戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 before and after instillation of an emulsion eye drop.
2 ot that can be administered as a traditional eye drop.
3 , blood pressure, heart rate, mydriatic, and eye drops.
4 P was 12.2 +/- 2.2 mmHg while on 1.1 +/- 0.9 eye drops.
5 tervention group) or placebo (control group) eye drops.
6 uld be allowed to pass after instillation of eye drops.
7 efore and after the treatment with 0.05% CsA eye drops.
8 ffective and efficient delivery devices than eye drops.
9  hosts were challenged with OVA (Texas-Red+) eye drops.
10 henicol eye drops and 163 to receive placebo eye drops.
11 jection, intramuscular injection, or topical eye drops.
12     67% of participants preferred spray over eye drops.
13 female and 18 589 [71%] male) prescribed PGA eye drops.
14 5+ without glaucoma who do not regularly use eye drops.
15  showed improvement after the use of HP-Guar eye drops.
16 ized to either latanoprost 0.005% or placebo eye drops.
17 th care system vs conventional postoperative eye drops.
18  given along with topical trifluoridine, 1%, eye drops.
19 control group who received preservative free eye drops.
20 s of IVT injections and positive factors for eye drops.
21 was maintained with placebo iontophoresis or eye drops.
22 bconjunctival injection compared to 3x daily eye drops.
23 nstillation of either high- or low-viscosity eye drops.
24 pressure-lowering response to SLT versus PGA eye drops.
25 vision subjects struggled to self-administer eye drops.
26 le maintaining a similar mydriatic effect as eye drops.
27 ts were allocated randomly to initial SLT or eye drops.
28 0.1 ml) combined with topical nepafenac 0.3% eye drops.
29 n, or 70% of the total cost of postoperative eye drops.
30 ensitive gelling formulations and commercial eye drops.
31 n, or by local administration in the form of eye drops.
32 nstallation of pilocarpine and apraclonidine eye drops.
33 nitial selective laser trabeculoplasty or to eye drops.
34 ted eye, compared to brimonidine twice-daily eye drops.
35 e barriers compared to current treatment via eye drops.
36  treated with dexamethasone (DEX) or control eye drops.
37 IOP for one month as an alternative to daily eye drops.
38  most patients elect to start treatment with eye drops.
39 P was 14.3 +/- 3.4 mmHg while on 1.5 +/- 0.8 eye drops.
40 ated with saline plus topical corticosteroid eye drops (0.5% loteprednol etabonate) 4 times daily for
41 e effect of giving this octamer (8mer) as an eye drop 1 hour before ocular infection with HSV-1 was i
42                         Prednisolone acetate eye drops 1% 5 times daily for the first week after surg
43 nge of therapy regimen: Prednisolone acetate eye drops 1% hourly for the first postoperative week.
44 traocular injection with vitrectomy (1), and eye drops (1).
45 er than the IOP-lowering efficacy of XALATAN eye drops (24 h).
46 nts were randomized to CsA CE 0.1% (1 mg/ml) eye drops 4 times daily (high dose), CsA CE twice daily
47 e acetate 1%, or ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% eye drops 4 times per day for 5 days commencing immediat
48 ients 1:1 to cenegermin 20 mug/ml or vehicle eye drops, 6 drops daily for 8 weeks of masked treatment
49                   Patients applied aganirsen eye drops (86 mug/day/eye) or placebo twice daily for 90
50       The pharmacologic activity of SAR 1118 eye drops administered thrice daily for 2 months at 1% (
51  However, the rapid clearance of Sunb-malate eye drops administered through topical instillation limi
52 sulin levels and by examining the effects of eye drop administration in decapitated rats.
53 ejection is highest and when typical steroid eye drop administration requirements are particularly on
54 EALM) as well as a qualitative assessment of eye drop administration technique using 3 different crit
55                                              Eye drop administration was video recorded before the fi
56 in-person counseling session 6 months later, eye drop administration was video recorded.
57                                    Exclusive eye drops administration (ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% an
58    We assessed the effect of fluorouracil 1% eye drops after surgery on recurrence.
59  protein 4 (SDP-4), also known as amlisimod, eye drops against a vehicle control formulation in patie
60 laucoma medication adherence, interest in an eye drop aid, and self-reported adherence (measured by t
61 ye drop self-administration and recommending eye drop aids.
