ライフサイエンスコーパス: filtration

1 nic salts (e.g., NaCl), combined with vacuum filtration.

2 ve monovalent ligands, and then separated by filtration.

3 of the sampling sites with activated carbon filtration.

4 cy compared to similar devices using passive filtration.

5 from their aqueous racemic mixture by simple filtration.

6 anticipated but is cleared slowly via renal filtration.

7 and yields of >80%, with isolation by simple filtration.

8 r capillary wall and is essential for kidney filtration.

9 and under two shear rate conditions without filtration.

10 including pressurized circulation and renal filtration.

11 hydrolysis, and in combination with membrane filtration.

12 ge and preserved zebrafish larval glomerular filtration.

13 dextran provide clear evidence of functional filtration.

14 nsors allows us to leverage CNNs for variant filtration.

15 No significant change in HLF following filtration across all data indicates these fluorophores

16 ffect of aging time and manufacturing steps (filtration, addition of additives or spices, solera agin

17 r reabsorption, SNGFR and glomerular protein filtration affect excretion.

18 re review was conducted on the safety of air filtration and air recirculation in healthcare premises.

19 collection, consisting of water collection, filtration and chemical preservation followed by post-de

20 reme-phenotype cohorting, functional variant filtration and pathway-based analysis.

21 sampling since it can automate water sample filtration and preservation of the captured material.

22 feasible line of research in the area of air filtration and recirculation in healthcare facilities.

23 P1 was purified using the combination of gel filtration and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chr

24 ify the relative contributions of glomerular filtration and tubular uptake to urinary protein excreti

25 Using bacterial two-hybrid, gel filtration, and MS analyses, we demonstrate that SvWhiD

26 extreme lactic acidosis, reduced glomerular filtration, and stress.

27 The glomerular filtration apparatus presents a barrier against therapeu

28 ze fractions, suggesting that the sequential filtration approach does not ensure taxonomical differen

29 The reported filtration-assisted approach enables image analysis of a

30 The filtration-assisted method provides a simple, fast and i

31 llected after coagulation, flocculation, and filtration at pH 6.5 and pH 8.5 with irradiation at thre

32 tion it imposes added physical stress on the filtration barrier and increases the oxygen demand to dr

33 the structure and function of the glomerular filtration barrier but little is known about the mechani

34 Proper function of the glomerular filtration barrier depends heavily on the integrity of l

35 he delivery of therapeutic agents across the filtration barrier of the glomerulus.

36 thereby reducing the physical stress on the filtration barrier, albuminuria, and the oxygen demand f

37 s with important function for the glomerular filtration barrier.

38 , we confirmed leakage of the size selective filtration barrier.

39 min size selectivity across their glomerular filtration barrier.

40 the integrity and function of the glomerular filtration barrier.

41 the selective permeability of the glomerular filtration barrier.

42 t half-life of SS1P is due to its very rapid filtration by the kidney followed by degradation in prox

43 protein reabsorption by lacuna channels and filtration by the slit diaphragm.

44 These habitats have tremendous filtration capacity that facilitates flow of carbon betw

45 duced filamin homolog Cher displayed altered filtration capacity, but exhibited no change in slit dia

46 doption of autonomous processes such as self-filtration, capillary pressure, and evaporative concentr

47 ring to enable different functions for water filtration, chemical adsorption and catalysis, energy an

48 ctivity was analysed using Sephadex G-75 gel filtration chromatography, Superdex peptide 10/300 GL si

49 Both antigens were compared by gel filtration, circular dichroism measurement, in vitro dig

50 smography to assess peripheral microvascular filtration coefficient (measuring capillary fluid extrav

51 In patients with HFpEF, microvascular filtration coefficient was lower (calf: 3.30 [interquart

52 A significant reduction in TLF following filtration (DeltaTLF) was observed across the entire dat

53 na were provided with a high-volume membrane filtration device (NuFiltration).

54 vision of a repurposed hemodialyzer membrane filtration device markedly improves health outcomes as m

55 tu analysis, consisting of water collection, filtration, DNA extraction and qPCR analysis, which allo

56 d filtration methods are limited because (1) filtration does not capture all extracellular DNA, (2) e

57 Cancer cells remained viable after filtration due to the minimal shear stress exerted over

58 roteins (LDLs) are removed by extracorporeal filtration during LDL apheresis.

