ライフサイエンスコーパス: filtration surgery

1 inhibitors, daily dose of BAK, and glaucoma filtration surgery.

2 mproved after completely successful glaucoma filtration surgery.

3 vent subconjunctival scarring after glaucoma filtration surgery.

4 nd White rabbits underwent modified glaucoma filtration surgery.

5 st cause of late bleb failure after glaucoma filtration surgery.

6 P may not manifest until subsequent glaucoma filtration surgery.

7 verse effect profile compared to traditional filtration surgery.

8 (ECP) can cause complications in subsequent filtration surgery.

9 d and 1 that required revision of a previous filtration surgery.

10 s an initial procedure prior to conjunctival filtration surgeries.

11 In a rabbit model of filtration surgery, AgNPs are a reasonable alternative t

12 ate leaks are a major problem after glaucoma filtration surgery and can result in hypotony or endopht

13 lications, and long-term results of glaucoma filtration surgery and discuss different surgical recomm

14 summarize the current variations of glaucoma filtration surgery and evidence-based review of their po

15 potential to improve outcomes after glaucoma filtration surgery and for several ocular disorders, inc

16 d be used to prevent fibrosis after glaucoma filtration surgery and other contractile scarring condit

17 Next, 32 additional NZW rabbits underwent filtration surgery and received either single or multipl

18 rative vitroretinopathy, failure of glaucoma filtration surgery, and corneal haze.

19 sy, trabeculectomy specimens obtained during filtration surgery, and meshworks from anterior segments

20 e in handling current variations of glaucoma filtration surgery are essential to offer an individuali

21 with visual field progression or history of filtration surgery between the groups with anterior and

22 the same time, although the combination with filtration surgery can produce a strong inflammatory res

23 e need for postoperative incisional glaucoma filtration surgery compared with CS after 5 years.

24 n AMT eyes was significantly greater than in filtration surgery controls (P = 0.014), though not at o

25 Six animals with AMT and six filtration surgery-controls were euthanatized at each of

26 sion to perform either laser or conventional filtration surgery depend on the physician's judgment an

27 MicroShunt, a controlled ab externo glaucoma filtration surgery device, was investigated in a 2-year,

28 Medical therapy, laser trabeculoplasty, and filtration surgery each have their advocates as the best

29 ive injections of saratin following glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS) in the rabbit model.

30 ENT FINDINGS: Recent innovations in glaucoma filtration surgery have focused on wound modulation to e

31 ], 5.18 [95% CI, 1.57-17.18]), previous tube filtration surgery (HR, 5.23 [95% CI, 1.47-7.33]), and r

32 a means of improving the success of glaucoma filtration surgery in a safe and nontoxic manner.

33 wenty-four albino rabbits underwent glaucoma filtration surgery in one eye.

34 izumab significantly improved the outcome of filtration surgery in this model.

35 odel of scar tissue formation after glaucoma filtration surgery increased the long-term success of th

36 armacologic advances in relation to glaucoma filtration surgery is reviewed.

37 with early treatment (often including early filtration surgery) is needed to avoid glaucoma when vis

38 my (PI), routinely performed during glaucoma filtration surgery, may contribute to scarring.

39 Glaucoma filtration surgery often fails because of the fibrotic r

40 viation (MD) of the VF, VF test duration and filtration surgery on IOP fluctuations.

41 Glaucoma filtration surgery or microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MI

42 Other alternatives, such as incisional filtration surgery, should be considered following faile

43 Filtration surgery survival was significantly longer in

44 ely to result in further incisional glaucoma filtration surgery than CS alone at 3 years.

45 sional work, which was the study of glaucoma filtration surgery, then in its early development from 1

46 odel of scar tissue formation after glaucoma filtration surgery, they increased the long-term success

47 Eyes were excluded for prior filtration surgery, trabeculoplasty within 90 days of th

48 Patients scheduled for glaucoma filtration surgery were included.

49 These findings are important in filtration surgery, where constant changes in the local

50 Filtration surgery with concurrent topical application o

51 s a greater extent of ECD loss than glaucoma filtration surgeries without the use of implants.