ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluoridation

1 dation as after widespread implementation of fluoridation.

2 to those born 1 year after the resumption of fluoridation.

3 pmental effects do not result from municipal fluoridation.

4 nce to policy debates about government water fluoridation.

5 ren into exposed (WF) and nonexposed (NF) to fluoridation.

6 nd professionally applied fluoride and water fluoridation among adults.

7 mine the association between community water fluoridation and osteosarcoma.

8 were sometimes ingested in areas with water fluoridation), and infant formula feeds.

9 e (self- and professionally applied or water fluoridation) annually averted 0.29 (95%CI: 0.16-0.42) c

10 The advantages of water fluoridation are that it provides substantial lifelong c

11 lts born before widespread implementation of fluoridation as after widespread implementation of fluor

12 This study examined exposure to fluoridation as an effect modifier of the association be

13 ted since 1962, had an 11-month cessation of fluoridation between September, 1990, and August, 1991.

14 Fluoridation causes an obvious reduction of dental carie

15 re defined by a child's age at the time that fluoridation ceased.

16 Effects were compared between the pre-fluoridation cohort born before 1960 (n = 2,270) and the

17 th authorities have promoted community water fluoridation (CWF) to prevent dental caries for more tha

18 e-forming teeth were affected by exposure to fluoridation, daily fluoride supplement use, or brushing

19 edures were used to determine the effects of fluoridation, early brushing, daily supplements, and oth

20 Findings for intermediate fluoridation exposure suggested a dose-response relation

21 ion of fluoride-containing toothpaste, water fluoridation, fluoride tablets (which were sometimes ing

22 Although the benefits of water fluoridation for dental health are widely accepted, conc

23 The effect of water fluoridation (found in NYC) was evaluated in Phase II by

24 ng dental caries-preventive effects of water fluoridation in adults.

25 While the benefit of fluoridation in the prevention of dental caries has been

26 = 1,509), when widespread implementation of fluoridation increased population coverage from < 1% to

27 this study demonstrated that community water fluoridation is not associated with an increased risk fo

28 Water fluoridation is the most effective measure in preventing

29 in plain tap water or bottled water to test fluoridation levels.

30 stly significant interaction existed between fluoridation living status and bottled water use (P = 0.

31 water supplies are fluoridated, and lack of fluoridation may disproportionately affect poor and mino

32 n Durham, NC, where an interruption to water fluoridation occurred between September, 1990, and Augus

33 risk should not be a reason for withholding fluoridation of water supplies.

34 sts concerning the impact of community water fluoridation on bone health in adults, and few studies h

35 effect of early childhood exposures to water fluoridation on measures of school-age executive functio

36 fluoride varnish) or systemically (eg, water fluoridation, prescription fluoride supplements) is wide

37 nal, and individual measures including water fluoridation, professionally applied topical fluorides a

38 justed models, > 75% of lifetime exposure to fluoridation relative to < 25% of lifetime exposure was

39 A national-scale fluoridation study addresses policy-relevant exposure le

40 This study used an 11-month break in water fluoridation to identify the time when developing inciso

41 The prevented fraction for water fluoridation was 27% (95%CI: 19%-34%).

42 n adults, caries-preventive effects of water fluoridation were at least as great in adults born befor

43 After successful trials, programs for water fluoridation were introduced, and industry developed eff

44 % CIs for the association of community water fluoridation with osteosarcoma.