62 patients who received topical nepafenac 0.3% eye drops alone and group (2) that included 30 patients
63 12 of them were treated with 0.25 % atropine eye drop and another 12 served as a control group.
64 centage was --30.29% (-33.03 to -27.55%) for eye drops and -32.29% (-34.87 to -29.70%) for spray.
65 gned 163 children to receive chloramphenicol eye drops and 163 to receive placebo eye drops.
66 e final analysis, with 67 eyes randomized to eye drops and 67 eyes randomized to spray.
67 ridocorneal angle, administration of steroid eye drops and circadian rhythmicity were blocked by TRPV
68           Current standards of care, such as eye drops and ointments, suffer from poor drug bioavaila
69 plores alternative RVD treatments, including eye drops and oral tablets.
70 enced in using both Mydriasert and mydriatic eye drops and results from the current clinical study of
71  the bioavailability of drugs delivery using eye drops and suspensions.
72 0.09%, lifitegrast 5%, and loteprednol 0.25% eye drops and varenicline 0.03-mg nasal spray).
73  received the gK 8mer or control peptides as eye drops and were then ocularly infected with HSV-1.
74  assay of CFX in pharmaceutical formulation (eye drops) and biological fluid (urine) by a significant
75 tion, spoke English, self-administered their eye drops, and had poor glaucoma medication adherence (d
76 ns and insurance coverage, how to administer eye drops, and nasolacrimal occlusion.
77 on-invasive ocular delivery methods, such as eye drops, and systemic delivery, have low bioavailabili
78 d that when Mydriasert substituted mydriatic eye drops, annual total costs decreased by 18% and annua
79 n the retina of normal rats 20 minutes after eye drop application (0.7 pg/microg; P < 0.00001).
80 ween the measurements taken before and after eye drop application (all P > 0.05).
81 sity of Washington who were experienced with eye drop application and were on a steady regimen of sel
82 , in one PDGFRbeta line, we found that focal eye drop application of tamoxifen led to an exclusive Cr
83                        At therapeutic doses, eye drop application of the dnG1 retroviral vector is sa
84  Adverse events, most commonly burning after eye drop application, were more common with treatment (3
85                                      Insulin eye drops (approximately 15 microL: 0.75% porcine insuli
86 rst-line treatment, both SLT and latanoprost eye drops are effective in newly diagnosed POAG and OHT
87 iple-blinded, randomized trial, two vials of eye drops are given to each participant, one with code A
88                                              Eye drops are often first-line treatment for glaucoma an
89                          Additionally, these eye drops are often prescribed for daily use for 1 year
90                     At present, moxifloxacin eye drops are prescribed for use multiple times per day,
91                         Applying hypotensive eye drops are presumed to initiate or exacerbate existin
92               However, steroids delivered in eye drops are rapidly cleared from the surface of the ey
93                            Low-dose atropine eye drops are safe over twelve months in otherwise healt
94 s dermatological ointment, 0.1% cyclosporine eye drops, artificial tears, and 0.5% loteprednol for ke
95  all patients (97%) had used nonprescription eye drops/artificial tears/ointments.
96 tcomes greatly support the use of pregabalin eye drops as once daily IOP-lowering therapy for glaucom
97  direct comparison study between 5FU and IFN eye drops as primary treatment modalities for OSSN.
98 te 0.5 % (50/99, 51 %), and autologous serum eye drops (ASD; 48/97, 49 %).
99 acy and safety of low-concentration atropine eye drops at 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% compared with plac
100 mmHg after discontinuation of corticosteroid eye drops at any follow-up visit.
101 underwent pupil dilation with 1% tropicamide eye drops at the baseline visit, before any laser or med
102  the use of Olopatadine 0.1% or cyclosporine eye drops before DALK (OR = 14.51, 95% CI = 1.43-147.23)
103      The SEE program significantly decreased eye drop bottle contamination, increased eye drop instil
104 s, suggesting an increased risk of potential eye drop bottle contamination.
105 urther evaluation and consideration of early eye drop bottle exhaustion in glaucoma patients.
106 by this higher level (>/= 5 times yearly) of eye drop bottle exhaustion were more likely to have poor
107 main outcome measure was self-reported early eye drop bottle exhaustion.
