ライフサイエンスコーパス: far-red light

1 g to green and red light rather than red and far red light.

2 es per square meter and is not reversible by far red light.

3 ation of low-lying charge transfer states by far-red light.

4 ated with near-infrared and inactivated with far-red light.

5 important for phyA-mediated deetiolation in far-red light.

6 ected in seedlings grown under low-intensity far-red light.

7 clear import of phyA-5 under low fluences of far-red light.

8 ent photopolymerization driven by visible to far-red light.

9 chrome is that it cannot be photoreversed by far-red light.

10 red light, with little effect under blue or far-red light.

11 pocotyls in seedlings grown under continuous far-red light.

12 may expand its signaling activity to red and far-red light.

13 phytochrome A and hypocotyl elongation under far-red light.

14 hyE) predominantly regulate responses to red/far-red light.

15 switchable on and off with near-infrared and far-red light.

16 n in dim white, red, and blue light, but not far-red light.

17 tinuous red light and to the ratio of red to far-red light.

18 essor of phytochrome A-mediated responses to far-red light.

19 ein PIF3 and the reversal of this binding by far-red light.

20 induction is rapidly abrogated by subsequent far-red light.

21 ocotyl, and fail to de-etiolate under red or far-red light.

22 as an elongated hypocotyl specifically under far-red light.

23 by red light, and this effect is reversed by far-red light.

24 atous plaque in which it can be activated by far-red light.

25 whereas rod divisions predominate in red or far-red light.

26 was reversed by subsequent irradiation with far-red light.

27 hromic kinases that are modulated by red and far-red light.

28 s hypersensitive responses to blue light and far-red light.

29 ows strongly reduced responses in continuous far-red light.

30 f any change in responsiveness to continuous far-red light.

31 ugh use of the phytochromes, which sense red/far-red light.

32 s the responses of these genes to continuous far-red light.

33 AT3 promoter responds differently to red and far-red light.

34 d physiological processes in response to red/far-red light.

35 sferases accumulated the most in response to far-red light.

36 er white light to an immobilized state under far-red light.

37 permits them to thrive in niches enriched in far-red light.

38 ectral range for photosynthesis by absorbing far-red light.

39 saI in darkness even after illumination with far-red light.

40 s of light (VLFR) and high fluences (HIR) of far-red light.

41 synthesis in two cyanobacteria that grow in far-red light.

42 nase assays, show hyposensitive responses to far-red light.

43 f cyanobacteria that is capable of utilizing far-red light.

44 ght above 700 nm and enable cells to grow in far-red light.

45 showed that some cyanobacteria could utilize far-red light.

46 nanometers) and enhances oxygen evolution in far-red light.

47 90/717 nm following a brief irradiation with far-red light.

48 hypersensitivity to continuous red, but not far-red, light.

49 Arabidopsis Long Hypocotyl in Far-Red Light 1 (HFR1), a bHLH transcription factor, pla

50 e a new Arabidopsis mutant, laf1 (long after far-red light 1) that has an elongated hypocotyl specifi

51 uced in wild-type Col-0 plants by continuous far-red light, 85% show reduced responsiveness in the fh

52 The red/far red light absorbing photoreceptor phytochrome-B (phy

53 ms, a red light absorbing species, Pr, and a far-red light absorbing form, Pfr.

54 he Y263F change prevents a red light-induced far-red light absorbing phytochrome chromophore configur

55 istinct red light-absorbing Pr conformer and far red light-absorbing Pfr conformer.

56 states, a red light-absorbing Pr form, and a far red light-absorbing Pfr form.

57 en the red light-absorbing (Pr) form and the far-red light-absorbing (Pfr) form is the central featur

58 erconversion of red light-absorbing (Pr) and far-red light-absorbing (Pfr) states.

59 red-light-absorbing ground state (Pr) and a far-red light-absorbing active state (Pfr).

60 The far-red light-absorbing form of phytochrome (Pfr) A stim

61 gnated PIF7, interacts specifically with the far-red light-absorbing Pfr form of phyB through a conse

62 light promotes the photoconversion to their far-red light-absorbing Pfr state or the red light-absor

63 e red light-absorbing Pr state and an active far-red light-absorbing Pfr state.

