ライフサイエンスコーパス: footwear

1 prevention in older people than conventional footwear.

2 harder calluses than those who typically use footwear.

3 unning shoes rather than the issued military footwear.

4 s impairment, activities, participation, and footwear.

5 ficant ulcer reduction compared with control footwear.

6 ed main effects and interactions of load and footwear.

7 assessments and the design of sport-specific footwear.

8 e generations of artificial turf and studded footwear.

9 fter six months of daily activity in minimal footwear.

10 with usual care, such as pressure-relieving footwear (13.3% vs 25.4%; relative risk, 0.49; 95% CI, 0

11 t the cost of tactile sensitivity, cushioned footwear also lowers rates of loading at impact but incr

12 iners being one of the most popular types of footwear among consumers.

13 rly true in the burgeoning field of forensic footwear analysis, where images of shoe prints are being

14 and suggest that arch supports used in some footwear and orthotics may increase the cost of running.

15 Foot pain, particularly related to shoes, footwear and rheumatic disorders, may be an important mo

16 cation of affected communities to use proper footwear and to reduce the risk of contact with snakes t

17 eported significantly greater use of special footwear, and had a higher prevalence of foot surgery th

18 n for patients, the provision of posthealing footwear, and regular foot care can reduce rates of re-u

19 Additionally, increased footwear bending stiffness did not affect muscle activit

20 Hence, footwear bending stiffness does not appear to alter the

21 Overall, increased footwear bending stiffness lengthened ground contact tim

22 treating osteoarthritis, such as specialized footwear, braces, and powered exoskeletons, also increas

23 f exercise, weight loss, education, inserts, footwear, bracing, therapeutic ultrasound, acupuncture,

24 onals may be more important than therapeutic footwear but does not negate the possibility that specia

25 ucing their HMP deviation and from selecting footwear by quantifying HMP deviation in order to minimi

26 Additionally, unlike cushioned footwear, callus thickness does not affect how hard the

27 Specialized footwear can effectively reduce joint loads in subjects

28 Footwear, carpet, automotive interiors, and multilayer p

29 : vaccine reaction and newly issued military footwear (combat boots and boot socks).

30 in from osteoarthritis, use of biomechanical footwear compared with control footwear resulted in an i

31 ight conditions (0, 15, and 30 kg) and three footwear conditions (barefoot, trainers, and military bo

32 This study investigated how different footwear conditions influence tibial loading across incr

33 d 15 athletes as they ran at 3.5 m/s in four footwear conditions that varied in shoe sole bending sti

34 rformed standing and walking trials in three footwear conditions, i.e. conventional shoes, minimal sh

35 ation from the HMP when running in different footwear conditions.

36 ee loads were compared between the different footwear conditions.

37 further insight on the long-term effects of footwear, consisting of Western adults with an average 2

38 ylon cover (n = 119); or to wear their usual footwear (controls; n = 160).

39 motion, environment modification, vision and footwear correction, referral to physiotherapy, and card

40 t 40 thousand years(1), the oldest recovered footwear dates to eight thousand years ago(2) and inexpe

41 Recent footwear design developments have shown that this approa

42 ormance, setting a new standard for athletic footwear design tailored to the rigorous demands of endu

43 Western adults wore minimal footwear for a six-month period (the "intervention" grou

44 ting of an assemblage of fibrous and leather footwear from Arnold Research Cave in central Missouri d

45 ootwear group compared with 9 in the control footwear group (2.7% vs 8.3%, respectively); none were r

46 ear group and from 4.0 to 2.6 in the control footwear group (between-group difference in scores at 24

47 mproved from 4.3 to 1.3 in the biomechanical footwear group and from 4.0 to 2.6 in the control footwe

48 adverse events occurred in the biomechanical footwear group compared with 9 in the control footwear g

49 Footwear has been implicated as a primary cause of foot

50 Although most features of modern footwear have been intensively studied, there has been a

51 such as Lamboglia 2 amphorae and a military footwear hobnail (type D of Alesia), indicate that they

52 rstanding on the topic of foot orthotics and footwear in adults with rheumatic diseases.

53 be a significant role for foot orthotics and footwear in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and os

54 Specifically, the footwear industry accounts for 1.4% of global carbon emi

55 ests that orthotics, specific shoe types and footwear interventions may provide an effective nonsurgi

56 articipants were randomized to biomechanical footwear involving shoes with individually adjustable ex

57 does not negate the possibility that special footwear is beneficial in persons with diabetes who do n

58 udinal studies investigating whether minimal footwear is more beneficial for fall prevention in older

59 Appropriate footwear is recommended for self-management of knee oste

60 ndicates that foot orthotics and specialized footwear may change muscle activation and gait patterns

61 Footwear may represent a therapeutic target for the trea

62 mobility shoes are removed, suggesting that footwear may serve as a biomechanical training device to

63 h as aerobic exercise, quadriceps exercises, footwear modification, education, and social support.

64 eight carriage increased tibial loading, but footwear modified this relationship.

65 ached to the outsole (n = 111) or to control footwear (n = 109) that had visible outsole pods that we

66 owever, the long-term effects of high-heeled footwear on the musculoskeletal kinematics of the lower

67 lightweight kirigami metasurfaces applied to footwear outsoles could help mitigate the risk of slips

68 that buckling kirigami structures applied to footwear outsoles generate higher friction forces in the

69 e of the highly varied nature of prehistoric footwear production in the United States throughout the

70 biomechanical footwear compared with control footwear resulted in an improvement in pain at 24 weeks

71 is study suggests that use of flat, flexible footwear results in significant reductions in knee loadi

72 There is indirect evidence that footwear such as sandals and moccasins were first invent

73 runners were either barefoot or wore minimal footwear such as sandals or moccasins with smaller heels

74 with higher HMP deviation and whether using footwear that increases HMP deviation during running sho

75 n average 2.5 years of experience in minimal footwear (the "experienced" group).

76 effects of 6 months of use of flat, flexible footwear (the mobility shoe) on knee loading in OA.

77 Individually calibrated biomechanical footwear therapy may improve pain and physical function

78 Changing from flat footwear to high heels induces chronic muscle shortening

79 ing, we aimed to: (1) compare the effects of footwear type on stability and mobility in persons with

80 lls, and (2) determine whether the effect of footwear type on stability is altered by the absence of

81 uggesting that six months of regular minimal footwear use is sufficient to gain full strength, which

82 hysical, foot, and diabetes characteristics; footwear use; foot lesions; and ulcers.

83 Alterations in the timing of the military footwear used and selected vaccine administration had no

84 thesis that normal daily activity in minimal footwear, which provides little or no support, increases