戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tural rearrangements that control the global folding rate.
2 ntly more stable, showing a 100 times faster folding rate.
3  folding rates at the temperature of maximum folding rate.
4 in the turn or loop region mostly affect the folding rate.
5 itions under which frustration increases the folding rate.
6 pared it with the corresponding experimental folding rate.
7 to quantify the influence of knotting on its folding rate.
8  of peptide backbone, thereby increasing the folding rate.
9 p leading to significant enhancements in the folding rate.
10 ation results in a 5-fold retardation of the folding rate.
11 ically decreased stability but increased the folding rate.
12 ive position, thereby decreasing the overall folding rate.
13 pendent experimental method to determine the folding rate.
14 es primarily with unfolding rate rather than folding rate.
15 d a web of nonnative states slow the average folding rate.
16 environment influences protein stability and folding rate.
17  of the mechanism by which urea enhances RNA folding rates.
18 e them from kinetic traps and increase their folding rates.
19 otein in the cis cavity, produces effects on folding rates.
20 t sequences with longer loops display slower folding rates.
21  apparent equilibrium constants and relative folding rates.
22 erived from known structures correlates with folding rates.
23 f native state contact orders for predicting folding rates.
24 uffer unfolding are similar, as are in vitro folding rates.
25      Macroscopically, this results in faster folding rates.
26 ry different temperature dependencies of the folding rates.
27 teins gives rise to their topology-dependent folding rates.
28 ir complex topologies and intrinsically slow folding rates.
29 and obtained coefficients that predict their folding rates.
30 ter describe the role of topology in protein-folding rates.
31 o be the most important determinant of their folding rates.
32 n misfolded conformations, and non-Arrhenius folding rates.
33 gnificant correlation with the logarithms of folding rates.
34 walls induces a very strong reduction of the folding rates.
35 s that cover a wide range of stabilities and folding rates.
36                   Indeed, both the raw TIP3P folding rate (4.5 +/- 2.5 micros) and the diffusion-cons
37                                 Although the folding rate accelerates as the viscosity declines, it t
38 d the relationship between RNA structure and folding rates accounting for hierarchical structural for
39 itive correlation between hydrophobicity and folding rate across all of the residues we have characte
40                            The resulting (un)folding rates agree well with experiments.
41 d TZ1 and TZ2 properties well; the estimated folding rates agreed with the experimentally determined
42                                          The folding rate also appeared to be influenced by differenc
43  Moreover, we find that the logarithm of the folding rates also scale as R(-gamma(c)), with deviation
44 llent agreement with experimentally measured folding rates, although pathways sampled in these simula
45 play an important role in dictating relative folding rates among topologically equivalent proteins.
46 erent members, with a 5000-fold variation in folding rate and 3000-fold variation in unfolding rate s
47 tution indicate a strong correlation between folding rate and charge state.
48  export competence is related to the protein folding rate and could be exploited for the isolation of
49 a linear relationship between the log of the folding rate and DeltaG* (H2O) .
50 tein plays a primary role in determining the folding rate and mechanism of relatively small single-do
51 sidues 509-511 and only minor differences in folding rate and stability.
52 mate is based on the correlation between the folding rate and the number of predicted long-range cont
53                              To increase the folding rate and to gain insight into the folding proces
54  for the role of unfolded chain diffusion on folding rates and barrier heights are discussed.
55 e toward the folded state by both increasing folding rates and decreasing unfolding rates.
56 ic core but that are predicted to affect the folding rates and dynamics dramatically.
57     To determine the extent to which protein folding rates and free energy landscapes have been shape
58 the concentration dependence of the observed folding rates and intermolecular FRET measurements.
59  test of such models, provide predictions of folding rates and mechanisms for a comprehensive set of
60                    The prediction of protein folding rates and mechanisms is currently of great inter
61  predict the effects of mutations on protein folding rates and mechanisms would greatly facilitate fo
62  explanation for the experimentally measured folding rates and mechanisms, in terms of the intrinsic
63 es agreed with the experimentally determined folding rates and native conformations were the global p
64 logy plays a key role in determining protein-folding rates and pathways.
65 imulation, to study protein kinetics through folding rates and population kinetics from approximate f
66                 Upon tethering, we find that folding rates and stability are impacted differently by
67 ure, there is no simple relationship between folding rates and stability for the archael histones.