64 a red light-absorbing ground state Pr, and a far-red light-absorbing photoactivated state Pfr.

65 Photoreceptors, especially the far-red light-absorbing phytochrome A, play a crucial ro

66 Red/far-red light-absorbing phytochromes (phys) also play a

67 Photomorphogenesis is regulated by red/far-red light-absorbing phytochromes and blue/UV-A light

68 The red and far-red light-absorbing phytochromes and UV-A/blue light

69 The red and far-red light-absorbing phytochromes interact with the c

70 Phytochromes are red/far-red light-absorbing receptors encoded by a gene fami

71 light-absorbing state and the photoactivated far-red light-absorbing state revealed a large scale reo

72 en the red light-absorbing form, Pr, and the far-red-light-absorbing form, Pfr.

73 The red- and far-red-light-absorbing photosensory pigments or phytoch

74 ate photomorphogenic development include red/far-red-light-absorbing phytochromes and blue/UV-A-light

75 Arg133 helping stabilize and destabilize the far-red-light-absorbing state of Phy (Pfr), respectively

76 red-light-absorbing, ground state (Pr) and a far-red-light-absorbing, photoactivated state (Pfr).

77 transfer bands could be responsible for the far-red light absorption leading to PS I photochemistry

78 To overcome these problems, we prepared the far-red light-activatable prodrug of PTX by conjugating

79 nd interconverted between the red (dark) and far red (light-activated) forms.

80 We demonstrate its application to far-red-light-activated prodrugs.

81 pigment-protein complex, photosystem II, in far-red-light-adapted thylakoid membranes of the viridis

82 Subsequent exposure to far-red light after the red light pulse reverses FHY1 ph

83 Ultraviolet, blue, red, and far-red light all have demonstrated roles in modulating

84 red light, red followed by far-red light, or far-red light alone.

85 nd further desensitizes seedlings to red and far-red light and accelerates flowering time, with the t

86 on mutants show an elongated hypocotyl under far-red light and are impaired in other far-red high-irr

87 covered, and further connections between red/far-red light and carbon were modeled.

88 Phytochromes sense red/far-red light and control many biological processes in p

89 eds, LeEXP4 mRNA accumulation was blocked by far-red light and decreased by low water potential but w

90 ur light environments: white, blue, red, and far-red light and in the dark.

91 ) regulates gene expression under continuous far-red light and is rapidly destabilized upon red light

92 Far-red light and long photoperiods promote flowering in

93 hyposensitivity to continuous low-intensity far-red light and shows reduced very-low-fluence respons

94 f hypocotyl elongation, which is specific to far-red light and therefore specific to the phytochrome

95 dulates photomorphogenesis primarily through far-red light and to a lesser extent through blue- and r

96 h cases was at least partially reversible by far-red light, and appeared biphasic over a range of red

97 ected in seedlings treated with red light or far-red light, and it is largely independent from phytoc

98 and phyB2 tomato mutants and was reversed by far-red light applied immediately after the red or blue

99 ree organs in response to a 1-h treatment of far-red light are highly distinctive.

100 ring in response to altered ratios of red to far-red light are largely unknown.

101 In aquatic environments, red and far-red light are rapidly attenuated with depth; therefo

102 ng that blue, yellow, and red light, but not far-red light, are absorbed by the neutral radical state

103 However, normal far-red light-associated transcript accumulation pattern

104 osphorylated and ubiquitinated under red and far-red light before being degraded with a half-life of

105 far-red light response, cotyledon expansion, far-red light block of greening, and light-induced expre

106 af1 has reduced responsiveness to continuous far-red light but retains wild-type responses to other l

107 longation zone when shifted from the dark to far-red light, but not blue or red light.

