戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  PI3K pathway, were undetectable, colony and focus forming abilities of the v-Src-RIE cells were only
2  of Rac1, and to a lesser extent RhoA, block focus forming ability of the GTPase-deficient mutant of
3 tive than ca Rac or ca Cdc42 in rescuing the focus forming ability of the mutants.
4       However, MAPK is not essential for the focus forming ability of the three oncogene-transformed
5 K stimulation by Vav, as well as reduces the focus-forming ability of Vav in NIH3T3 murine fibroblast
6 anced, whereas a dn PAK mutant inhibited the focus-forming ability of Vav3-(6-10).
7 We observed a striking cooperative effect on focus-forming ability when Galpha12 and c-raf-1 cDNAs we
8                        Despite having potent focus-forming ability, Vav3-(6-10) has very weak colony-
9 d the transformation phenotype and inhibited focus-forming ability.
10 dimers displayed a five- to sevenfold higher focus-forming ability.
11 resulted in synergistic cooperation of their focus-forming activities, indicating that Ras activates
12 n of Dbs with activated Rac1 causes enhanced focus forming activity and elevated levels of GTP.RhoA i
13 intracellular domain that confers the higher focus forming activity mediated by the beta PDGFR.
14 expression of full-length RalGDS reduced the focus forming activity of activated TC21.
15 ted from human placenta markedly reduced the focus forming activity of cotransfected, malignantly act
16 l residues showed a several 100-fold greater focus forming activity than that seen with deletion of 6
17                    In addition to its potent focus forming activity, constitutive overexpression of P
18 ant negative Rho most potently inhibited the focus forming activity, whereas Cdc42 was most effective
19       We have previously purified a protein, focus-forming activity 1 (FFA-1), which is involved in t
20 ve identified and purified a 170-kD protein, focus-forming activity 1 (FFA-1), which is required for
21 ensity, lower cell-doubling times, increased focus-forming activity and higher ability to grow on sem
22 ition, an Ad9 E1 region plasmid demonstrated focus-forming activity in both low-passage-number and es
23 n from a Ras-responsive promoter element and focus-forming activity in NIH 3T3 cells.
24  inhibition of either IKK-1 or IKK-2 reduced focus-forming activity in Ras-transformed RLEs.
25  potent mitogenic effect of thrombin and the focus-forming activity of one of its receptors, protease
26     The observed inhibitory effect of C3G on focus-forming activity of Ras and Sis was always higher
27                  Activated PI3K enhanced the focus-forming activity of Vav3-(6-10).
28 of Stat3 resulted in a 60% inhibition of the focus-forming activity of Vav3-(6-10).
29              Compared to wild-type GRF1, the focus-forming activity on NIH 3T3 cells of the GRF1 DH c
30 2 cooperated with Raf and showed synergistic focus-forming activity, both quantitative and qualitativ
31 ial MEK5-ERK5 effectors that might influence focus-forming activity.
32 LV) that is derived from the ampho-mink cell focus-forming (AMP/MCF) retrovirus in the serum of one r
33                                          The focus-forming and anchorage-independent growth activitie
34 tures were also assayed for infectivity in a focus-forming assay, and a correlation (P = 0.0002) was
35 asal swabs were negative for viable virus by focus-forming assay.
36 lymorphic respiratory isolate, using a novel focus-forming assay.
37  transforming activity in a Rat-2 fibroblast focus-forming assay.
38 rphologically transformed NIH 3T3 cells in a focus-forming assay.
39                    We demonstrate RT-PCR and focus-forming assays on-chip to detect mosquito DNA, Zik
40         NIH3T3 cells were used to screen for focus-forming genes using the ERM strategy.
41 photropic (4070A), and amphotropic-mink cell focus-forming hybrid (10A1) envelope constructions have
42 ptosis in mink epithelial cells by mink cell focus-forming (MCF) MLV infection results in the accumul
43                                    Mink cell focus-forming (MCF) murine leukemia viruses (MLVs) are t
44  exogenous infection by polytropic mink cell focus-forming (MCF) murine leukemia viruses (MuLVs).
45    To examine the possible role of mink cell focus-forming (MCF) recombinant virus in raising levels
46 classic toxicity of the polytropic mink cell focus-forming (MCF) retrovirus in mink cells.
47 MuLVs comprised ecotropic and mink lung cell focus-forming (MCF) virus classes and are termed Rausche
48 nce to infection by the polytropic mink cell focus-forming (MCF) virus subgroup of murine leukemia vi
49 the sequence similarity of XMRV to mink cell focus-forming (MCF) viruses and the enhanced leukemogeni
50 gence of recombinant polytropic or mink cell focus-forming (MCF) viruses.
