ライフサイエンスコーパス: flowering

1 consistent under drought stress initiated at flowering.

2 ing hours to lower heat stress damage during flowering.

3 sed to ambient temperature (AT) or HT during flowering.

4 opmental processes such as the initiation of flowering.

5 anslocated protein that regulates precocious flowering.

6 om the samples irrigated at the beginning of flowering.

7 ng as opposed to fall germination and spring flowering.

8 ral regulator of wheat vernalization-induced flowering.

9 ds, generated larger rosettes due to delayed flowering.

10 y mechanism underlying vernalization-reduced flowering.

11 identify regulators of phase transition and flowering.

12 of the florigen gene ZCN8 and causing early flowering.

13 tate gibberellin-promoted stem growth during flowering.

14 expression of several genes to mediate early flowering.

15 e networks directing internode growth during flowering.

16 metaxylem, and its expression is induced by flowering.

17 ch as accelerated shoot elongation and early flowering.

18 lity is due to reduced DNA replication after flowering.

19 IPs with promotive and repressive effects on flowering.

20 Drought selected for earlier flowering(11,12) and a higher expression of OsMADS18 (Os

21 ion factor and is a known regulator of early flowering(13)-marking this gene as a drought-escape gene

22 Oil accumulation began earlier after flowering (2 DAF) in 2011.

23 The evening complex consists of EARLY FLOWERING 3 (ELF3)(4,7), a large scaffold protein and ke

24 rain yield (0.12-1.67 t ha(-1)), days to 50% flowering (68.3-126.3 days), and plant height (128.9-298

25 ct the reproductive benefits of synchronized flowering after fire can alleviate mate-finding Allee ef

26 Vernalization accelerates flowering after prolonged winter cold.

27 ciated among themselves and with days to 50% flowering and 1000-grain weight (TGW) indicating the pos

28 The osfd4 mutants are late flowering and delay expression of genes promoting inflor

29 mination of fruit texture, the regulation of flowering and fruit ripening and the resistance to patho

30 ly controlling phyllotaxy, the transition to flowering and general growth properties.

31 enzyme activity were assessed at vegetative, flowering and grain-filling stages of maize.

32 DSW experienced higher temperature during flowering and had shorter vegetative and maturation peri

33 mised output pathways, such as photoperiodic flowering and hypocotyl elongation.

34 expression of JAZ4DeltaJas results in early flowering and increased length of root, hypocotyl, and p

35 Reducing GA levels strongly impairs flowering and inflorescence development in response to s

36 stigate the genetic pathways that coordinate flowering and inflorescence development of wheat (Tritic

37 fluence of human population density on plant flowering and leaf-out depends on the regional temperatu

38 detected strong signals associated with both flowering and maturity time in a genomic region containi

39 Two hormone systems that universally control flowering and plant architecture, florigen and gibberell

40 Flowering and pod-fill periods were identified as the cr

41 Flowering and pollination dynamics are hypothesised to p

42 However, how control of flowering and seed germination are regulated in moso bam

43 hly from April to September, and the growth, flowering and seed production were evaluated.

44 , root and shoot growth and architecture, to flowering and seed production.

45 ication treatments, as well as the timing of flowering and senescence.

46 n of CYCLIN C1 orthologs in the promotion of flowering and the maintenance of normal reproductive dev

47 ropriate level of activity, leading to early flowering and vigorous growth traits preferentially sele

48 about how flowering offset (i.e., ending of flowering) and duration of populations of the same speci

49 rlying floral scent biosynthesis; and winter flowering, and highlight the utility of multi-omics data

50 to begin deciphering why certain aspects of flowering are seemingly so conserved, and what the impli

51 While the cues that trigger flowering are well-understood, little is known about wha

52 ed toward more spring germination and summer flowering as opposed to fall germination and spring flow

53 een described as part of complexes promoting flowering at the meristem, and little is known about the

54 fied OsFD4 as a component of a FAC promoting flowering at the shoot apical meristem, downstream of Os

55 ifferent physiological growth stages (before flowering, beginning of flowering, pod-set and pod-fill

56 lotype blocks control a 77-day difference in flowering between ecotypes of the silverleaf sunflower H

57 tion of VRN2 does not enhance its effects on flowering, but does potentiate its repressive effects on

58 Furthermore, the synchronization of flowering by burning may improve mating opportunities, r

59 suggesting that it could modulate the end of flowering by controlling responses to both endogenous an

60 increased anthocyanin accumulation and late flowering compared with Col-0, while JAZ4DeltaJas lines

61 DF, while conferring flowering competence, favors a high tolerance to freezin

62 respectively lead to freezing tolerance and flowering competence.

