ライフサイエンスコーパス: flexion

1 ed in the posterior direction (ankle plantar flexion).

2 to pressure elevation (e.g. effusions, joint flexion).

3 ignificant mean difference of 13.3% of trunk flexion).

4 ts and, to a lesser extent, extension versus flexion.

5 e activated during neck rotation and lateral flexion.

6 PADs evoked by both sources were maximal in flexion.

7 ctus femoris (RF) produces an additional hip flexion.

8 ation and may not be associated with lateral flexion.

9 These structures unlock automatically during flexion.

10 arger when the ipsilateral hip was moving in flexion.

11 eral leg was moving either into extension or flexion.

12 ectromyography (EMG) before and during ankle flexion.

13 ring hip extension and reinforced during hip flexion.

14 oronal plane with the elbow in 20 degrees of flexion.

15 stsynaptic neuron firing and a contralateral flexion.

16 les for generating uropod flaring and telson flexion.

17 complete axial rotation and reduced cervical flexion.

18 stretch injury from cervical hyperextension/flexion.

19 was successful with all methods with forced flexion.

20 ermined and expressed as percentage of trunk flexion.

21 as they performed repetitions of full trunk flexion.

22 aracterised by abnormal thoracolumbar spinal flexion.

23 on and was mildest when it was around 20 deg flexion.

24 isting of repeated dorsal-ventral whole-body flexions.

25 onsisting of alternating left and right body flexions.

26 .93 degrees (95% CI 0.19-1.66 degrees ); for flexion, 1.11 degrees (95% CI 0.38-1.85 degrees ).

27 Upon hip flexion, 23 CIA and 116 EIA stenoses showed kinking (mea

28 subjects (age 25-45 years) performed finger flexion (7 % maximal voluntary contraction at 0.67 Hz) u

29 ocomotion [5], the nerve chord for abdominal flexion [9], antennal muscles [2, 10], and the flight mu

30 3.2 degrees [13.6 degrees ], P =.03; passive flexion: 90.5 degrees [6.8 degrees ] vs 81.8 degrees [13

31 pearance as either taut or lax in extension, flexion, abduction, adduction, and internal and external

32 hograde posture and (2) lateral side-to-side flexion about the C6-T3 axis while in a pronograde postu

33 infants toward airway collapse include neck flexion, airway secretions, gastroesophageal reflux, and

34 unction had 87% excellent recovery for elbow flexion and 67% for elbow extension.

35 easure brain activity in response to forward flexion and abduction in 16 patients with Polar Type II/

36 n of two seed release mechanisms: cone scale flexion and cone scale shedding.

37 muscle impairment was quantified by plantar flexion and dorsiflexion strength, compound muscle actio

38 and extension, and concentric ankle plantar flexion and dorsiflexion, and 3) body mass index and a k

39 The mean maximal range of motion of shoulder flexion and elbow extension increased significantly.

40 and elbow flexion) and 'reach out' (shoulder flexion and elbow extension).

41 vements were a sagittal 'reach up' (shoulder flexion and elbow flexion) and 'reach out' (shoulder fle

42 In contrast, head flexion and extension exerted nonspecific bilateral effe

43 ol subjects' was over 40% higher during both flexion and extension movements when compared with the p

44 iceps head over the medial epicondyle during flexion and extension movements.

45 haracteristics of the organization of finger flexion and extension movements.

46 ssing neurons in legs were stretched by both flexion and extension of corresponding joints.

47 rse spatial scale, the activity patterns for flexion and extension of the same finger would appear ve

48 Flexion and extension of the same finger, which never co

49 ifferent fingers, but were quite similar for flexion and extension of the same finger.

50 on of dorsostability and reduced reliance on flexion and extension of the spine allowed for increased

51 hase-related amplitudes, which resembled the flexion and extension sequence of the fingers.

52 Truncal flexion and extension strength, hand grip strength, leg

53 ed tone of the limbs at rest and with active flexion and extension were observed in the survivors of

54 running, loss of righting reflex, and tonic flexion and extension, and are followed by a postictal p

55 th measures of concentric and eccentric knee flexion and extension, and concentric ankle plantar flex

56 population activity in M1 for single finger flexion and extension, using 7T functional magnetic reso

57 ne of the two dominant phases of locomotion: flexion and extension.