108 eported any problem with early exhaustion of eye drop bottles, and this was associated with visual ac
109 s on daily basis was comparable with that by eye drops but with only 20% of drug dose, which suggeste
110 the posterior segment, the convenience of an eye drop combined with intermittent dosing frequency cou
111 ration of G1 or G2 peptide as a prophylactic eye drop completely blocked HSV-1 spread in the mouse co
112                       An investigational new eye drop containing 20 mug/ml NTX effectively reversed t
113  actively immunized mice challenged with OVA eye drops containing 1% anti-CCR7 antibody or isotype co
114  For comparison, some diabetic rats received eye drops containing NTX in sterile Vigamox(R).
115  were challenged for 7 consecutive days with eye drops containing the allergens.
116  altered eyes were subsequently treated with eye drops containing: a retroviral vector bearing a dnG1
117 an characteristics associated with increased eye drop cost included female gender, greater number of
118 s, patient factors associated with increased eye drop cost included older age, female gender, and rac
119 , 37%, and 36% of the total cataract surgery eye drop cost, respectively.
120 olerated noncorticosteroid anti-inflammatory eye drop could improve patient outcomes and quality of l
121 dults aged >= 65 years with glaucoma who use eye drops daily and adults aged 65+ without glaucoma who
122                                    Effective eye drop delivery systems for treating diseases of the p
123 op users preferred the NPDD over traditional eye drop delivery.
124 ts (94%) preferred the NPDD over traditional eye drop delivery.
125                                      Topical eye-drop delivery of a highly selective caspase-9 inhibi
126           Furthermore, these NCs, applied as eye drops, displayed clinical and histological efficacy
127 roid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug eye drops do not hinder the intraocular pressure (IOP)-l
128                                    Nepafenac eye drops do not increase the IOP.
129 hronic ocular diseases, patient adherence to eye drop dosing regimens and the need for frequent intra
130      Glaucoma is commonly treated with daily eye-drop drugs, but adherence to treatment is often unsa
131 y allocated to receive 50% glucose or saline eye drops every 5 minutes for 60 minutes.
132 rst treatment being more cost-effective than eye drops first at a willingness to pay of pound 20 000
133 ong-term, non-invasive gel/microsphere (GMS) eye drop for glaucoma.
134 htly placebo for 2 years then 0.05% atropine eye drops for 1 year and group 2, nightly 0.01% atropine
135 ering placebo, or tapering of 0.01% atropine eye drops for 1 year.
136 r 1 year and group 2, nightly 0.01% atropine eye drops for 2 years then rerandomization to placebo ni
137 tropine, 0.01%, or low-dose atropine, 0.02%, eye drops for 36 months.
138 days later, received artificial tears or CsA eye drops for 6 weeks.
139   Clinical trial results of topical atropine eye drops for childhood myopia control have shown incons
140 henylephrine was non-inferior to traditional eye drops for maximum pupil diameter and pupillary const
141 a safe and convenient alternative to topical eye drops for patients undergoing MIVS, but additional a
142 studies of the use of autologous serum-based eye drops for severe dry eye disease and 4 studies of pe
143  trabeculoplasty (SLT) to 0.005% latanoprost eye drops for the treatment of 24-h intraocular pressure
144 he study, and they were administered insulin eye drops formulated as 1 U/mL, four times a day.
145 the safety and efficacy of a proprietary new eye drop formulation for topical treatment of DED.
146 ocaprin make it ideal for use in a thickened eye drop formulation to combat eye infections.
147       In vivo delivery of GFX in a dendrimer eye drop formulation was studied in New Zealand White ra
148 retinal angiogenesis when administered in an eye-drop formulation.
149 mance in in vivo models compared to standard eye drop formulations.
150 , analytical/spectroscopic analyses of GCCNP eye drop formulations.
151                                              Eye-drop formulations should hold as high a concentratio
152 iameter was 2.15 mm (1.96 to 2.35 mm) in the eye drop group and 2.48 mm (2.09 to 2.87 mm) in the spra
153 r was 7.65 mm (95%CI 7.45 to 7.85 mm) in the eye drop group and 7.72 mm (7.54 to 7.90 mm) in the spra
154  pressure at more visits (93.0%) than in the eye drops group (91.3%), with glaucoma surgery to lower
155 uloplasty group versus 0.90 (SD 0.16) in the eye drops group, with no significant difference (differe
156 lective laser trabeculoplasty and 362 to the eye drops group.
