コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 itch evoked by electrical stimulation of the facial nerve.
2 uality depends primarily on the input of the facial nerve.
3 aneous rami of spinal nerves, but not by the facial nerve.
4 rlapping with the area of termination of the facial nerve.
5 ists for neurovascular contact involving the facial nerve.
6 lar compression of the proximal intracranial facial nerve.
7 resection, or radiation of a tumor near the facial nerve.
8 ves no motor or sensory innervation from the facial nerve.
9 d associative stimulation protocol using the facial nerve.
10 ese most likely represent motoneurons of the facial nerve.
11 well as the motor root of the trigeminal and facial nerves.
12 celerates the functional recovery of injured facial nerves.
13 ) in Schwann cells as well as in sciatic and facial nerves.
14 ry neurons located lateral and dorsal to the facial nerve-a region we termed the parafacial zone (PZ)
17 were located ventrally to the nucleus of the facial nerve and extended from the caudal part of the nu
18 to originate from the recurrent ramus of the facial nerve and from dorsal rami of the spinal cord, de
19 gene deletion only results in defects in the facial nerve and not the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerv
20 r sectioning the ipsilateral branches of the facial nerve and resecting the superior cervical ganglia
22 er that is characterized by paralysis of the facial nerves and variable other congenital anomalies.
24 rating distance A (p = 0.003) and horizontal facial nerve angle (p = 0.017) explained 44.0-59.9% of t
25 st every 1-degree increase in the horizontal facial nerve angle was associated with an 18.1% increase
30 ermined that the mSOD1 molecular response to facial nerve axotomy is phenotypically regenerative and
31 n the current investigation, we utilized the facial nerve axotomy model and a presymptomatic amyotrop
32 FMN loss after axotomy, we superimposed the facial nerve axotomy model on presymptomatic mSOD1 mice
33 /- mice showed increased rate of death after facial nerve axotomy, a response documented for SOD1-/-
39 lence of neurovascular contact involving the facial nerve can be as high as 51% in patients asymptoma
41 o surgery, and certainly after injury to the facial nerve, clinicians should consider the patient's g
43 genic injury to the temporal branches of the facial nerve (CN VII) is the leading postoperative compl
44 e hypertonicity of muscles innervated by the facial nerve, commonly attributed to the aberrant regene
45 the treatment of adult mice with LiCl after facial nerve crush injury stimulated the expression of m
47 without CNTFRalpha, even when challenged by facial nerve crush or the injection-associated trauma, t
51 There is a 16.0% incidence of postoperative facial nerve damage with TABs, which recovers fully in o
56 ngeal nerve and was not sufficient to rescue facial nerve defects, suggesting that FGF8 is functional
57 xin conveyed SEMA3/neuropilin signals during facial nerve development, we combined an expression anal
61 t, share the same migratory behaviour to the facial nerve exit points and express the same markers as
62 internal carotid arteries) or osteichthyans (facial nerve exiting through jugular canal, endolymphati
63 means of pulsed magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve for the purpose of increasing cerebral bloo
64 providing normal viability as well as proper facial nerve formation even in the Hoxb1 mutant backgrou
69 hiomeric motor neurons of the trigeminal and facial nerves generate spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients th
70 imaging of axial cryosections of human cross-facial nerve grafts demonstrated enhanced resolution of
75 tine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the facial nerve in patients with suspected idiopathic perip
77 rning algorithm to predict the likelihood of facial nerve injury following microsurgical resection of
78 of motor versus sensory nerve grafting after facial nerve injury has not been previously investigated
80 nerve injury is disabling for patients, and facial nerve injury is particularly debilitating due to
83 When validated via prospective assessment of facial nerve injury risk, this model demonstrated 84% ac
84 bgaleal hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, facial nerve injury, and brachial plexus injury (BPI).
