ライフサイエンスコーパス: facial expression

1 otential threat (i.e., suspicious or fearful facial expression).

2 f emotional information (fearful and neutral facial expressions).

3 y viewed as being specialized for processing facial expression.

4 ing macaque faces depicting the fear grimace facial expression.

5 rocessing of facial affect during changes in facial expression.

6 prosody and through the face in the form of facial expression.

7 ical or continuous neural representations of facial expression.

8 cement and decreased recognition of negative facial expression.

9 nisms that participate in self-monitoring of facial expression.

10 mood and attenuated recognition of negative facial expression.

11 n between simultaneous speech production and facial expression.

12 passive viewing of dynamic angry and neutral facial expressions.

13 uralistic angry, fearful, happy, and neutral facial expressions.

14 l vocalizations (e.g., crying), and (silent) facial expressions.

15 a are essential for the voluntary control of facial expressions.

16 in eye contact, gaze follow, and reciprocate facial expressions.

17 n produce an extraordinarily large number of facial expressions.

18 wing the positive anticipation and agonistic facial expressions.

19 various visual cues, such as eye contact and facial expressions.

20 onset, to fearful, but not neutral or happy, facial expressions.

21 creased amygdala responsiveness to emotional facial expressions.

22 y derived from neural responses to emotional facial expressions.

23 d expressive reactions to negative emotional facial expressions.

24 ce for a facilitation of processing positive facial expressions.

25 random, and did so using neutral or fearful facial expressions.

26 pothalamus, and periaqueductal grey to angry facial expressions.

27 vity, and left amygdala response to negative facial expressions.

28 sociability and enhanced recognition of sad facial expressions.

29 ongside emotional words, stories, movies, or facial expressions.

30 enhanced recognition of positive vs negative facial expressions.

31 al pyramidal motor system controls voluntary facial expressions.

32 ed through modification of ancestral primate facial expressions.

33 have evolved from ancestral primate rhythmic facial expressions.

34 ala to angry and fearful compared with happy facial expressions.

35 nts, only one was impaired at the imagery of facial expressions.

36 ciality, pleasure, and motivation, and coded facial expressions.

37 tivity, and autonomic responses to emotional facial expressions.

38 including gaze direction, body gesture, and facial expressions.

39 whether similar overlap occurs in real-life facial expressions.

40 in transmitting diagnostic cues for decoding facial expressions.

41 -specific modulation of spatial attention to facial expressions.

42 th amygdala responsiveness to threat-related facial expressions.

43 roduction) or lagged (monitor) initiation of facial expressions.

44 acial features in processing of naturalistic facial expressions.

45 showing similar biases for detecting fearful facial expressions.

46 and a stranger showing either happy or angry facial expressions.

47 ll stimuli, including social signals such as facial expressions.

48 recognition of faces and interpretations of facial expressions.

49 on their recognition of six basic emotional facial expressions.

50 ity of a BCI to display emotions by decoding facial expressions.

51 n of fearful, happy, angry, sad, and neutral facial expressions.

52 context-sensitivity in the interpretation of facial expressions.

53 emotional spoken sentences with accompanying facial expressions.

54 otions through electroencephalogram (EEG) or facial expressions.

55 nd increase attentional bias toward positive facial expressions.

56 ve effect on their behavior towards aversive facial expressions.

57 mely, affective multimedia content, EEG, and facial expressions.

58 l touch and attentional bias toward positive facial expressions.

59 ammals, since dogs do not display human-like facial expressions.

60 ained visuocortical facilitation to aversive facial expressions.

61 amygdala and hypothalamus responses to angry facial expressions.

62 Most mammalian species produce facial expressions.

63 g competitions) are associated with specific facial expressions(14) across different cultures.

64 ization (39.4%), social behavior (21.8%) and facial expressions (16%).

65 ts [1] to exhibit and recognize a variety of facial expressions [2].

66 right amygdala habituation to threat-related facial expressions, a phenotype associated with resilien

67 tested whether these individuals can imagine facial expressions, a process also hypothesized to be un

68 fically, while the perception of incongruent facial expressions activates somatosensory-related repre

69 These findings confirm that, like for facial expression, adolescents' recognition of basic emo

70 -oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response on a facial expression affective-reactivity task in both elde

71 significantly more infants had no change in facial expression after sucrose administration (seven of

72 In response to viewing facial expressions, all participant groups showed compar

73 responsiveness of this structure to fearful facial expressions, an effect that predicts superior per

74 Quantitative facial expression analyses successfully verified the pos

75 ding changes in volition/motivation, posture/facial expression and derealization/depersonalization.

