ライフサイエンスコーパス: extracapsular

1 emale, 79.4 +/- 9.3 years old; 58% presented extracapsular and 42% intracapsular fractures, with a 30

2 cured, retroperitoneal fluid (subcapsular vs extracapsular), ascites beyond the cul-de-sac, peritonea

3 in the human capsular bag still occurs after extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) surgery.

4 Manual extracapsular cataract extraction (especially small-inci

5 implanted into the ciliary sulcus following extracapsular cataract extraction and "in the bag" intra

6 culty with nuclear expression during planned extracapsular cataract extraction and capsular tears dur

7 ivisible into two general techniques: manual extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsificatio

8 autograft, or from other patients undergoing extracapsular cataract extraction from the superior bulb

9 Surgical techniques for manual extracapsular cataract extraction have undergone much re

10 8, 1950, in a patient who had initially had extracapsular cataract extraction in November 1949.

11 ns, cost analysis, and the continued role of extracapsular cataract extraction in Western countries.

12 lsification has been the mainstay method for extracapsular cataract extraction surgery in the anterio

13 iltering procedure--has evolved from planned extracapsular cataract extraction to small-incision phac

14 following phacoemulsification, 72% following extracapsular cataract extraction, and 40% following par

15 combined surgical procedures, planned manual extracapsular cataract extraction, and history of previo

16 sular cataract extraction, sutureless manual extracapsular cataract extraction, or intracapsular cata

17 roaches (phacoemulsification, sutured manual extracapsular cataract extraction, sutureless manual ext

18 No cases converted to extracapsular cataract extraction.

19 ctous lenses were obtained from donors after extracapsular cataract extraction.

20 hacoemulsification and manual small incision extracapsular cataract surgery achieve excellent visual

21 The evolution of intraocular lens and extracapsular cataract surgery has lead to faster postop

22 omplication rates, but manual small incision extracapsular cataract surgery is significantly faster,

23 Therefore, manual small incision extracapsular cataract surgery may be the preferred tech

24 ive communication with the vitreous (17.9%), extracapsular cataract surgery procedure (11%), and surg

25 technique, manual sutureless small incision extracapsular cataract surgery, has been increasing in p

26 changes, including synovitis, bursitis, and extracapsular changes, seen adjacent to tendon/ligament

27 ed hand disease is associated with prominent extracapsular changes, suggesting that inflammation in t

28 t was associated with a greater frequency of extracapsular disease [odds ratio (OR), 3.16; 95% confid

29 (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of extracapsular disease comes at the cost of a slightly re

30 tumor is increased twofold but the risk for extracapsular disease is increased threefold to ninefold

31 of clinically localized disease, unsuspected extracapsular disease may significantly increase the ris

32 An MR finding of definite extracapsular disease was 24% sensitive and 94% specific

33 tients whose MR examinations showed definite extracapsular disease, eight (62%) had disease recurrenc

34 of E-cadherin, increased Gleason score, and extracapsular dissemination has been observed.

35 ovitis, the proportion of MCP joints showing extracapsular enhancement was higher in the PMR group (1

36 A much greater degree of extracapsular enhancement, with diffuse involvement of t

37 In prostate cancer, tumor extracapsular escape occurs in part via laminin-coated n

38 rality (86 [64%] vs 60 [44%]; P = .001), and extracapsular extension (100 [75%] vs 84 [63%]; P = .01)

39 patients who had follicular histology (55), extracapsular extension (107), or vascular invasion (119

40 ve nodes (46.6% v 60.5%), and lower rates of extracapsular extension (9.3% v 15.1%).

41 (according to either reader), and degree of extracapsular extension (according to either reader) wer

42 gh-grade disease, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension (all P < or = .004), and biochem

43 gh-grade disease, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension (all P < or = .005), seminal ves

44 ot distinguish between focal and established extracapsular extension (an input variable of the nomogr

45 (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle infilt

46 RI, the radiologic-pathologic correlation of extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasi

47 ing beyond the positive lymph node (LN+) and extracapsular extension (ECE) has been overlooked in bre

48 Extracapsular extension (ECE) is an important predictor

49 The authors hypothesize that extracapsular extension (ECE) of the SN metastasis is hi

50 n 12 prostate regions and the likelihoods of extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion

51 gative surgical margins (SM negative) and no extracapsular extension (ECE).

52 ded tumor T stage and the radial diameter of extracapsular extension (if present).

53 01) and secondary Gleason grade (P = .0006), extracapsular extension (P < .0001), positive surgical m

54 negative/close margins (P =.03), absence of extracapsular extension (P <.01), and presence of semina

55 erative RT-PCR-PSA assay was associated with extracapsular extension (P = 0.044) and seminal vesicle

56 ent predictive variable was mean diameter of extracapsular extension (relative hazard ratio, 2.06; 95

57 antigen values, Gleason scores, and rates of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion com

58 prostate-specific antigen level, presence of extracapsular extension at MR imaging (according to eith

59 The presence and degree of extracapsular extension at MR imaging prior to external-

60 Its high specificity for the diagnosis of extracapsular extension is tempered by its low sensitivi

61 In particular, three of five patients with extracapsular extension of more than 5 mm at pretreatmen

62 lly organ-confined prostate cancer will have extracapsular extension on pathological analysis.

