ライフサイエンスコーパス: flowering time

1 1 and COP1 controls CO stability to regulate flowering time.

2 hich modulates defense against pathogens and flowering time.

3 ut responses determining seasonal growth and flowering time.

4 ated with altitude were also associated with flowering time.

5 ation, impairs COP1 function in coordinating flowering time.

6 s, and three major loci were found to govern flowering time.

7 is responsible for photoperiodic control of flowering time.

8 1 while the ICCV 96029 form had no effect on flowering time.

9 the early growth stage to jointly determine flowering time.

10 ways exhibit the strongest associations with flowering time.

11 h directly upregulates J/GmELF3a to modulate flowering time.

12 with the environmental sensitivity of maize flowering time.

13 a with allelic perturbations known to affect flowering time.

14 ing germination, vegetative growth rate, and flowering time.

15 Thus, plants face tradeoffs with advanced flowering time.

16 SNPs exhibited high accuracy for predicting flowering time.

17 its, such as grain quality, fruit shape, and flowering time.

18 mperature changes combine to modulate FT and flowering time.

19 nt temperature are major stimuli controlling flowering time.

20 e of the VEG2 gene from pea, associated with flowering time.

21 m4 mutant exhibits slower growth and delayed flowering time.

22 t dosage-dependent effects on ear length and flowering time.

23 pression in the vegetative meristem controls flowering time.

24 e this cold-exposure information to regulate flowering time.

25 i (genes) associated (34% combined PVE) with flowering time.

26 s hypocotyl elongation, root elongation, and flowering time.

27 lored to temperature-dependent plasticity in flowering time.

28 icting the consequences of climate change on flowering time.

29 is was reduced in frequency by selection for flowering time.

30 nd study their association with variation in flowering time.

31 ely been acknowledged as possible drivers of flowering time.

32 trated a role of this gene in the control of flowering time.

33 nds on synchrony between insect activity and flowering time.

34 egulates key physiological responses such as flowering time.

35 -regulatory changes in adaptive variation of flowering time.

36 obiota also altered patterns of selection on flowering time.

37 isms whose abundance in soil correlates with flowering time.

38 LASE6, and play a central role in regulating flowering time.

39 tion of spikelet development and accelerates flowering time.

40 t on major fitness-related traits, including flowering time.

41 sights into the regulation and adaptation of flowering time.

42 promiscuous germination, which then affects flowering time.

43 TaVrn1 had significant epistatic effects on flowering time.

44 , including young leaf serration and altered flowering time.

45 to the promoters of target genes to regulate flowering time.

46 g the thermal plasticity of plant growth and flowering time.

47 e exploration of the genetic architecture of flowering time.

48 iolation, and is also involved in regulating flowering time.

49 regimes, have also been linked to changes in flowering times.

50 e for a role of FRIGIDA in the regulation of flowering times.

51 hat are locally adapted and display distinct flowering times.

52 eraction), in spite of promising results for flowering time(8).

53 Early flowering time, a prolonged reproductive growth phase, a

54 tle about how biotic interactions can affect flowering times, a significant knowledge gap given ongoi

55 discuss the circadian regulation of growth, flowering time, abiotic and biotic stress responses, and

56 appreciable variation in genetic effects on flowering time across both time and space; the greatest

57 coordination of plant metabolic function and flowering time across seasons.

58 FT levels correlated strongly with flowering time across treatments.

59 mapping (FOAM) to map the genes that control flowering time, across 22 environments, and identified 1

60 hat phytochrome B (phyB) is able to regulate flowering time, acting in the phloem companion cells, as

61 nts of the photoperiod pathway that regulate flowering time, also control stomatal aperture in a dayl

62 essenger RNA levels generally correlate with flowering time among accessions grown in different photo

63 Warming caused a divergence in flowering times among species in the forest community, r

64 ronment-specific fitness landscapes based on flowering time and branching architecture, we observed t

65 tion-present conditions, where plasticity in flowering time and early internode lengths was adaptive.

66 ization at 8 degrees C, both at the level of flowering time and FLC chromatin silencing.

67 d vernalization pathways interact to control flowering time and floret fertility in response to ambie

68 d this warm temperature interruption affects flowering time and floret number and is stage specific.

69 solated from one parent by the difference in flowering time and from the other by habitat adaptation

70 influence important agronomic traits such as flowering time and fruit quality.

