ライフサイエンスコーパス: facial

1 negative affective and amygdala response to facial affect stimuli returned to baseline levels while

2 in, negative affect and amygdala response to facial affect stimuli were reduced, whereas positive aff

3 behaving mice, we found that while an abrupt facial air puff triggered transient increases in noradre

4 ls and interleukin-35 (IL-35) in suppressing facial allodynia and facial grimacing in animals with ex

5 The mucosa of facial allotransplants is one of the primary targets of

6 previously described specimens but differ in facial anatomy and size.

7 reveal the development of a neornithine-like facial anatomy despite the retention of a maxilla-premax

8 that differentially activated or deactivated facial and bodily nonverbal cues.

9 distal arthrogryposis defined by congenital facial and distal skeletal muscle contractures.

10 stor possessed maxillae and premaxillae with facial and palatal laminae, and that these bones underwe

11 play a classical FSHD phenotype with typical facial and scapular muscle weakness, whereas 20.1% prese

12 cortex implicated in the processing of both facial and vocal identity.

13 lates of emotion perception as influenced by facial and vocal information by measuring changes in oxy

14 Despite evidence of interactions between facial and vocal processing, these findings suggest some

15 These findings suggest that both facial and vocal recognition may be impaired in DP.

16 Here, we investigate whether facial and vocal tract movements are linked during speec

17 In addition, the facial and vocal tract regions that are important for re

18 cause of the potential need to sacrifice the facial and/or spinal accessory nerves and because of a l

19 man Immunodeficiency Centromeric Instability Facial Anomalies (ICF) 4 syndrome is a severe disease wi

20 munodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies (ICF) syndrome is a genetically heterog

21 e hypothesis posits that long-term partners' facial appearance converges with time due to their share

22 ge, they do not converge over time, bringing facial appearance in line with other personal characteri

23 t would be important to be able to place the facial appearance of a patient with congenital or acquir

24 n the EEG data, we reveal representations of facial attractiveness after 150-200 ms of cortical proce

25 already early perceptual representations of facial attractiveness convey idiosyncratic attractivenes

26 investigated how rapidly representations of facial attractiveness emerge in the human brain.

27 Maintaining higher perceived facial attractiveness may be costly due to increased oxi

28 Perceived facial attractiveness, a putative marker of high biologi

29 lly specific, and genuine representations of facial attractiveness, which may underlie fast attractiv

30 impressions of trustworthiness are driven by facial attributes.

31 In study 3, measured facial averageness and symmetry were weakly negatively r

32 In study 1, 966 judges rated the composites (facial averages) of women with higher OS as more attract

33 ith positive inferences when judging others' facial beauty.

34 hlight the importance of natural patterns of facial behaviour in emotional expressions, and demonstra

35 with depigmentation of 0.5% or more of their facial body surface area (BSA) and 3% or more of their n

36 ed increased radiographic density or thicker facial bone after the treatment.

37 iodontal phenotype, maintaining or enhancing facial bone thickness, accelerating tooth movement, expa

38 size of the gap between the implant and the facial bone wall may play a role on peri-implant tissues

39 their interactions with the closely-related facial branchiomotor neurons (FBMNs) in zebrafish.

40 hat has yet to be properly examined: tactile facial bristles in birds.

41 rface area (BSA) and 3% or more of their non-facial BSA were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) by use of

42 h no, one, or ten missing teeth would have a facial centroid size of 511.83, 510.81, or 501.70 mm, re

43 Linear discriminant analysis distinguished facial change determined by the emotional valence of the

44 n by promoting the extraction of distinctive facial characteristics and suppressing redundant or irre

45 nt and easily recognizable patterns of human facial characteristics co-vary with genomic ancestry, an

46 liance on single-trait-based versus holistic facial characteristics for species discrimination, with

47 O recommends the SAFE (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness, and Environmental improvement) strat

48 Health education of "Facial cleanness" and related factors is recommended to

49 mong exemplars (typically posed, stereotyped facial configurations).