63 t is known about the phylogenetic pattern of flowering control in grasses, and how this relates to br

64 ine previously uncharacterized components of flowering control pathways in the long-day legume, pea (

65 Mass-flowering crops provide forage for bees but also contain

66 t frost have advanced much more rapidly than flowering dates.

67 d with delayed flowering offset and extended flowering duration.

68 hat Hopkins' Bioclimatic Law also applies to flowering durations for summer-blooming species and herb

69 We found longer flowering durations in warmer areas, which is more obvio

70 Empirical forecast models suggested that flowering durations will be longer in 2030 and 2050 unde

71 gered a significant reduction in plant size, flowering, fruit yield, and fruit size.

72 The strongest signal resides in the known flowering gene E2, verifying the effectiveness of our ap

73 ute to the transcriptional regulation of key flowering genes, including the induction of the florigen

74 From germination to flowering, gravity influences plant growth and developme

75 t correlation matrix, genotypes with delayed flowering had lower SLA (thicker, tougher leaves) regard

76 for changes in year-round flowering, we show flowering has become earlier for all communities except

77 juvenile stage in citrus and inducing early flowering has been the focus of several citrus genetic i

78 Heat stress during flowering has differential impact on male and female rep

79 an interplay between promotion and delay of flowering in different climates to balance survival and,

80 at SPL7 and SPL8 induce phase transition and flowering in grasses by directly upregulating SEPALLATA3

81 es (FACs/FRCs), which regulate transition to flowering in leaves and apical meristem.

82 owever, the molecular processes underpinning flowering in nature remain poorly understood.

83 To understand how fruits regulate flowering in polycarpic plants, we focused on alternate

84 , or less rapidly, than the date of onset of flowering in response to climate warming.

85 nts remain dormant through the winter before flowering in spring.

86 ccurred during fall or spring and stimulated flowering in the subsequent summer, thus synchronizing r

87 n the Arabidopsis tfl1-11 mutant and delayed flowering in wild-type Arabidopsis Knockdown of CsTFL1 r

88 sis overexpressing siR109944 exhibited early flowering, increased tiller numbers, and increased susce

89 The FRI protein regulates flowering induction by binding partner proteins on its N

90 n different groups including: genes from the flowering induction pathway, APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE

91 precisely florigenic homologs contribute to flowering initiation and how these factors interact gene

92 ermore, BdES43 was antagonistic to BdFTL2 in flowering initiation in a transcription-dependent manner

93 flowering, whereas BdFTL2 was essential for flowering initiation.

94 We found flowering involves a stepwise increase in the expression

95 aintaining sufficient water transport during flowering is essential for proper organ growth, fertiliz

96 In many perennial plants, seasonal flowering is primarily controlled by environmental condi

97 Flowering is regulated by genes that respond to changing

98 tral C(3) photosynthesis in a broad range of flowering land plant families and in both monocots and d

99 cular function we identified the Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) as a direct target and found icu

100 pressive complex 2 to epigenetically silence FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) during vernalization, is central

101 a, the cold-induced epigenetic regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) involves distinct phases of Poly

102 in expression levels of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) leads to differences in vernaliz

103 genes CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) that are known targets of the HU

104 lated genes, such as FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), AGAMOUS (AG) and APETALA 3 (AP3

105 and epigenetic silencing of floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC).

106 omotes transcription of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC).

107 etermining when a plant flowers (focusing on FLOWERING LOCUS C, FRIGIDA, and CONSTANS), highlight som

108 TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and their orthologs antagonistica

109 FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) is a small phloem-translocated pr

110 r DF is characterized by an up-regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) postvernalization independent of

111 FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) protein, physiologically florigen

112 (probably through deletion of a homologue of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)), and are associated with seed si

113 epressor of flowering-related genes, such as FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), AGAMOUS

114 he florigens Heading Date 3a (Hd3a) and Rice Flowering Locus T 1 (RFT1), OsFD-like basic leucine zipp

115 oral transition through direct repression of FLOWERING LOCUS T and GIBBERELLIN 3-OXIDASE1/2, encoding

116 ves a stepwise increase in the expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T1 (FT1), which initiates under day-neut

117 pletion of spikelet formation is promoted by FLOWERING LOCUS T2, which regulates spikelet number and