71 pread concordance of C3 grasses accelerating flowering time and general delays for C4 grasses with in

72 The relationship of flowering time and geographic origin indicates likely ro

73 d with yield components, of which seed size, flowering time and harvest maturity traits were stable a

74 addition, we observed a correlation between flowering time and heat tolerance.

75 CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) is a key regulator of flowering time and inflorescence architecture in plants.

76 candidate quantitative loci associated with flowering time and maturity time.

77 gene networks for two major breeding traits, flowering time and oil metabolism, and revealed new cand

78 TFL1 in A. thaliana capable of changing both flowering time and plant architecture.

79 The lack of a correlation between flowering time and plant biomass combined with delayed c

80 kelet and spike development, and also affect flowering time and plant height.

81 Using association tests between flowering time and polymorphisms, 6 of these genomic are

82 ine and validated two novel miPs involved in flowering time and response to abiotic and biotic stress

83 Variation in flowering time and response to overwintering has been ex

84 unctional protein regulating plant immunity, flowering time and responses to hormones through interac

85 issue is critical and sufficient to regulate flowering time and root growth; control of cotyledon and

86 ontribute to domestication traits, including flowering time and seed dormancy.

87 Flowering time and seed size are traits related to domes

88 ed responses to chilling was correlated with flowering time and senescence to create a range of seaso

89 T (FT)), and are associated with seed size, flowering time and soil fertility in dune-adapted sunflo

90 F4 as regulators of endopolyploidization and flowering time and suggest an involvement of cell cycle

91 re reproductively isolated by differences in flowering time and survivorship on soils containing high

92 ation across an altitudinal gradient both in flowering time and the expression and regulation of gene

93 pmental and environmental signals to control flowering time and the fate of shoot meristems.

94 Of the five genes associated with flowering time and the three genes associated with seed

95 ially contribute to phenotypic plasticity of flowering time and to differential selection observed be

96 rature increases could differentially affect flowering times and pollinator flight periods, leading t

97 nd suggest the possibility of convergence in flowering times and therefore an increase in gene flow a

98 Many drought escape (e.g. flowering time) and drought avoidance (e.g. specific lea

99 henotype, reduced internodal length, delayed flowering time, and enhanced biomass yield.

100 n chromosomes 11 and 15 were associated with flowering time, and four on chromosomes 11 and 16 were a

101 ci associated with abiotic stress responses, flowering time, and morphology.

102 cryptochromes regulate the circadian rhythm, flowering time, and photomorphogenesis in higher plants

103 s genotypic correlations between Delta(13)C, flowering time, and plant height were not significant.

104 , GNC and GNL control germination, greening, flowering time, and senescence downstream from auxin, cy

105 an initiation, accessory meristem formation, flowering time, and senescence.

106 enarios, changes in carbon metabolism during flowering time are a consequence rather than a cause of

107 Major alleles for seed dormancy and flowering time are well studied, and can interact to inf

108 perm taxa have simultaneously advanced their flowering times as the climate has warmed.

109 tic basis of divergence in floral traits and flowering time associated with mating-system evolution,

110 Subsequently, the flowering time-associated expression of eight potential

111 and down-regulation (>three folds) of eight flowering time-associated genes (including six genes val

112 Six flowering time-associated major genomic loci harbouring

113 y of the three panels identified nearly 1000 flowering time-associated SNPs, mainly distributed aroun

114 andidate gene-based association mapping in a flowering time association panel (92 diverse desi and ka

115 We identify associations with flowering time at multiple loci, including in a homolog

116 ve trait locus controlling the difference in flowering time between maize and its wild ancestor, teos

117 itness via different paths: through shifting flowering time, branching, or both.

118 ody perennials involves pathways controlling flowering timing, bud dormancy and outgrowth in response

119 ences on key agricultural traits, especially flowering time but also yield, biomass, and biennial gro

120 Rising temperatures have begun to shift flowering time, but it is unclear whether phenotypic pla

121 pe II TFs regulate floral organ identity and flowering time, but type I TFs are relatively less chara

122 all component of the phenotypic variation in flowering time, but were sufficient to produce a signatu

123 xport, and regulates the circadian clock and flowering time by binding to chromatin of the flowering

124 ed the effect of the floral repressor FLC on flowering time by using constant temperature laboratory

125 B emissions scenario, we projected shifts in flowering timing by 2100.

126 s on the regulatory role of MCTP1 (FTIP1) in flowering time control in Arabidopsis, demonstrating tha

127 field data reveal that a cryptic function of flowering time control is to limit seed set of winter an

128 he expression and regulation of genes in the flowering time control network, often independent of FLC

129 Our knowledge of flowering time control now enables the investigation of

130 oduction in temperate regions depends on its flowering time control, but the underlying molecular mec

131 nctionally characterized in other plants for flowering time control, seed development and pod dehisce

132 the importance of pre-winter temperatures in flowering time control, we artificially simulated climat

133 opmental pathways, while SWP73A functions in flowering time control.