50 uals with tooth agenesis have indeed smaller facial configurations.

51 Significant difference of linear changes of facial contour was noted over time and not between the g

52 dings highlight the relative significance of facial cues compared to bodily cues on interpersonal out

53 m and function of patients with catastrophic facial defects.

54 rown group) birds also exhibit constraint on facial development(8,9), they have comparatively diverse

55 3 different hypothetical scenarios involving facial disfiguration.

56 her the psychological trauma associated with facial disfigurement alters their perception of FT and i

57 The psychological impact of facial disfigurement and its influence on accepting the

58 Participants with and without facial disfigurement were recruited to complete a questi

59 ife (QoL) among individuals with and without facial disfigurement.

60 sk acceptance of healthy individuals with no facial disfigurement.

61 significantly lower, than if they had severe facial disfigurement.

62 Affected individuals showed facial dysmorphism with coarse face, upslanted palpebral

63 tooth abnormality, intellectual disability, facial dysmorphism, attention-deficit hyperactivity diso

64 Here, we report a syndrome characterized by facial dysmorphism, colobomatous microphthalmia, ptosis

65 ximal shortening of the limbs, contractures, facial dysmorphism, congenital cataracts, ichthyosis, sp

66 /hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, mild facial dysmorphism, craniosynostosis, and multiple osteo

67 ity, self-harm, hetero-aggressive behaviour, facial dysmorphism, left facial paralysis, post-axial po

68 ovement disorders; growth abnormalities; and facial dysmorphism.

69 mental delay and/or intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms, and congenital anomalies.

70 h sleep disturbance, cerebellar atrophy, and facial dysmorphisms, and suggesting a recognizable syndr

71 delay and/or intellectual disability, subtle facial dysmorphisms, behavioral and psychiatric problems

72 linically variable symptoms, such as typical facial dysmorphisms, short stature, developmental delay,

73 , cerebellar ataxia, cerebellar atrophy, and facial dysmorphisms.

74 ial mimicry is emotion-specific, we measured facial electromyography (EMG) from five muscle sites (co

75 investigation of this pathway using combined facial electromyography and functional magnetic resonanc

76 ecorded alongside skin conductance level and facial electromyography from the corrugator supercilii a

77 In Study 3 (N = 40), using facial electromyography to explore a potential mechanism

78 stress-induced negative affect, measured via facial electromyography.

79 -SEA), which comprises the faux pas test and Facial Emotion Recognition Test (FERT); Mini-Mental Stat

80 Participants from two countries completed a facial emotion recognition test, and a subsample additio

81 - and 19-years using fMRI while performing a facial emotion task.

82 has been shown to be a key regulator of both facial-emotion processing and brain dynamics, and 5-HT a

83 Participants completed a facial-emotion processing fMRI task at least 8 days apar

84 examined how 5-HT influences the dynamics of facial-emotion processing in ASD.

85 on the responsivity of brain dynamics during facial-emotion processing in individuals with and withou

86 tivation in observers when they perceive the facial emotional expressions of others.

87 limbic regions during processing of negative facial emotions in adults with ASD-but not in neurotypic

88 Research into the perception of facial emotions typically employs static images of a sma

89 positive versus negative valence in observed facial emotions.

90 ion is specific, dissociating from other key facial evaluations of dominance and attractiveness.

91 nd a double dissociation of areas processing facial expression and those processing head orientation.

92 For example, when a person's facial expression changes, we are given information abou

93 We found that each kind of facial expression had distinct associations with a set o

94 Advice from partners making a fearful facial expression influenced participants' decisions mor

95 we examined the extent to which 16 types of facial expression occurred systematically in thousands o

96 e correlates with asymmetry, indicating that facial expression of the mouse is itself correlated with

97 ain activation in regions involved in infant facial expression processing and empathic and mentalizin

98 nd the left fusiform gyrus, recruited during facial expression processing, were positively correlated

99 A popular hypothesis holds that efficient facial expression recognition cannot be achieved by visu

100 dividuals can achieve normotypical efficient facial expression recognition despite a congenital absen

101 o reconsider the role of motor simulation in facial expression recognition.

