ライフサイエンスコーパス: external validity

1 sion or exclusion) and should thus have high external validity.

2 arch designs that yield greater internal and external validity.

3 wing, in part, to limited follow-up time and external validity.

4 rchers about effect measure modification and external validity.

5 distributional shift, generalizability, and external validity.

6 iveness as well as its internal validity and external validity.

7 ice implant, demonstrating good internal and external validity.

8 eories in the natural environment to enhance external validity.

9 ity using CMR demonstrates high accuracy and external validity.

10 was used for sensitivity analyses to ensure external validity.

11 call biases, demand characteristics, and low external validity.

12 get population is informative for addressing external validity.

13 the potential implications for internal and external validity.

14 contextualised ethology will likely improve external validity.

15 ty and turning its attention to questions of external validity.

16 system demonstrated evidence of internal and external validity.

17 exercise treadmill testing may have limited external validity.

18 nts associated with internal, construct, and external validity.

19 ed in one model only, raising concerns about external validity.

20 cute cholecystitis have limited contemporary external validity.

21 ne that our definition has minimum bias with external validity.

22 this trial are its pragmatic nature and high external validity.

23 proposed prediction rules have shown limited external validity.

24 exclusion and adjustment that further limit external validity.

25 his was supplemented with domains related to external validity.

26 The PIAMA risk score showed good external validity.

27 , inter-rater reliability, repeatability and external validity.

28 ty of SRT experiments and, ultimately, SRT's external validity.

29 rces and threatened the study's internal and external validity.

30 nical trials remain susceptible to a lack of external validity.

31 s to assess surgical research's internal and external validity.

32 measurement that threaten both internal and external validity.

33 , which impairs internal validity and, thus, external validity.

34 -analysis, is mistakenly thought to increase external validity.

35 omains: study design, internal validity, and external validity.

36 imizing loss to follow-up, and 7) threats to external validity.

37 It has good external validity among guideline developers and good in

38 days to 27 months and 15 days]) to test the external validity and 1456 (mean age 24 months and 8.5 d

39 linical trials (RCTs) are valuable to ensure external validity and applicability of results.

40 rnal dimensions which have good reliability, external validity and are responsive to a change in heal

41 Prevalence estimates had excellent external validity and changed marginally when adjusted t

42 ned from three further studies to assess the external validity and clinical validity of the standardi

43 usion risk prediction algorithm demonstrated external validity and discrimination.

44 resentation of minority groups, limiting the external validity and equity of trial results.

45 y of the EHR-CAT risk score demonstrated the external validity and feasibility of using readily avail

46 l.'s integrative design cannot guarantee the external validity and generalizability of results which

47 An analysis of the literature assessing external validity and generalizability of this intervent

48 RCTs may also lack external validity and have limited generalizability.

49 ratory designs has been shown to enhance the external validity and hence the reproducibility of findi

50 clinical practice guideline development, the external validity and interrater reliability of the inst

51 To improve external validity and routinize race and ethnicity repor

52 ials often make it difficult to assess their external validity and sustainability.

53 The aim was to confirm the external validity and transportability of the Status Epi

54 ce or narrow eligibility criteria that limit external validity, and implementation of proven therapie

55 itations include sample selectivity, limited external validity, and multiple testing.

56 es for improving its accuracy, completeness, external validity, and policy relevance.

57 ual studies were rated by internal validity, external validity, and quality of design.

58 cales indicate good psychometric properties, external validity, and test-retest reliability.

59 ncluding concerns abou research methodology, external validity, and utility of EST research, as well

60 d results to ground-truth data that quantify external validity bias are lacking.

61 vations, not only for long-term survival and external validity, but also for other potential genetic

62 model for globe AL growth demonstrated good external validity by accurately predicting measured AL c

63 those obtained in bootstrapped samples; and external validity by applying the equations to an extern

64 umptions of exchangeability for internal and external validity by comparing their contributions to th

65 lidated on external populations, we assessed external validity by investigating cluster generalisabil

66 ficacy versus effectiveness, internal versus external validity, data types, limitations, and analysis

67 ness research share problems of internal and external validity despite more attention to internal val

68 mechanism (16.1% [95% CI, 15.6%-16.6%]) and external-validity discussion (1.6% [95% CI, 1.5%-1.8%]).

69 FI-CD indicates its stability and reasonable external validity, external validation is needed.

70 ted social traits, which provides additional external validity for our learning task and the winning

71 These results provide external validity for the recently proposed diagnostic f

72 e introduce criteria (bias, reliability, and external validity) for the assessment of responder defin

73 liable internal validity and, thus, reliable external validity (generalizability) in biological resea

74 or be based on evidence lacking internal or external validity, guideline developers must assess the

75 The impact of these factors on internal and external validity in both observational and randomized c

76 on, blinding, standardized protocols) and to external validity in effectiveness studies (e.g., commun

77 Considering external validity in important target populations increa

78 we argue that considering either internal or external validity in isolation may be problematic.

79 It has robust external validity in men and women across a wide range o

80 dies based in higher income countries, their external validity in terms of applicability to settings

81 recommendations for greater consideration of external validity in the design and reporting of RCTs.

82 nted racial and ethnic minorities to improve external validity in trial findings.

83 However, reporting of the determinants of external validity in trial publications and systematic r

84 suggesting a need for increased emphasis on external validity in youth treatment research.