68 disulfide bridges: large variability in both folding rates and stability of intermediates, multi-stat
69 sms by comparing the effects of mutations on folding rates and stability, but determining varphi-valu
70  of polyglutamine guest inserts, the kinetic folding rates and structural perturbation of these CI2 i
71  can be used to extract population kinetics, folding rates and the formation of particular substructu
72                                 Plotting the folding rates and the reduced contact order from ten dif
73 or diffusive barrier crossing, including the folding rates and the transition time for crossing the b
74 tic interactions have a pronounced effect on folding rates and thermodynamic stability.
75 protein conformational dynamics, but protein folding rates and transition times have not been calcula
76 an drastically change the protein stability, folding rate, and cooperativity.
77 his stability increase greatly increases the folding rate, and suggests that the transition state ens
78 uorescence and CD experiments yield the same folding rate, and the chevron plots have the characteris
79 m expressed in terms of transcription speed, folding rates, and metabolite binding rates predicts dif
80                                  The diverse folding rates appear to reflect large differences in the
81                                          The folding rate approaches the diffusion-limited value and
82 m the data agrees well with the experimental folding rate (approximately 640/s).
83            The equilibrium stability and the folding rate are found to be strongly dependent upon the
84                     Further, these predicted folding rates are correlated strongly with contact order
85                                          The folding rates are faster for designed variants compared
86         In the presence of a crowding agent, folding rates are faster in the two-state regime, and at
87                                 The observed folding rates are found to be proportional to the number
88                                   Much lower folding rates are predicted when the folding is initiate
89 uch proteins frequently are hindered because folding rates are too fast to measure using conventional
90                        We show that observed folding rates are well predicted by a Kramers model with
91                                Errors in the folding rates arising from instrument artifacts were onl
92                                          The folding rate at 300 K is (0.7 micros)(-1) with little or
93                   Remarkably, the calculated folding rate at [C] = 0 is only 16-fold larger than the
94 o-Hyp)(4) region significantly decreases the folding rate at low but not high concentrations, consist
95 e sequences used exhibit a 600-fold range of folding rates at the temperature of maximum folding rate
96 on found between experimental and calculated folding rates based on free energy barrier heights using
97  compact denatured polypeptide can limit the folding rate, but the limiting time scale is very fast.
98 e same region of a beta-strand decreased the folding rate by 20- and 50-fold, respectively, suggestin
99 inhibitor 2 (CI2), accelerates the protein's folding rate by a factor of 36 relative to that of the w
100 anine residue with alanine will increase the folding rate by removing a transient non-native interact
101 ng Asp46 with Ala leads to a decrease in the folding rate by roughly 9 times.
102 ntramolecular interactions influence protein folding rates by altering dynamics and not activation fr
103 t rather adopts an active role, accelerating folding rates by decreasing the roughness of the energy
104 hain models of natural proteins with diverse folding rates by extensive comparisons between the distr
105 majority (55%) of these substitutions affect folding rates by less than a factor of 2, and that only
106  than a factor of 2, and that only 9% affect folding rates by more than a factor of 8.
107  a protein and provide insights into how its folding rate can be modified during evolution by mutatio
108 erstand the molecular basis of the decreased folding rate, changes in the unfolded as well as the fol
109 ment between simulation and experimental CI2 folding rates, CI2 structural perturbation, and polyglut
110 me in the unfolded state (the inverse of the folding rate coefficient).
111 the unfolded protein is extremely large, the folding rate coefficient, k(f), is much smaller than k(a
112                                  Whereas the folding rate coefficients differ by a factor of 10,000,
113 onds within the turn region elicits a slower folding rate, consistent with the hypothesis that these
114 , the corresponding estimated values for the folding rate constant are larger by two to three orders
115 Rs, a second exponential phase with a slower folding rate constant is observed.
116                     The 1.9-fold increase in folding rate constant observed for this change at the ch
117 pient downhill folder having an extrapolated folding rate constant of 2 x 10(5) s(-1) and a stability
118 ve similar unfolding rate constants, but the folding rate constant of gcUUCGgc is 4.1-fold faster at
119 erature dependence of the natural log of the folding rate constant suggests that folding occurs via a
120 ease is largely correlated with an increased folding rate constant, and with a smaller but significan
121                                          The folding rate constants approached limiting values with i
122 te state is significantly populated, and the folding rate constants are relatively slow compared to t
123 cal peptides and from demonstration that the folding rate constants for coiled coils, as obtained by
124                             The extrapolated folding rate constants in water at 298 K were 210,000 s(
125                 With increasing calcium, the folding rate constants increase while unfolding rate con
126 mula fits well the experimentally determined folding rate constants of the 24 proteins, with single v
127              Experiments have shown that the folding rate constants of two dozen structurally unrelat
128 erted together into R16 or R17, increase the folding rate constants, reduce landscape roughness, and
129 families, stability is also a determinant of folding rate constants.
