コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 changes in lower extremity venous uptake of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose.
2 minutes after injection of 370 MBq (10 mCi) fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) followed by p
3 ough positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) has a major i
4 al (IB) routes and imaged sequentially using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) uptake as a non
7 s, positron emission tomography imaging with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose, and cardiac magnetic res
8 ermined with findings of decreased uptake of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose at PET, shrinkage of tumo
9 patients (20.7%) with adequate follow-up had fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose-avid IMLN, with a median
10 CT scans is feasible and may be helpful when fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose-avid masses that are not
12 analysis, the role of metabolic imaging with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in breast cancer is
13 lculation of the percentage injected dose of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in tumor from small
16 s and possible CS who were investigated with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and cardiac
17 lly suspected underwent clinically indicated fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and, immedia
18 and to identify differences between WAT and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT proven cold-
19 he correlation between metabolic activity at fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
20 Purpose To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
22 he established patterns of hypometabolism on fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
23 trinsic contrast of melanin in comparison to fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
24 cal-pathologic nodal status with use of four fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
25 baseline magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
27 ively compare the sensitivity of a dedicated fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
28 luate the positive predictive value (PPV) of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
29 aging technique in body imaging is currently fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
30 ss significant (P < .05) differences between fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake of benign le
32 acilitate future direct correlations between fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid colonic lesion
33 ts suspected of having abdominal or thoracic fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positive lesions un
35 ing of malignancy, bone marrow activity from fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET may be informat
36 y (PET) using nitrogen-13 (N-13) ammonia and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for imaging of perf
37 pectively investigated the value of PET with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for preoperative ch
38 hat positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) may be useful for d
39 , and two underwent gallium scintigraphy and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission t
40 ing optimal interpretative criteria (IC) for Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission T
41 a marker for tissue viability with regional fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in patients
47 olving a labeled dose of 370 MBq (10 mCi) of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose is estimated to involve a
48 nt contrast material-enhanced MR imaging and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PEM in randomized order;
49 y (PET) and coregistered computed tomography/fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET are used primarily in
50 rials and Methods Between 2010 and 2013, 219 fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET examinations were per
51 etail methods for controlling the quality of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging conditions to
53 public data set of multimodality images (CT, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and T1-weighted MRI)
54 s gallium 68 DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET/CT and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET, play an increasing r
55 t (Fig 1), bilateral breast MRI (Fig 2), and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (Fig 3) were perfo
57 l of 30 lesions were evaluated at (18)F- FDG fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and (18)F- FPPRGD2
58 ure to compare the diagnostic performance of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and diffusion-weig
59 5 years) who underwent health screening with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT between January 20
60 xaminations, as well as clinically indicated fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT examination within
61 trointestinal malignancies underwent two FDG fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT examinations withi
62 n lesions presents a further challenge where fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has a potential ro
63 ted MRI is comparable or superior to that of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the differentia
66 background is recommended in multicenter FDG fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT studies on the bas
67 serial cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI, or fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT) between April 201
68 -grade tumors, they were also evaluated with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, with imaging find
70 ighted MRI showed significant agreement with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI for treatment res
71 onclusion A model that includes pretreatment fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET texture features from
72 anatomic localization and classification of fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET uptake patterns in fo
74 tudy was to evaluate the prognostic value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging of venous
75 phic (CT) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( FDG fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose ) PET/CT examinations wer
76 ndmark finding relied on the use of clinical fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomogra
78 d 20 nonsmoking control subjects underwent 2 fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomogra
79 erapy with both computed tomography (CT) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomogra
84 magnetic resonance imaging and angiography, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomogra
85 (molecular biology) and imaging diagnostic (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomogra
86 es after injection, compared with (18)F- FDG fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with SUVmax maximu
87 2.3) at 60 minutes, compared with (18)F- FDG fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with SUVmax maximu
88 hereas vascular inflammation was assessed by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emissi
89 ed to segment and quantify serial changes in fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake for veins of inter