戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 withholding action would have been correct ("false alarms").
2 emory responses (intrusions, perseverations, false alarms).
3 st levels, including contrast of zero (i.e., false alarms).
4  pain is maladaptive, essentially an ongoing false alarm.
5 he collaborative pipeline, without excessive false alarms.
6 ore accurate AF identification and to reduce false alarms.
7 ith multiple sources, missed detections, and false alarms.
8 y in fuel limited biomes, often resulting in false alarms.
9 maintaining a sensible balance of missed and false alarms.
10 e emergency warnings of volcanic activity as false alarms.
11 ns (i.e., pattern completion) underlies lure false alarms.
12 plify local responses to threats and prevent false alarms.
13 f medical equipment is intimately related to false alarms.
14 ing FN400 and LPC modulation associated with false alarms.
15 with FASD, the ethanol-exposed rats had more false alarms.
16  them for late or missed predictions and for false alarms.
17 d sensitivity, greater automation, and fewer false alarms.
18 onservative strategy is optimal for avoiding false alarms.
19 nals and in fact many signals turn out to be false alarms.
20 d proactively, potentially at the expense of false alarms.
21 eads to higher prestimulus activity and more false alarms.
22 the strongest predictor of the likelihood of false alarming.
23  see text] (thus reducing the probability of false alarms about pathogen adaptation).
24  human evaluators can discriminate Hits from False Alarms above chance levels, based on the justifica
25 ast to leading models of recognition memory, false alarms also appeared to be based partially on reco
26 al data and the developed method, we compute false alarm and miss error probabilities in wild-type ce
27 , the method computes and reveals changes in false alarm and miss probabilities in A20-deficient cell
28 two types of incorrect cell decisions called false alarm and miss.
29 nistration, reflected in both an increase in false alarms and a reduction in detected targets.
30 y improved over time, through a reduction in false alarms and an increase in speed, with no significa
31 , with within-trial pitch shifting elevating false alarms and extending reaction times.
32                                          The false alarms and security accompanying aminotransferase
33 fs and experiences who are not ill may raise false alarms and serve as adversarial examples to such n
34 fying more deteriorating patients with fewer false alarms and sufficient time to intervene.
35 ith justifications corresponding to Hits and False Alarms and were asked to directly assess whether t
36                    To minimize the number of false alarms, animals have evolved a variety of physiolo
37 erable prior efforts to address the problem, false alarms are a continuing problem in the ICUs.
38        According to signal detection theory, false alarms are attributed to noise in the visual nervo
39         Our results suggest the same outward false alarm behavior can be attributed to two different
40                Enhancing hits and generating false alarms both scaled with stimulation intensity.
41 eaction times to targets, and committed more false alarms but had comparable detection accuracy to yo
42  performance, decreasing hits and increasing false alarms, but not altering reaction times.
43 re are many instances in which it generates "false alarms," causing animals to reject harmless foods.
44 on dynamics and faster response time and (2) false alarms due to unstable sensory activity consistent
45 d purposes, and in other settings, to avoid "false" alarms due to isolated events and homogenize the
46            Though it led to a high number of false alarms, especially in the most vulnerable infants.
47                                         That false alarms evoked more activity than misses indicates
48 arison, suppressing PM selectively increased false alarm (FA) rates during contrast detection, withou
49 ience has focused on experiments that induce false alarms (FAs) in healthy participants,(1)(,)(2)(,)(
50 atients showed significantly higher rates of false alarms following incorrect cues ("BX" errors) and
51                            Unit staffing and false alarm frequency were not associated with response
52 railing of the immune system may result from false alarms generated by the innate immune system, resu
53                              We propose the "false alarm" hypothesis, in which AGEs that are present
54                 Peak shifting also may cause false alarms if target peaks shift out of or interfering
55  the opposite direction, leading to elevated false alarms in a simulated baggage search.
56 cantly affected the detection of targets and false alarms in both tasks.
57 l cholinergic inputs increased the number of false alarms in nonsignal trials.
58 , including speech, a pre-requisite to avoid false alarms in normal vocal communication.
59 ion sensitivity (proportion of hits in go vs false alarms in stop trials; p = 0.003).
60  as its proxy the average occurrence rate of false alarms, in that a false alarm risks unnecessary so
61 ates should be considered marginal or likely false alarms, including Kepler 186f with 20% FAP.
62 ks" inside or outside boundary regions (hits/false alarms), inserted earlier or later within those re
63                In biological terms, a higher false alarm metric in this abnormal TNF signaling system
64 the usual signal detection categories: hits, false alarms, misses and correct rejects.
65 ened by the absence of group differences for false alarms, omissions, and off-task behaviors.
66 more stable; and (3) low stability predicted false alarms on a single-trial level, and this relations
67 reases in reaction time (RT) variability and false alarms on choice reaction time (CRT) tasks.
68 s on the "mismatch" condition, but also more false alarms on the "match" condition.
69 etection of letters on the identity task and false alarms on the rhyme task.
70 interacted with memory load in its effect on false alarms on the rhyme task.