102 What mechanisms underlie facial expression recognition?

103 image onset, and identity across a change in facial expression was uniquely associated with neural pa

104 hes in the STS fundus were most sensitive to facial expression, as was the amygdala, whereas those on

105 cifically painful, angry, happy, and neutral facial expressions and questionnaires including a measur

106 hich measured amygdala responsivity to angry facial expressions and ventral striatum responsivity to

107 Facial expressions are important for intentional display

108 Perceptual biases for fearful facial expressions are observed across many studies.

109 Facial expressions carry key information about an indivi

110 Understanding the degree to which human facial expressions co-vary with specific social contexts

111 The availability of facial expressions had a positive effect on interpersona

112 evidence linking social context to specific facial expressions is sparse and is largely based on sur

113 in such images resemble more natural ambient facial expressions remains unclear.

114 esults reveal fine-grained patterns in human facial expressions that are preserved across the modern

115 CFS, and shows that the visibility of facial expressions vary according to how they are normal

116 , regions varied in how frequently different facial expressions were produced as a function of which

117 g competitions) are associated with specific facial expressions(14) across different cultures.

118 with refractory epilepsy and classified five facial expressions, based on neural activity.

119 ade trials with pain faces relative to other facial expressions, indicating a difficulty disinhibitin

120 completed the anti-saccade task with dynamic facial expressions, specifically painful, angry, happy,

121 Emotion processing-including signals from facial expressions-is often altered in individuals with

122 various visual cues, such as eye contact and facial expressions.

123 random, and did so using neutral or fearful facial expressions.

124 showing similar biases for detecting fearful facial expressions.

125 and a stranger showing either happy or angry facial expressions.

126 ity of a BCI to display emotions by decoding facial expressions.

127 odological approach combining trial-by-trial facial eye-blink startle electromyography and brainstem-

128 e brain focuses on a task-relevant subset of facial features and assessing log likelihood of a face u

129 aniofacial and tooth development, dysplastic facial features and delayed development of the ossicles

130 ing of the posterior part and characteristic facial features appeared to be unifying findings.

131 The facial features characteristic of FAS diminish with age,

132 uate a stranger's trustworthiness from their facial features in a fraction of a second, despite commo

133 It remains uncertain whether prototypical facial features in emotional expressions are being cover

134 We investigated the association between the facial features of 97 postmenopausal women and their lev

135 cial defects possibly akin to the dysmorphic facial features seen in individuals harboring putatively

136 cterized by developmental disability, coarse facial features, and fifth digit/nail hypoplasia that ar

137 y have intellectual disabilities, dysmorphic facial features, and ocular alterations such as ptosis,

138 dividuals with strikingly similar dysmorphic facial features, especially midface hypoplasia, and inte

139 ic disorders are associated with distinctive facial features, which can aid in diagnosis.

140 eurodevelopmental anomalies and non-specific facial features.

141 eness and trustworthiness, from a stranger's facial features.

142 tributed to the disruption of proprioceptive facial feedback reinforcing negative emotions.

143 itles, 35 were mastectomy, 6 mammoplasty, 21 facial feminization, and 31 voice/cartilage.

144 he size of a domestication phenotype-a white facial fur patch-is linked to their degree of affiliativ

145 ive impairment and hypotonia, a recognizable facial gestalt, and variable congenital anomalies.

146 from observation of a speaker's articulatory facial gestures.

147 (IL-35) in suppressing facial allodynia and facial grimacing in animals with experimental autoimmune

148 ology is characterized by excessive vertical facial growth with severe disarrangement of jaws and tee

149 ctrostatic interactions in the case of a syn-facial hydride attack.

