggest that IDS generates communicative expectations in infants.
161 urons encode differences between rewards and expectations in the goal-directed system, and difference
162 oward caregivers when they appear to violate expectations in their relationships.
163 ce across biological systems and theoretical expectations, including nonlinear averaging and bet hedg
164                                  Contrary to expectations, increases in in situ extractable soil phos
165   Here, we used abstract rules to manipulate expectations independently of local stimulus statistics.
166                     However, contrary to our expectations, individuals breeding with a new mate also
167 tant insight that the ways in which temporal expectations influence brain and behavior, and how brain
168 revious outcomes, rats flexibly modulate how expectations influence their decisions.
169 fMRI) task design to disentangle information expectation, information revelation and categorization o
170 lly purpose dependent, and show how temporal expectations interact with task-relevant neural states i
171  similarity analysis to examine how top-down expectation interacts with bottom-up perceptual input, i
172                                 An intuitive expectation is that NCEs that reduce prey fitness will e
173 ayed by specific inflammatory mediators, the expectation is that targeted anti-inflammatory therapies
174 ncephalography, we further show how temporal expectations latch onto anticipatory neural states assoc
175 e initial STAR report to further clarify the expectations, limitations, perceptions, and utility of a
176 ions about others' choices in a violation-of-expectation looking-time task modeled after the marshmal
177     Surface observations are consistent with expectations made from remote sensing data prior to land
178 ontrol, leading to improved performance when expectations match the actual control demand required.
179 serving the same purpose as the pre-existing Expectation-Maximisation algorithm, the new routine can
180 m for Boolean matrix factorization (BMF) via expectation maximization (BEM).
181 eriments, called Debris Identification using Expectation Maximization (DIEM).
182 uctions were performed with 2 ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithms: attenuation-
183 econstructed using 2 methods: ordered-subset expectation maximization (PET(OSEM)) or ordered-subset e
184 nomeric and dimeric TF-binding motifs and an expectation maximization algorithm MODER2 for learning s
185 he Epigenetic Pacemaker (EPM), a conditional expectation maximization algorithm that estimates epigen
186        We provide a tool, L1EM that uses the expectation maximization algorithm to quantify LINE-1 RN
187 rformed: an ordinary Poisson ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm with point-spread fun
188                  We additionally describe an expectation maximization based iterative algorithmic app
189 n maximization (PET(OSEM)) or ordered-subset expectation maximization with point-spread function (PET
190 ing time-of-flight list-mode ordered-subsets expectation maximization.
191                        We use an alternating expectation-maximization (AEM) algorithm, alternating be
192 e present in this paper a privacy-preserving Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to build GLMM co
193                                   We used an expectation-maximization algorithm to estimate the param
194    Therefore, we have developed an optimized expectation-maximization algorithm, designated HPV-EM, t
195                                 We derive an Expectation-Maximization procedure with closed-form upda
196             We develop an algorithm based on Expectation-Maximization to estimate the process noise p
197 me 'detection of RNA folding ensembles using expectation-maximization' (DREEM), which reveals the alt
198 ngly clear that distinct sources of temporal expectations may facilitate performance via distinct mec
199  regards the distinct purposes that temporal expectations may serve.
200                         Furthermore, against expectations, minocycline significantly reduced activity
201 t during tactile associative learning, prior expectations modulate connections originating in the ant
202 al states associated with concurrent spatial expectations-modulating task-specific anticipatory neura
203 ations in bioapatite-protein isotopic offset expectations, must be reconsidered.
204                                  Contrary to expectations, NMR data indicate that this second beta-st
205 ulated by any factor affecting an observer's expectations, not only target probability.
206 om each other and from the naive theoretical expectation of 3/4.
207 orphological characteristics, supporting our expectation of common genetic factors that drive the syn
208 ce of sciatic nerve lesions in DPN, with the expectation of correlations with the impairment of large
209                                      A basic expectation of evolution by natural selection is that sp
210  also affect dispersal, precluding any clear expectation of how dispersal changes at a global scale.
211 f moving to a location is proportional to an expectation of how informative it will be balanced again
212 inal transplantation if motivated only by an expectation of improved quality of life.
213 tify a neural signature corresponding to the expectation of information, involving the left lateral v
214 changes in continuous pain were moderated by expectation of pain relief.
215 other intra-abdominal tumors with reasonable expectation of posttransplant cure, extensive mesenteric
216                                          The expectation of predicting tannin contents on basis of gr
217 icitly instructed.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The expectation of tastiness is a particularly strong driver
218 e oculomotor system keeps the eyes steady in expectation of visual events.
219  in a virtual environment might modulate our expectations of action consequences.
220 IN tendering processes should consider local expectations of cost per year of functional life and not
221 experimental data can be leveraged to derive expectations of epidemiological impact of SRs deployed a
222  have been hypothesised to generate enhanced expectations of future punishment and 'pessimistic'/risk
223 J morphology was compared to the statistical expectations of neutral evolution and "Out of Africa" di
224 l outcomes and to meet (and exceed) the high expectations of patients.
225 and indirect costs, patient-specific values, expectations of possible financial burdens, and individu
226 nd scenarios for further warming have led to expectations of rapid movement of ecological boundaries.
227  and who stayed in surgical units had higher expectations of receiving smoking cessation intervention
228 rs and authorities should be realistic about expectations of the effect of school-based physical acti
229 re related to the different requirements and expectations of the home and school environments: the mo
230 ory, its global distribution does not follow expectations of the Out of Africa dispersal model.