157 al drug delivery methods, such as antibiotic eye drops, have limitations for intraocular drug deliver
158 ded wear contact lenses was then compared to eye drops in beagle dogs that suffer from spontaneous gl
159 e either 180 mug/mL rhNGF or vehicle control eye drops in both eyes, 3 times daily for 8 weeks, with
160 ve either 180 ug/mL rhNGF or vehicle control eye drops in both eyes, 3 times daily for 8 weeks, with
161 to 0.1% nepafenac or 1% prednisolone acetate eye drops in both eyes.
162 :1 (MIRA 3) to receive either POS or placebo eye drops in both eyes.
163 herapeutic efficacy to topically applied Dex eye drops in experimental mouse dry eye model, and these
164 needed ranibizumab administered with placebo eye drops in maintaining BCVA (estimated BCVA gains of 0
165                              Daily pazopanib eye drops in neovascular AMD subjects did not result in
166 insert was compared with twice-daily timolol eye drops in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or
167 he efficacy of N-acetylcysteine amide (NACA) eye drops in reversing the cataract formation induced by
168 -102 (brimapitide) compared to dexamethasone eye drops in the treatment of postoperative ocular infla
169 ular surgery is noninferior to dexamethasone eye drops in the treatment of postoperative ocular infla
170 to the effectiveness of prostaglandin analog eye drops in treating primary open-angle glaucoma, publi
171 rostaglandin analog (latanoprost) or placebo eye drops in UKGTS.
172                      To replace the need for eye drops, in this study we tested the hypothesis that I
173                             In addition, SST eye drops inhibited glutamate accumulation in the retina
174          A significant increase was found in eye drop instillation self-efficacy from an average scor
175 sed eye drop bottle contamination, increased eye drop instillation self-efficacy, and demonstrated an
176 lot study, adults with glaucoma demonstrated eye drop instillation success comparable to those withou
177                                              Eye drop instillation success was analyzed through video
178 The main outcome was change in participants' eye drop instillation technique as measured by (1) accur
179 on coaching session, which included teaching eye drop instillation techniques using a motivational in
180 s administered for 52 weeks included placebo eye drops instilled 4 times daily (n=73); pazopanib 5 mg
181  XG-102 900 mug, or placebo) was followed by eye drops instilled 4 times per day for 21 days with pla
182              Prolonged use of corticosteroid eye drops is a major risk factor for the occurrence of p
183  proper procedure for application of topical eye drops is stressed.
184  technique as measured by (1) accuracy of an eye drop landing on the eye, (2) ability to instill an e
185 dex date of PACG diagnosis; 2) no history of eye drops, laser, or cataract surgery unless preceded by
186 n, gentamicin and vancomycin or levofloxacin eye drops leading to enucleation in one case.
187                     However, the latanoprost eye drops may be better in decreasing mean and peak 24-h
188 ely administration of low-dose dexamethasone eye drops may serve as a simple, cost-effective, and non
189 eyes, and ocular hypertension which required eye drop medication occurred in 19.2% of eyes.
190 mmHg at 12 months; the number of hypotensive eye drop medications decreased from 3.07 +/- 1.04 to 1.0
191   Our study demonstrates that corticosteroid eye drops mitigate the acute adverse effects of an exper
192  despite its higher unit cost than mydriatic eye drops, Mydriasert resulted in overall savings in hea
193    Tg-MYOC(Y437H) mice were treated with PBA eye drops (n = 10) or sterile PBS (n = 8) twice daily fo
194 lycol chitosan nanoparticle as a new type of eye drop, namely GCCNP (glycol chitosan cerium oxide nan
195 d with prescribing patterns for prescription eye drops, not subject to the incentives created by Part
196 ymal stromal cells (MSC-exo) administered as eye drops notably alleviate GVHD-associated dry eye dise
197 tivitis on days 3 to 6 compared with placebo eye drops (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.91).
198                                     A single eye drop of 10(-5) M naltrexone (NTX), 10(-5) M [Met(5)]
199                                              Eye drops of aganirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide pre
200 % of normal eyes and 34.4% in dry eyes using eye drops of high viscosity.