108 Stromule formation was sensitive to red and far-red light, but not to blue light.

109 ich has reduced responsiveness to continuous far-red light, but responds normally to other light wave

110 switched between Pr and Pfr forms by red and far-red light, but the consequence of a bleaching phytoc

111 Sensing of red and far-red light by bacteriophytochromes involves intricate

112 The absorption of red or far-red light by one domain affects the conformation of

113 ontaining photoreceptors that detect red and far-red light by photointerconversion between a dark-ada

114 s of cAMP and cGMP by up to sixfold, whereas far-red light can be used to down-regulate activity.

115 opening is reversed by green light and that far-red light can be used to probe phytochrome-dependent

116 Depending on the fluence rate of far-red light, carbon either attenuated or potentiated l

117 ying light intensities and ratios of red and far-red light caused by shading and neighbor proximity.

118 responses are maximally sensitive to red and far red light, complementary chromatic adaptation is uni

119 Finally we show that both shaded, low red/far-red light conditions and high temperature induce mor

120 When grown under far-red light conditions ars4ars5 shows the same elongat

121 gulation of photomorphogenesis under red and far-red light conditions involves both positively and ne

122 radation of PIFs in response to both red and far-red light conditions to promote photomorphogenesis.

123 RBCS, CHS, and PORA, under both darkness and far-red light conditions.

124 uadruple mutant pifq both in the dark and in far-red light conditions.

125 to examine effects of those mutations on the far-red light control of genome expression.

126 protochlorophyllide reductase (POR) genes by far-red light coupled with irreversible plastid damage.

127 of a unique CBCR called IflA (influenced by far-red light), demonstrating that a second CBCR called

128 Furthermore, the response to far-red light depended on functional FHY1 but not on FIN

129 light and brassinosteroid pathways mainly by far-red-light-dependent modulation of brassinosteroid le

130 Moreover, treatments with red or red/far-red light did not alter the concentrations of citrat

131 ped; they can operate with low-power density far-red light-emitting diode light.

132 in 60 s of irradiation using green, red, and far-red light-emitting diodes.

133 oximity and shade (i.e. to the perception of far-red light-enriched light filtered through or reflect

134 ngs of their contrasting growth responses to far-red light enrichment.

135 ering and can be fully induced by end-of-day far-red light (EOD FR) treatments.

136 pmental responses associated with end-of-day far-red light (EOD-FR) signaling were investigated in ma

137 on was reversed by subsequent treatment with far-red light, establishing that light-induced accumulat

138 Under relatively bright, high red:far-red light, ethylene production by seedlings of wild-

139 romotion in response to end-of-day pulses of far-red light, even in a phyA-null background, supports

140 ith a continuous light treatment enriched in far-red light, flowers developed directly from previousl

141 tal results confirmed that cells grown under far-red light form biofilms with a significantly increas

142 nsitivity of hypocotyls to red light (R) and far-red light (FR) and an overall dwarfing of the mature

143 e reduction in the ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR) as a warning of competition with neig

144 Far-red light (FR) pretreatment and transfer to white li

145 plant photoreceptor known to be activated by far-red light (FR).

146 ging plants have to adapt to a high ratio of far-red light (FR)/red light (R) light in the canopy bef

147 g responses to the ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR; an indicator of competition) by suppr

148 able from wild-type seedlings under constant far-red light (FRc), and phyC deficiency had no effect i

149 ng responsiveness specifically to continuous far-red light (FRc), thereby suggesting a locus likely t

150 and high irradiance responses to continuous far-red light (FRc).

151 th those induced by continuous monochromatic far-red light (FRc; perceived exclusively by phyA) in WT

152 ococcidiopsis thermalis PCC 7203 grown under far-red light (FRL; >725 nm) contains both chlorophyll a

153 red light by canopy leaves and reflection of far-red light from neighboring plants.

154 me phyA, phyB, and hy1 mutants as well as in far-red light-grown seedlings, indicating that neither C

155 1 transcript level is only seen in dark- and far-red light-grown spa1-100 mutants.

156 Additionally, dark-grown and far-red-light-grown spy-4 seedlings were found to have s

157 Under far-red light (>710 nm), the level of P700(+) was high i

158 fted from white light D2O-seawater medium to far-red light H2O-seawater medium, the observed deuterat

159 Far red light had an inhibiting effect on germination fo

160 e light induces the StBEL5 promoter, whereas far-red light had no effect.