59 salt-functionalized membranes achieved high filtration efficiency as opposed to the bare membrane, w

60 veral drawbacks (i.e., cross-infection risk, filtration efficiency improvements limited by difficulty

61 literature, the particle-size-resolved fresh filtration efficiency of seven different cordierite filt

62 based on their listing estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) as well as based on their eGFR at the

63 nal factors an on an electrokinetic-enhanced filtration (EKEF) application to dewater orange juice (O

64 Gel filtration experiments reveal that gC1qR clusters FXII a

65 ence binding, X-ray crystallography, and gel filtration experiments with asparagine, aspartate, and v

66 is captured in grab samples, concentrated by filtration, extracted, and analyzed using molecular meth

67 that was simple to produce, did not require filtration for sterilization, and used reagents that wer

68 significant issues in conventional membrane filtration: fouling and membrane damage.

69 This approach to visualizing glomerular filtration function will be instrumental for translation

70 Rapid clearance by renal filtration is a major impediment to the translation of s

71 stribution as confirmed by gold nanoparticle filtration is also found to account for the much higher

72 Standard dead-end sample filtration is used to improve sample purity, but is limi

73 n alpha-lactalbumin, produced using membrane filtration (LAC-M), selective precipitation (LAC-P) and

74 nd ultrastructural changes in the trilaminar filtration layers of the nephron.

75 part of this study, we have also tested five filtration matrices for their effectiveness at removing

76 of the magneto-immunoassay, including sample filtration, MB washing and electrochemical detection, is

77 Microbial cellulose is an effective membrane filtration medium, and pristine microbial membranes can

78 Living Filtration Membranes (LFMs) are a water filtration techn

79 Water filtration membranes produced sustainably through microb

80 icrofluidic devices, to cylindrical pores in filtration membranes, to nanoporous glasses and carbon n

81 Utilizing this filtration method, 75 solutions from 0 to 150 ppb lead g

82 Conventional capture and filtration methods are limited because (1) filtration do

83 mpared our model to current state-of-the-art filtration methods like Gaussian Mixture Models, Random

84 The cell transfer coefficient measured under filtration mode and at a higher shear rate showed a simi

85 A porous media filtration model was used to determine the attachment ef

86 Classic filtration models assume a homogeneous pore space and la

87 ving conditions, an extension to established filtration models is developed.

88 e presented model as well as for established filtration models.

89 pore has routinely fit-tested staff for high-filtration N95 respirators and established Web-based sta

90 ld threaten ecosystem services such as water filtration, nutrient cycling, habitat stabilization, and

91 is a useful adjunct to improve high pressure filtration of foodstuffs.

92 The first priority is cytocentrifugation and filtration of fresh, unfixed effusion fluid to produce a

93 rder to reliably predict the particle number filtration of gasoline particulate filters (GPF) under p

94 principle, we report the rapid and efficient filtration of polystyrene beads from small molecules and

95 due to their potential to deliver precision filtration of species with performance that can challeng

96 ersonal protective equipment, evacuation and filtration of surgical plume, limiting energy device use

97 to excellent yields (36-99%) after a simple filtration on a pad of silica gel.

98 It may be a result of impaired glomerular filtration or impaired proximal tubule (PT) reabsorption

99 thyl octanoate (fermentation, maturation and filtration), or ethyl alcohol and isoamyl acetate (final

100 s are removed after fermentation by racking, filtration, or centrifugation, which add costs to the ov

101 ing carbon nanotube arrays with differential filtration porosity for the rapid enrichment and optical

102 egulating glomerular blood flow and reducing filtration pressure.