58 of phase locking at the transitions between flexion and extension.

59 and visible adjustment of the knee with each flexion and extension.

60 d from the normal phasing pattern underlying flexion and extension.

61 ions commenced from a position of full elbow flexion and full wrist extension.

62 ences were found in the stifle flexion, hock flexion and hock adduction, suggesting greater movement

63 The composite is sensitive to pressure and flexion and recovers its mechanical and electrical prope

64 ite resistance varies inversely with applied flexion and tactile forces.

65 rgery resulted in a decrease in both truncal flexion and truncal extension.

66 Indeed both voluntary finger flexion and voluntary leg extension produced significant

67 iew radiographs of the knee in 30 degrees of flexion and with weight bearing were obtained at baselin

68 cortex, we evoked finger movements involving flexions and extensions of multiple digits, or of the fi

69 nd the majority of these consisted of finger flexions and extensions.

70 ittal 'reach up' (shoulder flexion and elbow flexion) and 'reach out' (shoulder flexion and elbow ext

71 sed the initial phase of the movement (wrist flexion) and assisted the reverse phase, so that recruit

72 s of paw placement, weight-bearing, and limb flexion, and (3) the lowest level of body weight support

73 eptive acuity was assessed in varus, valgus, flexion, and extension using threshold to detection of p

74 power and isometric knee extension, plantar flexion, and hand grip strength measures.

75 orientation behavior either before or during flexion, and only larvae that were within a given maximu

76 ror when attempting to reproduce a test knee flexion angle (a measure of joint position sense).

77 , 40, 60, 80, and 100%), during which lumbar flexion angle and trunk moment were recorded.

78 onally, the middle age group had higher knee flexion angle at ground contact in walking (p = 0.005) a

79 g speed (r = 0.73), cadence (r = 0.79), knee flexion angle at maximum extension (r = 0.83), and Gait

80 There were significant effects of flexion angle on initial moment, moment drop, changes in

81 ed neutral zone increased exponentially with flexion angle.

82 reproduce the in vivo knee position at each flexion angle.

83 ing BO bisect offset measurements at various flexion angles with 4D four-dimensional CT.

84 ion exposures and the influence of different flexion angles.

85 severe FPA deformations occurring with limb flexion are likely involved.

86 lunge motion from 0 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion as images were recorded with a dual fluoroscopic

87 rs were much stiffer for stretching than for flexion, as expected from their diameter and length.

88 s, ten healthy men performed isometric elbow flexion at 20% to 70% of their maximal force.

89 ignificant only for abduction at 1 month and flexion at 3 months.

90 ealthy subjects sustained an isometric elbow flexion at 30% maximal level until exhaustion while thei

91 As the K/L score was increasing, the knee flexion at the heel strike and 50% of the stance phase i

92 or tasks, contributing to an upper extremity flexion bias following stroke.

93 ere measured with the elbow at 30 degrees of flexion, both at rest and with valgus stress.

94 interneurons mediates flexion reflex and the flexion components of locomotion and scratching.

95 se fasciitis, with severe loss of motion and flexion contractures in multiple joints.

96 isorder of the palmar fascia, which leads to flexion contractures of the digits, and is associated wi

97 neous nodular tumors, gingival fibromatosis, flexion contractures of the joints, and an accumulation

98 skin thickness score (MRSS), and knee joint flexion contractures were measured with a goniometer.

99 ity, corpus callosum agenesis or hypoplasia, flexion contractures, brachydactyly of hands and feet wi

100 progressive fibrosis of the palm leading to flexion deformities of the digits that impair hand funct

101 descending stairs, palpable effusion, fixed-flexion deformity, restricted-flexion range of motion, a

102 on in the limbs to stand still, but how much flexion depends directly on where its CM is assumed to l

103 sonance scanner using a custom-built plantar flexion device.

104 en the wrist was spontaneously moving in the flexion direction, extension direction or at random.