85 dence is tempered by threats to internal and external validity, including unsuccessful blinding, smal

86 - Silhouette and Davies-Bouldin (DB) and one external validity index Classification Accuracy (CA) are

87 External validity is an important part of epidemiologic

88 There is concern among clinicians that external validity is often poor, particularly for some p

89 that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalise from the

90 nd governmental regulators alike all neglect external validity, leaving clinicians to make judgments.

91 methods with respect to several internal and external validity metrics.

92 terventions will strengthen the internal and external validity, minimize research waste and add value

93 h acute lung injury was used to evaluate the external validity of a simple prediction model for short

94 develop better testing methods, improve the external validity of behavioral techniques, and make bet

95 Our goal is to (1) quantify external validity of commercial healthcare claims data a

96 The external validity of conventional two- to three-year car

97 Future research must demonstrate the external validity of current findings to on-road perform

98 Predictive performance and external validity of each model were assessed.

99 We discuss the evidence for the external validity of EC research.

100 We examined the external validity of existing HF risk scores, optimized

101 l approaches limited study comparability and external validity of findings.

102 The external validity of MetaSig was evaluated in another ne

103 The external validity of multicenter randomized trials in ca

104 Internal and external validity of NRMI 2 was defined using the CCP as

105 The external validity of our model should now be tested in i

106 ions of transportability have focused on the external validity of overall study results and understan

107 Explanations could include the poor external validity of pre-clinical (cell, tissue, and ani

108 External validity of prevalence estimates was evaluated

109 Our results thus question the external validity of previous findings and call for furt

110 he transplant population that may affect the external validity of research findings.

111 responses is important for understanding the external validity of studies that investigate drug effec

112 These differences may affect the external validity of study findings, reflect access to c

113 methods to improve not only the internal and external validity of surgical trials but also their asse

114 The external validity of survival outcomes derived from clin

115 This not only limits the external validity of test procedures used to identify SR

116 These results demonstrate the external validity of the DSF model and provide a strong

117 The current study assessed the external validity of the DSF model by testing its perfor

118 enced the development policy debate, but the external validity of the extant evidence is limited.

119 The small patient population may limit the external validity of the findings observed.

120 ults, further strengthening the internal and external validity of the findings.

121 Further exploration of the feasibility and external validity of the model is needed.

122 Few studies assessed internal or external validity of the models or their use in clinical

123 External validity of the optimal PPS time frames derived

124 duce the false positive rate and to increase external validity of the predictive gene set, a jackknif

125 After assuring the external validity of the predictors, an important next s

126 ), and calibration curve were used to assess external validity of the proposed prognostic model to pr

127 The aim of this study was to examine the external validity of the randomized TIME trial, when min

128 sting and analysis of variance to assess the external validity of the results.

129 the biases of trial design, which impact the external validity of the results.

130 study, the assumption of exchangeability for external validity of the risk difference is stronger tha

131 model (r = -0.45; P = .046), confirming the external validity of the scheme.

132 To increase the external validity of the study, we conducted lab-in-the-

133 External validity of the surveys was evaluated with the

134 ltivariate genetic findings also support the external validity of the three ODD dimensions at the eti

135 for more complex patients, which limits the external validity of the trial's findings.

136 The external validity of these findings must be examined fur

137 wever, there is a paucity of research on the external validity of these methods that examines whether

138 However, the external validity of these models is poor when applied a

139 Concerns about the external validity of traditional randomized clinical tri

140 ls remains a critical concern, affecting the external validity of trial results, equitable access to

141 present study was conducted to evaluate the external validity of various cardiovascular disease (CVD

142 deed rest on experiments lacking established external validity, often without even a small "menu of o

143 Relevance depends on external validity (or generalisability)--ie, whether the

144 the cost of smaller study sizes and reduced external validity, particularly when assessing a newly a

145 irements and trade-offs between internal and external validity posed by different designs.

146 o -0.6), constipation dimension had moderate external validity (r = -0.2 to -0.3).

147 Pain and diarrhoea dimensions had good external validity (r = -0.3 to -0.6), constipation dimen

148 t approaches to these issues have considered external validity separately from internal validity.

149 asing attention has been paid to problems of external validity, specifically to methodological approa

150 The external validity study found a correlation coefficient

151 and probable deception required and risk to external validity, the practice of using PRI periods in

152 Considering the observed external validity, the present study also suggests mGluR

153 addressed important internal, construct, and external validity threats, limiting their clinical gener

154 ing non-parametric framework to demonstrate (External Validity, Unconfoundness and Precision) tradeof

155 We corroborate external validity via an independent cohort of 254 peopl

156 External validity was assessed in the Danish VTE cohort,

157 External validity was confirmed by the correlation coeff

158 External validity was confirmed by the correlation coeff

159 External validity was evaluated by correlating WUSPI-Pol

160 The external validity was evaluated using the Essential Hype

161 External validity was explored by regressing ADVS scores

162 f the treatment trials was fair to good, and external validity was limited by the minimal ethnic or g

163 t a risk of bias assessment for internal and external validity was undertaken, and none reported meth

164 gical, and clinical measures of internal and external validity.We next compared the AP molecular endo

165 Predictive and external validity were evaluated within an independent e

166 ) computer personality judgments have higher external validity when predicting life outcomes such as

167 and social outcomes, supporting internal and external validity while efficiently accommodating hetero

168 and Youden indices to evaluate internal and external validity with a retrospective institutional val

169 s of the Track mutation carriers showed good external validity with the COHORT mutation carriers afte