戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 rce and recommendations are largely based on expert opinion.
2 erative electronic survey process to collect expert opinion.
3 tory asthma might be lower than estimated by expert opinion.
4 n evidence-based risk scores complemented by expert opinion.
5 ed from literature review and elicitation of expert opinion.
6 g and observational studies in children, and expert opinion.
7  than 140/90 mm Hg for those groups based on expert opinion.
8 epatotoxicity caused by HDS was evaluated by expert opinion.
9 hnology based on both published evidence and expert opinion.
10 narios, and the AIT developed a consensus of expert opinion.
11 he literature, an empirical data survey, and expert opinion.
12 ere determined through literature review and expert opinion.
13 ure, clinical experience, illustrations, and expert opinion.
14 impact and uncertainty were quantified using expert opinion.
15  2012 and EMBASE from 1980 to June 2012) and expert opinion.
16 sentially based on observational studies and expert opinion.
17 not evidence based, but are largely based on expert opinion.
18  screening should be considered given recent expert opinion.
19 om lower levels of evidence but with uniform expert opinion.
20 y developed from lower levels of evidence or expert opinion.
21  DBT parameters were based on literature and expert opinion.
22  medical literature, existing databases, and expert opinion.
23 delines are mainly based on small studies or expert opinion.
24 its of largely retrospective case series and expert opinion.
25 om pediatric organophosphate poisonings, and expert opinion.
26 on a systematic review of the literature and expert opinion.
27 hi method is a formal approach for gathering expert opinion.
28  and again achieve an analysis agreeing with expert opinion.
29 ased on the strength of evidence and his own expert opinion.
30 ives mainly from case series information and expert opinion.
31 t transport provided personal experience and expert opinion.
32 ntific information within the literature and expert opinion.
33  is currently informal and relies heavily on expert opinion.
34 ine resources, texts, meeting abstracts, and expert opinion.
35    We also used online resources, texts, and expert opinion.
36 ce reports; HIV pathogenesis data; and panel expert opinion.
37  extrapolations from existing literature and expert opinion.
38  baseline, based on published literature and expert opinion.
39 literature review, qualitative research, and expert opinion.
40 erview of current knowledge and augmented by expert opinion.
41 modifying existing systems and incorporating expert opinion.
42 om a systematic review of the literature and expert opinion.
43 er screening programs, but they are based on expert opinion.
44 medium-term outcomes studies complemented by expert opinion.
45  pediatric OSA based on limited evidence and expert opinion.
46 th PPRD on the basis of limited evidence and expert opinion.
47 gents, but management is guided primarily by expert opinion.
48 a for sepsis were published in 2005 based on expert opinion.
49 om a systematic review of the literature and expert opinion.
50 ent, the recommendations herein are based on expert opinion.
51 e basis of current evidence, guidelines, and expert opinion.
52 and most treatment recommendations represent expert opinion.
53 across guideline bodies and largely based on expert opinion.
54 literature, previously published models, and expert opinion.
55 enters use local protocols that are based on expert opinion.
56 ubjective process involving surveillance and expert opinion.
57 Database, and performance recommendations by expert opinion.
58 vides an effective data-driven supplement to expert opinion.
59  patients with systemic cancer or formulated expert opinion.
60 and recommendations are largely derived from expert opinion.
61 ines that are based on studies in adults and expert opinion.
62 ts, small series, registries, databases, and expert opinion.
63       Data Sources: Published literature and expert opinion.
64 reening studies in high-risk individuals and expert opinion.
65 based primarily on retrospective reviews and expert opinions.
66 mposite plus disease images corresponding to expert opinions.
67 , and reliance has defaulted to consensus of expert opinions.
68 ecisions are inevitably made on the basis of expert opinions.
69 ards, and the mix of reporting standards and expert opinions.
70 ears or have used maps drawn from historical expert opinions.
71 e in source literature and based on multiple experts' opinions.
72          Using a combination of evidence and expert opinion, 10 indicators for quality of gout care w
73 st for information (2), and expressing their expert opinion (3); II) Influence decision-making: explo
74 cording to appropriateness criteria based on expert opinion (71 blacks [9.0 percent] vs. 152 whites [
75           Based on observational studies and expert opinion, AACT represents a valuable therapy for t
76 he recent peer review literature and provide expert opinion about the diagnosis and treatment of slin
77 he identified knowledge gaps on the basis of expert opinion about their importance and relevance.