105 d tibialis anterior generated an increase in flexion duration and augmented the evoked electrical res

106 tingent shock) do not exhibit an increase in flexion duration and fail to learn when tested with cont

107 s extended exhibit a progressive increase in flexion duration that minimizes net shock exposure, a si

108 ed (contingent shock) exhibit an increase in flexion duration, a simple form of instrumental learning

109 f leg position do not exhibit an increase in flexion duration.

110 set of spinal cord neurons that produce hip flexion during flexion reflex, locomotion, and scratchin

111 oe-walking" gait with excessive hip and knee flexion during stance.

112 exions (LR) and rhythmic dorsal-ventral body flexions (DV).

113 locking at the transition from extension to flexion (E to F) is stronger than at the transition from

114 rog (0.33-0.58)], as well as tonic and ankle flexion-evoked EMG activity.

115 Comparison between knee extension and flexion exercise at the same RPE with and without PTV fo

116 An energetic plantar flexion exercise fatigability test and magnetic resonanc

117 Symptomatic fatigue during plantar flexion exercise occurs at a common energetic limit in a

118 Then the subjects performed plantar flexion exercise producing a torque of ~8ft-lb.

119 eatine recovery kinetics following a plantar flexion exercise using an efficient sampling scheme with

120 lower operating pressure (P < 0.05) and knee flexion exercise with PTV (increased CC activation) rese

121 cts also performed static knee extension and flexion exercise without PTV at a force development that

122 rmed duplicate MR experiments during plantar flexion exercise, three weeks apart.

123 in calf muscles during recovery from plantar flexion exercise.

124 and WBRT groups performed knee extension and flexion exercises, and the WBRT group also performed che

125 elaxation of the lumbar spine in response to flexion exposures and the influence of different flexion

126 activation in the motor cortex during simple flexion-extension finger movements.

127 between strain changes and amount of lumbar flexion-extension motion compared to L5S1 (R(2) <= 0.5).

128 getting each subject to perform an isolated flexion-extension movement at each of the shoulder, elbo

129 The metronome-timed flexion-extension movement speed varied 36-fold from "sl

130 inger and both one-finger passive and active flexion-extension movement tasks for the three groups.

131 atients were scanned while performing a hand flexion-extension movement twice before and twice after

132 attached semi-isolated preparations, passive flexion-extension movements applied to a single hindlimb

133 st, slow or moderately paced voluntary wrist flexion-extension movements dramatically increase the ha

134 lthy subjects performed a series of imagined flexion-extension movements of the fingers.

135 of six healthy subjects while they performed flexion-extension movements of the right index finger (f

136 contributes to their differential actions on flexion-extension movements.

137 Two animals performed an index finger flexion-extension task to track a target presented on a

138 xion phase of contralateral rhythmical wrist flexion-extension.

139 g (fMRI) while tracking complex targets with flexion/extension at right finger, elbow and ankle separ

140 ted a virtual table through continuous wrist flexion/extension movements with the goal to position a

141 assembled in a medicare brace to record the flexion/extension of joints, which may benefit personali

142 uring 10, 30, and 70% of maximal right wrist flexion force.

143 erosseous during the generation of fingertip flexion forces.

144 Patients with PD and Pisa syndrome (lateral flexion >10 degrees in the standing position) were exami

145 ccuracy of reproduction of the angle of knee flexion had modest effects on the trajectory of pain and

146 d other discrete motor responses (e.g., limb flexion, head turn, etc.) learned with an aversive uncon

147 lateral differences were found in the stifle flexion, hock flexion and hock adduction, suggesting gre

148 Flexion imagination with TMS increased MEPs in flexors a

149 Quadriceps strength deficits and knee flexion impairments persisted.

150 It required some flexion in the limbs to stand still, but how much flexio

151 echanics between 0 degrees and 60 degrees of flexion in the medial compartment of the knee.

152 rmation from 0 degrees to 30 degrees of knee flexion in the presence of ACL deficiency.

153 tolith organs and involved both rotation and flexion in the spine.

154 low-intensity (0.5-2.0 kg), rhythmic plantar flexion in the supine posture.

