ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluorescent signal

1 converting an electrochemical signal into a fluorescent signal.

2 deoxyribozyme catalytic cores that produce a fluorescent signal.

3 ethod based on integration of the associated fluorescent signal.

4 nzymatically coupled to the development of a fluorescent signal.

5 ine binding interface produces an integrated fluorescent signal.

6 and each other in their contributions to the fluorescent signal.

7 n molecules, giving rise to amplification of fluorescent signal.

8 excitation, DDAO generates a far-red-shifted fluorescent signal.

9 (CTX:Cy5.5) bioconjugate that emits near-IR fluorescent signal.

10 ecular conformation torsion adjustment ratio fluorescent signal.

11 e probe is efficiently cleaved, generating a fluorescent signal.

12 ement, therefore, its fluorophore releases a fluorescent signal.

13 t hybridization resulted in quenching of the fluorescent signal.

14 those areas in the dermal tissues lacking a fluorescent signal.

15 inhibition for caspofungin as measured by a fluorescent signal.

16 m temperature with immediate generation of a fluorescent signal.

17 llations of the correlation functions of the fluorescent signal.

18 es, such as the correlation functions of the fluorescent signal.

19 in an approximately 100-fold increase in the fluorescent signal.

20 ivatized by fluorescamine, thus generating a fluorescent signal.

21 format and an automated end-point capture of fluorescent signal.

22 he illuminating fiber to collect the emitted fluorescent signal.

23 y CRISPR complex upon targeting to produce a fluorescent signal.

24 measurable increase in the intensity of the fluorescent signal.

25 ducing application time enhanced the nuclear fluorescent signal.

26 tificial wound extract were converted into a fluorescent signal.

27 g the binding of metal ions into a change of fluorescent signal.

28 airpin structure to induce a decrease in the fluorescent signal.

29 esulting in YFP complementation and a bright fluorescent signal.

30 alized with Frmpd1-GFP based upon the merged fluorescent signals.

31 the generation and transmission of multiple fluorescent signals.

32 ossible to isolate near-field from far-field fluorescent signals.

33 t as juxtaposed or overlapping red and green fluorescent signals.

34 ower labeling densities to avoid overlapping fluorescent signals.

35 er exo-/endocytosis-associated pH changes to fluorescent signals.

36 is quantitative image analysis of cells and fluorescent signals.

37 ins (E1, E2, and C), reflected by immunoblot fluorescent signals.

38 resulting in the significant decrease of the fluorescent signals.

39 onucleotides (oligos) to produce and enhance fluorescent signals.

40 s of DNA logic gates are oligonucleotides or fluorescent signals.

41 that allow for highly tunable and on demand fluorescent signaling.

42 techniques, which reduce the overlap of the fluorescent signals, a new colocalization method is need

43 citation was found to elicit a better deGFP4 fluorescent signal above cellular autofluorescence when

44 Comparative bulk fluorescent signals achieved only micromolar sensitivity

45 fected the uniformity and reproducibility of fluorescent signal across DNA microarrays.

46 In addition, a non-targeted FIT-PNA shows no fluorescent signal after spraying this FIT-PNA on fresh

47 measurements are obtained by calibrating the fluorescent signal against chemically synthesized standa

48 ccurate quantification of N-glycans from the fluorescent signal alone.

49 GluSnFR.A184S revealed punctate synapse-like fluorescent signals along dendrites and somas in the pre

50 the next strand cycle to produce exponential fluorescent signal amplification for miRNA detection.

51 up to 16 MS2 binding motifs to enable robust fluorescent signal amplification.

52 ntact duplex has an extremely low background fluorescent signal and provides up to 50-fold fluorescen

53 by direct base-calling from the unprocessed fluorescent signals and improved heterozygote analyses o

54 amplicons, we can distinguish between their fluorescent signals and quantify each independently.

