ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluid overload

1 roughout admission and PICU day 2 cumulative fluid overload %.

2 s independently associated with higher day 2 fluid overload %.

3 r dialysate sodium with the goal of reducing fluid overload.

4 ensive care unit and increased perioperative fluid overload.

5 ing diuresis in critically ill children with fluid overload.

6 of 49 of the 391 (12.5%) patients developed fluid overload.

7 is not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload.

8 ntravenous albumin may increase the risk for fluid overload.

9 gimen complexity are important predictors of fluid overload.

10 d data were the most important predictors of fluid overload.

11 The main safety outcome was fluid overload.

12 sk for postoperative acute kidney injury and fluid overload.

13 n 90 mm Hg and IV fluids held for concern of fluid overload.

14 g, such as a low skeletal muscle mass and/or fluid overload.

15 mechanical ventilation and the avoidance of fluid overload.

16 t risk of developing acute kidney injury and fluid overload.

17 for management of acute kidney injury and/or fluid overload.

18 ] >/= 1600 pg/mL), and signs and symptoms of fluid overload.

19 hanical ventilation is often associated with fluid overload.

20 ctice, which may contribute to perioperative fluid overloading.

21 e observations may help preventing pulmonary fluid overloading.

22 reas: (1) epidemiology; (2) diagnostics; (3) fluid overload; (4) kidney support therapies; (5) biolog

23 Models to predict fluid overload (a positive fluid balance >= 10% of the a

24 splantation patients with various amounts of fluid overload, a modest correlation was found between s

25 We described fluid overload after cardiac surgery, identified risk fa

26 Fluid overload after congenital heart surgery is frequen

27 as the study-average difference in absolute "Fluid Overload" (an estimate of excess extracellular wat

28 nd determined their association with percent fluid overload and acute organ dysfunction and generated

29 ac surgery, identified risk factors of worse fluid overload and also determined if fluid overload pre

30 Fluid overload and cumulative fluid balance were both as

31 Concerns regarding potential for fluid overload and electrolyte disturbances and regardin

32 ients with acute decompensated HF to improve fluid overload and hemodynamics.

33 ement relies on fluid resuscitation avoiding fluid overload and its related organ congestion.

34 Intravascular fluid overload and lower inspiratory capacity were signi

35 We examined the association between fluid overload and major adverse kidney events in critic

36 te fluid resuscitation decreases the risk of fluid overload and mortality compared with aggressive re

37 lly reviewed and synthesized the evidence on fluid overload and mortality in critically ill patients

38 orting adjusted risk estimates suggests that fluid overload and positive cumulative fluid balance are

39 osis, highlight the importance of cumulative fluid overload and provide key management strategies for

40 blood pressure targets is a means to prevent fluid overload and reduce exposure to vasopressors; mean

41 nd bumetanide, are the primary treatment for fluid overload and symptomatic relief of patients with A

42 estimating equations (daily PICU cumulative fluid overload % and oxygenation index repeated measures

43 porter 2 inhibition on bioimpedance-derived "Fluid Overload" and adiposity in a CKD population.

44 mined rates of renal replacement therapy and fluid overload, and measured biomarkers of kidney damage

45 One patient died of fluid overload, and one died of deep venous thrombosis o

46 ficulty, hyperglycemia, acute kidney injury, fluid overload, and prolonged intubation contribute sign

47 ubjects ranged from 2-46 months of age, were fluid overloaded, and were receiving a continuous infusi

48 Strategies to prevent and/or treat fluid overload are likely to improve outcomes.

49 from underlying causes of lung injury and/or fluid overload as well as from each other.

50 levels were directly associated with percent fluid overload at baseline (rs = 0.18; p = 0.0008) and a

51 Median fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy d

52 The degree of fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy d

53 age, and severity of illness, the change in fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy d

54 In pediatric patients, fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy i

55 Median fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy i

56 erent periods, age, severity of illness, and fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy i

57 al replacement therapy initiation found that fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy i

58 Our data demonstrate an association between fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy i

59 After adjusting for percent fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy i

60 was to characterize the association between fluid overload at continuous renal replacement therapy i

61 tality, but appears to reflect the effect of fluid overload at initiation.