155 e stance phase increased while the peak knee flexion in the swing phase decreased.

156 22 subjects performed plantar flexions in a 7T MR-scanner, leading to PCr changes rang

157 Flexion-induced changes in viscous properties and neutra

158 f-expanding stents significantly affect limb flexion-induced FPA deformations, but in different ways.

159 Further, the DeltaMAP during 0.5 kg plantar flexion inversely correlated with the ankle-brachial ind

160 sual; obligatory external rotation of hip in flexion is classic.

161 ammable stimulator, and the resultant finger flexion joint angles were recorded using a motion captur

162 goniometer, 2) a posteroanterior (PA) fixed-flexion knee radiograph (anatomic(PA) axis), and 3) an a

163 with knee OA underwent nonfluoroscopic fixed-flexion knee radiography.

164 valent of which are rhythmic left-right body flexions (LR) and rhythmic dorsal-ventral body flexions

165 with the placebo group at discharge (active flexion: mean [SD], 84.2 degrees [11.1 degrees ] vs 73.2

166 omparisons are made to other passive digital flexion mechanisms suggested to exist in other vertebrat

167 and myometric measurements of ankle plantar flexion (median change -0.5 Nm, IQR -9.5 to 0, p=0.0007)

168 upling between shoulder abduction and finger flexion, most probably as a result of the low resolution

169 aretic subjects tended to produce concurrent flexion motions of shoulder and elbow joints when attemp

170 nked online neural decoding of extension and flexion motor states with stimulation protocols promotin

171 an ataxic gait characterized by exaggerated flexion movements and marked alterations to the step cyc

172 nce of unconstrained syncopated index finger flexion movements in patients with PD, older adult subje

173 by an exercise protocol (repetitive plantar-flexion movements in supine position; n=28).

174 rtical activation during thumb extension and flexion movements of eight human volunteers was measured

175 bundles by MOSD induces precise extension or flexion movements of the ankle joint, while eight-site s

176 rget on a computer screen with extension and flexion movements of the paretic index finger.

177 (FCO) of the hindleg monitors extension and flexion movements of the tibia and provides the main sou

178 Intermittent Head Drops are episodic head flexion movements that can occur in a number of conditio

179 During ballistic wrist flexion movements, the latency of the second agonist EMG

180 the timely initiation and execution of limb flexion movements.

181 sic EMG pattern accompanying ballistic wrist flexion movements; and reciprocal inhibition between for

182 in the forelimbs and a greater mid-thoracic flexion (n = 60).

183 Flexion number and sensor-based motion variability param

184 structure lies near one end of the range of flexion observed.

185 Mean maximum flexion of affected knees was 114.08 degrees .

186 scillatory activity in the STN and voluntary flexion of either the index or little finger at differen

187 t individuation abnormalities were excessive flexion of joints that should have been held fixed durin

188 Interestingly, flexion of tail and toes could also be evoked.

189 sults demonstrated a significant increase in flexion of the digits (P < 0.001) and elbow (P < 0.005),

190 ions: dorsiflexion of the dominant ankle; or flexion of the dominant wrist.

191 genetically-identified motor neurons control flexion of the fruit fly tibia.

192 in the impaired leg was active during finger flexion of the impaired hand in the stroke survivors and

193 to be triggered by self-initiated voluntary flexion of the index finger.

194 ns, as did MEPs evoked during unopposed weak flexion of the index finger.

195 Passive and active flexion of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joint

196 e an arbitrary number of at least 45 degrees flexion of the thoracolumbar spine when the individual i

197 antly extended three-domain molecule exhibit flexions of <40 degrees .

198 e, instantly peaking pain) and "limited neck flexion on examination" resulted in the Ottawa SAH Rule,

199 ion of the limbs on the side moving down and flexion on the opposite side.

200 which stroking the skin on one side leads to flexion on the other side, is disynaptic.

201 vements from neutral to targets at 20 deg of flexion or extension in response to an auditory cue.

202 ects were then asked to imagine either wrist flexion or extension movements during TMS delivery (n =

203 at the elbow and simultaneously feeling for flexion or extension of the contralateral (paretic) arm.