76 Facial expression and eye gaze provide a shared signal a

77 y of our lineage, including the evolution of facial expression and facial asymmetry.

78 n perception of basic social signals such as facial expression and gaze direction, and preferential a

79 tigate this view, the present study examines facial expression and identity recognition abilities in

80 the probability density function of neutral facial expression and the natural logarithm of mode on t

81 nd a double dissociation of areas processing facial expression and those processing head orientation.

82 where it might be implicated in controlling facial expression and urinary voiding, and also in bladd

83 the synergic action of muscles implicated in facial expression and urine voiding.

84 pecific "preparatory" system learns aversive facial expressions and autonomic responses such as skin

85 f repeated oxytocin on autistic individuals' facial expressions and demonstrated a time-course change

86 mygdala hold information about self-executed facial expressions and demonstrates an intimate overlap

87 he question of whether we can identify fetal facial expressions and determine their developmental pro

88 g was qualitatively similar across different facial expressions and different intensities.

89 ie clips are most correlated with changes in facial expressions and EEG.

90 nly underpinned by brain regions involved in facial expressions and emotion recognition processing.

91 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (emotional facial expressions and executive functioning) and were c

92 They tend to ascribe anger to ambiguous facial expressions and exhibit enhanced and prolonged re

93 tage to induce in viewer monkeys spontaneous facial expressions and looking patterns in the laborator

94 cifically painful, angry, happy, and neutral facial expressions and questionnaires including a measur

95 dala processes both the degree of emotion in facial expressions and the categorical ambiguity of the

96 g control over enactment of subtly different facial expressions and therefore skills in emotional com

97 hich measured amygdala responsivity to angry facial expressions and ventral striatum responsivity to

98 aces varying freely in viewpoint, hairstyle, facial expression, and age; and for well known cars embe

99 fect expressions but not positive or neutral facial expressions, and impaired in Stroop cognitive con

100 MA impaired recognition of angry and fearful facial expressions, and the larger dose (1.5 mg/kg) incr

101 Facial expressions appear to exert special influence ove

102 Facial expressions are a central part of human communica

103 Facial expressions are considered sensitive indicators o

104 Facial expressions are important for intentional display

105 Because facial expressions are indeed created by moving one's fa

106 roducing facial expressions, suggesting that facial expressions are not just inflexible and involunta

107 Perceptual biases for fearful facial expressions are observed across many studies.

108 arch using CFS has demonstrated that fearful facial expressions are prioritised by the visual system

109 In humans, facial expressions are rich sources of social informatio

110 study, we aimed to test whether domestic dog facial expressions are subject to audience effects and/

111 Emotional facial expressions are thought to have evolved because t

112 Although facial expressions are widely considered to be the unive

113 rimate lineage, also have the ability to use facial expressions as a means of gaining social informat

114 ed significant progress towards more complex facial expressions as gestational age increased.

115 Whether the brain represents facial expressions as perceptual continua or as emotion

116 ontrollable appearance cues (e.g., clothing, facial expressions) as shown previously, but also by fea

117 hes in the STS fundus were most sensitive to facial expression, as was the amygdala, whereas those on

118 ") and using manual analysis with changes in facial expressions assessed using the Mouse Grimace Scal

119 ively studied the human ability to recognize facial expressions associated with dog emotions (hereaft

120 to approach photographic stimuli displaying facial expressions associated with positive attention an

121 ponent displays either an angry or a neutral facial expression at the beginning of each trial and del

122 contextual modulations of the processing of facial expressions at a neuronal level.

123 assessment while viewing fearful and neutral facial expressions at baseline and again 8 weeks later.

124 the extent to which mothers mirrored infant facial expressions at two months postpartum predicted in

125 ing facial proportions, but the same neutral facial expression, baldhead and skin tone, as stimuli.

126 with refractory epilepsy and classified five facial expressions, based on neural activity.

127 g newer brain-computer interfaces as well as facial-expression-based algorithms to read emotional res

128 ere, we demonstrate the utility of surprised facial expressions because exemplars within this emotion

129 "pain/distress" also demonstrates that this facial expression becomes significantly more complete as

130 o matrix of fearful, sad, happy, and neutral facial expressions before they were deployed to Iraq.