201 ects of systemic and topical administration (eye drops) of GLP-1R agonists in db/db mice; and 3) to e
202 icate that periodic induction, via use of an eye drop, of AAV-mediated secretion of MMP-3 into AH cou
203 anding on the eye, (2) ability to instill an eye drop on the first attempt, and (3) contaminating the
204 o clinically relevant effect of hyperosmolar eye drops on early morning corneal edema.
205  most of which are administered topically as eye drops or as injectables.
206 ical ointment rather than tacrolimus topical eye drops or ointment showed satisfactory efficacy when
207 l treatment was administered by using 4% CsA eye drops or vehicle (castor oil) four times daily for 1
208 llitus (STZ-DM) were treated with either SST eye drops or vehicle for 15 days.
209 to either Group 1, who received timolol 0.5% eye drops, or Group 2, who received artificial tears for
210 andomized to moxifloxacin eye drops, placebo eye drops, or no intervention.
211 to receive 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops, or placebo eye drop, respectively, once night
212                  GLX7013114, administered as eye drops (paradigms A and B), was beneficial in treatin
213 inical trial were randomized to moxifloxacin eye drops, placebo eye drops, or no intervention.
214 nters for Medicare and Medicaid Services for eye drops prescribed for postoperative use after catarac
215 D claims were used to extract information on eye drop prescriptions that were filled during the posto
216                           Treatment with SST eye drops prevented ERG abnormalities, glial activation,
217 d prevalence of early exhaustion of glaucoma eye drops prior to a scheduled refill, and associated ri
218 (8-11 times per year) or "always" ran out of eye drops prior to a scheduled refill.
219 ne 0.1% or any concentration of cyclosporine eye drops prior to DALK.
220                        Tear film-stabilizing eye drops prior to keratometry measurements influenced K
221 icipants, use of short-term topical atropine eye drops ranging from 0.01% to 1.0% for a duration of 2
222        The 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops reduced myopia progression along a concentrati
223  by poor patient adherence to the prescribed eye drop regimen.
224                        Further, adherence to eye drop regimens is often problematic due to the diffic
225 ation, and preferable to difficult and toxic eye-drop regimens.Immunochromatographic assay is an effe
226                      Topical instillation of eye drops remains the most common and easiest route of o
227 nt factors, such as permanent treatment with eye drops, repeated surgeries, and heritability of the d
228 5%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops, or placebo eye drop, respectively, once nightly to both eyes for 1
229 printed lenses than non-imprinted lenses and eye drops, respectively.
230 , 0.44 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.60]; P < .001) and eye drops (rho, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.62]; P < .001).
231 ng low-vision patients about difficulty with eye drop self-administration and recommending eye drop a
232 t population, or to those inexperienced with eye drop self-administration.
233 ad >= 1 comorbid condition that could affect eye drop self-administration.
234  have >= 1 medical condition that may impair eye drop self-administration.
235                  Instillation of an emulsion eye drop significantly increased the thickness of the li
236 f corneal angiogenesis showed that aganirsen eye drops significantly inhibited corneal neovasculariza
237                                     SAR 1118 eye drops significantly reduced leukostasis and blood-re
238                                      Insulin eye drops significantly reduced the corneal wounding are
239 y applied towards the detection of GSH in an eye drop solution.
240 ric preservative-free latanoprost 0.05 mg/ml eye drops solution, in lowering IOP when compared to the
241 s in the previous study, the identity of all eye drop solutions was masked.
242       We tested the hypothesis that topical (eye drop) SRPK1-selective inhibitors could be generated
243 lf-efficacy was assessed using the validated Eye Drop Technique Self-Efficacy Scale (EDTSES) survey a
244 pically administered prodrug delivered as an eye drop that is readily converted to the active compoun
245 d with artificial tear and anti-inflammatory eye drops that are generally administered several times
246 lar hypertension are habitually treated with eye drops that lower intraocular pressure.
247                  Glaucoma management through eye drops that reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP) has
248                                  Compared to eye drops, the spray met non-inferiority criteria for ma
249              The higher the viscosity of the eye drops, the stronger the influence and the longer its
250 bitors could be a potentially novel topical (eye drop) therapeutic for wet AMD.
251 h TM-implant contact lenses in comparison to eye drop therapy.