55 imple and effective mechanism to enhance the fluorescent signal, and hence the sensitivity of the sys

56 nt nucleotide into the DNA, detection of the fluorescent signal, and photocleavage of the fluorophore

57 SGFP4 allows for spectral separation of each fluorescent signal, and provides the means to image thes

58 However, silver nanoparticles quench this fluorescent signal, and thus it is possible to obtain a

59 latform to firstly detect bioluminescent and fluorescent signals, and secondly, record ultrasound and

60 For enumeration of T4-LacZ phage, the fluorescent signal appeared in as little as 90 min.

61 It is likely that this approach to producing fluorescent signaling aptamers is of general use for pro

62 A new approach to creating fluorescent signaling aptamers using fluorescent nucleot

63 Fluorescent signals are generated when multivalent aptam

64 Fluorescent signals are relatively photostable, allowing

65 bound Abs can be scored by counting discrete fluorescent signals arising from individual Ag-Ab comple

66 lulose and measuring the attenuation of this fluorescent signal as a hydrogel consisting of poly(ethy

67 The sensor reports the fluorescent signal as a product of amino acid chain clea

68 ngineered reporter cell lines that produce a fluorescent signal as a proxy for protein expression.

69 re they display robust function and distinct fluorescent signals as detected by TIRF microscopy.

70 e analysis of the FRET signal from the total fluorescent signal at acceptor emission wavelength, whic

71 A fluorescent signal at the site of nascent transcription

72 HCR) resulting in deposition of an amplified fluorescent signal at the site.

73 ein isothiocyanate anti-human Fc resulted in fluorescent signals at immobilized concentrations of 6'-

74 effects of PIT are monitored using the IR700 fluorescent signal based on macroscopic fluorescence ref

75 cleavage instead of photobleaching to remove fluorescent signals between consecutive rounds of smFISH

76 the attached gold nanoparticle quenches the fluorescent signal by 95%, or less likely that the compl

77 chnique, was used to dynamically enhance the fluorescent signal by concentrating the modified particl

78 ulted in complementation of YFP and a bright fluorescent signal by confocal microcopy that localized

79 urther enhanced by the rapidity at which the fluorescent signal can be captured and the resultant mul

80 ationship between template concentration and fluorescent signal can be demonstrated down to template

81 s of magnitude, putting us in a regime where fluorescent signals can be considered to be a quantitati

82 usion proteins is induced by heat shock, the fluorescent signals can be visualized as early as 30 min

83 Because the photoactivation leads to fluorescent signals catalytically rather than stoichiome

84 This substrate produces a fluorescent signal caused by the extrusion of the crucif

85 The fluorescent signal changes of the genes within the three

86 concentration were quantitated by measuring fluorescent signal changes of the single wavelength calc

87 n of DNA and its mutations by monitoring the fluorescent signal changes of the target DNA/molecular b

88 e nanoendoscope was fabricated and resultant fluorescent signals collected.

89 that the distribution of the radioactive and fluorescent signal colocalized with CEA-expressing tumor

90 gh an increased signal-to-noise ratio of the fluorescent signal compared with performing the same ass

91 three Trp residues allows assignment of the fluorescent signal completely to the three tryptophan re

92 We show that the relative amounts of fluorescent signal correlate well with the abundance of

93 ace-localized virus particles and that large fluorescent signals correlated with membranous Gag-conta

94 We found that small punctate fluorescent signals correlated with single viral particl

95 rated into surface-elongated lambda DNA, and fluorescent signals corresponding to the addition of R11

96 probe allowed in vivo renal imaging and the fluorescent signal could be specifically captured in the

97 tonic crystal (PC) in the array enhanced the fluorescent signal due to a guided mode resonance.

98 nergy transfer (FRET) probes and generates a fluorescent signal during PCR.

99 onfirmed the ability to noninvasively detect fluorescent signal during replication, which generally c

100 egative control cell line (Jurkat) showed no fluorescent signal either intra- or extracellularly.

101 breast cancer cells by quantifying the total fluorescent signal emanating from individual cells.

102 f a laparoscopic camera system to detect the fluorescent signal emanating from sentinel lymph nodes (

103 The origin of the fluorescent signal emitted by infected cells was further

104 We found that fluorescent signal emitted by NanoOrange dye increases e

105 indices inside cells and tissues distort the fluorescent signal emitted from single-molecule probes,

106 for simultaneous selective detection of the fluorescent signals emitted by a bacterial biosensor arr

107 The time-dependent line shape of the fluorescent signal enables detection of DCV docking, fus

108 luorescent signal and provides up to 50-fold fluorescent signal enhancement following hydrolysis.