62 Fluid overload at the initiation of continuous renal rep

63 significant levels of bioimpedance-derived "Fluid Overload" at recruitment.

64 Es are caused by four conditions: pneumonia, fluid overload, atelectasis, and acute respiratory distr

65 Future fluid overload avoidance trials may confirm or refute a

66 ated AEs such as fever, thrombophlebitis, or fluid overload between the groups.

67 disease (ESRD), a condition characterized by fluid overload, both obstructive and central sleep apnea

68 te malnutrition because of the concern about fluid overload, but evidence to support this concern is

69 These findings indicate that fluid overload contributes to the pathogenesis of OSA an

70 ere eligible that investigated the impact of fluid overload (defined by weight gain > 5%) or positive

71 ing subset of heart failure patients exhibit fluid overload despite significant doses of loop diureti

72 Fluid overload developed in 20.5% of the patients who re

73 red with placebo, the overall mean absolute "Fluid Overload" difference among those allocated empagli

74 % CI, -0.69 to -0.30, including the -0.24 L "Fluid Overload" difference) and a -0.30 L (95% CI, -0.57

75 Secondary end points included incidence of fluid overload, duration of mechanical ventilation and i

76 y, primarily in patients without evidence of fluid overload (edema).

77 Although fluid overload (FO) at CRRT start has been associated wi

78 With the recognition that fluid overload (FO) has a detrimental impact on critical

79 Sustained fluid overload (FO) is considered a major cause of hyper

80 Given the complex interrelatedness of fluid overload (FO), creatinine, acute kidney injury (AK

81 at survival was associated with less percent fluid overload (%FO) in the intensive care unit (ICU) be

82 hock, multiple organ dysfunction, and severe fluid overload for more than 400 h with the CARPEDIEM, u

83 medical ICU patients with pulmonary edema or fluid overload for which aggressive diuresis was intende

84 Acute kidney injury and fluid overload frequently necessitate initiation of cont

85 for management of acute kidney injury and/or fluid overload from January 2000 through July 2009 were

86 major adverse kidney events than those with fluid overload greater than 10% (71.6% vs 79.4%; p = 0.0

87 Fluid overload greater than 10% was also found to be ind

88 ultivariable logistic regression showed that fluid overload greater than 10% was associated with a 58

89 he proportion of patients (95% CI) with peak fluid overload % greater than 10% and greater than 20% w

90 n attempting fluid removal after significant fluid overload has developed.

91 ietin-2 levels are associated with increased fluid overload, hepatic and coagulation dysfunction, acu

92 nditions such as tissue injury, interstitial fluid overload, hyperglycaemia and inflammation.

93 talization at Texas Children's Hospital were fluid overload/hypertension (FO/HTN) and vascular access

94 Little is known about fluid overload in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

95 rmine whether earlier use of CVVH to control fluid overload in critically ill children can improve su

96 ritical illness often results in significant fluid overload in critically ill patients.

97 Fluid overload in patients undergoing hemodialysis contr

98 and systemic inflammation, independently of fluid overload in patients with heart failure (HF).

99 odels appear to perform similarly to predict fluid overload in the ICU.

100 was to evaluate its use in the treatment of fluid overload in these patients.

101 ithout causing hypokalemia for patients with fluid overload, including patients with congestive heart

102 Fluid overload % increased from median (interquartile ra

103 In contrast, body weight (fluid overload) increased already 5 days prior to contin

104 Cumulative fluid overload independently predicts poor outcomes.

105 Fluid overload, indication for continuous renal replacem

106 induced a prompt and sustained reduction in "Fluid Overload," irrespective of sex, diabetes, and base

107 Fluid overload is a common complication in patients with

108 Fluid overload is associated with poor PICU outcomes in

109 This observation suggests that fluid overload is involved in the pathogenesis of OSA an

110 Management of fluid overload is one of the most challenging problems i

111 In CKD, fluid overload is the most important factor leading to m

112 Patients with fluid overload less than or equal to 10% were less likel

113 tilator-free days (p = 0.044), compared with fluid overload less than or equal to 10%.