252 uterization and subsequent VEGF TrapR(1)R(2) eye drops three times per day whereas the monotherapy gr
253 acebo (n = 22) was preoperatively applied as eye drops to 1 eye in patients scheduled for cataract su
254 domly assigned (1:1) to receive 0.5% timolol eye drops to administer twice daily or to receive SLT.
255 sulin levels, and the application of insulin eye drops to decapitated rats still resulted in the accu
256 t insert may provide an alternative to daily eye drops to improve adherence, consistency of delivery,
257 riasert compared with conventional mydriatic eye drops to induce pupil dilation prior to cataract sur
258  of using MSC-derived extracellular exosomes eye drops to treat SS-associated DES.
259                         In addition, for all eye drop treatment groups, open-label ranibizumab was ad
260                                       Either eye drop treatment of 1% apoEdp topically 4 times a day
261                                      Topical eye drop treatment with dexamethasone (P < 0.01) or cycl
262  twice a day topically applied dexamethasone eye drop treatment.
263       One eye was randomized to hyperosmolar eye drops (treatment); the fellow eye was randomized to
264 riasis with Mydriasert compared to mydriatic eye drops (tropicamide [1%] plus phenylephrine [10%]).
265 ceive SAR 1118 (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) or placebo eye drops twice daily for 84 days.
266                        Participants received eye drops twice.
267 3%), congestive heart failure (78%), steroid eye drop use (65%), and the non-emergency vaccination of
268 n of the short duration of action of topical eye drops used against ocular inflammation in dry eyes.
269                                              Eye drop users preferred the NPDD over traditional eye d
270                            Administration of eye drops using a small-volume adapter demonstrated simi
271  and efficacy of short-term, high-dose rhNGF eye drops versus placebo in a cohort of glaucoma patient
272 perties of said drugs, which included liquid eye drops, viscous cold syrup solution, ointment cream,
273 en the combination of prednisolone and NSAID eye drops vs NSAID monotherapy or sub-Tenon dexamethason
274                  Non-preservative steroid 1% eye drop was prescribed frequently.
275 ith either SLT or prostaglandin analog (PGA) eye drops was assessed at different levels of baseline I
276 evere ROP, the introduction of dexamethasone eye drops was associated with a significant reduction in
277          Adherence to frequent postoperative eye drops was high and can be successfully monitored rem
278 ion of both low-viscosity and high-viscosity eye drops was observed (P < .01).
279 tin eye ointment and propamidine isethionate eye drops) was administered, resulting in significant vi
280                                              Eye drops were administered 3 times per day until 3 week
281                       N-acetylcysteine amide eye drops were administered beginning on week 3 until th
282                             Nepafenac (0.1%) eye drops were instilled 3 times a day in the eye that r
283 dule AOR 2.52 (95% CI;1.009-6.29), believing eye drops were not effective AOR 6.35 (95% CI;1.17-34.49
284                                Postoperative eye drops were prescribed in 2016 to 88% of 591 733 Medi
285  pre- or postoperative antibiotic or steroid eye drops were prescribed.
286 h glaucoma who were using at least 3 or more eye drops were recruited from the ophthalmology clinic a
287 ery, with or without the use of IOP-lowering eye drops, were 70%, 72%, 60%, and 44%, for achievement
288 Glaucoma control was generally achieved with eye drops, whereas surgery was necessary in 5 patients (
289  expensive than postoperative corticosteroid eye drops, which have historically been standard care.
290           Glaucoma is commonly treated using eye drops, which is highly inefficient due to rapid clea
291 al edema was not accelerated by hyperosmolar eye drops, which more frequently caused AEs.
292 treatment included hourly dexamethasone 0.1% eye drops while awake, atropine 1% three times daily, a
293 f 5 anti-inflammatory prophylactic regimens: eye drops with a combination of prednisolone, 1%, and ke
294  hours of patching and frequency of atropine eye drops with clinical success of about 83%.
295 cal corticosteroids: prednisolone acetate 1% eye drops with or without dexamethasone 0.1% eye ointmen
296 compare the effectiveness of chloramphenicol eye drops with placebo in children with infective conjun
297 which allows easy application in the form of eye drops without any vision interference.
298  formulated in sodium hyaluronate-containing eye-drops without impairing efficacy of the siRNA.
299                                              Eye drops would be preferred over IVT injections by 76%
300 greater than non-imprinted lenses and 0.035% eye drops (Zaditor(R)), respectively.

 
Page Top