134 Flowering time correlated with altitude in a nonlinear m

135 sea level) in the Swiss Alps to test whether flowering time correlated with altitude under different

136 Flowering time could be explained by the expression and

137 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using flowering time data from a switchgrass association panel

138 gene families, including those with roles in flowering time, defense response, flavor, and pigment ac

139 he shoot apex, VRN2 differentially modulates flowering time dependent on photoperiod, whilst its pres

140 association potential (41% combined PVE) for flowering time differentiation in cultivated and wild ch

141 Understanding the genetic basis of flowering time divergence illuminates the origins and ma

142 y a few major loci accounted for substantial flowering-time divergence.

143 iology, the ways in which genetic studies of flowering time diversity have enriched the field of evol

144 transcription factor CONSTANS that underlies flowering time diversity in Arabidopsis.

145 dopsis thaliana because of its role creating flowering time diversity.

146 odulation of developmental programs, such as flowering time, dormancy, and the circadian clock.

147 f nested association mapping populations for flowering time, ear height, and grain yield.

148 tal of 8, 22, and 47 QTL were identified for flowering time, early vigor, and energy traits, respecti

149 egulation of FLORE, whereas GUS-staining and flowering time evaluation were used to determine its bio

150 size recent findings on the genetic basis of flowering time evolution as a way to begin deciphering w

151 To clarify the molecular bases of flowering time evolution in crop domestication, here we

152 of floral development (APETALA3 and PI) and flowering time (FLC) in the Brassicales and for the regu

153 ons in the control of germination, greening, flowering time, floral development, senescence, and flor

154 of parental isolating major genes related to flowering time from one parent and alleles of major gene

155 Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for flowering time (FT) and anthocyanin accumulation under a

156 for two target traits-heading date (HD) and flowering time (FT)-were identified and positioned on li

157 Flowering time (FTi) control is well examined in the lon

158 ed from maize and encompassing ZCN8, a major flowering time gene associated with adaptation to high l

159 tion factor regulating the expression of the flowering time gene FLC.

160 e co-expressed with five genes homologous to flowering time genes in Arabidopsis, and Glyma11g15480 w

161 e expression of Brachypodium homologs of key flowering time genes in the photoperiod pathway such as

162 We show that barley flowering time genes Ppd-H1, Sdw1, Vrn-H1 and Vrn-H3 exe

163 ime-associated expression of eight potential flowering time genes was confirmed in three tulip cultiv

164 the increased transcriptional levels of two flowering time genes with opposing functions, FLOWERING

165 e examined the allelic variation in the four flowering-time genes across the diverse accessions from

166 Here, we review examples of pleiotropy of flowering-time genes and highlight those that also influ

167 Flowering-time genes were highly overrepresented among c

168 Arabidopsis thaliana flowering-time genes, and the pathways in which they ope

169 ker models identified only 1 of 14 benchmark flowering-time genes, while transcript models identified

170 onomic traits, including disease resistance, flowering time, glucosinolate metabolism and vitamin bio

171 Control of flowering time has been a major focus of comparative gen

172 We found that the genomic architecture of flowering time has been shaped by the most recent whole-

173 date, suggesting that temperature control of flowering time has evolved to constrain seed set environ

174 Although numerous loci affecting flowering time have been mapped in maize, their underlyi

175 The nNILs were phenotyped for flowering time, height and resistance to three foliar di

176 e as traditional labor-intensive measures of flowering time, height, biomass, grain yield, and harves

177 underlying the effects of GA in controlling flowering time in a day-neutral species.

178 early and late alleles for seed dormancy and flowering time in a field experiment.

179 s has been demonstrated for heading date and flowering time in a global forage grass.

180 ly been shown to affect natural variation in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana, most either show

181 asure changes in daylength, which influences flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana.

182 ative regulator microRNA824 (miR824) control flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana.

183 c overexpression of PhFT4 and PhFT5 promotes flowering time in Arabidopsis, and that of PhFT1, PhFT2

184 tion of AtU2AF65b as a negative regulator of flowering time in Arabidopsis.