130                             In contrast, the folding-rate constants are almost identical for the thre
131 -folding field is whether unfolding rates or folding rates correlate to the stability of a protein.
132                              The accelerated folding rates could result from helix stabilization with
133          Under most conditions, the observed folding rate decreases with increasing counterion concen
134                                  Protein (un)folding rates depend on the free-energy barrier separati
135 folding can either speed up or slow down the folding rate depending on the amount of native and nonna
136 her accelerated or retarded compared to bulk folding rates, depending on the temperature of the simul
137            We find that the logarithm of the folding rate depends linearly on the entropic change ass
138 eely jointed chain models illustrate how the folding rate depends on the entropic and enthalpic energ
139                                          The folding rate determined for these cyclic peptides is acc
140 lusion of beta-turn mimics alters beta-sheet folding rates, enabling us to classify beta-turn mimics
141                     In addition the 5-6-fold folding rate enhancement varied only slightly with pH, 7
142                   In all cases examined, the folding rate enhancement with the aromatic thiol was 5-
143          These substrate proteins experience folding rate enhancements without undergoing multiple ro
144                                          The folding rates extracted using a simple kinetic model are
145 bility, and that the experimentally measured folding rates fall within this narrow triangle built wit
146 e slow diffusion that markedly decreases the folding rate for a designed alpha-helical protein.
147  results showing, if anything, a slowdown in folding rate for encapsulated Rhodanese.
148 had a nonnative free-energy minimum, and the folding rate for OPLS(aa) TZ3 was sensitive to the initi
149 is well-correlated with the logarithm of the folding rate for these small, well-characterized molecul
150 ness holds over a surprisingly wide range of folding rates for our designed sequences.
151 den triangle" limiting the possible range of folding rates for single-domain globular proteins of var
152 t with experimentally derived structures and folding rates for specific systems, leaving them positio
153                                          The folding rates for telomeric RNA and DNA G-quadruplexes a
154 thermodynamic and kinetic quantities such as folding rates, free energies, folding enthalpies, heat c
155 s can be jointly analyzed to compute unknown folding rates from detailed balance.
156                  Here, we estimate two-state folding rates from predictions of internal residue-resid
157 dary structure prediction methods to predict folding rates from sequence alone.
158 dary structure had been exploited to predict folding rates from sequence.
159 ally, Kramers theory was used to predict the folding rates from the landscape profile, recovering the
160 t of many experimental studies, but its slow folding rate has made it difficult to observe and charac
161 tabilization of I(2)* correlated with slower folding rates, implying that NNS is not a kinetic trap b
162 ightly steeper temperature dependence of the folding rate in some cells that can be rationalized in t
163                                          The folding rate in the absence of denaturant is 260 s(-)(1)
164              We find that enhancement of the folding rate in the second, rate-limiting step is correl
165  between experimental observed and predicted folding rates in jackknife cross validation.
166 to contribute to the viscosity dependence of folding rates in larger proteins.
167 trapolating GuHCl-based chevrons to estimate folding rates in the absence of denaturant and in interp
168                                          The folding rates in the absence of denaturant were found to
169  thiol was initially determined and then the folding rates in the presence of each thiol were measure
170                                The trends in folding rates in the presence/absence of gatekeepers obs
171                                          The folding rate increases due to reduced-dimension pathways
172 5.0 to 6.40 kcal mol(-1) at pH 8.0 while the folding rate increases from 0.60 to 18.7 s(-1).
173       Analysis of the urea dependence of the folding rates indicates that mutations modulate the unfo
174 /B/G/H helix core substantially decrease the folding rate, indicating that docking and folding of the
175                                          The folding rate is 640 s(-1) and the value of deltaG degree
176                                      The net folding rate is a product of the equilibrium constant of
177  as the sole factor to determine the hairpin-folding rate is an oversimplification.
178           At a higher force (f = 11 pN), the folding rate is controlled by the formation of the bulge
179                            What controls the folding rate is hotly debated.
180                                          The folding rate is not retarded by populating an intermedia
181 ions), the influence of these factors on the folding rate is poorly understood.
182 the mutations and fluorophore locations, the folding rate is similar for various protease constructs.
183 rotein folds in a two-state fashion, and the folding rate is slow.
184  in protein stability and indicates that the folding rate is unchanged.