51 0002) was measured between the percentage of focus-forming microsporidia and the percentage of expect
52 nexpectedly, at least two types of mink cell focus-forming MuLV elements, arising from endogenous ret
53    Upon inoculation into AKR mice, mink cell focus-forming murine leukemia virus (MCF MLV) accelerate
54 ction of thymic lymphocytes by the mink cell focus-forming murine leukemia virus (MCF MLV) during the
55 fection of thymic lymphocytes by a mink cell focus-forming murine leukemia virus induces apoptosis du
56 of the long terminal repeat of the mink cell focus-forming murine leukemia virus is important for vir
57                        Using high-throughput focus-forming reduction or luciferase-based neutralizati
58 rmore, the amount of viral nucleoprotein per focus forming unit differed markedly whether viruses wer
59 rved: replication defective (dead; titer < 1 focus-forming unit [FFU]/ml), replication compromised (R
60  assay) and 11.7 h (by replating fluorescent focus-forming unit assay).
61  H77-S particles (5.4 x 10(4) RNA copies per focus-forming unit) was significantly lower than JFH-1 v
62 than JFH-1 virus (1.4 x 10(2) RNA copies per focus-forming unit).
63 on, animals were challenged with 5.0 log(10) focus forming units (FFU) of a wild-type dengue-2 virus.
64  a 50% mouse lethal dose (MLD(50)) of ~10(5) focus forming units (FFUs), ZIKV-Paraiba infection resul
65 ity of infection, similarly to how plaque or focus forming units (PFU, FFU) are used.
66    The assay's analytical sensitivity was 10 focus forming units, and respiratory specimens with thre
67  deposition of baboon semen containing 10(6) focus-forming units (FFU) of ZIKV (n = 3 for FP isolate
68 netics and an infectivity titer of 6.7 log10 focus-forming units (FFU)/ml.
69 ce inoculated with greater than 2 x 10(5) R7 focus-forming units (FFUs).
70 ood agreement with the ratio of particles to focus-forming units determined by infectivity assays.
71 ually at immunization titers as low as 10(3) focus-forming units for both RV vaccine vectors.
72 transformation in vitro with an abundance of focus-forming units in monolayer cultures and anchorage-
73 end virus complex was determined to be 10(3) focus-forming units of attenuated virus.
74 trols were infected intranasally with 10 000 focus-forming units of influenza A/WSN/33 (H1N1) per mou
75 , handwashing water must contain <2 x 10(-6) focus-forming units of rotavirus, <1 x 10(-4) CFU of Vib
76 days after subcutaneous inoculation of 10(6) focus-forming units of SFTSV.
77 npregnant female C57BL/6 mice with 5 x 10(5) focus-forming units of ZIKV intravaginally.
78 hing HCV infectivity titers of 3.9-4.5 log10 focus-forming units per milliliter.
79 ectious particles of approximately 5 log(10) focus-forming units per mL; passaged TNcc did not requir
80             More R7Delta447 than R7Delta447K focus-forming units were detected in both NIH3T3 and mou
81 nd J8 achieved infectivity titers >4.5 log10 Focus-Forming Units/mL.
82 elded approximately 4.5 x 10(4) to 1 x 10(5) focus-forming units/ml.
83 of up to 10(6) alkaline phosphatase-positive focus-forming units/ml.
84  each group was challenged orally with 10(5) focus-forming-units of virulent HRV at 33 days of age.
85                                   The spleen focus forming virus (SFFV) gp55-P envelope glycoprotein
86 ority of tumors induced by the murine Spleen Focus Forming virus (SFFV), while fli-1 proved to be the
87 der control of the strong, ubiquitous Spleen Focus Forming Virus promoter within a self-inactivating
88 tor (pSFF) derived from murine Friend spleen focus forming virus was used to transduce murine hematop
89  growth factor beta receptor; gp55 of spleen focus forming virus, which activates the erythropoietin
90 ene of the polycythemic strain of the spleen focus forming virus.
91       Constructs containing the viral spleen-focus-forming virus (SF), ubiquitous promoters, or cell
92                                Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) causes rapid erythroleukemia
93                            The Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) encodes a unique envelope gly
94   The erythroleukemia-inducing Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) encodes a unique envelope gly
95   The erythroleukemia-inducing Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) encodes a unique envelope pro
96                            The Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) env gene encodes a 409-amino-
97                            The Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) env gene encodes a glycoprote
98  erythroid progenitor cells by Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) leads to acute erythroid hype
99 on of erythroid cells with the Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) leads to the interaction of t
100 throid cells infected with the Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) proliferate in the absence of
101 dies enhanced the expression of Sfpi1 spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) proviral integration 1 (PU.1)
102 inkins osteosarcoma oncogene (c-fos), Spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) proviral integration 1 (PU.1)
103         Infection of mice with Friend spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) results in a multistage eryth
104 Spi-1) by retroviral insertion of the spleen-focus-forming virus component of Friend virus.
105     The gp55 envelope proteins of the spleen focus-forming virus initiate erythroleukemia in adult mi
106 nd virus-induced erythroleukemia, the spleen focus-forming virus integrates into the PU.1 locus betwe
107 rus envelope glycoprotein (F-gp55) of spleen focus-forming virus or specific mutations in the extrace
108 nt binding sites for CCAAT/CEBPalpha, spleen focus-forming virus, proviral integration oncogene (SPI1
109 oviral insertion in nearly all Friend spleen focus-forming virus-transformed murine erythroleukemia c
110 her MuLV complex but do not include a spleen focus-forming virus.

 
Page Top