103 f permeate) via a fast, flow-through electro-filtration process without the addition of chemical prec

104 modified classic techniques, modern membrane filtration processes and no organic solvents to yield on

105 ough microbial cellulose production can have filtration properties altered through facile chemical tr

106 s to others), but laboratory studies of mask filtration properties suggest that they could also provi

107 atrial fibrillation and estimated glomerular filtration rate >=15 mL/(min.1.73 m(2)) were identified

108 30 to 5000 mg/g and an estimated glomerular filtration rate >=25 to <75 mL per min per 1.73 m(2), tr

109 re prescribed a NOAC in estimated glomerular filtration rate >=90, 60 to 90, 45 to 60, 30 to 45, 15 t

110 nd poor renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min or graft loss at 1 y, n = 66

111 Estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) was a key exclu

112 ents with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) from the Swedi

113 es (male sex, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), Killip class >=II,

114 nder the curve [AUC]4.5/AUC5, for glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min only) administered intravenou

115 3 populations: baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(-2), albuminuria,

116 proteinuria >=1+ and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) base on both out- a

117 sure, beta-blocker use, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), higher most recent

118 HFrEF and moderate CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60-30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), for whom b

119 me of GF, mortality, or estimated glomerular filtration rate <= 20mL/min/1.73m.

120 isease (CKD, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <=60 mL/min) status.

121 e no differences in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (57.7 +/- 18.2 vs 56.3 +/- 17.7, P = .75

122 -, P = .9), 1-year mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (63 mL/min D+ vs 57 mL/min D-, P = .31),

123 cted in each of the 1000 splits), glomerular filtration rate (794 splits), diabetes (323 splits) and

124 dex, blood pressure, or estimated glomerular filtration rate (all P for interaction >0.20).

125 ts with normal baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR >90 mL/minute/1.73 m2).

126 hort Study with a first estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 after January

127 ey disease at baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <= 60 mL/min/BSA) (n = 118), we c

128 Participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 59 to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 on two co

129 pre- and postope-rative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine were noted.

130 idney disease measures, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-to-creatinine

131 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine (sCr) i

132 to-creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine and cys

133 variates, stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before imaging (>=60 mL/min/1.73

134 volume (TKV) growth and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline over 3 years.

135 uate the decline of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with chronic kidney d

136 m creatinine (SCr) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the MELD-Na score may improve

137 s presented with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 13 +/- 11 mL/min/1.73 m2, and

138 30 to less than 300, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25 to less than 60 ml per minu

139 itively associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time and a log-unit increase

140 duals but the impact on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remains unclear.

141 ry outcome was 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease

142 Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 43.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (interq

143 tion were retrieved and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated.

144 fat (BF) percentage and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were identified.

145 ly adjusted for BMI and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were used.

146 We determined baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the Chronic Kidney Disease E

147 with pre- and post-TAVR estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and assess association of post-T

148 ctive protein (hs-CRP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and homeostasis model assessment

149 aphics, blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria.

150 tion for heart failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body-mass index, and region (pos

151 her: >=50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), end-stage renal disease, or deat

152 ction measures included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, and blood pressure.

153 ure (ACGF) and 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), respectively.

154 ), defined by a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

155 plasmin (ogen) uria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

156 han had higher baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, p < 0.001).

157 ted negatively with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, rho = -0.309, p < 0.0001).

158 , within groups with preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >=60 mL/min/1.73 m; GFR between 30

159 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary albumin excretion rate

160 on was assessed by measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urine albumin excretion, and k

161 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is a key aspect in the

162 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is indicated before eve

163 /protein models to predict future glomerular filtration rate (GFR) deterioration in this population.

164 inol may slow the decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in persons with type 1 diabetes an

165 Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is central to the assessment of ki

166 Reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) not meeting CKD criteria was obser

167 Kidney size and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) often increase with the onset of d

168 The best glomerular filtration rate (GFR) recovery in survivors was a median

169 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the GFR assess

170 al oxygen availability (RO(2)) to glomerular filtration rate (GFR), a measure of relative renal hypox

171 asculopathy (CAV), improvement in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and reduced malignancy.

172 based calculations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

173 use disorder (AUD) and comparable Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).

174 Primary end point was glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

175 s. r = 0.29; Meng test p = 0.07), glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.52 vs. r = -0.24; Meng test p =

176 ts were associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (rs58720902 at AQR, minor allele frequen

177 ion with increased single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) following unilateral-nephrectomy

178 , 0.94-1.43; P = 0.16), estimated glomerular filtration rate 1-y posttransplant (B, 0.58; 95% CI, -2.