185 pe AP2 gene family, members of which control flowering time in Arabidopsis.

186 the genetic control of natural variation in flowering time in Brachypodium distachyon, a nondomestic

187 ironmental and endogenous cues that regulate flowering time in C. hirsuta We found that petal number

188 and unravelling the domestication pattern of flowering time in chickpea.

189 ngs indicate that climate change is shifting flowering time in complex ways, even across local spatia

190 Critical photoperiod and flowering time in glasshouse conditions followed distinc

191 on of RAV gene function in the regulation of flowering time in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous pl

192 advance many phenological events, including flowering time in plants and the flight time of insects.

193 n components that participate in controlling flowering time in plants.

194 light signaling and photoperiodic control of flowering time in plants.

195 hat is a homolog of CONSTANS, which controls flowering time in plants.

196 hylation may regulate defense mechanisms and flowering time in plants.

197 ient temperatures are major cues determining flowering time in spring.

198 r understanding of the genetic regulation of flowering time in switchgrass will aid the development o

199 nd then tested whether the same QTLs control flowering time in sympatry.

200 nificantly, delayed, as opposed to the early flowering time in the hub1-4 mutant.

201 50 (AGL50), which we show directly to alter flowering time in the predicted manner.

202 st that loss of PPD function does not affect flowering time in the presence of functional HR, whereas

203 i suggests that greater complexity underlies flowering time in this nondomesticated system.

204 in the phloem effectively restores wild-type flowering times in agl15 agl18 mutants.

205 domestication-related traits, shattering and flowering time, in a mapping population derived from a c

206 Because flowering time is a complex, environmentally responsive

207 Flowering time is a key adaptive and agronomic trait.

208 Divergence in flowering time is a key contributor to reproductive isol

209 Flowering time is a major determinant of biomass yield i

210 Flowering time is a major determinant of the local adapt

211 This suggests that variation in flowering time is controlled in part by a set of genes b

212 Flowering time is one of the major adaptive traits in do

213 Flowering time is one of these behaviors that can also a

214 Flowering time is tightly controlled by complex genetic

215 viable yet show phenotypes in seed dormancy, flowering time, lateral root, and stomata formation-comp

216 haplotyping algorithm, enabled us to map the flowering time locus in the diploid wheat Triticum monoc

217 e resequenced the entire major but conserved flowering time locus Ppd-D1 in just a few such selected

218 sured traits such as leaf area, growth rate, flowering time, main stem branching, rosette branching,

219 id depletion produces non-genetic changes in flowering time, maturation, and growth rate that are her

220 and role of alternative MAF2 transcripts in flowering time modulation is not understood.

221 sted this hypothesis by growing large-effect flowering time mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana in multip

222 , day length and vernalization influence the flowering time of 59 genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana w

223 Dramatic shifts in the flowering times of cherry trees may have implications fo

224 e long-term (1895-2013) relationship between flowering times of grass species and climate in space an

225 osystems due to a greater advancement in the flowering times of late-flowering species than early-flo

226 ions in crops typically result in changes in flowering time, often involving the PEBP family of genes

227 ing temperature was significantly related to flowering time only for later-flowering species.

228 e form strictly correlate (R(2) = 0.94) with flowering time over an extended vegetative period.

229 rthermore, we show that nonlinear changes in flowering times over the 33-year record are obscured by

230 investigate the natural diversity governing flowering time pathways in a nondomesticated grass, the

231 dentified as a system integrator of numerous flowering time pathways in many studies, and its homolog

232 ith no link to known meristem maintenance or flowering time pathways.

233 such as inversions, and genes from multiple flowering-time pathways exhibit the strongest associatio

234 transitory starch synthesis and analyze its flowering time phenotype in relation to its altered capa

235 nctional analyses in Arabidopsis resulted in flowering time phenotypes in line with TgTFL1 being a fl

236 lly with its homolog ICA1, alters growth and flowering time plasticity in relation to temperature in

237 report findings from the dissection of rice flowering-time plasticity in a genetic mapping populatio

238 mponents that participate in controlling the flowering time point in plants.

239 h physiological (defense) and developmental (flowering time) processes in Arabidopsis.

240 , 6 of these genomic areas appeared to carry flowering time QTL, 1 of which corresponds to Ppd-D1, a

241 Many of the flowering-time QTLs are detected across a range of photo

242 f the two NAM panels, both common and unique flowering time regions were detected.