118 of 22 flowering PTG events and 11 out of 12 flowering MPG events showed modified floral phenotypes i

119 Consistent with the rapid-flowering mutant phenotype, a range of genes involved in

120 Fine mapping of a rapid-flowering mutant was done using whole-genome sequence da

121 isolated two complementation groups of late-flowering mutants in pea that define two uncharacterized

122 om early flowering populations on five early flowering native species were greater than the effects o

123 Flowering of B. gracilis and soil respiration responded

124 as well as leaf water potential, growth, and flowering of the dominant grass species (Bouteloua graci

125 The best-attested early flowering of these distinctive features was in a glacial

126 However, little is known about how flowering offset (i.e., ending of flowering) and duratio

127 al precipitation are associated with delayed flowering offset and extended flowering duration.

128 removed the negative effect of asynchronous flowering on seed set.

129 potential climatic and landscape drivers of flowering onset, offset, and duration of 52 plant specie

130 had been experimentally established as fully flowering or nonflowering.

131 ver in species composition match terrestrial flowering or whether species richness steadily accumulat

132 ling and dormancy) to quantify the impact on flowering performance.

133 These changes in flowering phenology among communities and subpopulations

134 Competitive treatments altered selection on flowering phenology and plant architecture, with signifi

135 so points to a mechanism by which changes in flowering phenology can affect plant reproduction of mas

136 southwestern United States, we test whether flowering phenology diverged among subpopulations within

137 A new study examined how flowering phenology has changed over the past three deca

138 rovides critical insight into drivers of key flowering phenophases and confirms that Hopkins' Bioclim

139 resulted in Arabidopsis plants with a rapid flowering phenotype similar to that of plants with mutat

140 1-overexpressing plants that showed an early flowering phenotype, resistance to abscisic acid and tol

141 understand the molecular basis of the rapid-flowering phenotype, transcriptomic analyses were conduc

142 erennial and older flower strips with higher flowering plant diversity enhanced pollination more effe

143 The pollen tube in a flowering plant grows in a direction that is influenced

144 Apomixis, widespread across flowering plant orders, does not occur in major crop spe

145 Flowering plant SEC14L-PITPs often have modular structur

146 odium quinoa willd.) is an annual herbaceous flowering plant showing appropriate nutritional and func

147 previous studies of the responses of diverse flowering plant species around the world.

148 cted experiments on 23 native and cultivated flowering plant species in Australia, South America, Nor

149 Approximately 6% of flowering plant species possess flowers with anthers tha

150 e sperm cell can produce viable progeny in a flowering plant.

151 Flowering plants (angiosperms) are characterized by poll

152 n clades, for which there are at least 16 in flowering plants (angiosperms); however, there is eviden

153 fundamental to the origins of both seed and flowering plants [3, 4].

154 ts into epigenetic homeostasis mechanisms in flowering plants and mammals, highlighting analogous mec

155 Since ELF3 and GI are conserved across flowering plants and represent important breeding and do

156 nated the list of highest risk species, with flowering plants and terrestrial invertebrates also repr

157 susceptible to temporal mismatch if bees and flowering plants differ in their phenological responses

158 emum Webb (Asteraceae), the largest genus of flowering plants endemic to the Macaronesian archipelago

159 The activity of bacteria in association with flowering plants has been extensively analysed.

160 ow the paternal epigenome is reprogrammed in flowering plants has remained unclear since DNA is not d

161 Flowering plants have evolved a wide variety of traits t

162 product present in Amaryllidaceae family of flowering plants including daffodils, belongs to a class

163 Sexual reproduction in flowering plants relies on the production of haploid gam

164 Flowering plants rely on pollen tubes to transport their

165 Fertilization of flowering plants requires the organization of complex ta

166 Flowering plants serve as a powerful model for studying

167 For example, angiosperms (flowering plants) evolved during the Cretaceous period m

168 subfamily within the third largest family in flowering plants), and evaluate the results relative to

169 romatin was marked by H3K9 methylation as in flowering plants, a significant proportion of transposon

170 tion of embryogenesis after fertilization in flowering plants, and prevent its occurrence without fer

171 close paralogs of SSP that are conserved in flowering plants, are involved in several YDA-dependent

172 utionary innovation for many animals and all flowering plants, but its impact on selection and domest

173 st and most phenotypically diverse genera of flowering plants, containing species ranging from woody

174 In flowering plants, floral nectar spurs are a prime exampl

175 Legumes, a subset of flowering plants, form root nodules in symbiosis with ni

176 to affect the growth and development of both flowering plants, including crops, and marine algae.