78  Among 250 patients with suspected DILI, the expert opinion adjudication process scored 78 patients (
79 the key recommendations were on the basis of expert opinion alone.
80 reshold of 80 mm Hg was recommended based on expert opinion and changes the definition of isolated di
81              Evidence-based medicine employs expert opinion and clinical data to inform clinical deci
82 , psychiatric disorders have been defined by expert opinion and clinical observation.
83  undertook a horizon scanning exercise using expert opinion and consensus approaches to identify the
84  delineation guidelines are largely based on expert opinion and conventional imaging, with limited in
85                                     However, expert opinion and critical review of the literature sho
86 ent therapeutic decisions are guided only by expert opinion and current evidence-based guidelines for
87 nt of persistent disease is based largely on expert opinion and extrapolation from studies in older c
88                               The group used expert opinion and federal regulations, the National Bio
89       These diagnostic criteria are based on expert opinion and have been the subject of considerable
90  team activation criteria were created using expert opinion and have demonstrated variable accuracy i
91 es inherent in rural water development using expert opinion and indicates the need for future researc
92 e of pain management is primarily limited to expert opinion and inferences from observational studies
93 apies in children previously often relied on expert opinion and inferences from studies involving adu
94 guideline is based on evidence as well as on expert opinion and is aimed at both adult physicians and
95 Risk factors were identified on the basis of expert opinion and knowledge of the literature.
96 S) nodule management guidelines are based on expert opinion and lack independent validation.
97 he leishmaniases remains vague, reliant upon expert opinion and limited to poor spatial resolution.
98 n-depth patient interviews and focus groups, expert opinion and literature review) were used to devel
99 iews with 30 people with multiple sclerosis, expert opinion and literature review.
100                               An overview of expert opinion and major evidence in humans and animals
101 any surgical procedures are adopted based on expert opinion and novel, untested concepts.
102 dations outlined in this review are based on expert opinion and on relevant publications from PubMed
103 dations outlined in this review are based on expert opinion and on relevant publications from PubMed,
104                                              Expert opinion and peer consultation were also used thro
105                               In addition to expert opinion and pertinent literature, data sources in
106 llergy which, despite being based largely on expert opinion and plausible assumptions, suggested that
107  highest between the scores derived with the expert opinion and principal component analysis weightin
108            Covariates were selected based on expert opinion and prior literature.
109 IV-associated Burkitt lymphoma, we summarise expert opinion and provide general recommendations for t
110  Society (ATS) published guidelines based on expert opinion and published data--but not clinically de
111 n 0.70, yet this fixed threshold is based on expert opinion and remains controversial.
112  written guidelines from the ACCM, published expert opinion and statements from official organization
113 ovariates were selected through a process of expert opinion and statistical analysis.
114 ent treatment strategies are based mainly on expert opinion and studies of related syndromes.
115 lines based on aggregated secondary data and expert opinion and suggest less extreme deterioration in
116                 Moreover, we also provide an expert opinion and suggestions for future development of
117 rom two databases (n = 204), supplemented by expert opinion and summary data from 12 studies (n = 667
118                                              Expert opinion and the opinion of readers as to what JAM
119     Sensitivity analysis was performed using expert opinion and uninformed estimates of survival bene
120  for red blood cell transfusion are based on expert opinion and vary.
121 sented are based on the current evidence and expert opinion and will require an update as new evidenc
122                                          The expert opinions and experience of the members of the con
123          These recommendations were based on expert opinions and have not been rigorously evaluated.
124 ID-19 condition (PCC) are primarily based on expert opinions and observational data, and there is an
125 supplant current rules based on consensus of expert opinions and to understand by what mechanisms and
126 ed approaches" based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature
127 ature review on available clinical outcomes, expert opinion, and alignment with work done by other or
128 n therapy based on scant empirical evidence, expert opinion, and clinical experience to aid clinician
129   To review and discuss selected literature, expert opinion, and conventional care of the hyperglycem
130 is based almost exclusively on consensus and expert opinion, and differs considerably among existing
131 a self-organizing artificial neural network, expert opinion, and discriminant analysis separated the
132                           Literature review, expert opinion, and input from an Internet bulletin boar
133                  All documents were based on expert opinion, and none described a formal literature r
134 rom surveillance data, published literature, expert opinion, and other secondary sources.
