ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluorescence-activated cell sorting

1 pression were measured using flow cytometry (fluorescence-activated cell sorting).

2 mphoid organs and purified by multiparameter fluorescence activated cell sorting.

3 ression of injected cells after isolation by fluorescence activated cell sorting.

4 ated from the hearts of PG(WT) and PG(TR) by fluorescence activated cell sorting.

5 macrophages by using confocal microscopy and fluorescence activated cell sorting.

6 iciently labeled LAP clones were isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting.

7 sing combinations of chemokine receptors and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

8 were labeled with fluorescent antibodies for fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

9 rifying undifferentiated spermatogonia using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

10 matured by sequential random mutagenesis and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

11 inergic neurons followed by enrichment using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

12 nd electron microscopy, lineage tracing, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

13 e generated from asynchronous cultures using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

14 tobrush-derived CD4+ T cells was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

15 cell injury models using both histology and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

16 i-67, and cleaved caspase 3 were measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

17 site for genomic editing, can be isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

18 gammadeltaT cells were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

19 HSC and CD133 MP levels were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

20 imitations of traditional flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

21 in calcified arteries by immunostaining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

22 ed in the Adult Clinical Trials Group 384 by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

23 a CD133 and CD39 MP subsets were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

24 ha2 protein expression was measured by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

25 OPCs, which could be further purified using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

26 d), and B cells (BC4d) were determined using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

27 ty, allowing the isolation of these cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

28 Transduced cells underwent fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

29 xpression was determined by high-dimensional fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

30 expression of MHC class II/CD80 measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

31 lial cell coculture, the latter coupled with fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

32 rin-exacerbated respiratory disease by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

33 chano-enzymatic tissue digestion followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

34 ic procedure over a period of 16 weeks using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

35 levels were examined by quantitative PCR in fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

36 k of DNA replication, and G2 arrest by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

37 D4, Gr1, and Mac1 antibodies and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

38 y directed evolution using yeast display and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

39 rase chain reaction; 2) Western blotting; 3) fluorescence-activated cell sorting; 4) immunohistochemi

40 ropositive cases were tested additionally by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, a live transfected

41 ns based on cell growth/survival, as well as fluorescence-activated cell sorting according to fluores

42 s work, we demonstrate a sheathless acoustic fluorescence activated cell sorting (aFACS) system by co

43 s with CVID homogenously grouped by means of fluorescence-activated cell sorting allowed additional s

44 e or intracellular staining and multi-colour fluorescence activated cell sorting alone or in combinat

45 Confocal microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses showed tran

46 Microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses suggest tha

47 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses were perfor

48 We used immunostaining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses with in viv

49 g results were corroborated by histology and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses.

50 Fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis was used to

51 ro specific binding of ligands was tested by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and by radi

52 nt interleukin-17 (IL-17) were quantified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and enzyme-

53 plant or OVA-B16F10 tumor could be traced by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis as effector

54 Finally, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis demonstrate

55 ding was assessed by cell binding assays and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis in a variet

56 fluorescence protein signal was detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis in the CD90

57 Immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis indicate th

58 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of monolaye

59 Histology and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of the bone

60 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed el

61 were repeated using human fibroblasts, with fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealing t

62 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis showed only

63 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis suggested t

64 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was perform

65 l viability as a marker of proliferation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was used to

66 Mass spectrometry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and functi

67 gammaH2A.X assay, cell cycle progression by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and PARP-1

68 By using fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, fibrocytes

69 Using multi-parameter fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, we quantif

70 Immune cells were characterized by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

71 wed by biodistribution, autoradiography, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

72 ed in gastric tissue and peripheral blood by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

73 xpression of CD86 and CD80 was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

74 red by using either time-lapse microscopy or fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

75 , Mac-2/Galectin-3 immunostaining, and FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) analysis (CD45(+)CD

76 We used flow cytometric (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) analysis to quantif

77 Fluorescence activated cell sorting and immunofluorescen

78 In this paper, we use fluorescence activated cell sorting and RNA-seq to deter

79 Fluorescence activated cell sorting and Western blot wer

80 es were analyzed by using combined bacterial fluorescence-activated cell sorting and 16S rRNA sequenc

81 Bone marrow-derived HSCs were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and administered aft

82 of microparticles by CACs was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and by fluorescence

83 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and cDNA-microarray

84 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and cell binding ass

85 m differentiated cultures were purified with fluorescence-activated cell sorting and characterized.