177 undred genes that are highly conserved among flowering plants, including genes involved in root devel

178 There are two main types of root systems in flowering plants, namely taproot systems of dicots and f

179 In flowering plants, pollen tubes undergo tip growth to del

180 In flowering plants, pollen wall is a specialized extracell

181 In flowering plants, pollinators are considered a driver of

182 In flowering plants, the shoot apical meristem (SAM) contai

183 In flowering plants, UV exposure favors larger areas of UV-

184 Dioecy has often broken down in flowering plants, yielding functional hermaphroditism.

185 lopment of complex and diverse morphology in flowering plants.

186 hesis is hypothesized as a key innovation in flowering plants.

187 undant and best studied mRNA modification in flowering plants.

188 ource for future studies on the evolution of flowering plants.

189 titive sequences in Marchantia compared with flowering plants.

190 t not H3K9 or DNA methylation as reported in flowering plants.

191 nally abundant in meiotic anthers of diverse flowering plants.

192 rn along the placenta inside the gynoecia of flowering plants.

193 tional repression of protein-coding genes in flowering plants.

194 expand current concepts on the evolution of flowering plants.

195 lishing a unified evolutionary timescale for flowering plants.

196 llen tubes imposes hybridization barriers in flowering plants.

197 questration, a function conserved across the flowering plants.

198 zospheric and internal hormonal functions in flowering plants.

199 tal pigmentation patterning is widespread in flowering plants.

200 that has been lost in several lineages like flowering plants.

201 ential requirement of sexual reproduction in flowering plants.

202 rowth stages (before flowering, beginning of flowering, pod-set and pod-fill periods) on nutritional

203 ompetitive effects of L. serriola from early flowering populations on five early flowering native spe

204 r than the effects of L. serriola from later flowering populations.

205 cal advancement may reduce plant fitness, as flowering prior to the final frost date of the winter/sp

206 regulation by combining an accelerated birch flowering program with a recessive mutation at the ELIMA

207 has evolved unique fragrant aroma and winter-flowering properties, which are critical for its success

208 By early 2018, six out of 22 flowering PTG events and 11 out of 12 flowering MPG even

209 onstraints associated with the energetics of flowering, rather than sexual conflict, have probably sh

210 ntagonistic action of aspen orthologs of the flowering regulators TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and APETAL

211 LHP1 is a transcriptional repressor of flowering-related genes, such as FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT),

212 ZmMADS69 functions upstream of the flowering repressor ZmRap2.7 to downregulate its express

213 This variation influences flowering responses of Arabidopsis accessions resulting

214 Water deficits that coincide with flowering result in leaf wilting, necrosis, tassel brown

215 neous utilization of leaf photosynthates for flowering, rhizome fortification, stress response and ti

216 leading to a contraction of community-level flowering seasons in tundra ecosystems due to a greater

217 dation, BPMs play an important role in plant flowering, seed development and abiotic stress response.

218 s influenced by ubiquitination: induction of flowering, seed size, and pathogen responses.

219 nodes that optimally arrange and support the flowering shoot.

220 ombine mutations for condensed shoots, rapid flowering (SP5G) and precocious growth termination (SP).

221 r advancement in the flowering times of late-flowering species than early-flowering species.

222 g times of late-flowering species than early-flowering species.

223 ess either at early stages of development or flowering stage or both.

224 control and drought stressed PRLT2/89-33 at flowering stage than at the vegetative stage.

225 ches in the first and the second year during flowering stage.

226 is has been performed at both vegetative and flowering stages of a terminal drought tolerant genotype

227 The nonlethal collapse of a flowering stalk, for example, can greatly reduce plant f

228 ola as a focal crop in tents and manipulated flowering strip composition using plant species we had p

229 Thus, flowering strips benefited colony reproduction by adding

230 y, colony reproduction was improved with any flowering strips compared to canola alone.

231 Although high-infection flowering strips increased colony infection intensity, c

232 Effects of flowering strips on colony reproduction were explained b

233 ained by nectar availability, but effects of flowering strips on infection intensity were not.

234 In agroecosystems, flowering strips or hedgerows are often used to augment

235 Both infection treatment and flowering strips reduced visits to canola, but we saw no

236 Flowering strips using high-infection plant species near

237 Greater within-season flowering synchrony in postfire mating scenes further in

238 Higher flowering synchrony yielded greater pollination efficien

239 cs upon vernalization and showed that before flowering, the taproot underwent a reversal from a sink

240 e is no such reprieve under terminal stress (flowering through grain filling).