204 strate that human fMRI activity patterns for flexion or extension of the same finger are highly simil

205 ure in which neural populations that control flexion or extension of the same finger produce distinct

206 nificantly lower than IOP measured with neck flexion or extension or in the recumbent positions.

207 and PADs showed maximal amplitude in either flexion or extension phases.

208 Both of these effects depend on the phase (flexion or extension) of the rhythm in which the stimuli

209 No significant changes in flexion or grip strength, no systemic allergic reactions

210 g of the muscular annular perimeter, annular flexion, or angular excursion of the anterior or posteri

211 measurements obtained at 30 degrees of knee flexion (P = .047) had an association with the presence

212 ignificantly greater DeltaMAP during plantar flexion, particularly at 0.5 kg with the most affected l

213 plit-belt walking, whereas that of the swing/flexion phase decreased.

214 n phase decreased, whereas that of the swing/flexion phase increased.

215 e the limbs were at rest, and during the mid-flexion phase of contralateral rhythmical wrist flexion-

216 iculospinal inputs were increased during the flexion phase, whereas sensory-evoked DRPs and PADs show

217 rn, but with increased firing centred on the flexion phase.

218 the data show that the Q loop is the central flexion point where the aspect of the drug-binding cavit

219 rix exhibits multimodal detection of strain, flexion, pressure, and temperature.

220 The same stimulation delivered during flexion produces a temporary resetting to extension with

221 ne and 30 months using posteroanterior fixed-flexion radiographs and Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading,

222 ondral tibial plateau was performed on fixed flexion radiographs of 248 nonreplaced knees, using a co

223 lity of the nonfluoroscopically guided fixed-flexion radiography protocol to detect knee joint space

224 Hip and knee flexion range contribute significantly to walking veloci

225 aminer variation, revealed that hip and knee flexion range explained 6% of the variance in walking ve

226 ffusion, fixed-flexion deformity, restricted-flexion range of motion, and crepitus.

227 correlation (r) between walking velocity and flexion range of the hip and knee were 0.40 and 0.35, re

228 ed the variance attributable to hip and knee flexion range only slightly, to 5%.

229 ocity over 50 feet explained by hip and knee flexion range, adjusting for the combined influence of d

230 imental studies suggest that prolonged trunk flexion reduces passive support of the spine.

231 t are strongly activated during both fictive flexion reflex and fictive scratching.

232 We show here that flexion reflex and swimming also share key spinal cord c

233 However, similar interactions between leg flexion reflex and swimming have not been reported.

234 a common set of spinal interneurons mediates flexion reflex and the flexion components of locomotion

235 s that are strongly activated during fictive flexion reflex but inhibited during fictive scratching a

236 Leg cutaneous stimuli that evoke flexion reflex can alter the timing of (i.e., reset) cat

237 Flexion reflex can interrupt and reset the rhythm of scr

238 Therefore, leg flexion reflex circuits likely share key spinal interneu

239 escending control of both spinal nociceptive flexion reflex EMG activity and individual dorsal horn n

240 a long-term potentiation (LTP) in the spinal flexion reflex in mammals, presumably to provide enhance

241 These two phase-dependent effects of flexion reflex on the swim rhythm and vice versa togethe

242 and vice versa together demonstrate that the flexion reflex spinal circuit shares key components with

243 ecordings of the H-reflex and nonnociceptive flexion reflex were obtained from pentobarbital-anesthet

244 or nerve activity underlying leg withdrawal (flexion reflex) and the rhythmic, alternating hip flexor

245 The spinal cord can generate leg withdrawal (flexion reflex), locomotion, and scratching in limbed ve

246 f limb movements, including limb withdrawal (flexion reflex), scratching, and locomotion, and thus is

247 cord neurons that produce hip flexion during flexion reflex, locomotion, and scratching based on evid

248 hat spinal cord neuronal networks underlying flexion reflex, multiple forms of locomotion, and scratc

249 the ipsilateral hip flexor bursts of fictive flexion reflex.

250 , HDEMG has not been used to investigate the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP).