179 fter LT in the SIR arm (estimated glomerular filtration rate 74 [57-95] versus 67 [55-85] mL/min/1.73

180 ations to patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2); upper b

181 ease (CKD) at baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) or albumin-t

182 nction (>=2 measures of estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 >=90 days apar

183 med among patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate above 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at ICU admissi

184 tigated the prevalence of reduced glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria in the Fontan population

185 lbuminuria, leading to decline in glomerular filtration rate and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), has

186 significantly superior estimated glomerular filtration rate and lowest rate of chronic kidney diseas

187 ence in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate and the number of patients alive without

188 ephrotic mice displayed decreased glomerular filtration rate and urinary potassium excretion associat

189 identify novel loci for estimated glomerular filtration rate and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio in

190 rphisms associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate are located in the SHROOM3 gene, suggest

191 surrounding the donor candidate's glomerular filtration rate assessment.

192 delayed graft function, estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 y, or long-term graft survival.

193 Glomerular filtration rate at 12 months and rates of biopsy-proven

194 The median (range) estimated glomerular filtration rate at 2 years posttransplant was 61.3 (24.0

195 Median estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months following transplantation wa

196 The decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years post-biopsy was significantly

197 (HR, 2.26; P = 0.015); even when glomerular filtration rate at month 3 < 30 mL/min/1.73 m (HR, 2.61;

198 Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 36 was comparable between group

199 d that patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) be educated ab

200 gnificant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate between CS and MP at 12 months posttrans

201 An estimated glomerular filtration rate by chronic kidney disease (CKD)-EPI-CysC

202 Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by the plasma clearance of an IV single

203 n between treatment and estimated glomerular filtration rate categories for any outcome.

204 d patients according to classical glomerular filtration rate categories in approximately half of the

205 atinine doubling or 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, kidney failure, or death), alon

206 ts with elevated cfDNA, estimated glomerular filtration rate declined by 8.5% (interquartile rate [IQ

207 All known estimated glomerular filtration rate equations displayed high biases and unac

208 using creatinine based estimated glomerular filtration rate equations.

209 diatric inpatients with estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73

210 rrors when compared with measured glomerular filtration rate in a mixed ICU population, with the lowe

211 icantly associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate in meta-analysis with replication sample

212 may preserve tubular function and glomerular filtration rate in the long term.

213 and trials indicate that reduced glomerular filtration rate increases the risk of stroke by about 40

214 ents who have AKI or an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) who are no

215 In patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m, the false-po

216 r lymphocyte counts and estimated glomerular filtration rate levels, and had higher serum lactate deh

217 Finally, estimated glomerular filtration rate misclassified patients according to clas

218 onic kidney disease (an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) or re

219 Nine LD had estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 mL/min/1.73 m versus 43 in THIN (

220 ne ratio >300 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) To clarify

221 age of 62 +/- 13 y old and a mean glomerular filtration rate of 59 +/- 20 mL/min/1.73m.

222 lure, on the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate over time, and on the risk of serious ad

223 On average, estimated glomerular filtration rate slope improved postconversion in non-HS

224 The estimated glomerular filtration rate slope postconversion was compared using

225 50.6% were male, median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 42.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, and median urin

226 Mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 74.7 mL/min and 62.4 mL/min with eve

227 Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was found to be a strong moderator of pr

228 tion of pre-angiography estimated glomerular filtration rate with adverse outcomes.

229 dose of iohexol and estimation of glomerular filtration rate with creatinine or cystatin C-based stan

230 tion of pre-angiography estimated glomerular filtration rate with the primary outcome.

231 of the pre-angiography estimated glomerular filtration rate with these outcomes.

232 ype, pregraft sensitization, mo 3 glomerular filtration rate).

233 off levels (> 333 ug/L [estimated glomerular filtration rate, > 60 mL/min/1.73 m], > 1,306 ug/L [30-6

234 chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 25 to 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of

235 3 months before biopsy (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 55.3 +/- 18.9 mL/min/1.73 m).

236 ith kidney-related traits such as glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, hypertension, electrolyte

237 raphics, comorbidities, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and enrollment strata.

238 Full blood count, glomerular filtration rate, and liver function test were obtained a

239 delayed graft function, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and occult UOC.

240 cardiac complications, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and occurrence of delayed graft functio

241 ex, smoking, education, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and study center.