109 tify simultaneously occurring scattering and fluorescent signals, even when contaminating particles (

110 othiols is determined from the difference in fluorescent signal (excitation/emission wavelengths of 3

111 According to our data, direct fluorescent signals (FI(635)), IC(50) and K(d) values pr

112 ated nanoparticle provides an extremely high fluorescent signal for bioanalysis and can be easily inc

113 esorufin as a transduction module provides a fluorescent signal for probing the catalyzed oxidation o

114 in aggregate will generate a single, strong fluorescent signal for regions as small as a single gene

115 C) assays leverage protein-amplification and fluorescent signaling for the accurate detection of misf

116 xcitation source was developed to detect the fluorescent signals for bacterial quantification.

117 nose surface biomarker while affording clear fluorescent signals for FACS screening as well as for fl

118 The fluorescent signals for pIX-mRFP1 and pV-EGFP were detec

119 release FDOM that closely match the typical fluorescent signals found in oceanic environments.

120 y demonstrate ~2.5-3 fold enhancement of the fluorescent signal from 2-10 mum sized particles.

121 A strong fluorescent signal from BCC lesions was detectable throu

122 dipy-650 and the subsequent detection of the fluorescent signal from Bodipy-650 and its photocleavage

123 ecline was followed by rapid recovery of the fluorescent signal from both cyto-pHluorin and pH-GluA2.

124 The fluorescent signal from collagen fibers within the scler

125 rget proteins based on the colocalization of fluorescent signal from orthogonally labeled capture and

126 mice at different stages of the disease, the fluorescent signal from pHLIP Var3 marked cancerous lesi

127 Fluorescent signal from rMA-EBOV expressing ZsG was dete

128 e optical imaging detected a strong tdTomato fluorescent signal from skeletal muscle grafts in mice w

129 The fluorescent signal from the 2nd-Ab is measured as mean f

130 against XIST RNA demonstrated that the major fluorescent signal from the autoantibody colocalized wit

131 The fluorescent signal from the collagen fibers of the corne

132 Green fluorescent signal from the Fam83h-GFP fusion protein wa

133 rase and dUTP-PC-Bodipy-FL-510, detected the fluorescent signal from the fluorophore Bodipy-FL-510, a

134 ulation produced rapid redistribution of the fluorescent signal from the membrane to cytosol, which w

135 We first showed that fluorescent signal from the oligonucleotide array varies

136 DNPs) that can shift the peptide's intrinsic fluorescent signal from the ultraviolet to the visible r

137 ity of the method by simultaneous readout of fluorescent signals from bacteria expressing fluorescent

138 ected PCR primers and probe did not generate fluorescent signals from eight other helicobacters (H. c

139 Detecting fluorescent signals from individual labeled proteins abo

140 The routing of fluorescent signals from NADH to quantum dots (QDs) has

141 CRISPR reactions and enable the detection of fluorescent signals from the paper.

142 beta2AR) resulted in internalization of both fluorescent signals from the plasma membrane.

143 wly free to fluoresce, contributes to global fluorescent signal generated by 4-MU.

144 The fluorescent signals generated in the fSBA correlate to t

145 The fluorescent signal generation mechanism is based on the

146 The universality of the fluorescent signal generation mechanism, as well as the

147 cularly imprinted polymer (MIP) containing a fluorescent signaling group on a 4-cm long polystyrene o

148 Variation in the MB/mRNA hybridization fluorescent signal has been observed for different PtK2

149 mechanochromic molecules, which emit strong fluorescent signals if sufficiently deformed.

150 medical applications, because they exhibit a fluorescent signal in a spectral region where there is m

151 The probe has low fluorescent signal in aqueous media, but its solubility

152 vo, resulting in up to a 45-fold increase in fluorescent signal in bacteria and a 3-fold increase in

153 arning approach for estimating the amount of fluorescent signal in different subcellular compartments

154 In either scenario, the observed fluorescent signal in fact arises from a large populatio

155 ssed together, these two proteins produced a fluorescent signal in human embryonic kidney 293 cells t

156 beacon (RBMB), which generates a detectable fluorescent signal in living cells that express the targ

157 Optical imaging showed antigen-specific fluorescent signal in PSCA-positive xenografts and high

158 n the untemplated reaction providing a clear fluorescent signal in response to the protein oligomer w

159 and cytoplasmic staining with enrichment of fluorescent signal in the nucleus and nucleolus.

