コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 (ohyA) and putative fatty acid efflux pump (farE).
2 is usually considered as standard great ape fare.
3 receptor alpha (PPARalpha) demonstrated that FARE-1 is a PPARalpha response element capable of confer
5 I gene promoter fatty acid response element (FARE-1) was localized to a hexameric repeat sequence loc
7 how new reinnervating axons following injury fare amid skin keratinocytes that also express Pcdhgamma
8 nscription factor competitively binds at the FARE and modulates fatty acid induction of the promoters
10 mplexes with oligonucleotides containing the FARE, and anti-PPARalpha antibody shifted nuclear protei
11 with CRVO (CFT >250 mum at month 3) did not fare as well as early responders if they were treated wi
12 that elderly recipients of liver allografts fare as well as their younger counterparts, but our resu
13 f life and distress, patients who choose CPM fare as well as those who do not in the first year after
17 the past decade, but black children have not fared as well as white children in large national trials
20 ts reported as having no acute rejection and fare at least as poorly as those with reported kidney gr
21 thus opine that our moral-social capacities fare badly in profoundly unjust social contexts such as
22 nd 12 months identified patients destined to fare badly, although criteria at 18 months were less use
25 dence-based medicine, carotid endarterectomy fares badly, with only the indications for the surgery h
26 orm of social dilemmas: collectively, people fare best if all cooperate but each individual is tempte
30 on respiratory pathogens than adults but can fare better against novel pathogens like severe acute re
32 this impasse and suggest how the field might fare better and deliver impactful neurobiological insigh
33 er patients with acute myocardial infarction fare better at centers where more patients undergo prima
34 nti-NY-ESO-1 immune response and appeared to fare better by imaging than those without such an immune
35 Results indicated that aposematic strategies fare better in environments with low predation intensity
37 nic minorities and SES disadvantage patients fare better or similarly to their counterparts, highligh
40 m -100% if all patients in the control group fare better than all patients in the treatment group up
42 iculty explaining why animals driven by cues fare better than animals driven by food reward itself, w
43 we find that purely evolutionary techniques fare better than do model-based approaches across all bu
44 ht into the question of why some individuals fare better than others do when encountering stress in t
49 nmental as well as genetic data, will likely fare better than traditional linkage analysis in disenta
54 grafts that received Custom-I solutions also fared better (0.75, P < 0.05) than the 21.4% that had Cu
55 d in specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions fared better against I/R-induced injury than SPF Nod2(-/
56 eir high failure rate, other cellular assays fared better and although they have not entered widespre
57 and those without graft-versus-host disease fared better as compared with their allogeneic and graft
58 e who demonstrated this immunologic response fared better clinically: 59% and 88% attained complete o
59 Duke criteria, the 2023 Duke-ISCVID version fared better for the diagnosis of IE among streptococcal
61 cal management with naltrexone, CBI, or both fared better on drinking outcomes, whereas acamprosate s
62 h tumors harboring EGFR activating mutations fared better on erlotinib alone (median PFS, 18.2 months
66 t on both arms; however, more patients on GC fared better regarding weight, performance status, and f
67 val rates than males (P = .005) and children fared better than adolescents and adults (P = .002).
70 tics as a simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) fared better than diabetics receiving a kidney alone (9.
72 phageal reconstruction, patients in group II fared better than patients in group I in terms of surviv
78 rioritising immunity while older individuals fared better when maintaining high-protein nutritional p
83 , whereas patients with the lowest quartiles fared better with protocol-based care (odds ratios, 0.32
84 > or =298 g (those in the group with EF >35% fared better) but not in the group with LV mass <298 g.
87 ther segmentation models, NuSeT consistently fares better in generating accurate segmentation masks a
88 ated datasets, the Bayesian method generally fares better than the ML approach in accuracy and covera
91 ncy in neuroprotection, with forced exercise faring better than voluntary exercise through increased
92 widespread use of smart cards for automated fare collection in these systems offers a unique opportu
94 restoration by identifying species that have fared comparatively well across locations, grounding eff
96 re), 4) criterion validity (how new criteria fare compared to standards), 5) measurement burden (cost
103 ons, the EGS patients who were managed early fared equally well, if not better, than the EGS patients
104 ons that primarily reviewed POR applications fared equivalently to LOR applications; in contrast, POR
105 with detectable MRD at end of consolidation fared especially poorly, with only a 43% plus or minus 7
108 tant in their antral colonization defect and fared even worse than the Che(-) mutant in the corpus.