150 niosynostosis with neurological sequelae and facial hypoplasia.

151 e memory guidance is specific for associated facial identities, it does not only occur for the specif

152 sharpened tuning of visuocortical neurons to facial identity cues, indicating the behavioral relevanc

153 tual distance between the raw and normalized facial image pair.

154 realistic, normalized versions of any given facial image, and objectively measures the perceptual di

155 sly measured arousal signal from the thermal facial imagery was moderate and did not correlate with s

156 between the features of artificial composite facial images and attributions of personality traits by

157 study, we isolated the level of error in 3D facial images attributable to four sources, using the 3d

158 rum by reexamining this hypothesis using the facial images of 517 couples taken at the beginning of t

159 res of the face and other characteristics of facial images to predicting personality.

160 dimensional personality profiles from static facial images using ANNs trained on large labelled datas

161 of unidentified biological material against facial images with known identity.

162 or both men and women using real-life static facial images.

163 However, facial impression models do not consider variation betwe

164 of others based on incomplete and inaccurate facial information.

165 r decoding facial strains and for predicting facial kinematics.

166 e premaxillae and maxillae lacking external (facial) laminae.

167 The mean value of mid-facial linear 3D spatial resorption ranged from 0.1 to 0

168 tment claims to rejuvenate skin by improving facial lines, wrinkles and skin pigmentation associated

169 eservation at the esthetic concern area (mid-facial margin and 2 to 6 mm above) at the final 12-month

170 verall, we find no support for the idea that facial masculinity is a condition-dependent male ornamen

171 te activation patterns across muscles during facial mimicry and to provide evidence for distinct patt

172 ng covertly mimicked and also whether covert facial mimicry involves distinct facial muscle activatio

173 Covert facial mimicry involves subtle facial muscle activation

174 dividual emotion categories, suggesting that facial mimicry is emotion-specific, rather than just val

175 To test whether covert facial mimicry is emotion-specific, we measured facial e

176 MRI findings and NDD diagnoses together with facial morphological variants and genetic copy number va

177 47% female) imaged by MRI, 280 with data for facial morphological variants, and 183 for CNVs.

178 When combining the presence of MRI findings, facial morphological variants, and CNVs, statistically s

179 etween MRI findings and any NDD diagnosis or facial morphological variants; however, MRI findings wer

180 health traits were related to the macaques' facial morphology and their observed behaviour supportin

181 is did not reveal significant differences in facial morphology depending on OS levels.

182 Significant differences in the facial morphology of the pre-Columbian inhabitants of Hi

183 within the "Straight Egyptian" subgroup, for facial morphology.

184 ion despite a congenital absence of relevant facial motor representations and, therefore, unaided by

185 been claimed that certain configurations of facial movements are universally recognized as emotional

186 dyads that were able to see their partner's facial movements mapped onto their avatars liked each ot

187 hesis that people infer emotional meaning in facial movements using emotion knowledge embrained by cu

188 stures were also available and not when only facial movements were available.

189 e positively compared to those unable to see facial movements.

190 signatures, enable the reliable decoding of facial movements.

191 en they could see their partner's bodily and facial movements.

192 Covert facial mimicry involves subtle facial muscle activation in observers when they perceive

193 ther covert facial mimicry involves distinct facial muscle activation patterns across muscles per emo

194 to provide evidence for distinct patterns of facial muscle activation when viewing individual emotion

195 us research by including a greater number of facial muscle measures and emotional expressions.

196 and the emotional implications of changes in facial musculature.

197 ed by local infiltration around the lids and facial nerve (n = 6), topical anesthesia (n = 5), and ge

198 ll infiltration in the distal portion of the facial nerve after axotomy in mice.

199 Following facial nerve axotomy, nerve function is not fully restor

200 tect transected axon cell-autonomously after facial nerve axotomy.