135 evidence, health economic analyses, clinical expert opinion, and patient views.
136 bursement schedules, average IMS drug costs, expert opinion, and peer-reviewed literature.
137 e, the framework of the Health Belief Model, expert opinion, and pilot study data.
138            Published literature, guidelines, expert opinion, and practical experience regarding effor
139 roiditis, based on the published literature, expert opinion, and practical experience, to bridge the
140  for sICH are based on small case series and expert opinion, and the efficacy of recommended treatmen
141         This recommendation is based only on expert opinion, and the influence of reading volume on p
142  limited to case reports, cohort studies and expert opinions, and relies heavily on extrapolation fro
143 tion (scoping-reviews, professional-surveys, expert-opinion, and 'implementability-score-statistics')
144 re search, solicitation and consideration of experts' opinions, and 2 focus groups of 16 subjects wit
145 ty about model functional form; diversity of expert opinion; and when it does or does not make sense
146 ithms based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion are provided to guide in the selection of
147 ical practice update, available evidence and expert opinion are used to generate best practice recomm
148                        Further content-based expert opinions are actively solicited.
149 Because no published data are yet available, expert opinions are, by necessity, based on case experie
150 egories were derived with empirical data and expert opinion, as were markers of hemodynamic vulnerabi
151 risk patients with less common diseases, and expert opinion based on limited data in uncommon disorde
152 s work.Thirteen statements were derived from expert opinions' based on the current literature, on rec
153 tober 2012 to revise and expand evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV managem
154 nsplantation Society to develop evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV managem
155 ute lymphoblastic leukaemia treatment, these expert opinion-based definitions will allow reliable com
156             Evidence-informed, consensus and expert opinion-based guidelines for the management of be
157  ECG interpretation in athletes and provides expert opinion-based recommendations linking specific EC
158                           Evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations were made through a
159 Many recommendations, however, were based on expert opinion because rigorous clinical data are not av
160 stic criteria have been established based on expert opinion but have not been validated.
161               Consensus was based largely on expert opinion, but relevant literature was cited where
162  systematic evidence reviews integrated with expert opinion by means of a rigorous Delphi process.
163            Content validity was sought using expert opinion by semistructured interviews and the Delp
164                                     Based on expert opinion, clinical guidelines recommend percutaneo
165                                     Based on expert opinion concerning presumptive benefit, early bre
166 ncer screening is also recommended, based on expert opinion concerning presumptive benefit.
167 f which was to provide an evidence-based and expert-opinion consensus on proposed modifications to MR
168  formal presentation of experiential data to expert opinion debates.
169 merican College of Physicians guidelines and expert opinion discourage the use of a central venous ca
170                   A Delphi method survey and expert opinion elicited over consecutive rounds of surve
171 stent definitions of trophic guilds based on expert opinion, especially when applied to hyperdiverse
172 monly used patient and tumor factors driving expert opinion for the use of preoperative MRI provide l
173      We provide specific guidelines, through expert opinion, for choosing reliable and reproducible a
174                                        Here, expert opinion from health-care professionals, policy ma
175             In this Commission, we summarise expert opinion from key stakeholders-patients, caregiver
176                          In this Commission, expert opinion from primary care and public health profe
177                                              Expert opinion from the American College of Cardiology/A
178 LINE articles, textbooks, etc.) and provided expert opinion from which consensus was derived.
179 s reviewed published literature and provided expert opinion from which the consensus was derived.
180                                              Expert opinions generally favor the clinical utility of
181 lammatory cardiomyopathy are mainly based on expert opinion given the lack of well-designed contempor
182 endations, based on observational studies or expert opinion, have not been assessed.
183 to order a chest radiograph needs to rely on expert opinion in seeking strategies to optimize the bal
184      This survey offers insight into current expert opinion in the treatment of DED.
185  recent, consensus-based recommendations for expert opinion in these clinical areas.
186 e proved a practical instrument to transform expert opinion into a group consensus for relevant perio
187                             The E rating for expert opinion is assigned to recommendations based on e
188                                              Expert opinion is divided about whether US military vete
189                                              Expert opinion is valuable in highlighting relevant miss
190                                              Expert opinion may still be the better method of diagnos
191 nstruments, or causality assessment based on expert opinion, may be more appropriate.