243 Genome wide, a total of 90 flowering time regions were identified.

244 en together, eight potential known/candidate flowering time-regulating genes [efl1 (early flowering 1

245 is well appreciated that genetic studies of flowering time regulation have led to fundamental advanc

246 he genetic architecture and genes underlying flowering time regulation in switchgrass.

247 es insights into the evolutionary context of flowering time regulation in the Poaceae as well as eluc

248 molecular mechanisms underlying bolting and flowering time regulation in vegetable crops.

249 differentiation required changes of genes in flowering timing regulation, while transition to floral

250 kout mutants to examine the role of SPL10 in flowering-time regulation and we investigated possible i

251 enetic control of long-distance signaling in flowering-time regulation.

252 t the two GATA factors act upstream from the flowering time regulator SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF

253 light receptor and well-known photoperiodic flowering time regulator, in cellulose biosynthesis.

254 ort the identification of GmPRR3b as a major flowering time regulatory gene that has been selected du

255 demonstrate the new methods, we analyzed six flowering time related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana an

256 further validate pKWmEB, we re-analyzed four flowering time related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana, a

257 dentified 48 previously reported genes for 7 flowering time-related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana.

258 cuss three QTL for grain yield and three for flowering time, reporting candidate genes.

259 that miR824 and AGL16 modulate the extent of flowering time repression in a long-day photoperiod.

260 Notably, we show that the major flowering-time repressor gene FLC is disrupted by a TE i

261 IDA4 to regulate abscisic acid responses and flowering time, respectively.

262 Seventy nine QTLs for flowering time, seed quality and root morphology traits

263 To examine how seed dormancy and flowering time shape annual plant life cycles over multi

264 However, flowering times shifted at different rates across elevat

265 by 7 days, which is similar in magnitude to flowering time shifts over 2-3 decades of climate change

266 agronomically important adult traits such as flowering time, stem size and leaf node number.

267 tially associated with meristem maintenance, flowering time, stomatal density, WUE, and/or stress res

268 The mutant phenotypes in biomass and flowering time suggested a deregulation of their respect

269 egetative shoot and required for a wild-type flowering time, supporting that TFL1 expression in the v

270 These results show that CmNF-YB8 influences flowering time through directly regulating the expressio

271 flowering-regulatory pathways to synchronize flowering time to environmental cues.

272 nd are thus candidates for the adaptation of flowering time to environmental gradients such as altitu

273 study for quantitative dissection of complex flowering time trait in chickpea.

274 were associated with major fiber quality and flowering time traits in previously published QTL mappin

275 e maize flowering time variants we evaluated flowering time traits using an extremely large multi- ge

276 Ppd-H1-dependent variation in flowering time under different ambient temperatures corr

277 To detect more maize flowering time variants we evaluated flowering time trai

278 d quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping for flowering time variation between two winter annual popul

279 For instance, recent studies of flowering time variation have reconstructed how, when, a

280 Our results suggest that flowering time variation in switchgrass is due to variat

281 Flowering time variation is a main factor driving rapid

282 ive trait locus on Ca5 that explained 59% of flowering time variation under short days.

283 utonomous pathways in generating switchgrass flowering time variation.

284 nt interactions as an important influence on flowering time variation.

285 ease or induction by cold and interacts with flowering-time variation to construct different seasonal

286 ent, is involved in endopolyploidization and flowering time via genetic interaction with MOS1, a nega

287 In the spen3-1 mutant, the delay in flowering time was correlated with an enhanced FLC expre

288 Flowering time was delayed for most grass species with i

289 Flowering time was evaluated in F4:5 families in five en

290 Branching was under stronger selection, but flowering time was more genetically variable, pointing t

291 Flowering time was sensitive to both microbes and the ab

292 Across butterfly-plant associations, flowering time was significantly more sensitive to tempe

293 Strikingly, in spen3 mutants, the flowering time was slightly, but significantly, delayed,

294 rait loci (QTLs) that control differences in flowering time were identified.

295 contrast, more lateral branches and delayed flowering time were observed in SPL13 silenced plants.

296 ganism Arabidopsis thaliana to determine how flowering time (which defines seed-maturation temperatur

297 ly favorable developmental traits, including flowering time, which resulted in the creation of variet

298 on and eliminates the negative regulation of flowering time, while the analogous C76S substitution in

299 ination season affects subsequent growth and flowering time, with significant genotype-by-environment

300 We use this method to map loci for flowering time within natural populations of Mimulus gut