86 PBMCs and human mast cells were assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and degranulation, r

87 e and cartilage progenitors were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and expression of Fa

88 t day 21, we harvested blood and spleens for fluorescence-activated cell sorting and hearts for 2,3,5

89 wing acute drug exposure using intracellular fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunoblot analy

90 ubset of primary HSCs was demonstrated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunofluorescen

91 h and without asthma was examined by RT-PCR, fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunohistochemi

92 l model for beta2AR expression, we performed fluorescence-activated cell sorting and isolated cells t

93 uorescently mark the ZPA or AER, followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and low-cell H3K27ac

94 LC2s and TH2 cells were isolated by means of fluorescence-activated cell sorting and magnetic cell so

95 Direct comparisons with cell isolation by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and magnetic-bead-ba

96 , single MEP cells were analyzed using index fluorescence-activated cell sorting and parallel targete

97 In addition, fluorescence-activated cell sorting and polymerase chain

98 The combined fluorescence-activated cell sorting and PROMIDISalpha an

99 High-viability cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and re-suspended in

100 logies and gene editing tools, combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting and RNA sequencing,

101 ILC2s were isolated by means of fluorescence-activated cell sorting and studied for Il5

102 ined from healthy control subjects underwent fluorescence-activated cell sorting and then were cocult

103 xp3GFP+ CBir1-Tg Treg cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and transferred into

104 ell type-specific functions were assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and viral-mediated o

105 Numerous clones were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and affinity matura

106 by means of RT-PCR, Western immunoblotting, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and double-immunofl

107 try, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and electrophysiolo

108 ofluorescence, Luminex assay, ELISA, UniCAP, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and PCR.

109 fluorescent labeling, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and quantitative PC

110 Experimental techniques, such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and single cell RNA

111 ions, isolated these subpopulations by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and subjected them

112 lls from mouse intestine were isolated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and transcriptional

113 In IAS cells isolated with fluorescence-activated cell sorting, Ano1 expression was

114 ersister-FACSeq, which is a method that uses fluorescence-activated cell sorting, antibiotic toleranc

115 ine mammary epithelial cells, we developed a fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay based on fluor

116 nd to be negative, should be retested with a fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay when available

117 l antimicrobial activity was assessed with a fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay.

118 ing quantitative fluorescence analysis using fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay.

119 These 2 patients alone tested positive by a fluorescence-activated cell-sorting assay.

120 d immunosorbent, transfected cell-based, and fluorescence-activated cell-sorting assays.

121 loride staining determined infarct size, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting assessed cell compos

122 were isolated by enzymatic dissociation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting at day 3 following s

123 Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, B-cell subsets were

124 Cholinergic neurons were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting based on either tran

125 s from normal, RD and HGPS individuals using fluorescence activated cell sorting-based assays.

126 We exploited a high-throughput, fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based green fluoresc

127 Here we describe and validate a fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based protocol that

128 Our two-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based screen provide

129 , high-throughput and quantitative two-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based screening stra

130 Using an intersectional fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based strategy, we i

131 Using a fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based strategy, we o

132 BONCAT-labeled cells could be isolated with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (BONCAT-FACS) for su

133 Fluorescence-activated cell-sorting, cell-based, and enz

134 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting combined with MBs wa

135 Multicolor fluorescence-activated cell sorting could isolate distin

136 tological and biochemical analyses following fluorescence-activated cell sorting demonstrate a positi

137 Histological, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, dot blot analysis,

138 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting-enriched CD133(-)/Ep

139 an All-in-One Cas9(D10A) nickase vector with fluorescence-activated cell sorting enrichment followed

140 Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis reve

141 Western blot and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis reve

142 me (live cell imaging), separate cells using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and control c

143 dily accessible experimental methods such as Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) and multiplex

144 present the development of an acoustofluidic fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) device that s

145 In this work, we harness the capacity of fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) for multicolo

146 High throughput screening by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) is a common t

147 he embryo to define cell type and includes a fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) procedure tha

148 SmoM2 expressing cells, purified by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) via the genet

149 defined as CD34(+)VEGR2(+) using traditional fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), are rare cel

150 nanoLCMS proteomics workflow by integrating fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), focused ultr

151 on chromosome 10 (PTEN) was observed both in fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-isolated TICs

152 RT-qPCR on Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)-sorted tnfa(+

153 lls of L. braziliensis, which were sorted by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS).