161 ty, such that axillary buds growing in added far-red light have greatly increased receptor transcript

162 SCL21 transcript itself is down-regulated by far-red light in a phytochrome A- and PAT1-dependent man

163 mportant reduction in sensitivity to red and far-red light in the control of hypocotyl elongation, wh

164 n, apparently by sensing the ratio of red to far-red light in the environment.

165 ve mutation rsf1 (for reduced sensitivity to far-red light) in the Arabidopsis Columbia accession by

166 ced responsiveness to continuous red but not far-red light, in both wild-type and ABO backgrounds, co

167 lysis of fruit treated with red light or red/far-red light indicated that phytochromes do not regulat

168 he behavior of these two chimeras in red and far-red light indicates: (i) that the NH2-terminal halve

169 The chromophore conformations of the red and far red light induced product states "Pfr" and "Pr" of t

170 eetiolation, anthocyanin accumulation, and a far-red light-induced inability of seedlings to green up

171 Further analysis reveals that far-red light-induced phosphorylation and degradation of

172 primary photoreceptor for mediating various far-red light-induced responses in higher plants.

173 ceptor phytochrome A (phyA) mediates various far-red light-induced responses.

174 By contrast, carbon potentiated far-red-light induction of GLN2 and ASN2 in light-grown

175 Far-red light inhibited red light induction of these mRN

176 This opening was green light reversible and far-red light insensitive, indicating that stomata of th

177 ommunities because of the deep penetrance of far-red light into mammalian tissue and the small size o

178 ed light, and the mRNA accumulation from red/far-red light irradiation was equal to that found in the

179 As far-red light is only perceived by phyA, our results sug

180 t mutant, confirming that gene expression in far-red light is regulated solely by phytochrome A.

181 Additionally, exposure to yellow but not far-red light leads to comparable increases in the expre

182 Continuous far-red light led to seedlings showing stronger staining

183 t changing R:FRs or lowering R:FRs by adding far-red light led to the appearance of small nuclear bod

184 eds display strong hyposensitive response to far-red light-mediated seed germination and light-regula

185 After photoactivation with far red light, MLu facilitates production of cytotoxic o

186 diminished effect of an end-of-day pulse of far-red light on hypocotyl elongation, and a decrease in

187 locked by abscisic acid (ABA), water stress, far-red light, or dormancy, but was low or undetected in

188 single pulses of red light, red followed by far-red light, or far-red light alone.

189 ay a role in all responses to 'high fluence' far-red light perceived by the light-labile phytochrome

190 ought cannot be attributed to changes in red/far-red light perception alone.

191 tointerconversion between red light (Pr) and far-red light (Pfr)-absorbing states.

192 In addition, the long hypocotyl in far-red light phenotype of the laf6 mutant could not be

193 is part of an extensive acclimation process, far-red light photoacclimation (FaRLiP), which occurs in

194 Far-red light photoacclimation appears to be controlled

195 obiliproteins and minor amounts of Chl d via far-red light photoacclimation in a range of cyanobacter

196 Far-red light photoacclimation leads to substantial remo

197 Phytochromes are red/far red light photochromic photoreceptors that direct ma

198 Here we propose that the red/far-red light photoreceptor HvPHYTOCHROME C (HvPHYC), ca

199 Moreover, the red/far-red light photoreceptor phyB interacts with SPA1 thr

200 The red/far-red light photoreceptor phytochrome mediates photomo

201 The red/far-red light photoreceptor phytochrome participates in

202 has been shown to require a phytochrome red/far-red light photoreceptor, FphA, which is cytoplasmic

203 Phytochromes are red/far-red light photoreceptors that direct photosensory re

204 rs that interact physically with the red and far-red light photoreceptors, phytochromes, are called P

205 Of the five phytochromes-a family of red/far-red light photoreceptors-in Arabidopsis, phytochrome

206 g, far-red photosystem II (FR-PSII) supports far-red light photosynthesis.

