戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 reasing abdominal distention and not passing flatus.
2 ne of the main malodorous compounds in human flatus.
3 nausea score (4.7 vs 3.5; P = 0.01), days to flatus (4.8 vs 3.7 days; P = 0.04), and LOS (7.0 vs 5.0
4 h respect to the primary outcomes of time to flatus and bowel motion.
5  return of gut function, assessed by time to flatus and first bowel motion.
6 aroscopic patients, mean times to passage of flatus and first bowel movement were 3.6 +/- 0.2 days an
7       No significant difference was seen for flatus and minor leaks.
8  18% were able to always distinguish between flatus and stools, and this ability was similar in patie
9 abdominal pain, borborygmi, bloating, excess flatus, and stools/day) between cinnamon and placebo gro
10 0.79-0.95, P < 0.001), but not time to first flatus, best indicated recovery of gastrointestinal tran
11      The median time to the first passage of flatus decreased from 70 to 49 hours (P=0.03), the media
12                                              Flatus frequency (7.5+/-1.9 times/12 h) was significantl
13 l, rice meal (3.2+/-0.8 times/12 h), whereas flatus frequency after the low-oligosaccharide soy meal
14 aldigestion reported significantly increased flatus frequency and subjective impression of rectal gas
15 an indicator of carbohydrate malabsorption), flatus frequency, and abdominal symptoms were assessed a
16  most important items were "incontinence for flatus," "incontinence for liquid stools," "frequency,"
17 ary endpoints included nausea score, days to flatus, length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative
18 he most common symptoms were incontinence to flatus (n = 86/132; 65.2%) and defaecatory clustering (8
19 lly useful means of controlling fecal and/or flatus odor and of decreasing the putative injurious eff
20 uld be clinically useful in the treatment of flatus odor and of ulcerative colitis.
21 , none was fully continent to both stool and flatus; only four were totally continent to solid and li
22              However, it accelerated time to flatus or stool (18.9 vs 32.7 hours; P = 0.047) and time
23 al response (defined as prompt evacuation of flatus or stool and a reduction in abdominal distention)
24 ting for 3 consecutive meals) and passage of flatus or stool.
25  difference was seen in mortality, return of flatus, or risk of paralytic ileus.
26                                 Frequency of flatus passage and flatus severity ratings after the lac
27              Frequency of flatus passage and flatus severity ratings after the lactose challenge decr
28 time to ambulation, time to first passage of flatus/stool, length of hospital stay, and pathophysiolo
29                            Median passage of flatus was 1 day later (4 vs 3 days, 2 [1-2], p=0.001);
30  Almost all of the patients passed stool and flatus within 24 hours of surgery.