63 Extracapsular extension requires invasion within and thr

64 A/PSM RT-PCR was a better predictor of tumor extracapsular extension than initial serum PSA, clinical

65 he involvement of seminal vesicles and other extracapsular extension were assessed by histopathology

66 risk for recurrence owing to nodal features (extracapsular extension with largest node >=20 mm in dia

67 follicular histology, vascular invasion, or extracapsular extension) showed no benefit over partial

68 cancer volume, relative percentage by grade, extracapsular extension, and margin status.

69 survival in patients with positive margins, extracapsular extension, and no seminal vesicle invasion

70 adiologists for SVI, tumor at prostate base, extracapsular extension, and other features considered i

71 fication of the dominant nodule, laterality, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesical invasion.

72 al vesicle invasion, surgical margin status, extracapsular extension, lymph node invasion, and expres

73 rgical/staging (stage, grade, margin status, extracapsular extension, lymph node status, seminal vesi

74 eason 3 + 4 adenocarcinoma bilaterally, with extracapsular extension, no seminal vesicle invasion, a

75 inal vesicle invasion, biopsy Gleason score, extracapsular extension, preoperative PSA, and dominant

76 prognostic variables (ie, positive margins, extracapsular extension, primary site, and performance s

77 On the basis of the MR reports, the risks of extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and l

78 tigen concentration, surgical margin status, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph

79 were significantly elevated in patients with extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle involvement, hi

80 neurovascular bundle were most predictive of extracapsular extension, with a specificity of up to 95%

81 neurovascular bundle were most indicative of extracapsular extension.

82 overall accuracy of 77% in determination of extracapsular extension.

83 r ALND were metastases in >/=3 SLNs or gross extracapsular extension.

84 al, 2.3-23.4; P = 0.001) in predicting tumor extracapsular extension.

85 follicular histology, vascular invasion, and extracapsular extension.

86 of eye trauma (HR, 3.98; 95% CI, 3.69-4.30), extracapsular extraction (HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.94-3.30),

87 ctomy, including older literature on planned extracapsular extraction plus trabeculectomy as well as

88 ge, capsular rupture, history of eye trauma, extracapsular extraction technique, male gender, and dia

89 ear was 0.20%, with a higher proportion from extracapsular extraction than phacoemulsification (7.9%

90 was performed in 99.9% of cases, and manual extracapsular extraction was performed in 0.1% of cases.

91 ques were evaluated: phacoemulsification and extracapsular extraction.

92 abetes (p = 0.002), dementia (p = 0.001) and extracapsular fractures (p = 0.01) increased risk of mor

93 The degree of extracapsular Gd-DTPA enhancement was assessed in both c

94 iques for the detection of intracapsular and extracapsular implant rupture.

95 aluate the relationship between synovial and extracapsular inflammation in PMR and early rheumatoid a

96 and morbidity of prostate cancer result from extracapsular invasion and metastasis.

97 Many clinical circumstances require extracapsular IOL fixation and multiple options exist in

98 An extracapsular lens extraction (ECLE) was performed in 72

99 hy was performed before and after intra- and extracapsular lens extraction (ICLE, ECLE) and anterior

100 An extracapsular lens extraction was performed in one eye o

101 six eyes of New Zealand White rabbits after extracapsular lens extraction.

102 creased cellularity in the joint capsule and extracapsular ligaments.

103 tudy aims to examine the prognostic value of extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) and intrac

104 st of 10.8 Gy in six fractions was given for extracapsular nodal extension or T3 lesions.

105 an 0.5 mL without Gleason 4 or 5 patterns or extracapsular or seminal vesicle invasion.

106 ed phacoemulsification and combined standard extracapsular procedures, long-term results of combined

107 rupture in 50 (24.4%) and intracapsular and extracapsular rupture in 38 (18.5%).

108 rupture in 44 (21.5%) and intracapsular and extracapsular rupture in 43 (21.0%).

109 2 independent risk factors in the PET group (extracapsular spread and lymphatic invasion) predicted b

110 MR imaging findings of definite extracapsular spread of disease helped predict prostate

111 thal) of the primary tumor, determination of extracapsular spread, guidance and evaluation of local t

112 rrence, nine had SN metastases > 2 mm and/or extracapsular spread.

113 The improvements of phacoemulsification over extracapsular surgery have naturally given rise to impro

114 The extracapsular technique showed a contamination rate of 3

115 sion to perform a simultaneous contralateral extracapsular tonsillectomy can be addressed via clinici

116 ound that omission of contralateral elective extracapsular tonsillectomy in HPV-positive SCC was safe

117 ests that omission of contralateral elective extracapsular tonsillectomy in tonsillar SCCa is safe wi

118 eral radical tonsillectomy and contralateral extracapsular tonsillectomy).

119 mors by as much as threefold and the odds of extracapsular tumors by threefold to fivefold.

120 as ([MIC] n = 23) had one focus of intra- or extracapsular Vi, one focus of complete Ci, or both.