207 propose new roles for SCF regulation of the far-red light/phyA and sugar signaling pathways.

208 in and abscisic acid treatments and enhanced far-red light/phyA-mediated photomorphogenesis.

209 Upon activation by far-red light, phytochrome A signals are transduced thro

210 of treatments (Norflurazon, lincomycin and a far-red light pre-treatment) leading to plastid damage i

211 Excitation of the holoproteins by red or far-red light promotes the photoconversion to their far-

212 s in Arabidopsis, we show that phyA mediates far-red light promotion of flowering with modes of actio

213 High intensity far-red light provides a way to specifically assess the

214 light pulse is reversible with a subsequent far-red light pulse, clearly showing that phytochrome me

215 under a light program of alternating red and far-red light pulses and were named eid (for empfindlich

216 vels of active phytochrome (Pfr) with red or far-red light pulses subsequent to blue-light treatments

217 celerated by a reduced ratio of red light to far-red light (R/FR), which indicates the proximity of c

218 oreceptors perceive reduced ratios of red to far-red light (R:FR) and initiate stem elongation to ena

219 hotoreceptor that senses the ratio of red to far-red light (R:FR) to regulate the shade-avoidance res

220 as a reduction in the ratio of red light to far-red light (R:FR).

221 -limited and super-resolution imaging in the far-red light range, is optimally excited with common re

222 ribution of light quality, including the red/far-red light ratio (R/FR) that informs plants about pro

223 Plants interpret a decrease in the red to far-red light ratio (R:FR) as a sign of impending shadin

224 Low red light/far-red light ratio (R:FR) serves as an indicator of imp

225 ow that both low blue light and a low-red to far-red light ratio are required to rapidly enhance phot

226 phytochrome B mutation and of low red light:far-red light ratio on branching were largely due to red

227 The influence of red/far-red light ratio on the fibre length prompted us to e

228 The red light:far-red light ratio perceived by phytochromes controls p

229 egetation-induced reduction in the red light:far-red light ratio provides a competition signal sensed

230 th light quality (as crowding and the red-to-far-red light ratio) and phosphate availability, such th

231 carpel development to spt mutants by low red/far-red light ratios, simulating vegetation shade, which

232 The far-red light receptor phytochrome A (phyA) and the bZIP

233 by photosensory receptors including the red/far-red light-receptor phytochromes and the blue/UV-A li

234 th to floral development is regulated by red-far-red light receptors (phytochromes) and blue-ultravio

235 Phytochromes, red/far-red light receptors, are believed to regulate light-

236 These signaling components include the red/far-red light receptors, phytochromes, at least one blue

237 Phytochrome-mediated detection of far-red light reflection from neighboring plants activat

238 Far-red light regulates many aspects of seedling develop

239 phenotype of phyB-9 or phyA-211 under red or far-red light, respectively, and RFI2 likely functions d

240 impaired in phytochrome-mediated end-of-day far-red light response, cotyledon expansion, far-red lig

241 utation in HRB1 also enhances the end-of-day far-red light response, inhibits leaf expansion and peti

242 as the major photoreceptor/effector for most far-red-light responses, although phyB and cry1 modulate

243 Far-red light reversed this effect of red light, and the

244 orm (Pfr) depressed the ATPase activity, and far-red light reversed this effect.

245 through direct physical interaction and red/far-red light reversible phosphorylation to fine-tune th

246 teristic phytochrome-mediated red light- and far-red light-reversible low-fluence induction of the G-

247 s of both phyB and PCH1 generate stable, yet far-red light-reversible PBs that persisted for days.

248 tified a long hypocotyl mutant under red and far-red light, rfi2-1 (red and far-red insensitive 2 to

249 y to simultaneously sense red light-rich and far-red light-rich environments through deactivation of

250 y because it enables plants to deetiolate in far-red light-rich environments typical of dense vegetat

251 mitted farther through seawater than the red/far-red light sensed by land plant phytochromes.