160 dye for new bone formation revealed a strong fluorescent signal in treated animals that was equivalen

161 not reduce the viral titer and resulted in a fluorescent signal in viable transduced cells detectable

162 carrying the gene encoding GFP resulted in a fluorescent signal in viable transduced cells that was d

163 omatically quantifies synaptically localized fluorescent signals in a high-throughput and robust mann

164 a transgenic zebrafish that exhibited green fluorescent signals in blood vessels.

165 tron microscopy, confirming that overlapping fluorescent signals in confocal z-stacks accurately iden

166 and assay reagents produced colorimetric or fluorescent signals in droplets.

167 Whole-body fluorescence imaging detected fluorescent signals in the liver and lungs.

168 ether, YFP-N-beta1 and YFP-C-gamma7 produced fluorescent signals in the plasma membrane that were not

169 e efficiency of excitation and collection of fluorescent signals in the presence of fluorophore photo

170 eases in apparent diffusion coefficients and fluorescent signals in tumor masses immediately after th

171 APon for protease activity showed a 390-fold fluorescent signal increase upon tobacco etch virus prot

172 The ability to directly read the TCPP fluorescent signal increases assay simplicity by reducin

173 significant differences in the amplitude of fluorescent signal indicate that the mutations also affe

174 Fluorescent signals, indicating the retention of virions

175 r to probe injection), a significantly lower fluorescent signal (inflamed paws 50%, inflamed toes 70%

176 With sham treatment, TTc transport causes fluorescent signal intensity over the thoracic spine to

177 cing up to an 850% increase in near-infrared fluorescent signal intensity.

178 The generation of fluorescent signal is controlled by strand-specific elec

179 Although most studies assume that the fluorescent signal is emitted from the surface layer of

180 Moreover, the fluorescent signal is expanded in time in a way that mak

181 he primers are designed in such a way that a fluorescent signal is generated only when the primers ar

182 Fluorescent signal is generated when the hybridization p

183 The fluorescent signal is inversely proportional to the conc

184 The fluorescent signal is measured during oxidation of 2',7'

185 uces the transcription of the aptamer, and a fluorescent signal is produced.

186 citation are linear processes, but the total fluorescent signal is quadratic, proportional to the squ

187 argeting to synapses, the specificity of the fluorescent signal is uncertain, compared to sensors dir

188 The ratio of fluorescent signals is a measurement of the efficiency o

189 and pillar diameter dependent enhancement of fluorescent signals is clearly demonstrated using green

190 , resulted in a strong, sporulation-specific fluorescent signal localized to the sites of sporulation

191 are given for the three experimentally used fluorescent signal mechanisms (intensity, intensity rati

192 ts in a single fluorometric channel based on fluorescent signal modulation using a limiting probe des

193 d accurate method for detection of very weak fluorescent signals obtained in many applications such a

194 The fluorescent signals obtained with this approach exhibite

195 protein or particle and that recovery of the fluorescent signal occurs in response to enzymatic degra

196 The BDNF-induced increase in fluorescent signal of a green fluorescent protein transl

197 mic properties can cause abrupt increases in fluorescent signal of both GFP and fluorescein.

198 following a power-law; (ii) at equilibrium, fluorescent signal of different probes hybridized to the

199 The enhanced fluorescent signal of each N(3+)-aptamer solution is sel

200 The enhancement of the fluorescent signal of N(3+) by three K(+) aptamers consi

201 e efficient in lowering the quenching of the fluorescent signal of tagged insulin, in keeping the dil

202 Additionally, the inherent fluorescent signal of TCPP molecules can be measured aft

203 We report enhancement in the fluorescent signal of the carbocyanine dye Cy5 by using

204 roscopic imaging was performed to detect the fluorescent signal of the tracer in the pancreas of mini

205 comparison of emission spectra indicates the fluorescent signal of wild-type R67 DHFR is dominated by

206 Fluorescent signals of 10 bacteria had significant corre

207 ons with local minimums in intensity) in the fluorescent signals of mobility markers.

