コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ring intraoperative GDFT versus conventional fluid therapy.
2 went GDFT and 1059 who received conventional fluid therapy.
3 ce of using central venous pressure to guide fluid therapy.
4 which has led to the advent of goal-directed fluid therapy.
5 d acute lung injury and were not affected by fluid therapy.
6 on of supplemental-oxygen and/or intravenous-fluid therapy.
7 Mortality in FVB mice was fully prevented by fluid therapy.
8 w colloids', and on the amount and timing of fluid therapy.
9 s for mice that received only antibiotic and fluid therapy.
10 deaths at 90 days than standard intravenous fluid therapy.
11 to an acute illness, and needed intravenous fluid therapy.
12 atients (1.3%) receiving plasmalike isotonic fluid therapy.
13 , and SIRS persistence than moderate or high fluid therapy.
14 Restrictive vs. standard IV fluid therapy.
15 -fold greater in children receiving isotonic fluid therapy.
16 mL/kg is a key target guiding perioperative fluid therapy.
17 e commercially available plasmalike isotonic fluid therapy (140 mmol/L of sodium and 5 mmol/L potassi
18 In the alert group, more patients received fluid therapy (23.0% vs. 4.9% and 9.2%, p mu .01), diure
19 gnificantly greater in patients who received fluid therapy (26.9 +/- 12.5% vs 6.2 +/- 4.3%; p < 0.000
20 on in children receiving plasmalike isotonic fluid therapy (61 of 308 patients [20%]) compared with t
21 sium in 5% dextrose) or moderately hypotonic fluid therapy (80 mmol/L sodium and 20 mmol/L potassium
22 ed with those receiving moderately hypotonic fluid therapy (9 of 306 patients [2.9%]; 95% CI of the d
24 hat incorporates quantitative projections of fluid therapy and fluid losses on the patient's serum so
26 est further vomiting and prevent intravenous fluid therapy and hospitalization aids children with vom
27 of vomiting, decreased need for intravenous fluid therapy and hospitalizations, without serious adve
28 an overview of the history of perioperative fluid therapy and its relevance to modern practice.Intra
30 ed as a 10% increase in cardiac output after fluid therapy, assessed by a second transthoracic echoca
31 e PICU and considered to require intravenous fluid therapy by the treating clinician were eligible.
33 ugs, as well as cardiovascular, hormonal and fluid therapies, can all influence the ability to fast-t
34 r in children receiving isotonic, plasmalike fluid therapy compared with those receiving mildly hypot
38 er integrity, or affecting immune responses, fluid therapy (FT) fully rescues Il22(-/-) mice by corre
41 review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether fluid therapy guided by dynamic assessment of fluid resp
42 nistration until very recently.Newer work in fluid therapy has explored the concept of fluid restrict
43 olutions, the renewed focus on perioperative fluid therapy has led to IVF administration being guided
44 o < 20 ml/kg/h), and low (5 to < 10 ml/kg/h) fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis were considered.
45 nic crystalloids are recommended for initial fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis, but whether the use
52 receive BMES (Plasma-Lyte 148) or saline as fluid therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU) for 90 da
58 gan perfusion are evaluated); stabilization (fluid therapy is used only when there is a signal of flu
59 , commercially available plasmalike isotonic fluid therapy markedly increased the risk for clinically
60 In the Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC
61 fference was found between moderate and high fluid therapy (OR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.41, 0.86]; p = 0.006
62 d clinical outcomes with low versus moderate fluid therapy (OR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.13, 4.03]; p = 0.71)
63 plications improved with moderate versus low fluid therapy (OR = 1.22; 95% CI [0.84, 1.78]; p = 0.29)
64 ed intravenous fluid or standard intravenous fluid therapy; patients were included if the onset of sh
66 ffered solution) administered as intravenous fluid therapy reduced the incidence of rise in plasma ch
70 In conclusion, PPV is useful for managing fluid therapy under specific conditions where it is reli
72 9 [95% CI, 1.2-140]; p = 0.04) and cumulated fluid-therapy volume greater than 10.7 L (odds ratio, 16
78 an 3.0 mmol/L on admission; clinical need of fluid therapy with 10% glucose solution; a history of di