154 SC chimeras were tetraploid as determined by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS).

155 l-specific fluorescent reporters purified by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS).

156 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) allows for ra

157 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis indi

158 e endothelial activation was validated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of i

159 FV-2 showed antibody titers of >1:10(6), and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis reve

160 tudy, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis were

161 Furthermore, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and confocal

162 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and confocal

163 tly infected resting CD4(+) T cells and used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and fiber-opt

164 n vitro contact cocultures, as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and fluoresce

165 We use fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and genomic s

166 fluorescence-based genetic screen utilizing fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and high-thro

167 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and histopath

168 cessing times of common sorting methods like fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic-

169 This allows for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and single-ce

170 om normal mouse intestine using DCAMKL-1 and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and subjected

171 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and subsequen

172 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) confirmed tha

173 A direct comparison of this technology with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) demonstrated

174 aploid state for at least five weeks without fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) enrichment of

175 e cells isolated from hepatoma cell lines by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) form spheroid

176 as not detectable in clear cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) from B1-EGFP

177 iIACS extends beyond the capabilities of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) from fluoresc

178 eparation based on SSEA-5 expression through fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) greatly reduc

179 In order to facilitate genomic analysis, a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) method was de

180 This aptamer enables better separation by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of c-kit(+) h

181 their binding to fluorophores, coupled with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of millions o

182 enables enrichment of high-lipid mutants by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of pooled mut

183 ater than 10(4) eosinophils were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) protocol resu

184 Analysis of inflammatory infiltrates by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) revealed sign

185 nces from BONCAT-positive cells recovered by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) reveals that

186 scent protein and nuclease was combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to allow for

187 transcription polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to analyze in

188 ining genes, we employed flow cytometry with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to enrich a t

189 We then use fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to individual

190 cle, Maurice et al. (2013) report the use of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to perform a

191 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to purify str

192 We employed fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to sort for c

193 y the earliest responding cell type, we used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to sort the g

194 Cells were isolated and purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using endogen

195 tudying gene expression in cells purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using intrace

196 ed apoptosis, which we quantify by combining fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with annexin

197 e NME1(LOW) cells for phenotypic analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), a CRISPR-Cas

198 ative RT-PCR (Q-RT-PCR) of cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and by immun

199 mory B cells are first single-cell-sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and V(D)J tr

200 etry, coupled with the sorting capability of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), can detect,

201 s were assessed by RT-PCR, western blotting, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), enzyme-linke

202 nd their expression levels were confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), GFP visualiz

203 fluidic devices are seamlessly combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), so that indi

204 Upon EGFP-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), the E/sox2:E

205 east cancer, we developed a highly sensitive fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based assay,

206 Using a fluorescent reporter and a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based transpo

207 s, we performed gene expression profiling of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified muri

208 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified Tbx1

209 ompatible with high-throughput screening via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

210 e breeding of live oil-rich E. gracilis with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

211 ine incorporation, and cell size assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

212 ate MuSCs from limb muscles of adult mice by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

213 ng histological analysis, real-time PCR, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

214 ), while cytokine production was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

215 vast libraries when used in combination with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

216 Fluorescent yeast cells were selected using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

217 g optical imaging, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

218 munosorbent assay (ELISA) and multiparameter fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

219 sed single cell transcriptional analysis and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

220 and developed a novel flow-cytometry-based (fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FACS) strategy to d

221 ious techniques such as ultracentrifugation, fluorescence-activated cell sorting flow cytometry and r

222 (~1% of the library) using yeast display and fluorescence-activated cell sorting followed by deep seq

223 populations using stable isotope tracing and fluorescence-activated cell sorting followed by liquid c

224 Here we describe site-specific integration fluorescence-activated cell sorting followed by sequenci

225 ll subsets (RRMS; n = 7) were isolated using fluorescence activated cell sorting for bulk RNA sequenc

226 with non-redundant transposon insertions by fluorescence-activated cell sorting for reduced depositi

227 ons were isolated from kidney homogenates by fluorescence-activated cell sorting for whole genome mic

228 bility to reproducibly use cells isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting from human prostate

229 ferent populations of cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from disaggregated l

230 re, we purified HSCs with retinoid-dependent fluorescence-activated cell sorting from eGFP-expressing

231 ethod for recovering live cells suitable for fluorescence-activated cell sorting from human islets en

232 al and non-neuronal nuclei were separated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from postmortem DLPF

233 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting from the skins of tr

234 rt-Seq that combines saturating mutagenesis, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, high-throughput seq

235 od via immunomagnetic enrichment followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (IE-FACS).