192 ved using the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, expert opinion, medication claims datasets, and Ontario
193 ased review of the published data and on the expert opinion of a multidisciplinary consensus panel co
194 tic search of the medical literature and the expert opinion of members of the Fleischner Society.
195  cystoid macular edema (CME) on the basis of expert opinion of the authors.
196 topic and article selection was based on the expert opinion of the authors.
197                                 Based on the expert opinion of the Medical Board of the National Psor
198 d on the evidence reviewed in this study and expert opinion of the Medical Board of the National Psor
199 erature during the past year and provides an expert opinion of the therapeutic goals for statin thera
200 scripts were selected for inclusion based on expert opinion of well-designed or key studies and revie
201  on literature review, current practice, and expert opinion of working group members.
202 nalyses, studies of HIV pathophysiology, and expert opinions of panel members were considered.
203 erences; studies of HIV pathophysiology; and expert opinions of panel members.
204        The recommendations, suggestions, and expert opinions of the Panel are described in this artic
205 ental conditions has been dependent upon the expert opinions of well-trained biologists.
206  provide its readership with timely reviews, expert opinion on clinical hematology, practice-changing
207 vice use estimates, empirical cost data, and expert opinion on implementation strategies.
208 nt guidelines but are intended to provide an expert opinion on novel literature that will be incorpor
209 iterature on ADHD treatment, supplemented by expert opinion on plausibility.
210 re in July 2015 published a solicitation for expert opinion on reimbursing office-based cataract surg
211                     A questionnaire elicited expert opinion on the best treatment of fungal keratitis
212                       The review presents an expert opinion on the current state-of-the-art in these
213  assay evidence as a source of international expert opinion on the evaluation of functional- evidence
214                          We conclude with an expert opinion on which agent to use under different sce
215 of available current literature and elicited expert opinions on glomerular diseases in pregnancy with
216 lysed data for corrected case-notifications, expert opinions on the case-detection rate, prevalence s
217 tudies or a single RCT], and C [supported by expert opinion only]) were determined for each guideline
218 and case definitions-are often determined by expert opinion or deference to operational consideration
219           Clinical diagnosis of LDS based on expert opinion or histopathologic findings.
220 n/exclusion criteria mostly depend on ad-hoc expert opinion or naive threshold by sample size or plat
221 l or better than metrics based on aggregated expert opinions or large population surveys.
222  the published literature, unpublished data, expert opinion, or a combination of the above.
223 lyses of this risk have been based either on expert opinion, perturbation analysis of simplified clim
224 ed empirical studies, theoretical reports or expert opinion pieces that explored therapeutic engageme
225 d: n = 27 empirical research studies, n = 10 expert opinion pieces, n = 1 case study and n = 1 theore
226  and the complete article of theoretical and expert opinion pieces.
227 s for prostate cancer survivors are based on expert opinion, preclinical studies, and observational d
228                    Results of the structured expert opinion procedure were compared with those derive
229  agreement was reached for 50 (27%) with the expert opinion process and for 34 (19%) with a five-cate
230 thods to assess DILI causality: a structured expert opinion process and the Roussel-Uclaf Causality A
231                         The structured DILIN expert opinion process produced higher agreement rates a
232 r probabilities in comparison with the DILIN expert opinion process.
233 ction patients on home warfarin diverge from expert opinion provided by current practice guidelines.
234                       Medical literature and expert opinion provided risks of stroke and death for di
235  (WHO) recommendations were largely based on expert opinion, rarely used systematic evidence-based me
236  5-year intervals; this interval is based on expert opinion rather than on direct research evidence.
237  the current recommendations largely rely on expert opinion rather than on properly designed studies.
238 tal transfusions guidelines rely largely on "expert opinion" rather than experimental data.