71 n as well as during false recognition (i.e., false alarms) or whether false recognition resembles fam
72            For both databases, the number of false alarms per hour reached values less than 0.5/h for
73 stimating their statistical significance via false alarm probability (FAP) is crucial for their valid
74       Nearby collinear flankers increase the false alarm rate (reports of the target being present wh
75  could be used to design a sensor with a low false alarm rate and an excellent ability to discriminat
76             Across flank distances, both the false alarm rate and d' (with no external noise) are cor
77  associated with longer trial sequences; (2) false alarm rate decreased (and response times slowed) w
78 le a high probability of detection and a low false alarm rate if an adequate number of such particles
79 ed the amount of external noise at which the false alarm rate increases by the radical2 (which we ref
80 work achieved a balanced accuracy of >= 71%, false alarm rate of <= 2.3 alarm/patient/year with a med
81 use in under 10 minutes, while maintaining a false alarm rate of 0.014 per minute.
82                           The detector had a false alarm rate of only 0.31 per day and a positive pre
83                          The sensitivity and false alarm rate of the proposed AM peak model are found
84                          Behavioural hit and false alarm rate patterns were consistent with this, and
85 ith statistically significant improvement in false alarm rate while simultaneously addressing the iss
86 aired ability to reject new items (increased false alarm rate), whereas the identification of old ite
87 y (d') and increasing the filling-in effect (False Alarm rate).
88 tify nearly 80% of BIPAP failures with a 50% false alarm rate, equal to an NNA of 2.
89 dularity levels were associated with a lower false alarm rate.
90 e, and resistance to dirt with an acceptable false alarm rate.
91 te extended field operation with an ultralow false alarm rate.
92 ies (>10(6) particles), an ultralow decoding false-alarm rate (<10(-9)), the ability to manipulate pa
93  increase the hit rate without affecting the false-alarm rate (increasing discriminability).
94 activity, data-driven predictions reduce the false-alarm rate of high-danger forecasts, enhancing the
95 ficity) and the false-positive rate (ie, the false-alarm rate or 1 - sensitivity) and compared these
96 sk for circulatory failure with a much lower false-alarm rate than conventional threshold-based syste
97  d' (a measure based on the hit rate and the false-alarm rate).
98 ect of N (the number of visual items) on the false-alarm rate.
99 lity, with 97% successful detection and a 5% false-alarm rate.
100 her d' values; the increased noise to higher false alarm rates (the filling effect).
101 sive graft failures of 15%, 62%, and 73% and false alarm rates of 5%, 40%, and 52%, with 3, 1, and 1
102  detection rates were 83%, 93%, and 100% and false alarm rates were 5%, 16%, and 69%, with 6, 13, and
103 n settings with low event incidence and high false alarm rates with high sensitivity.
104 es to provide increased reliability with low false alarm rates.
105  and explosive threats while maintaining low false alarm rates.
106 t identification as well as for reduction in false alarm rates.
107 1950 and yields hit rates above 0.5, whereas false-alarm rates are below 0.1.
108  positive responses to non-target sequences (false alarms) rather than omissions.
109 s were observed for Go correct-hit and No-Go false-alarm reaction times with increased reaction times
110                                        Prior false-alarm reduction approaches are often rule-based an
111  a decreased LPC amplitude was observed with false alarms relative to correct rejections.
112   Attenuation of the FN400 also occurred for false alarms (responses largely driven by familiarity) r
113  ("old" response to a related shape; related-false alarm) revealed preferential true recognition-rela
114 e occurrence rate of false alarms, in that a false alarm risks unnecessary social and economic disrup
115 le compete for preferred mates and males use false alarm snorts to manipulate receptive females.
116 ocial and economic environments can tolerate false alarms, such predictions would be impractical for
117  on misses, and was significantly greater on false alarms than on correct rejections.
118 nces were small, older adults committed more false alarms than younger adults.
119 , where misinformation occurs in the form of false alarms that can spread contagiously through groups
120 examining neural stability: (1) premeditated false alarms that might lead to greater stability in pop
121      In good memory performers (R-hits minus false alarm), the coupling was stronger in R than NR bet
122 et of non-target words that animals commonly false alarmed to.
123 s cathodal stimulation reduced the number of false alarms to lure pictures in subsequent recognition
124 es to make low-latency false alarms, to make false alarms to recently seen lures, to produce curvilin
125 ssed monkeys' tendencies to make low-latency false alarms, to make false alarms to recently seen lure
126 re correctly detected, and the occurrence of false alarms was 7.2%.
127 ion error types, associated to both true and false alarms, we argue that being subcritical, and modul
128                                     Hits and false alarms were associated with significantly more cor
129 ore suggest that at higher target opacities, false alarms were increasingly triggered by signal, i.e.
130         The correct detection of targets and false alarms were measured for each task.
131                                              False alarms were restricted to times when the glucose c
132 et sequences that should have been ignored ("false alarms") were analyzed as a function of cue-target
133  a more liberal response bias (more hits and false alarms) when testing memory for the scenes 24 h la
134  decrease in item hit rate with no change in false alarms, whereas patients showed the opposite patte

 
Page Top