251 bar flexion specified relative to individual flexion-relaxation angles (i.e., 30, 40, 60, 80, and 100

252 subjects' ability to reacquire the prolonged flexion response during testing.

253 drug baclofen dose-dependently decreased the flexion response of Chronic Spinal rats (A(50)=4.3 mg/kg

254 ally transected rats can acquire a prolonged flexion response to prevent the delivery of shock.

255 spinal transections can learn to maintain a flexion response when shock delivery is paired with leg

256 (contingent shock) will learn to maintain a flexion response.

257 acquisition and retention of this prolonged flexion response.

258 rotor and the C ring also exhibited angular flexion, resulting in a slight narrowing of both structu

259 These flexion-selective cells are physiologically and morpholo

260 These flexion-selective interneurons are typically rhythmicall

261 also show that our material is pressure- and flexion-sensitive, and therefore suitable for electronic

262 ity parameters, within the normal pace elbow flexion, showed significant between-group differences (m

263 Here we develop a new model of flexion spasms based on prenatal exposure to betamethaso

264 n therapy on the development of age-specific flexion spasms were determined and electroencephalograph

265 in structures involved in the development of flexion spasms.

266 rain structures involved in the induction of flexion spasms.

267 16 min to each of five magnitudes of lumbar flexion specified relative to individual flexion-relaxat

268 raining states and accurately generate wrist flexion states that are intermediate to training levels.

269 AWR demonstrated an increase of both truncal flexion strength (from mean 505.6 N to 572.3 N, P < 0.00

270 ed arm strength (P < 0.05), and improved hip flexion strength (P < 0.05) with treatment.

271 Poorer plantar flexion strength (p trend = 0.004), lower baseline leg p

272 lower calf muscle density and weaker plantar flexion strength, knee extension power, and hand grip we

273 Observed responses to trunk flexion suggest nonlinearity in viscoelastic properties,

274 The Gaussian spread of angles of flexion suggests that flexibility is driven thermally, f

275 The wrist flexion task yielded no differences in onset latencies b

276 ce of a finger tapping task, but not a wrist flexion task, improved significantly with anesthesia of

277 ved in all five tested subjects in imaginary flexion tasks at very short latencies (26.4 +/- 3.7 msec

278 ormed a series of submaximal isometric elbow flexion tasks.

279 mbs suggest greater strength capabilities in flexion than the normal dromaeosaurid condition, in conj

280 ent walking pattern marked by excessive knee flexion that worsens with age.

281 no consensus on the degree of thoracolumbar flexion to define camptocormia.

282 o F) is stronger than at the transition from flexion to extension (F to E).

283 at low obstacle height), and increased head flexion to look down at more immediate areas of the grou

284 ts also generated 0.2 Newton meter voluntary flexion torque in preloading tasks before stretch.

285 ions reveals a pronounced asymmetry favoring flexions toward the central protrusion.

286 fMRI data obtained during rest, thumb flexion (trained movement) and thumb extension (untraine

287 undertaken before unilateral ballistic wrist flexion training.

288 Intervertebral flexion translations from L2-S1 were determined for each

289 Radiography of the knee in the fixed-flexion view provides a sensitive and valid measure of j

290 Knee flexion was increased in the rofecoxib group compared wi

291 observed with complete rings, normal annular flexion was maintained with the Tailor ring before and d

292 As well, IOP in neck flexion was significantly higher than IOP in neck extens

293 the knee in extension and lateral 30 degrees flexion were obtained and assessed for the Kellgren/Lawr

294 g PECO following electrically evoked plantar flexion, where only muscle chemosensitive afferents were

295 d a pattern of finger extension reversing to flexion, whereas the second principal component became i

296 d and torso in the anterior direction (torso flexion) while the hips shifted in the posterior directi

297 nd marked axial weakness, especially of neck flexion, while limb muscles were less involved.

298 contraction (MVC) static knee extension and flexion with manipulation of central command (CC) by pat

299 tral neck position, neck extension, and neck flexion, with the order of measurements randomized.

300 e pulley system was studied at extension and flexion without and with MR tenography.