242 L with estimated kidney function (glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) and overall survival at 2 years p

243 eir sensitivity to changes in the glomerular filtration rate, glomerular protein leak, tubular protei

244 increased liver stiffness, lower glomerular filtration rate, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriureti

245 tography-derived liver stiffness, glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic pepti

246 L, or >=25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, or an increase in cystatin C >=0.3 mg/L

247 uracy when compared with measured glomerular filtration rate, overestimating renal function.

248 nd fibrosis biomarkers; and lower glomerular filtration rate, peak oxygen consumption, 6-minute walk

249 ithout AKI or with high estimated glomerular filtration rate, penKid was associated with higher morta

250 race, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, previous myocardial infarction, heart f

251 The effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine level, and the risk fo

252 eviously suggested that estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels (> 333 ug

253 ate can be reduced when estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels are appli

254 te previously suggested estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels.

255 nal dysfunction affects estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer test characteristics.

256 liferative disease, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

257 o-creatinine ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

258 at the lowest baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate.

259 layed graft function or estimated glomerular filtration rate.

260 lood urea nitrogen, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

261 Among 28 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates <30 mL/min who received >=5 days of cef

262 for administering prophylaxis to glomerular filtration rates <30ml/min/1.73m(2) and eliminating most

263 ined stable with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rates of 67 +/- 21 and 71 +/- 19 at 36 and 60

264 ionally, the influence of varying glomerular filtration rates, kidney somatostatin receptor densities

265 ethnic groups and the spectrum of glomerular filtration rates.

266 Biological filtration reduced concentrations of carbonyls by over 9

267 roduced with both strains displayed improved filtration-related properties.

268 port current practice is very scarce, proper filtration remains one important approach to maintain th

269 For comparison, we estimate that filtration removed ~130 mg/h of PM(0.01-0.3).

270 Filtration results in the loss of antioxidant compounds

271 Water treatment varied from disinfection, filtration, sedimentation, and activated carbon techniqu

272 un nanofibers have extensive applications in filtration, sensing, drug delivery, and tissue engineeri

273 artially purified by ultrafiltration and gel filtration showed a specific activity of 2793 U/mg.

274 nd glomerulosclerosis and increased podocyte filtration slit density, as assessed by STED super-resol

275 al and juxtamedullary nephrons, and podocyte filtration slit density.

276 cyte density in juxtamedullary nephrons, and filtration slit density.

277 these parameters were also obtained without filtration (SSF = 0).

278 e by applying molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) filtration step followed by shotgun proteomic analysis.

279 om HCPs can be easily achieved with the MWCO filtration step.

280 Our findings highlight a new electro-filtration strategy and an innovative reactive membrane

281 The unique engulfment filtration strategy of microphagous rorqual whales has e

282 o a 3.5-fold elevation in albumin glomerular filtration, supporting the use of microalbuminuria scree

283 viation (MD) of the VF, VF test duration and filtration surgery on IOP fluctuations.

284 ely to result in further incisional glaucoma filtration surgery than CS alone at 3 years.

285 the oldest known zeolite water purification filtration system occurs in the undisturbed sediments of

286 aquiferous system evolved from an open-type filtration system, and that the first metazoans were fil

287 samples were fractionated using differential filtration techniques, and metagenomic sequencing was pe

288 ving Filtration Membranes (LFMs) are a water filtration technology that was recently developed in the

289 e changes in fluorescence occurred following filtration they were correlated with potential controlli

290 mes passed through the POU faucet or pitcher filtration units.

291 Membrane filtration using recycled hemodialyzers allows water pur

292 stimation of a dialyzable fraction, dialysis filtration was conducted.

293 le chemical composition and demonstrate that filtration was effective in preventing UFP emissions and

294 ial bioavailability, evaluated by tangential filtration, was not detected.

295 ly organized surface structure-essential for filtration-was disrupted, and key proteins were mislocal

296 es, with applications such as drinking water filtration, wastewater treatment, and contaminant remedi

297 Here, through comprehensive filtration, we prioritized rs7198799, a common SNP in th

298 Urine samples after gel filtration were analyzed for the presence of different m

299 The pioneer bacteria and archaea (without filtration) were identified by next-generation sequencin

300 onsidered in macroscopic models for particle filtration, yet is critical to consider in the processes