131 entials (nociceptive cortical activity), and facial expression (behavior) were acquired in individual

132 d manifested as subtle changes in providers' facial expression behaviours during the clinical interac

133 tive ratings, skin conductance responses and facial expression behaviours.

134 hemodynamic response to implicitly presented facial expressions between depressed and healthy control

135 thiness or attractiveness, but we found only facial expressions biased decisions.

136 is a key structure for processing emotional facial expressions, but it remains unclear what aspects

137 Facial expressions can be either voluntarily or emotiona

138 als, the analytical methods used to quantify facial expressions can be subjective, relying heavily on

139 Facial expressions carry key information about an indivi

140 d the dimension of valence within the single facial expression category of surprise.

141 Assessment of facial expression changes, as a novel means of pain scor

142 For example, when a person's facial expression changes, we are given information abou

143 Understanding the degree to which human facial expressions co-vary with specific social contexts

144 the probability density function of neutral facial expression compared with placebo in exploratory (

145 eases in these indices characterize autistic facial expression, compared with neurotypical individual

146 lcus was equally sensitive to all changes in facial expression, consistent with a continuous represen

147 universal language of emotion, some negative facial expressions consistently elicit lower recognition

148 at information about both dynamic and static facial expressions could be robustly decoded from Mf are

149 acebo showed reduced recognition of positive facial expressions, decreased speed in responding to pos

150 fundamental role in enhancing recognition of facial expression despite the complex stimulus changes a

151 or faces learnt through video clips, dynamic facial expression did not create better transfer of lear

152 Gender discrimination of the same facial expressions did not modulate somatosensory-evoked

153 o segments depicting appeasing or aggressive facial expressions directed at the viewer.

154 for differences in the looking patterns and facial expressions displayed by the viewers.

155 years] passively viewed videos of universal facial expressions during functional MRI acquisition, wi

156 This bias may arise because facial expressions evoke positive and negative emotional

157 We investigated whether non-rigid motion of facial expression facilitates the learning process.

158 resonance scanning while viewing pictures of facial expressions from the Ekman and Friesen series.

159 We found that facial expressions, functional status entailing extremit

160 such as eye-contact induced reciprocation of facial expression, gaze aversion, and gaze following, th

161 We found that each kind of facial expression had distinct associations with a set o

162 The availability of facial expressions had a positive effect on interpersona

163 mans have revealed that the motor control of facial expressions has a distributed neural representati

164 Historically, animal facial expressions have been considered inflexible and i

165 namic relation between speech production and facial expression in children with autism and to establi

166 This study demonstrates how differences in facial expression in emotionally ambiguous contexts may

167 s unclear to what extent there exists common facial expression in species more phylogenetically dista

168 The authors examined neural responses to facial expressions in adults and adolescents with social

169 monstrated elevated responses to threatening facial expressions in amygdala, as well as left fusiform

170 recognition of positive relative to negative facial expressions in an emotional test battery.

171 We examined dogs' facial expressions in contexts presumed to induce both p

172 esent Review deals with the motor control of facial expressions in humans.

173 r system during observation and execution of facial expressions in nine-month-old infants, implicatin

174 quantify and compare human and domestic dog facial expressions in response to emotionally-competent

175 t of sensorimotor alpha in the processing of facial expressions, including affect.

176 amygdala responded selectively to changes in facial expression, independent of changes in identity.

177 te valence for the remaining stimulus (e.g., facial expressions), indicating a representation of vale

178 ade trials with pain faces relative to other facial expressions, indicating a difficulty disinhibitin

179 gnition contend that to understand another's facial expressions, individuals map the perceived expres

180 Advice from partners making a fearful facial expression influenced participants' decisions mor

181 ce-selective areas exhibited relatively less facial expression information.

182 do not seem to be affected by facial injury, facial expression, intellectual disability, drug history

183 resentative values of objectively quantified facial expression intensity in a repeatable part of the

184 recognition has been dominated by studies on facial expression interpretation; very little is known a

185 Facial expression is a common channel for the communicat

186 nd emotion ambiguity (the uncertainty that a facial expression is categorized as fearful or happy).