85 ation, defined as House-Brackmann (HB) I vs. facial nerve injury, defined as HB II-VI, as determined
91 deformity of the susceptible portion of the facial nerve is highly associated with the symptomatic s
92 yngeal and vagus nerves, suggesting that the facial nerve is most sensitive to perturbations in RTK s
94 ha-internexin protein expression after three facial nerve lesion paradigms: crush, transection, and r
95 lled forelimb training in conjunction with a facial nerve lesion, cholinergic mechanisms were require
98 ed by local infiltration around the lids and facial nerve (n = 6), topical anesthesia (n = 5), and ge
99 ), among whom 106 (94.6%) showed evidence of facial nerve neuritis on the affected side (hypersignal
100 sates at the level of the caudal pole of the facial nerve nucleus in the rostral medulla oblongata.
103 nerve innervation to fungiform papillae, the facial nerve of developing animals was labeled with the
104 g to decipher predictive factors relevant to facial nerve outcomes following microsurgical resection
112 re, analysis of the number of admissions for facial nerve palsy during the same period in preceding y
113 Thirty-seven patients were admitted for facial nerve palsy during the study period, 22 (59.5%) o
114 son with the overall number of patients with facial nerve palsy in preceding years was performed.
119 he underlying anatomy and pathophysiology of facial nerve palsy, while also exploring different treat
128 sions in 23 percent, arthritis in 6 percent, facial-nerve palsy in 3 percent, aseptic meningitis in 2
129 rogens enhance both functional recovery from facial nerve paralysis and the rate of regeneration in t
130 rove understanding and clinical treatment of facial nerve paralysis, mitigating facial asymmetry, abe
133 g experiments for the study of the autonomic facial nerve pathway in birds in terms of both its anato
134 rm the somatic motor component of the VIIth (facial) nerve, possibly through a failure to specify the
135 ised machine learning classifiers to predict facial nerve preservation, defined as House-Brackmann (H
137 the sural nerve can be successfully used for facial nerve reconstruction research in a clinically rel
138 ine sural nerve as a potential candidate for facial nerve reconstruction, and performed its histologi
140 changes, PTEN deletion positively regulated facial nerve regeneration and recovery of whisker moveme
144 ode at the facial motor nerve and found that facial nerve spiking is functionally associated with the
149 enuated the cerebral vasodilator response to facial nerve stimulation when applied locally to the cor
150 evelopment of a non-invasive pulsed magnetic facial nerve stimulator that will increase CBF as a trea
151 contact along the intracranial course of the facial nerve, the culprit vessel, and the severity of co
152 xamined motor versus sensory grafting of the facial nerve to investigate effect of pathway on regener
153 s 4 and 5 underwent surgical severing of the facial nerve (to cause complete paralysis of the OOM).
154 t neurons, located dorsal to the genu of the facial nerve, to the cerebellar flocculus and ventral pa
156 adult male hamsters were subjected to right facial nerve transection at the stylomastoid foramen.
162 forms of plasticity within the motor cortex: facial nerve transections evoke reorganization of cortic
163 r contact of the intracranial segment of the facial nerve typically occurs at one point, involving th
165 graded as contact alone (vessel touching the facial nerve) versus deformity (indentation or deviation
166 ng the first and second transplantation, the facial nerve was coapted at the level of the branches.
170 d in 7 of 27 articles and included transient facial nerve weakness, persistent blue dye staining of t
172 rm the somatic motor component of the VIIth (facial) nerve which controls the muscles of facial expre
174 hat carry a risk of iatrogenic injury to the facial nerve, which can significantly impact patients' q
175 RP/PLXN signalling in the development of the facial nerve, which contains axons from two motor neuron
178 ry sulci, olfactory bulbs and oculomotor and facial nerves, which support underlying abnormalities in
179 suspected BP underwent an MRI of the entire facial nerve with a double-blind reading of all images.
180 is an acute and idiopathic paralysis of the facial nerve, with an estimated incidence ranging from 1
181 focal magnetic field was directed toward the facial nerve within the temporal bone by placing a 6.5 c