208 nsor, the AAO surface is used to enhance the fluorescent signals of the fluorophore-labeled hairpin D

209 Neutrophil EGFP-fluorescent signals of the S. aureus-infected mice were

210 olution microscopy detected primarily single fluorescent signals of variable intensity that parallele

211 yanocarbonate epoxides that produce a strong fluorescent signal on epoxide hydrolysis by both human a

212 steps: a cleavage reaction, which generates fluorescent signal on microsphere surfaces, followed by

213 This new approach puts the detection of fluorescent signals on a firm statistical foundation.

214 ble filter (AOTF) is used to detect multiple fluorescent signals on a fluidic microdevice.

215 n, suberin, cellulose) based on differential fluorescent signals on unstained samples.

216 chitectures, rationally designed to elicit a fluorescent signal only after target engagement.

217 anner similar to molecular beacons, yielding fluorescent signals only in the presence of a cognate li

218 reen and red SNAP ligands provide sufficient fluorescent signal, only the tetramethyl rhodamine (TMR)

219 multaneous detection of multiple independent fluorescent signals or signal multiplexing has the poten

220 appositions of presynaptic and postsynaptic fluorescent signal, or synapses, showed overall predomin

221 hippocampal neurons a large fraction of the fluorescent signal originates from intracellular pH-GluA

222 ction sensitivity, either through increasing fluorescent signal output per mRNA molecule or increasin

223 age-guided surgery system which superimposes fluorescent signals over analog, real-time, tissue image

224 nts that could be visualized and measured as fluorescent signals over multiple cell cycles.

225 Optical mapping is a technique for capturing fluorescent signal patterns of long DNA molecules (in th

226 f carriers is being used but a high level of fluorescent signal persists for 48 h indicating that flu

227 The fluorescent signal produced from probe-based RT-RPA or R

228 Here, we show that the fluorescent signals produced by single-copy, targeted GF

229 in which low power (a few tens of picowatts) fluorescent signals produced by the bacterial sensors ar

230 uced the average coefficient of variation of fluorescent signal ratios on DNA microarrays in addition

231 f the polymer sample are calculated from the fluorescent signals recorded over a range of dilutions.

232 septic mice had attenuated abdominal AV-750 fluorescent signal, reduced ex vivo fluorescence in the

233 A Ca2+ spark is a fluorescent signal reflecting the activation of a small

234 xin gradient across the root visualized by a fluorescent signaling reporter explained the reversed, u

235 kes into account stochastic variability in a fluorescent signal resulting from intrinsic noise of gen

236 mages showed that the intensity of the green fluorescent signal revealed much weaker signal from the

237 The number and position of the fluorescent signal(s) provides information about the rel

238 liver, adipose tissue, and bone marrow; the fluorescent signals showed complete concordance with the

239 iazole resulted in the redistribution of the fluorescent signal, suggesting that fluorescent PtdIns(4

240 They give a greater fluorescent signal than stem-loop Scorpions due to the v

241 (e.g., mRNAs, DNAs, or proteins), emitting a fluorescent signal that can be quantified and correlated

242 The probes produced a maximum fluorescent signal that could be monitored noninvasively

243 the nuclei of tumor cells emitted a specific fluorescent signal that could be visualized using a hand

244 c two-stage reaction which produces a robust fluorescent signal that is easy to detect and process.

245 of the transcriptional regulator TetR into a fluorescent signal, thereby linking UPS activity to an e

246 ing capability, and hinder quantification of fluorescent signals, thereby compromising strategies to

247 hich directly converts molecular tensions to fluorescent signals, therefore enabling cellular force m

248 s rely on delivery of light and recording of fluorescent signals through optical fibers that can redu

249 the cycle threshold (CT) indicating adequate fluorescent signal to signify a positive result was esta

250 to a few minutes and achieves correlation of fluorescent signal to submicron target structures in ele

251 ing a technical limitation to the ability of fluorescent signals to accurately represent gene express

252 ctures and generates significantly amplified fluorescent signals to achieve highly sensitive detectio

253 pen, Glomax, Flocam) measured and quantified fluorescent signal-to-background ratios (SBR) in vitro,

254 ol agent on CA IX positive cells, showed low fluorescent signal under both conditions.