236 thod involving immunomagnetic enrichment and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (IE/FACS), a techniq

237 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting, immunofluorescence,

238 e-wide gene expression analysis from ex vivo fluorescence-activated cell sorting in MDM4-deficient re

239 We isolated Ly6c(high) monocytes via fluorescence-activated cell sorting in the blood of susc

240 apoptosis functional tests were evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting; interleukin 10 (IL-

241 or the isolation of idioblast protoplasts by fluorescence-activated cell sorting is established, taki

242 Indeed, the fluorescence-activated cell sorting-isolated EpCAM(+) HC

243 pplications, including sample concentration, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, label-free cell/par

244 Here we describe live animal fluorescence-activated cell sorting (laFACS), a protocol

245 ally altering cell phenotypes, we employed a fluorescence activated cell sorting method to isolate ke

246 and they were isolated from each other using fluorescence-activated cell sorting methods.

247 w-cost, and high-performance microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorting (muFACS) technology

248 escent reporter gene with an ochre mutation, fluorescence-activated cell sorting of a library of SUP4

249 The procedure involves fluorescence-activated cell sorting of a library, deep s

250 Four rounds of quantitative screening by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of an error-prone li

251 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting of CD24 high versus

252 Upon fluorescence-activated cell sorting of each neutrophil s

253 Here, we applied fluorescence-activated cell sorting of green fluorescent

254 ng IL-17A-producing cells were identified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of myeloid versus ly

255 entially methylated loci was performed after fluorescence-activated cell sorting of oligodendrocyte a

256 Upon fluorescence-activated cell sorting, only Prominin-1/Nes

257 s) were isolated as side population cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting or isolated by clona

258 ired to generate single-cell suspensions for fluorescence-activated cell sorting or single-cell RNA s

259 DCs were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting or with immunomagnet

260 ively, in RFP-positive Sk-Hep-1 recovered by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (P < 0.04 vs Mu-APT

261 ssion tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, polymerase chain re

262 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting purification of huma

263 The in vitro characterization of fluorescence-activated cell sorting-purified cells is co

264 Using gradient centrifugation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting, rat G cells were pr

265 of NKG2D and its ligands were determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, real-time polymeras

266 RH-positive parasites sorted with fluorescence-activated cell sorting resumed growth at 10

267 Pollen germination assays following fluorescence-activated cell sorting revealed that the hi

268 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting revealed that type I

269 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting, RNA sequencing, qua

270 rpin RNA depletion, cDNA overexpression, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting selection.

271 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting showed significantly

272 These results were corroborated by fluorescence activated cell sorting showing a 48% yield

273 eter size, which is challenging for existing fluorescence-activated cell sorting systems.

274 ivated, CD154(+) CD4(+) memory T cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, TCRbeta sequencing,

275 We show by confocal microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting that amino acids 50

276 ng directed in vivo angiogenesis assays with fluorescence-activated cell sorting, thereby confirming

277 morphology on bacterial physiology, we used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to enrich a library

278 ne expression from labeled cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to generate cell-typ

279 sed them to a starvation stress before using fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify and isol

280 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify circulat

281 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate a pure po

282 display, enzyme-mediated bioconjugation, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate cells exp

283 We used multicolor fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate different

284 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate each cell

285 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate EGFP(+) c

286 Using CD140a/PDGFRalpha-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate fetal OPC

287 e(X) antigen can be used in conjunction with fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate neurosphe

288 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate reinstate

289 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to measure hepatic l

290 The method uses fluorescence-activated cell sorting to screen randomly m

291 chain reaction (qPCR), or immunoblot assays; fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed to ide

292 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to isolate

293 Next, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we compared gene ex

294 By performing growth using enrichments and fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we demonstrated suc

295 By employing fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we have generated g

296 Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we identified alveo

297 By fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we isolated JG cell

298 CD45(low)CD271+ cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting were enumerated and

299 ection, embryonic day 14.5 embryo digestion, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, whole-genome sequen

300 a novel approach that combines the power of fluorescence-activated cell sorting with barcode microar