241 tion-present conditions, where plasticity in flowering time and early internode lengths was adaptive.

242 solated from one parent by the difference in flowering time and from the other by habitat adaptation

243 d with yield components, of which seed size, flowering time and harvest maturity traits were stable a

244 candidate quantitative loci associated with flowering time and maturity time.

245 kelet and spike development, and also affect flowering time and plant height.

246 ed responses to chilling was correlated with flowering time and senescence to create a range of seaso

247 T (FT)), and are associated with seed size, flowering time and soil fertility in dune-adapted sunflo

248 re reproductively isolated by differences in flowering time and survivorship on soils containing high

249 he shoot apex, VRN2 differentially modulates flowering time dependent on photoperiod, whilst its pres

250 iology, the ways in which genetic studies of flowering time diversity have enriched the field of evol

251 dopsis thaliana because of its role creating flowering time diversity.

252 size recent findings on the genetic basis of flowering time evolution as a way to begin deciphering w

253 of parental isolating major genes related to flowering time from one parent and alleles of major gene

254 ed from maize and encompassing ZCN8, a major flowering time gene associated with adaptation to high l

255 Control of flowering time has been a major focus of comparative gen

256 ngs indicate that climate change is shifting flowering time in complex ways, even across local spatia

257 on of RAV gene function in the regulation of flowering time in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous pl

258 Because flowering time is a complex, environmentally responsive

259 Flowering time is a key adaptive and agronomic trait.

260 Flowering time is a major determinant of the local adapt

261 Flowering time is one of these behaviors that can also a

262 dentified as a system integrator of numerous flowering time pathways in many studies, and its homolog

263 is well appreciated that genetic studies of flowering time regulation have led to fundamental advanc

264 light receptor and well-known photoperiodic flowering time regulator, in cellulose biosynthesis.

265 ort the identification of GmPRR3b as a major flowering time regulatory gene that has been selected du

266 The mutant phenotypes in biomass and flowering time suggested a deregulation of their respect

267 For instance, recent studies of flowering time variation have reconstructed how, when, a

268 eraction), in spite of promising results for flowering time(8).

269 pe II TFs regulate floral organ identity and flowering time, but type I TFs are relatively less chara

270 The nNILs were phenotyped for flowering time, height and resistance to three foliar di

271 the early growth stage to jointly determine flowering time.

272 h directly upregulates J/GmELF3a to modulate flowering time.

273 e of the VEG2 gene from pea, associated with flowering time.

274 nd study their association with variation in flowering time.

275 tion of spikelet development and accelerates flowering time.

276 t on major fitness-related traits, including flowering time.

277 , including young leaf serration and altered flowering time.

278 e examined the allelic variation in the four flowering-time genes across the diverse accessions from

279 ker models identified only 1 of 14 benchmark flowering-time genes, while transcript models identified

280 report findings from the dissection of rice flowering-time plasticity in a genetic mapping populatio

281 ease or induction by cold and interacts with flowering-time variation to construct different seasonal

282 perm taxa have simultaneously advanced their flowering times as the climate has warmed.

283 osystems due to a greater advancement in the flowering times of late-flowering species than early-flo

284 rthermore, we show that nonlinear changes in flowering times over the 33-year record are obscured by

285 However, flowering times shifted at different rates across elevat

286 From flowering to maturity, fruits were harvested weekly and

287 potential mates and overlap in the timing of flowering, to determine the extent to which fire influen

288 cation are homologues of genes that regulate flowering transition and flower development.

289 l overcome heat stress-induced damage during flowering under current and future hotter climatic condi

290 Flowering under DF is characterized by an up-regulation

291 In wheat, flowering under natural photoperiods is regulated by ste

292 ved function as a repressor of photoperiodic flowering upstream of the floral activators OsMADS14 and

293 In late-flowering vernalization-dependent ecotypes, VRN2 is only

294 Early flowering was always selected.

295 Flowering was delayed in the hk5 hk6 mutant and the pani

296 statistics to test for changes in year-round flowering, we show flowering has become earlier for all

297 Survival and probability of flowering were reduced by early snowmelt in the previous

298 ed that both BdFTL1 and BdFTL2 could promote flowering, whereas BdFTL2 was essential for flowering in

299 lants overexpressing SPL10 showed precocious flowering, whereas the triple loss-of-function mutants o

300 s obtained from the samples irrigated before flowering while the greatest total starch (36.30%) was o