231 Offshore plumes were spatially narrower than expectations of the plume width based on terrestrial atm
232  is that neural coding is directly driven by expectations of the sensory input.
233 ent nature and consequences of cued temporal expectations on brain and behavior in male and female hu
234 emonstrate that the consequences of temporal expectations on neurophysiological brain activity and be
235                    We made no assumptions or expectations on which kind of ions to predict but instea
236  quantity, which supports learning about the expectation, or mean, of stochastic outcomes.
237                          Consistent with our expectations, orally administrated 6-S-NL exhibits a sup
238                         Consistent with that expectation, pain rises with age into old age in other w
239                          However, counter to expectation, parasitic chicks were duller (less red) tha
240                                         Such expectations, particularly about where to expect certain
241 .15-fold higher rate than the mutation model expectation (permuted 95% confidence interval: 1-10 gene
242         Together, these results suggest that expectations play an integral role in the neural computa
243  social support and demands, as well as role expectations, play in risk for psychosis.
244                    It has been proposed that expectation plays a role early in the perceptual process
245                                     Temporal expectations predominantly affected response times when
246 other sources of information; after inducing expectations (prior beliefs) about stimuli probabilities
247 ects primarily breaches of non-probabilistic expectations, rather than target probability.
248  testing viral vaccine candidates can inform expectations regarding the development of safe and effec
249 s often shaped by their hopes and prognostic expectations related to kidney transplant.
250       However, current models explaining how expectations render perception either veridical or infor
251  population of cells always falling short of expectations set by their adult counterparts, neonatal T
252  disease, and the predictions fit biological expectations, showing stromal expansion, a reduction of
253 grates external sensory inputs with internal expectation signals remains unknown.
254  the BLA supports economic choice and reward expectation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Economic choices rely
255 ntial sampling model indicated that temporal expectations speeded up non-decisional processes but had
256 much recent research has revealed that prior expectations strongly modulate sensory processing.
257 terization show associations consistent with expectations, such as high Ca with high clay content.
258                          A failure to adjust expectations sufficiently when an environment becomes wo
259 as signaling violations of learned, top-down expectations than changes in low-level stimulus properti
260 nmental conditions are rejected in the false expectation that better options will materialize.
261 ctronic health records (EHRs) has raised the expectation that data obtained during routine clinical c
262 findings are consistent with the theoretical expectation that ecological risks and environmental unpr
263                              Contrary to the expectation that floral visitation would increase monoto
264 egg volume and nestling survival despite the expectation that in the absence of a change in reproduct
265 ucing additional data and analysis, with the expectation that increasing our fundamental understandin
266 processing abnormalities, giving rise to the expectation that neural signals of these processes may s
267 r cells to replace neurons in situ, with the expectation that new neurons will create new synaptic ci
268                  This is consistent with the expectation that nonfunctional states will not have evol
269   These observations are consistent with the expectation that some human activity should correlate be
270 ter is reduced in the mutant, counter to the expectation that the absence of smooth muscle constricti
271                                          The expectation that the effector-free state should expose t
272                                  There is an expectation that, on average, pain will increase with ag
273  work provides a counterpoint to theoretical expectations that divorce is triggered by low reproducti
274 ed 12 weeks into the dry season, contrary to expectations that immune indices should decrease with in
275 e life experiences, in influencing the prior expectations that individuals have about their world in
276  a metallicity floor for GCs and theoretical expectations that massive GCs could not have formed at s
277 city to reorient their flowers, in line with expectations that the orientation of radially symmetrica
278                                  Contrary to expectation, the LLD group showed less Abeta deposition
279 , tSCs died but, importantly and contrary to expectations, their associated motor axons did not fully
280                       On the contrary to our expectations, there was no association between HP2 and A
281                                  Contrary to expectation, these drugs induced A3B expression and conc
282                              Contrary to the expectation, they found that this differentiation is pra
283               In Contrast to the theoretical expectations, this slope >1 indicates that larger hummin
284 omplimentary, techniques well beyond initial expectations, thus opening new opportunities for their c
285 sitive information that disconfirms negative expectations, thus resulting in sustained negative predi
286 ntum information processing hardware and has expectation to address large and complex optimization pr
287 r brains integrate sensory inputs with prior expectations to make sense of the world.
288 ulations of the nested Wannier bands and the expectation value of the quadrupole operator.
289                   Due to size dispersion the expectation values of the observables can differ somewha
290 ion, we analytically obtain the steady-state expectation values of the observables signaling a symmet
291 ity of the systems one can average the N (2) expectation values over the ensemble while retaining clo
292 and orbitofrontal cortex, during information expectation versus reward-related processing.
293  unexpected highly similar foils, suggesting expectation violation does not enhance memory indiscrimi
294 e gyrus (DG) and CA3 being more sensitive to expectation violation than CA1.
295                              Contrary to our expectations we found that spontaneous play was suppress
296    When subsequent experiences violate these expectations, we find a 80-120 Hz prediction error signa
297                              Contrary to our expectations, we found that map expansion impaired frequ
298 h that behavior was influenced more by prior expectations when uncertainty was high.
299 genotype proportions close to Hardy-Weinberg expectations within loci, lack of linkage disequilibrium
300                                  Contrary to expectation, YAP protein levels appear to be much less s

 
Page Top