185 es that the topology-dependence of two-state folding rates is a direct consequence of the extraordina
186 racy of total contact distance in predicting folding rates is essentially unchanged if "short"-ranged
187 ethanol cosolvent allows us to determine the folding rate (kf approximately 0.3 (micros)(-1)) and the
188 en able to predict the temperature-dependent folding rate, kinetic intermediates, and folding pathway
189 r the observation of "chevron behavior" (log folding rate linear in denaturant concentration) typical
190 phobicity of a side-chain and the log of the folding rate, ln(k(f)).
191 ar relationship between stability (logK) and folding rates (logk(f)) over the range of pH 5-9 for all
192           Moreover, starting structures with folding rates most similar to experiment show some nativ
193                             Accordingly, the folding rate must be slower than the product of the frac
194  agree with the extrapolated barrier-limited folding rate observed near the melting transition.
195                             Little change in folding rates occurred for the Ala/Gly pair mutations at
196 free energy barrier and results in a maximum folding rate of (2.0 +/- 0.3 micros)(-1), which is appro
197                                    The known folding rate of 20 s-1 at 1.5 M guanidinium chloride in
198                                          The folding rate of 26.4 mus(-1) (at 80 degrees C), extracte
199                 We measure the stability and folding rate of a mutant of the enzyme phosphoglycerate
200 e studied the effect of Gly mutations on the folding rate of barnase to investigate the secondary str
201 -Pro bonds are crucial for the stability and folding rate of collagen, the most abundant protein in m
202 l limiting law, both the stability and (log) folding rate of FynSH3 increase nearly perfectly linearl
203 to "zipper up," while having an extrapolated folding rate of k(f) = 2 x 10(5) s(-1).
204         We interpret the acceleration of the folding rate of MrH3a in 8% HFIP as a direct consequence
205                   While GroELS increases the folding rate of PepQ by over 15-fold, we demonstrate tha
206  the effect of crowding on the stability and folding rate of protein tertiary structures, very little
207 At pH 6.0, the aromatic thiols increased the folding rate of RNase A by a factor of 10-23 over that o
208 vestigated for their ability to increase the folding rate of scrambled RNase A.
209 y binds to its client, the more it slows the folding rate of the bound client.
210                                          The folding rate of the CLN025 beta-hairpin is unchanged wit
211 0)PC liposomes resulted in a decrease in the folding rate of the fast pathway.
212  of the 5' end to G303 in J8/7 decreased the folding rate of the P4-P6 domain.
213 ding leads to an appreciable decrease in the folding rate of the shortest beta-hairpin peptide, indic
214 ore a target for engineering to increase the folding rate of the subdomain from approximately 0.5 mic
215                                              Folding rate of this class of proteins is positively cor
216 mical basis for the previously observed slow folding rate of this mutant, compared to its analogue (d
217                 Our results suggest that the folding rate of two-state proteins is a function of thei
218 the basis of our simulations we estimate the folding rate of villin to be approximately 5micros.
219                  These results contrast with folding rates of 2-0.2 s(-1) previously observed for for
220 eters, we obtain a good correlation with the folding rates of 24 two-state folding proteins.
221 ing, two-state proteins and confirm that the folding rates of a diverse set of Go 27-mers are poorly
222 igated the effects of point mutations on the folding rates of a small single domain protein.
223 lts suggest that the differences in regional folding rates of AKe are not derived from the specific d
224                                          The folding rates of all the other constructs were lower tha
225                    To examine this division, folding rates of circularly permutated isomers are compa
226                                 By comparing folding rates of consensus ankyrin repeat proteins (CARP
227 imited by rates of protein synthesis, by the folding rates of its slowest proteins, and--for large ce
228 trast, SurA showed no effect on the observed folding rates of PagP, consistent with the view that the
229                              We also assayed folding rates of PGK-FRET in spatial proximity to and fa
230                This model gives estimates of folding rates of proteomes, leading to a median folding
231                                The oxidative folding rates of RNase B are between 1.7 and 1.3 times f
232                                 The relative folding rates of simple, single-domain proteins, protein
233                                              Folding rates of small single-domain proteins that fold
234                    In contrast, the relative folding rates of small, Go-potential lattice polymers, w
235 rotected in the bulk and (b) by accelerating folding rates of the protein.
236                                          The folding rates of the redesigned proteins are greater tha
237                                          The folding rates of the slow kinetics phase calculated over
238 ed by results from an Eyring analysis of the folding rates of the two proteins.
239 lation between sigma and either the relative folding rates of these proteins or the presence or absen
240                                              Folding rates of two-state folding proteins correlate we
241                                          The folding rates of two-state single-domain proteins are ge
242  with the 9 order of magnitude dependence of folding rates on protein size for a set of 93 proteins,
243 rimentally identified from the dependence of folding rates on solvent viscosity.