239 d cancer-specific specialists met to provide expert opinion recommendations on optimal cancer surveil
240  consensus documents produced are to provide expert opinion recommendations that help in the evaluati
241                                              Expert opinion regarding both this suggestion and on the
242                                              Expert opinion regarding the strengths and weaknesses of
243 s combined with analysis of key studies with expert opinion regarding the use of aflibercept for the
244                                              Expert opinion remains divided on the issue of whether t
245 LI-RADS has been based on literature review, expert opinion, rounds of testing and iteration, and fee
246                 Of these, nine articles were expert opinion, seven were original research, three were
247 nsfusion medicine was assembled to render an expert opinion statement pertaining to the use of CCP fo
248 l studies, clinical practice guidelines, and expert opinion/statements to summarize existing evidence
249 uding MEDLINE, Web of Science through 2018), expert opinion/statements, analyses of databases and com
250 d were reviews, non-human subjects, reports, expert opinions, subject age less than 65, papers that w
251  randomized clinical trials (RCT), employing expert opinion such as consensus panels, and meta-analys
252                             Empiric data and expert opinion suggest that use of feeding tubes is not
253                                              Expert opinion surveys indicate that R. reniformis has r
254               Based on literature review and experts opinions, tentative recommendations were made by
255 re, which protect against attempts to obtain expert opinion testimony without compensation.
256 r a set of consensus guidelines derived from expert opinion that identifies critically ill surgical p
257 f literature reviews and, where appropriate, expert opinion, the 16 statements and five overarching p
258            Based on published literature and expert opinion, the Basic Science Committee of the Socie
259                                     Based on expert opinion, the following are recommended: 1) avoid
260    Based on the results of meta-analyses and expert opinion, the guideline identifies efficacious int
261 d on an analysis of the current evidence and expert opinion, the panel concluded that the appropriate
262 hat our findings are serious and contrary to expert opinion, the results need to be validated in othe
263 h of evidence, the inclusion or exclusion of expert opinion, the suggested ASCVD risk assessment tool
264 ng database analysis, literature review, and expert opinion, they were vetted against a diverse set o
265  consultation technique is designed to gauge expert opinion through multiple rounds of surveys until
266 We used comprehensive literature reviews and expert opinion to compile a list of asthma exacerbation
267 We used comprehensive literature reviews and expert opinion to compile a list of asthma healthcare ut
268 tilized comprehensive literature reviews and expert opinion to compile a list of asthma outcomes and
269 l of 133 (11.1%) ALF subjects were deemed by expert opinion to have DILI; 81.1% were considered highl
270         Most risk stratification methods use expert opinion to identify a fixed number of clinical va
271 ype should be considered for referral for an expert opinion to maximise the chance of reaching a mole
272 ta-analyses, and systematic reviews; second, expert opinion was added for specific issues following s
273 prehensive literature search in concert with expert opinion was completed.
274 nce-based recommendations could not be made, expert opinion was documented.
275 An evidence-based flow diagram combined with expert opinion was generated for clinicians to manage PI
276                                              Expert opinion was integrated with published evidence to
277                           Consensus based on expert opinion was not used as a substitute for a lack o
278 commendations largely on related studies and expert opinion, we describe means of accomplishing 5 com
279  sensitivities differ among biomes, based on expert opinion, we expect forests to exhibit the largest
280                                     Based on expert opinion, we identified 3 obesity goals scenarios:
281                Based on previous reports and expert opinion, we predicted that 20 to 30 cases of SLND
282 on the best available published evidence and expert opinion, we recommend the most appropriate strate
283 e on end-of-life care and critical care, and expert opinion were considered.
284 eliability, accuracy, and reproducibility of expert opinion were reviewed.
285 on of available evidence and consensus-based expert opinion were used to develop these best practice
286   Consensus findings from published data and expert opinions were used to create recommendations in c
287 cience research, clinical trial results, and expert opinions were used to form the basis of this repo
288 ommendations, based on literature review and expert opinion, were agreed upon.
289       Five recommendations, largely based on expert opinion, were developed: 1) interprofessional sha
290 ained supplementary literature and consensus expert opinions when the published literature was insuff
291 blications, including systematic reviews and expert opinion (when applicable).
292 ies and systematic reviews, and incorporates expert opinion where applicable.
293 he fitness costs and benefits of resistance, expert opinion will be insufficient.
294  guidelines are currently determined only by expert opinion will become driven by level 1 data only b
295 lication of negative results; replacement of expert opinion with hard data where needed; careful cons
296 ndrome of LSS, using a reference standard of expert opinion with radiographic or anatomic confirmatio
297 intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) are based on expert opinion, with limited data available on efficacy.
298 The 18 recommendations are based on Level D (Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or b
299 from well-conducted randomised trials) to C (expert opinion without strong empirical data).
300       Based on 1 observational study and our expert opinion, women with diabetes without voiding abno

 
Page Top