187 er a resolution to the controversy about how facial expression is processed in the brain by showing t

188 It is widely assumed that identifying facial expression is the key to this, and models of emot

189 Processing facial expressions is an essential component of social i

190 Keeping track of self-executed facial expressions is essential for the ability to corre

191 evidence linking social context to specific facial expressions is sparse and is largely based on sur

192 Emotion processing-including signals from facial expressions-is often altered in individuals with

193 Our analyses of facial expression judgments of likely voters are consist

194 llingness to consume a food and not just the facial expressions made during feeding.

195 tofrontal cortex (OFC) struggle to recognize facial expressions, make poor social judgments, and freq

196 A small number of facial expressions may be universal in that they are pro

197 he right pSTS were better at differentiating facial expressions measured outside of the scanner.

198 We previously showed that facial expressions modulate functional MRI activity in t

199 screen) evoked by the perception of various facial expressions (neutral, fearful, aggressive, and ap

200 ated whether gaze cues paired with emotional facial expressions (neutral, happy, suspicious and fears

201 Images of four distinct monkey facial expressions--neutral, aggressive (open mouth thre

202 volume and reduced responsiveness to fearful facial expressions observed in psychopathic individuals.

203 we examined the extent to which 16 types of facial expression occurred systematically in thousands o

204 association tracts in the recognition of the facial expression of emotion and identify specific tract

205 acial movements coalesce into a recognisable facial expression of pain/distress.

206 e correlates with asymmetry, indicating that facial expression of the mouse is itself correlated with

207 inadequate to reliably distinguish universal facial expressions of "fear" and "disgust." Rather than

208 uman speech rhythm evolved from the rhythmic facial expressions of ancestral primates.

209 Finally, it suggests that the forms of human facial expressions of anger and happiness may have coevo

210 enteen healthy participants (8 females) with facial expressions of anger, disgust, fear, happiness, s

211 Here we investigated whether facial expressions of different basic emotions modulate

212 ccurred, infants were less likely to display facial expressions of distaste initially when eating the

213 HCF infants displayed fewer facial expressions of distaste while eating the bitter a

214 ACS, an anatomically-based method for coding facial expressions of dogs, we found that the "Ears addu

215 se to morphed images to directly address how facial expressions of emotion are represented in the bra

216 nts from both cultures visually discriminate facial expressions of emotion by relying on culturally d

217 Modulation of the processing of facial expressions of emotion by serotonin significantly

218 iological and social evolutionary pressures, facial expressions of emotion comprise specific facial m

219 & Scholl (F&S), we have shown that perceived facial expressions of emotion depend on the congruency b

220 However, many more facial expressions of emotion exist and are used regular

221 The commonality of facial expressions of emotion has been studied in differ

222 Past research on facial expressions of emotion has focused on the study o

223 Darwin's seminal works, the universality of facial expressions of emotion has remained one of the lo

224 Here, we show that dynamic facial expressions of emotion provide a sophisticated si

225 Understanding the different categories of facial expressions of emotion regularly used by us is es

226 d Bayesian classifiers, we show that dynamic facial expressions of emotion transmit an evolving hiera

227 systematically vary intensities of six basic facial expressions of emotion, and employed a self-paced

228 r results question the universality of human facial expressions of emotion, highlighting their true c

229 uring subliminal and supraliminal viewing of facial expressions of emotion.

230 heir mental representations of the six basic facial expressions of emotion.

231 lood oxygenation level-dependent response to facial expressions of emotion.

232 in behavioral as well as neural responses to facial expressions of emotion.

233 pyramidal system enables humans to simulate facial expressions of emotions not actually experienced.

234 trapyramidal motor system drives spontaneous facial expressions of felt emotions, and a cortical pyra

235 and 7-month old infants were presented with facial expressions of happiness, anger, and fear.

236 ng participants (N = 20) were presented with facial expressions of happy and sad emotion at three int

237 imuli depicting individuals being harmed and facial expressions of pain were compared between incarce

238 and anger, and no impairment in recognizing facial expressions of surprise or happiness.

239 (Equus caballus) could discriminate between facial expressions of their conspecifics captured in dif

240 in a new expression after several different facial expressions of these faces had been shown during

241 Viewing facial expressions often evokes facial responses in the

242 to assess either a monkey's ability to match facial expressions or facial identities.

243 oscience mainly focused on the processing of facial expressions, overlooking the exploration of emoti

244 cific aspects of the endogenous Hmx1 lateral facial expression pattern.