244 he alanine substitution has no effect on the folding rate or on the equilibrium constant.
245 misfolding is not determined by the relative folding rates or barrier heights for forming the domains
246      The nucleus increases PGK stability and folding rate over the cytoplasm and ER, even though the
247 In the example studied here, the analysis of folding rates, Phi-values, and folding pathways provides
248             The increased stability and high folding rate predicted by our simulations were subsequen
249            The posterior distribution of the folding rate predicted from the data agrees well with th
250 contact map prediction is useful for protein folding rate prediction, model selection and 3D structur
251                     The model gives reliable folding rate predictions provided excluded volume terms
252 lding proteins to experimentally resolve the folding rate prefactor and investigate how much it varie
253 elix (helix I) unfolded, fold with identical folding rates, providing direct evidence for the conclus
254 gregation, or an active role in accelerating folding rates, remains a matter of debate.
255 d aggregation but did not alter the observed folding rates, resulting in a higher overall yield of ac
256  the protein by 1 kcal/mol and increases the folding rate sixfold, as measured by nanosecond laser T-
257 the effects of single-point mutations on the folding rate, stability, and transition-state structures
258 e of barnase do not significantly affect the folding rate, suggesting a lack of specific favorable in
259 y next to the beta-turn, does not change the folding rate, suggesting that most native interstrand H-
260 tion is completely reflected in an increased folding rate suggests that this region of the protein is
261  known correlation between contact order and folding rates, suggests that other proteins will have a
262 temperature at which it exhibits its fastest folding rate (T(m)<T(f)).
263 ins exhibit two-state folding kinetics, with folding rates that span more than six orders of magnitud
264 n thus does not appear to operate on protein folding rates, the majority of the designed proteins unf
265 gle, experimentally determined structure and folding rate, this does not ensure that a given simulati
266 is related to the ratio of the unfolding and folding rates, this increase completely accounts for the
267 r map-based kinetics techniques by comparing folding rates to known experimental results.
268         For confinement to positively impact folding rates under physiological conditions, it is henc
269               2.1 Single-domain chains: fast folding rates; unstable intermediates; two-state kinetic
270 presence of the salts markedly increased the folding rates (up to 5-fold).
271 transition state identified by the change in folding rate upon addition of metal ions.
272  protein exhibited a twofold acceleration in folding rates upon encapsulation.
273                                          The folding rate varies remarkably between different members
274 cillus subtilis RNase P RNA isomers, whereas folding rates vary by only 1.2-fold for circularly permu
275                                              Folding rates vary by tenfold for circularly permuted Ba
276                   For a fixed pore size, the folding rates vary non-monotonically as lambda is varied
277                                The ultrafast folding rate, very accurate X-ray structure, and small s
278 ding for all of the constructs; however, the folding rate was affected by their amino acid sequences
279 haracteristics of the native enzyme, but its folding rate was altered.
280     In contrast, a significant difference in folding rates was observed for the Ala/Gly pair mutation
281 hose substitutions that significantly affect folding rates, we find that accelerating substitutions a
282        Furthermore, under similar conditions folding rates were almost identical with either reduced
283                         Both the opening and folding rates were found to vary with changing salt cond
284                                    Oxidative folding rates were further increased in the presence of
285                                 Two distinct folding rates were observed across a range of Mg(2+) con
286                                              Folding rates were observed to be either accelerated or
287                            We found that the folding rates were relatively similar, approximately 0.1
288    We find a substantial acceleration of the folding rate when the connecting loop is made shorter (i
289 cs also provide a novel method for measuring folding rates when the exchange between folded and unfol
290 f a beta-hairpin primarily by increasing its folding rate, whereas a stronger hydrophobic cluster inc
291 f a beta-hairpin primarily by increasing its folding rate, whereas a stronger hydrophobic cluster inc
292                              The increase in folding rate with chain length, as opposed to a decrease
293 ects of folding such as the variation of the folding rate with stability or solvent viscosity and the
294 roteins (CARPs), we find a clear increase in folding rates with increasing size and repeat number, al
295 p mutants show unusually strong increases in folding rates with marginal effects on stability.
296 ack disulfide bridges, and (ii) display slow folding rates with multi-state kinetics, to determine re
297 n path time is remarkably insensitive to the folding rate, with only a 2-fold difference for rate coe
298  by a 35-fold increase in tetraloop-receptor folding rate, with only a modest decrease in the corresp
299 ass, comprising all other residues, produces folding rates within a factor of two of the wild-type ra
300 o other hydrophobic residues often increases folding rates without significantly altering folding fre

 
Page Top