255 sed technique that allows amplification of a fluorescent signal up to 1000-fold.

256 e medium was assayed for the presence of the fluorescent signal up to 32 h after transfection.

257 re (F) and a quencher (Q), which amplifies a fluorescent signal upon cleavage.

258 P sequence gives more than 100-fold brighter fluorescent signals upon excitation with 490 nm (blue) l

259 rtner and its target to generate a change in fluorescent signal using an environment-sensitive fluoro

260 Preservation of fluorescent signal was achieved by decreasing clearing t

261 The in vivo thoracic and abdominal AV-750 fluorescent signal was attributed to the thymus, liver,

262 ucing nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, and a fluorescent signal was collected.

263 A fluorescent signal was detected from 20 ng of H. bilis D

264 omoalanine or homopropargylglycine, a robust fluorescent signal was detected in somata and dendrites.

265 n the pancreatic islets of mice, and a clear fluorescent signal was detected in the pancreas of mini

266 a strain that does not express FtsZ, and the fluorescent signal was distributed all over the cell.

267 However, the maximum area of green fluorescent signal was found at 0.04 mug/ml PCBs.

268 ptide was detected when the intensity of the fluorescent signal was measured with a charge-coupled de

269 Only a dim fluorescent signal was observed on spirochetes at the 48

270 into sternomastoid muscles, a strong rapsyn fluorescent signal was observed selectively at synapses,

271 the optimized protocol, a hardly detectable fluorescent signal was obtained after incubation of the

272 the overexpression of EGFP-tagged Orai1, the fluorescent signal was present primarily in the cell cor

273 cal imaging of arterial tissues, the average fluorescent signal was significantly higher (P <.05) in

274 The fluorescent signal was then obtained through fluorescenc

275 be (TPOFF) for sensing and quantifying tumor fluorescent signals was tested in vivo.

276 s established that measurements of the total fluorescent signal were not sensitive to the focal plane

277 Cells that incorporated both red and green fluorescent signals were considered to be hASCs that had

278 Fluorescent signals were detected as diffusely distribut

279 Fluorescent signals were found to be proportional to the

280 The Simoa fluorescent signals were highest when the koff of the de

281 starting amplicons from the two tissues and fluorescent signals were measured at each DNA spot.

282 etramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI) fluorescent signals were not only located in Kupffer cel

283 Distinct fluorescent signals were observed by flow cytometry when

284 Fluorescent signals were observed only in the presence o

285 ocedure is required to provide high contrast fluorescent signal when applied to stain brain tissues.

286 Ca2+ channel beta1b subunit induces a strong fluorescent signal when interacting with the loopI-II bu

287 ed by iron and account for almost the entire fluorescent signal when iron is released.

288 rting analysis showed only a minor change in fluorescent signal when the tumor was probed with a fluo

289 ples appear as 'spots' with a fixed ratio of fluorescent signals, whereas proteins that differ betwee

290 )A sensor (GEMS) technology, which couples a fluorescent signal with cellular mRNA methylation.

291 ized AuNCs showed very good stability of the fluorescent signal with light exposure and at neutral an

292 y multiple tumour-specific enzymes produce a fluorescent signal with significantly improved specifici

293 By correlating the GCaMP3 fluorescent signal with the host ECG, we found that graf

294 s used to co-register the bioluminescent and fluorescent signals with muCT images.

295 ergy transfer (ET) primers that produce high fluorescent signals with solid-phase-capturable biotinyl

296 analysis software correlates the position of fluorescent signals with the identity of the analyte.

297 The assay produces a fluorescent signal within 15 to 20 min and worked well u

298 educed clearing time, improved efficiency of fluorescent signals without the need for electrophoretic

299 l amplification is capable of measuring weak fluorescent signals without the need of dedicated labora

300 is method to quantitatively characterize the fluorescent signal, without considering the intensity-va