110 istinguishing men who are a priori likely to fare favourably with ADT from those who harbour disease
112 s in service cost, emissions, and with split fares, hinting toward a wide passenger acceptance of suc
119 sts how the efficacy findings of T2 research fare in the real world, diverse populations, and varied
121 e Institute of Medicine priority topics have fared in the agencies' funding programs, and the develop
123 years, to see how medical aid projects were faring in particular, and to assess whether the past dec
125 e Abl inhibitors dasatinib and nilotinib are faring in the treatment of imatinib-resistant CML, espec
126 ) older adults living in low-education areas fare less well cognitively than those living in high-edu
127 f the following 3 criteria, POR applications fare less well than LOR applications: (1) POR status and
130 Patients with poorly differentiated cancers fared less well than those with better differentiated le
133 s urinary incontinence by urodynamic testing fare more poorly after the most commonly offered surgica
134 hat the heterogametic sex (XY or ZW females) fares more poorly in interspecific hybrids, is generally
136 nucleotide assembly-based strategy does not fare much better, as metagenomic assemblies are typicall
142 saster and the impact of social norms; women fare no better when they constitute a small share of the
143 the professionally administered intervention fared no better in terms of quality of life than patient
145 receive antibiotics for neutrocytic ascites fared no worse than patients who did receive antibiotics
149 how children with ischaemic perinatal stroke fare over time is particularly important, as there has b
151 status, and/or bone or visceral involvement fare poorly and are unlikely to benefit significantly fr
152 ng adults with hypodiploid B-ALL continue to fare poorly and do not seem to benefit from CR1 HSCT.
153 hypodiploid B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) fare poorly and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation
155 ant rates of mortality and morbidity and may fare poorly compared with less-invasive procedures.
156 patients with unresectable or metastatic RMS fare poorly due to high rates of disease recurrence.
157 Visually impaired and blind adolescents fare poorly in educational attainment compared to adoles
159 ket (Austin, Texas) found that periodontists fare poorly on the Yelp website for nearly all measured
161 materials with excellent in-plane properties fare poorly when out-of-plane through-thickness properti
162 cancers, and patients with malignant glioma fare poorly, even after aggressive surgery, chemotherapy
163 he best way to identify patients destined to fare poorly, thereby allowing early clinical interventio
169 ry in Afghanistan who returned to duty still fared quite poorly on many clinical outcome measures 6-1
170 Response Theory for categorical imputation, fared quite well compared to currently used multiple imp
171 ited Kingdom suggests that cancer drugs have fared quite well, with most recommendations being positi
172 n high-risk patients with diabetes, who have fared relatively better with CABG in most prior trials,
174 concern because patients discharged at night fare significantly worse than those discharged during th
176 in Level 2, patients with anxious depression fared significantly worse in both the switching and augm
177 3 abnormalities, infants younger than 1 year fared significantly worse than patients 1 year of age or
178 patients who received whole-pelvis treatment fared significantly worse than those in the other two gr
179 t 8% of the intensity of normal lymphocytes) fared significantly worse than those with lower-density
181 1 to 0.28; P<.001), while non-Fusarium cases fared similarly (regression coefficient=0.02 logMAR; 95%
183 e tissue complications of aging and diabetes fared since the identification of the link between these
184 H1 and FBXW7 mutant-positive patients do not fare sufficiently well to warrant an individualized trea
186 s analysis shows that African American males fared the worst, with lives characterized by incarcerati
189 with high social risk to understand how they fare under the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices
192 rent prices for similar services (e.g., full-fare vs. advanced-purchase plane tickets, full tuition v
193 A promoter fatty acid response element (FARE) was mapped, mutation of which ablated fatty acid-m
194 ancer patients with venous thrombosis do not fare well and have an increased mortality compared with
195 neration of Aurora kinase inhibitors did not fare well in clinical trials, owing to poor efficacy and
203 Regrettably, neither of the 2 approaches has fared well in animal experiments, and the only clinical
209 o high levels of posttraining fear tended to fare worse at the follow-up if they received methylene b
215 cal health than heterosexuals, and bisexuals fare worse than individuals who identify as lesbian and
216 d by high levels of gender inequality, women fare worse than men in human capital accumulation and he
218 In general, patients with carcinosarcomas fare worse than patients with carcinomas of the same ana
219 US citizens for 6 health outcomes but often fare worse than the mean measure of health outcomes of 1
220 ile receiving medication, children with ADHD fare worse than their peers across a wide range of outco
221 er septic conditions, PAD4(-/-) mice did not fare worse than wild-type mice and had comparable surviv
223 whether the socioeconomically disadvantaged fare worse via various types of worry in terms of their
224 vation and, in contrast to other xenografts, fare worse when the complement of the graft recipient is
226 )-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) fare worse, presumably because of temozolomide resistanc
227 ith alveolar RMS or undifferentiated sarcoma fare worse; however, FFS and overall survival are substa
230 s with DED and EDS >=60 (highest discomfort) fared worse on OCI, VFQ-28R, and WPAI than respondents w
233 for functional capacity, in which etanercept fared worse than the other treatments: steroids vs. etan
237 ntation, with non-Hispanic Black individuals faring worse compared with individuals of other racial a
238 been widely recognized, with males generally faring worse than females and a potential link to sex st