201 Given that the facial nerve is a pure motor nerve, we presume that the

202 d macrophage accumulation was reduced in the facial nerve of CD38 KO mice after axotomy.

203 (LAI) afferent inhibition of face M1, while facial nerve stimulation evoked LAI but not SAI.

204 In contrast, facial nerve stimulation produced significant LAI (P < 0

205 d in 7 of 27 articles and included transient facial nerve weakness, persistent blue dye staining of t

206 itch evoked by electrical stimulation of the facial nerve.

207 d associative stimulation protocol using the facial nerve.

208 ferents are segregated in the trigeminal and facial nerves, respectively.

209 able to faithfully predict human scoring of facial normality.

210 n neuronal death and glial activation in the facial nucleus in the brain stem, and on axon degenerati

211 ical structures (0.47 ug . g(-1) +/- 0.10 in facial nucleus, 0.39 ug . g(-1) +/- 0.10 in choroid plex

212 showed reduced microglial activation in the facial nucleus, whereas the levels of neuronal death wer

213 After intraplantar, facial or lingual injection, Lgmn evoked nociception in

214 nd an overlapping spectrum of symptoms, with facial pain and loss of smell being the most differentia

215 p period, patients recorded daily ratings of facial pain intensity and duration; the product was comp

216 management differ among the various forms of facial pain.

217 r antagonist that is efficacious in reducing facial pain.

218 ion; the product was computed as an index of facial pain.

219 ng, static and dynamic validated scoring for facial palsy patients, and complications.

220 ical blindness/retinal detachment, temporary facial paralysis and maternal death, were adopted.

221 s preserved, and no abnormalities suggesting facial paralysis were noted.

222 gressive behaviour, facial dysmorphism, left facial paralysis, post-axial polydactyly, and for the fi

223 bility of these fish to discriminate complex facial patterns tracked categorical rather than metric d

224 trained the fish to discriminate sets of two facial patterns.

225 alized morphometric changes may underlie the facial phenotype seen in human patients with severe OI.

226 ions at the Xq13.2-q13.3 locus with a common facial phenotype, intellectual disability (ID), distinct

227 y a distinct neurologic, ophthalmologic, and facial phenotype.

228 tiple signals with associations to different facial phenotypes, and there is evidence for potential c

229 MRD2, and levator function were measured and facial photography was taken before, 1 month, and at lea

230 tment-driven classification for tooth-bound, facial PMMDs in non-molar sites, consisting of three dif

231 nconscious, covert imitation of the observed facial postures and movements.

232 Since the improvement of LF patients on facial profile and occlusion is often difficult and lack

233 OX9 expression during a restricted window of facial progenitor development at distances up to 1.45 Mb

234 Relative to no cranial or facial radiation, those who had received <= 32.00 Gy wer

235 Results suggest that facial reactions during anticipated and experienced plea

236 n lower physical effort and greater negative facial reactions during reward anticipation, especially

237 gh naltrexone led to a reduction in positive facial reactions to liked rewards during reward consumpt

238 Subjective ratings, physical effort, and facial reactions to matched primary social (affective to

239 it stands in sharp contrast to variation in facial recognition ability, which is driven mostly by ge

240 -2 VF MD remained a significant predictor of facial recognition after adjusting for potential confoun

241 heir facial similarity (human judgment and a facial recognition algorithm), we show that while spouse

242 there was a significant correlation between facial recognition and 10-2 VF MD (P < .0001 better, wor

243 Facial recognition from DNA refers to the identification

244 aucomatous macular damage exhibit diminished facial recognition, which is partly mediated through dim

245 ship between glaucomatous macular damage and facial recognition.

246 way between macular damage and impairment of facial recognition.

247 A fundamental task for the facial reconstructive surgeon is to answer that question

248 We report facial retransplantation in a man, 8 years after his fir

249 linical report of the first documented human facial retransplantation is proof-of-concept that the lo

250 ve faces, represent an attentional effect to facial salience rather than to their rewarding propertie

251 The origins of pai-facial selectivities in the borohydride reduction of end

252 related catalysts, and a totally unexpected facial selectivity inversion was also noticed.