114 ning prior to the development of significant fluid overload may be more clinically effective than att

115 In patients with fluid overload not exceeding 25% of ECW, ECW correlated

116 Fluid overload occurred in 8.3% of protocolized care and

117 Fluid overload occurring as a consequence of overly aggr

118 Fluid overload occurs early after cardiac surgery and is

119 de group was 3 times more likely to have 10% fluid overload (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.9),

120 Fluid overload (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17) and

121 elevated left atrial pressure at rest due to fluid overload or during exercise, leading to pulmonary

122 hospitalization in the last year, persisting fluid overload or escalating diuretics, and low blood pr

123 CC vs seven [8%] patients receiving plasma), fluid overload or similar cardiac events (three [3%] pat

124 voidance trials may confirm or refute a true fluid overload-outcome causative association.

125 Fluid overload-outcome relations were evaluated using st

126 Fluid overload peaked on PICU day 2.

127 Fluid overload portends poor outcomes in critically ill

128 Day 2 fluid overload % predicted longer length of stay (adjust

129 without cyanotic heart disease, worse daily fluid overload % predicted worse daily oxygenation index

130 ormance (AUROC 0.78, PPV 0.27, NPV 0.94) for fluid overload prediction.

131 Potential patient and medication fluid overload predictor variables (n = 28) were collect

132 approaches to identify clinically meaningful fluid overload predictors.

133 worse fluid overload and also determined if fluid overload predicts longer length of PICU stay, prol

134 The patient's 65% fluid overload, raised creatinine and bilirubin concentr

135 Fluid overload, rather than a slight decrease in hemoglo

136 trointestinal sodium absorption, (2) improve fluid overload-related symptoms, such as hypertension an

137 Fluid overload, renal dysfunction, low cardiac output an

138 Fluid overload represents a potentially modifiable risk

139 Fluid overload risk factors were evaluated using stepwis

140 operative day 1, as well as avoidance of 10% fluid overload; shorter duration of mechanical ventilati

141 on ordering, and "dry" weight, adjusting for fluid overloaded states.

142 x 100] and expressed as PICU peak cumulative fluid overload % throughout admission and PICU day 2 cum

143 d grade 3 dyspnoea and the other had grade 2 fluid overload), thus the 204 mg dose was considered to

144 Furthermore, correction of fluid overload to </= 10% was not associated with improv

145 remains supportive, including prevention of fluid overload, treatment of electrolyte disturbance and

146 t any time point, adjusted relative risk for fluid overload was 2.79 (95% CI, 1.55-5.00) and 1.39 (95

147 days of ICU stay, adjusted relative risk for fluid overload was 8.83 (95% CI, 4.03-19.33), and for cu

148 Fluid overload was assessed as fluid balance from admiss

149 renal replacement therapy, greater than 10% fluid overload was associated with higher risk of 90-day

150 Fluid overload was associated with mortality in patients

151 idence of pulmonary edema, heart failure, or fluid overload was noted.

152 Peak cumulative fluid overload % was 7.4% +/- 11.2%.

153 Peak fluid overload % was associated with greater PICU mortal

154 Greater peak fluid overload % was associated with Major Adverse Kidne

155 Cumulative fluid overload % was calculated as [(total fluid in - ou

156 Substudy mean baseline absolute "Fluid Overload" was 0.4+/-1.7 L.

157 cause of their perceived risk for iatrogenic fluid overload, we also evaluated patients with a histor

158 ations other than acute kidney injury and/or fluid overload were excluded.

159 Fluid overload, while common in the ICU and associated w

160 uction in a bioimpedance-derived estimate of fluid overload, with no statistically significant effect

161 uscitation resulted in a higher incidence of fluid overload without improvement in clinical outcomes.