252 Phytochromes are red/far-red light sensing photoreceptors employing linear te

253 multiple photoreceptors, among which the red/far-red light-sensing phytochromes have been extensively

254 causes a 100-fold shift in the threshold for far-red light sensitivity.

255 tochromes comprise a principal family of red/far-red light sensors in plants.

256 re dimeric proteins that function as red and far-red light sensors influencing nearly every phase of

257 the mutants in the dark and following red or far-red light short treatments or continuous light, than

258 Plants grown under continuous blue or far-red light showed NPA-induced hypocotyl inhibition si

259 egulated by phyA in response to a continuous far-red light signal.

260 on module in leaves strongly linking red and far-red light signaling to drought responses in a TOC1-d

261 he interaction of carbon with blue, red, and far-red-light signaling and set the stage for further in

262 hanges in gene expression in response to red/far-red light signals in part by physically interacting

263 he light-to-dark) switch, the blue, red, and far-red light signals, and UV-B irradiation.

264 liar shade or neighbor proximity (low red to far-red light), some plant species exhibit shade-avoidin

265 veness to continuous red, but not continuous far-red light, suggesting a role in phyB signaling but n

266 duced sensitivity to both continuous red and far-red light, suggesting involvement in both phyA and p

267 yl phenotype of the atmdr1-100 mutants under far-red light, suggesting that phyA acts downstream of A

268 nses to limiting fluence rates of continuous far-red light that are absent in the parental phyA-105 m

269 nsive photoacclimative response to growth in far-red light that includes the synthesis of chlorophyll

270 rowing wild-type seedlings with supplemental far-red light that induces shade avoidance responses.

271 rough reduction in the ratio between red and far-red light that triggers the shade avoidance syndrome

272 When stimulated by far-red light, the intense TTA upconversion blue emissio

273 However, once illuminated with far-red light, the prodrug effectively killed SKOV-3 ova

274 Photoconversion of AtBphP2 with far-red light then generates Pr but this Pr is also unst

275 Land plant phytochromes perceive red and far-red light to control growth and development, using t

276 in plants, which measure the ratio of red to far-red light to control many aspects of growth and deve

277 vely ablated tumors by the illumination with far-red light to the mice, presumably through the combin

278 light conditions (continuous white, red and far-red light) to examine more closely the light regulat

279 their expression in hypocotyl is induced by far-red light treatment.

280 Moreover, a far-red-light treatment at the end of day also reduced P

281 sponses that are fully induced by end-of-day far-red light treatments.

282 hondria was photoreversibly modulated by red/far-red light treatments.

283 Red-light and red-light/far-red-light treatments during ripening did not influen

284 exposure and to complete this process under far-red light (typical of dense vegetation canopies).

285 photobleaching and constitutes the brightest far-red light-up aptamer system known to date owing to i

286 are bacterial photoreceptors that sense red/far red light using the biliverdin chromophore.

287 Plants sense and respond to red and far-red light using the phytochrome (phy) family of phot

288 gulation of lettuce seed dormancy by red and far red light was determined at various hydration levels

289 ponse to the relative proportions of red and far red light was regulated by SIG5 through phytochrome

290 For example, the phytochromes perceive far-red light (wavelengths between 700 and 800 nm) refle

291 dling responses to continuous white, red, or far-red light (Wc, Rc or FRc, respectively) were examine

292 nsed through a reduced ratio between red and far-red light, we show here through computational modeli

293 tion activities in plants exposed to red and far-red light were 30% to 85% less than in blue light/UV

294 bidopsis thaliana) mutants hypersensitive to far-red light were isolated under a light program of alt

295 Here, blue-green reversibility and far-red light were used to probe the stomatal responses

296 A and phyB in red light were not observed in far-red light, which inhibited growth persistently throu

297 L3 (FHY3) promotes seedling de-etiolation in far-red light, which is perceived by phytochrome A (phyA

298 sing tissue penetrable and clinically useful far-red light, which kills the cancer cells through the

299 oximity as a decrease in the ratio of red to far-red light, which triggers a series of developmental

300 Here we present clear evidence that even far-red light with wavelengths beyond 800 nm, clearly ou