253 their observed behaviour supporting a shared facial signalling system in primates.

254 pproaches risk missing potentially important facial signals and within-person variability in expressi

255 two independent methods of estimating their facial similarity (human judgment and a facial recogniti

256 continue to regulate the number of teeth and facial size of modern humans in a coordinated manner.

257 dification of the pharyngeal soft tissues or facial skeleton to enlarge the upper airway.

258 e, osteoid seams were evident throughout the facial skeleton.

259 d tissue, smaller airways, and smaller lower facial skeletons from measurements of the mandible and l

260 to evaluate the uptake of APIs within human facial skin and confirm accurate drug delivery, a select

261 hat the skin organoids are equivalent to the facial skin of human fetuses in the second trimester of

262 Linear changes of facial soft-tissue resorption at immediately placed impl

263 testing of an integrated system for decoding facial strains and for predicting facial kinematics.

264 at the brain's neural suppression of average facial structure facilitates recognition by promoting th

265 rate that the dynamic suppression of average facial structure plays a prominent role in the responses

266 s that the brain computes and stores average facial structure, which it then uses to efficiently dete

267 tches exhibited robust tuning around average facial structure.

268 rtical areas specialized for the analysis of facial structure.

269 nt of Sox9 dosage perturbation to developing facial structures through context-specific enhancer acti

270 2; rhinorrhoea OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.86; facial sweating OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.93).

271 y outcomes, subjects reported less bruising, facial swelling, and use of ice pack for the ERL group.

272 Intraoral, throat and facial swellings, but no systemic reaction were observed

273 gy of several disorders involving the cranio-facial system.

274 er immediate provisionalization can preserve facial tissue contour remains undetermined.

275 in patients with limb amputations or severe facial tissue loss.

276 cular region was captured through noncontact facial topography mapping.

277 experiments with live guenons, showing that facial traits critical for accurate classification influ

278 ation is proof-of-concept that the loss of a facial transplant after CAMR can be mitigated successful

279 ograft necrosis and the eventual loss of the facial transplant, the desensitisation protocol used for

280 plantation in a man, 8 years after his first facial transplantation because of extensive disfiguremen

281 oughout the planning and operative stages of facial transplantation by performing a critical analysis

282 Since the first successful facial transplantation in 2005, the benefits of this pro

283 istidine (His134) of the 2-His-1-carboxylate facial triad, instead of assuming the offline-binding mo

284 Our finding that variation in facial trustworthiness evaluation is driven mostly by pe

285 epidemiological dynamics of Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease (DFTD), a fatal, transmissible canc

286 Devil facial tumour 1 (DFT1) is a transmissible cancer clone e

287 el was used to capture the key dimensions of facial variance across frames.

288 er emotional and non-emotional dimensions of facial variance.

289 de significant) associated with normal-range facial variation.

290 Facial vascularized composite allotransplantation (fVCA)

291 onstructed with high fidelity using only the facial video and PCA.

292 a 25% or higher improvement from baseline in facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) at week 24 w

293 Facial volume changes at 12 months remained significantl

294 patients, which persisted in 3 at 4 months; facial weakness in 3 patients, which persisted in 1 at 4

295 reas 20.1% present incomplete phenotype with facial weakness or scapular girdle weakness, 6.7% displa

296 rats and mice, where the arrangement of the facial whiskers is preserved in the arrangement of cell

297 ats, employ cyclic scanning motions of their facial whiskers to explore their proximal surrounding, a

298 ienced influences the rate of growth of this facial white patch, and this suggests a mechanistic link

299 ntrast, we find that Boc deletion results in facial widening that correlates with increased HH target

300 ived BoNT injections to treat hyperhidrosis, facial wrinkles, migraine prophylaxis, spasticity, and s