245 ain activation in regions involved in infant facial expression processing and empathic and mentalizin

246 onth-old infants, implicating this system in facial expression processing from a very young age.

247 nd the left fusiform gyrus, recruited during facial expression processing, were positively correlated

248 arning and abnormal neural activation during facial expression processing.

249 Emotional facial expressions provide important nonverbal cues in h

250 A popular hypothesis holds that efficient facial expression recognition cannot be achieved by visu

251 dividuals can achieve normotypical efficient facial expression recognition despite a congenital absen

252 t the neural computations that contribute to facial expression recognition in each region are functio

253 ous work has tested this theory by examining facial expression recognition in participants with Mobiu

254 Reverse simulation models of facial expression recognition suggest that we recognize

255 gnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and (ii) the facial expression recognition task (FERT), a decision-ma

256 s (rpSTS) that responds more strongly during facial expression recognition tasks than during facial i

257 d nonsynesthetic participants on measures of facial expression recognition, but not on control measur

258 ery of emotional processing tasks comprising facial expression recognition, emotional categorization,

259 o reconsider the role of motor simulation in facial expression recognition.

260 What mechanisms underlie facial expression recognition?

261 in such images resemble more natural ambient facial expressions remains unclear.

262 Facial expressions represent one of the most salient cue

263 ychology propound that visual recognition of facial expressions requires an intermediate step to iden

264 the signs (which was related to the ongoing facial expression research at the research centre).

265 Further comparison between individual facial expressions revealed that although proportional g

266 of unknown conspecifics portraying different facial expressions, showing appropriate behavioural and

267 Here, focusing on the decoding of facial expression signals, we merge behavioral and compu

268 n covert vigilance and avoidance of aversive facial expressions, social anxiety appears to confer a s

269 that a combination of head orientation with facial expression, specifically involving both the eyes

270 completed the anti-saccade task with dynamic facial expressions, specifically painful, angry, happy,

271 reated second-order faces with happy and sad facial expressions specified solely by local directions

272 ants attended to the emotion category of the facial expression, suggesting an interaction between the

273 the human's attentional state when producing facial expressions, suggesting that facial expressions a

274 Early in the signaling dynamics, facial expressions systematically transmit few, biologic

275 of 10 Hz for 500 ms, selectively impaired a facial expression task but had no effect on a matched fa

276 ttle is known about the form and function of facial expression temporal dynamics.

277 r activations to fearful relative to neutral facial expressions than did healthy comparison subjects

278 esults reveal fine-grained patterns in human facial expressions that are preserved across the modern

279 Direct gaze is an integral part of facial expressions that signals cooperation or conflict

280 ear (happy, angry) and ambiguous (surprised) facial expressions, then re-rated similar stimuli after

281 The systematic study of facial expressions through a computerised system has ide

282 Do facial expressions transmit diagnostic signals simultane

283 a responses tracked the valence of surprised facial expressions, unconfounded by arousal.

284 UFS is also characterized by an abnormal facial expression upon smiling, and bilateral weakness i

285 cant risk of kidney failure, and an abnormal facial expression upon smiling, laughing, and crying.

286 ted amygdala reactivity to fearful and angry facial expressions using functional magnetic resonance i

287 r social information conveyed by conspecific facial expressions using the framework of optimal foragi

288 CFS, and shows that the visibility of facial expressions vary according to how they are normal

289 vocal tract during lip-smacking (a rhythmic facial expression) versus chewing.

290 y binding together social signals carried by facial expressions, vocalizations, and social grooming.S

291 the probability density function of neutral facial expression was found in confirmatory trial (P < 0

292 -modal coordination of speech production and facial expression was greater when the neurotypical chil

293 image onset, and identity across a change in facial expression was uniquely associated with neural pa

294 nisms that participate in self-monitoring of facial expression, we simultaneously recorded the elicit

295 Ekman facial expressions were also used to quantify emotion re

296 Sample images of their facial expressions were collected from 230 human subject

297 However, when responses to all facial expressions were combined, pediatric patients exh

298 Amygdala responses to emotional facial expressions were examined in pediatric (N=18) and

299 , regions varied in how frequently different facial expressions were produced as a function of which

300 ey watched videos of conspecifics displaying facial expressions with direct or averted gaze.

301 aging to measure neural responses to dynamic facial expressions with positive and negative valence an