戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 her feeding nor social stimuli did not alter feeding behaviour.
2 rain as a major modulatory centre underlying feeding behaviour.
3 tides that regulate the sleep-wake cycle and feeding behaviour.
4 hes, which correspond to a more generalistic feeding behaviour.
5 takeout, influencing sex-specific mating and feeding behaviour.
6 omated and high-throughput quantification of feeding behaviour.
7 ression or ablation eliminates sugar-induced feeding behaviour.
8 e production and release from the liver, and feeding behaviour.
9 f body fat stores to adaptive adjustments of feeding behaviour.
10  roles in regulating growth, development and feeding behaviour.
11 ntrol the choice between social and solitary feeding behaviour.
12 -deficient mice show alterations of baseline feeding behaviour.
13 ctions in the mammalian brain, in particular feeding behaviour.
14 tinergic neurons exert a tonic inhibition of feeding behaviour.
15 ought to function as a central stimulator of feeding behaviour.
16 ch abolished optogenetically induced hedonic feeding behaviour.
17 andard model that captures the complexity of feeding behaviour.
18 esity in mice, with no change in movement or feeding behaviour.
19 y and quantity of prey might influence their feeding behaviours.
20 from zona incerta (ZI) for the regulation of feeding behaviours.
21 ventral tegmental area (VTA) encoded hedonic feeding behaviours.
22 basic drives (for example, for social versus feeding behaviour(1-3)) can exert potent influences on e
23 bsorption and motility(2,3), and brain-wired feeding behaviour(2).
24 der range of foodstuffs and the more general feeding behaviour adopted by rats.
25 on of a single Fdg neuron induces asymmetric feeding behaviour and ablation of a single Fdg neuron di
26 hrough the regulation of insulin production, feeding behaviour and adipose tissue metabolism.
27 peptide implicated in the central control of feeding behaviour and autonomic homeostasis.
28  play an important role in the regulation of feeding behaviour and energy balance.
29  have been shown experimentally to influence feeding behaviour and energy metabolism.
30  in the diet, has important consequences for feeding behaviour and is a possible factor involved in f
31 les in the regulation of sleep-wake rhythms, feeding behaviour and metabolism.
32 unusual and unique context of the extra-oral feeding behaviour and pentaradial body plan of an echino
33 t rates, which provide insight into how host feeding behaviour and physiology may affect transmission
34 ring US04, indicating plasticity in reindeer feeding behaviour, and potentially overall increased lic
35 mptoms of depression, including dysregulated feeding behaviour, anhedonia and behavioural despair.
36                                         Many feeding behaviours are the result of stereotyped, organi
37 ghlights host traits related to movement and feeding behaviour as important determinants of whether s
38  vector arthropods differ in life histories, feeding behaviour as well as reproductive strategies, th
39 environmental tolerance and an opportunistic feeding behaviour, as assessed by the study of environme
40 e-structured and salinity-dependent predator feeding behaviour, based on laboratory experiments.
41 let aggression by 30% and tended to increase feeding behaviour by 35% the first 24 h post-weaning.
42 vity of subcortical networks and to regulate feeding behaviour by dynamic reorganization of functiona
43 lony area is expected to impair its peculiar feeding behaviour by limiting the exploitable dimensiona
44      These functions contribute crucially to feeding behaviour by unknown neural mechanisms.
45 hat modifying rhythmic behaviours (including feeding behaviour) can dramatically impact the 24 h rhyt
46                                              Feeding behaviour consists of feeding events, separated
47 cate that the interaction of temperature and feeding behaviour could be a major ecological determinan
48 ents and shows that the temporal dynamics of feeding behaviour depends on the severity and stage of t
49 irect and unrecognized link between mosquito feeding behaviour, EIP and vector competence.
50 ur analysis demonstrates that the changes in feeding behaviour evoked by the anorectic agents investi
51 from electrophysiological studies describing feeding behaviour experiments where resistance mechanism
52 h cranial strength, suggests a very specific feeding behaviour for this animal.
53                      Here we analyzed T. rex feeding behaviour from trace evidence, estimated bite fo
54  mammalian brain to regulate many aspects of feeding behaviour, from food-seeking to meal termination
55 s system signalling mechanisms in regulating feeding behaviour have been largely uncharacterized.
56  that control a naturally polymorphic social feeding behaviour in C. elegans.
57                           In line with this, feeding behaviour in many species exhibits a strong circ
58 n simulations, multiple but not preferential feeding behaviour in mosquitos reduced the accuracy of f
59              This is especially the case for feeding behaviour in small, genetically tractable animal
60             Yet their host seeking and blood feeding behaviours in the presence of insecticide-treate
61                      Here we describe unique feeding behaviours in two closely related species of sna
62  caudolateral orbital frontal cortex predict feeding behaviour independently of meal-related sensory
63  are well established, the interplay between feeding behaviour, infection and immune function remains
64                              Ghrelin-induced feeding behaviour is controlled by arcuate nucleus neuro
65 lammation, immune functions, mood disorders, feeding behaviour, neuroprotection, diabetes mellitus an
66 are keystone grazers in reef ecosystems, yet feeding behaviour of adults causes physical damage and m
67                       We evaluated the sugar-feeding behaviour of Anopheles mosquitoes as part of bas
68 r their suitability to describe the observed feeding behaviour of cows.
69 stant plants have common consequences on the feeding behaviour of diverse insect groups.
70  vector control tool that exploits the sugar-feeding behaviour of mosquitoes.
71 hat stochastic resonance enhances the normal feeding behaviour of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula), whi
72           Analysing the different effects on feeding behaviour of peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36), lithium c
73 ndings resolve long debated questions on the feeding behaviour of Phytomyxea, suggesting an unrecogni
74 discuss how mycorrhizal fungi can affect the feeding behaviour of S. avenae in wheat, inducing suscep
75                            Due to the weekly feeding behaviours of bed bugs, these results suggest th
76 nt, reproduction, attraction, settlement and feeding behaviour on two naturally susceptible varieties
77 brainstem, which in turn control elements of feeding behaviour operating on short and long timescales
78        We experimentally assessed changes in feeding behaviour (prey preference and consumption rate)
79 ty and calcium imaging simultaneously during feeding behaviour reveals that the Fdg neurons respond t
80 hese differences support the hypothesis that feeding behaviour selects for specific gut bacterial com
81 precisely engaged to bidirectionally control feeding behaviours subject to, for example, social influ
82 s then excite brain regions known to mediate feeding behaviour, such as the lateral parabrachial nucl
83 ties, and provides information on the infant-feeding behaviours that were practised by prehistoric hu
84 ive neurons was causally linked to increased feeding behaviour; this effect was selective as, by cont
85 ng whole body energy balance by coordinating feeding behaviour through the hypothalamus in conjunctio
86 single Fdg neuron distorts the sugar-induced feeding behaviour to become asymmetric, indicating the d
87 indings indicate that dopamine adapts future feeding behaviour to the availability of food by signifi
88 e contribution of these distinct circuits to feeding behaviour using optogenetic and pharmacogenetic
89 eeders world-wide, indicating the changes in feeding behaviour we document here may not be sufficient
90 e species' entire spring activity season and feeding behaviours were quantified with camera traps at
91                    Some animals change their feeding behaviour when infected with parasites, seeking
92 filaria location are exploited by the vector feeding-behaviour whereas adult survival is enhanced by
93                      Better understanding of feeding behaviour will be vital in reducing obesity and