ライフサイエンスコーパス: forage

1 s well as a potential benefit (e.g. improved foraging).

2 enewable fuels and chemicals, as well as for forage.

3 vated genera that were visited during pollen foraging.

4 ding attraction, aggregation, avoidance, and foraging.

5 nd dense thicket being favoured habitats for foraging.

6 timization, action selection, consensus, and foraging.

7 sa, inspired by research on animal and human foraging.

8 allel mechanisms of natural and reprogrammed foraging.

9 ctory information also plays a major role in foraging.

10 li to detect potential prey and direct their foraging.

11 ng and required for the epigenetic switch to foraging.

12 color perception is vital for signaling and foraging.

13 To improve their foraging activities, plants have evolved mechanisms to m

14 These herbivores face a tight window for foraging activity being exposed to nocturnal predation a

15 e temporal patterns in acoustic presence and foraging activity of oceanic dolphins at two seamounts (

16 peaks in dive effort and a peak in nocturnal foraging activity, indicating that guillemots adapted th

17 Here, we tracked groups of freely foraging adult zebrafish with spatially dispersed food i

18 Due to financial constraints and low-quality forage, African livestock are rarely fed at 100% mainten

19 he energetic efficiency (per lunge) of krill foraging, allowing for flexible foraging strategies that

20 Forest elephants' selective browsing and foraging also decreased tree species richness and altere

21 ivum L.), a dual-purpose crop, used for both forage and grain production, significantly contributes t

22 s between the fatty acid (FA) composition in forage and milk (F&M) from different dairy systems were

23 cific relationship between individual FAs in forages and related milk.

24 viduals specialized for either egg-laying or foraging and 'generalists' that perform both.

25 ales migrate vast distances annually between foraging and breeding grounds, and their population fitn

26 Animal foraging and competition are defined by the partitioning

27 ody size, counts of queens, and estimates of foraging and dispersal to assess changes in worker size,

28 nce and behaviour, with higher detections of foraging and echolocation vocalizations during the night

29 Muscle-restricted dpp RNAi promotes foraging and feeding initiation, whereas dpp overexpress

30 gnostic feature of BV, promoted F. nucleatum foraging and growth on mammalian sialoglycans, a nutrien

31 repertoire are selectively displayed during foraging and in social scenarios, and we investigate how

32 dividual consumer's energetic reserves while foraging and reproducing on a landscape with resources t

33 n in predator-prey ecology: how prey balance foraging and safety, as formalized by the risk allocatio

34 disease hosts vary in home range-associated foraging and social behaviours, which may increase the s

35 The social interactions underlying group foraging and their benefits have been mostly studied usi

36 d provides the very first information on the foraging and trophic ecology of the poorly-known TP.

37 limiting the number of days gray whales can forage, and thus sea ice conditions may be one limiting

38 psis tetragonoloba) may also serve as summer forages, and add resilience to agricultural systems in t

39 ect behavior such as reactive space, optimal foraging, and dispersal, as well as develop strategies f

40 ed metabolic demand for maintaining station, foraging, and migration.

41 ing indispensable roles during mate-finding, foraging, and oviposition behaviors.

42 t affect their fitness, such as mate-choice, foraging, and predator avoidance.

43 d sequence over kilometers, walking solitary foraging ants can precisely recapitulate routes of up to

44 individuals often travelled through suitable foraging areas en route to their 'home' site and so exte

45 Interspecific overlap of foraging areas was higher than intraspecific overlap.

46 ces while showing high spatial similarity in foraging areas, indicating that site selection was not d

47 iated with a decision to relocate (e.g. poor foraging) as well as a potential benefit (e.g. improved

48 Furthermore, S. carpocapsae IJ ambush foraging associated behaviors (tail standing, waving, an

49 ing degree of mixing between roosts in their foraging associations.

50 uggest that while offshore, white sharks may forage at depth on mesopelagic species, yet no biochemic

51 istently use Condor and Gigante seamounts to forage at night.

52 The fiddler crab Afruca tangeri forages at low tide on tropical and semi-tropical mudfla

53 y date was then compared with a daily spring forage availability date dataset, resulting in "wait tim

54 pecies through indirect bottom-up effects on forage availability.

55 dings in the context of generalized predator foraging behavior and the functions of multimodal warnin

56 However, field-based studies of changes in foraging behavior at fine spatial and temporal scales ar

57 r in this cognitive ability drive collective foraging behavior in honey bee colonies.

58 snapshot of cooperative and sexually divided foraging behavior in Late Pleistocene humans.

59 re has shown that horizontal transmission of foraging behavior is biased toward species with broad cu

60 rt when learning about flowers parallels the foraging behavior of a colony.

61 To derive information on changes in foraging behavior of breeding brown pelicans (Pelecanus

62 ly observed feedback between the density and foraging behavior of herbivorous fish leads to alternati

63 f measuring feeding in worms quantify either foraging behavior or food intake, but not both.

64 ologists can infer asymmetry in predatory or foraging behavior, including predation scars on trilobit

65 nitial colony infection to assess impacts on foraging behavior.

66 factors previously associated with honey bee foraging behavior.

67 , engaging molecular pathways fundamental to foraging behavior.

68 scent may have negative impacts on bumblebee foraging behavior.

69 there are multiple transmission pathways of foraging behaviors in dolphins, highlighting the similar

70 which animal populations can optimize their foraging behaviors in the context of uncertain and dynam

71 hed as the primary transmission mechanism of foraging behaviors in the Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphi

72 and dietary source mixing models, to examine foraging behaviour among locations and between seabird b

73 ontrolled experiment to investigate pangolin foraging behaviour and cognition, which may have implica

74 Understanding the factors which influence foraging behaviour and success in marine mammals is cruc

75 ing birds carrying GPS devices altered their foraging behaviour compared to untagged birds.

76 expenditure, location, colony attendance and foraging behaviour for surviving individuals from a popu

77 monstrate a striking increase in exploratory/foraging behaviour in skates in response to EMF and a mo

78 equired to predict behaviours on land versus foraging behaviour in water (R(2) = 0.75).

79 lating evidence that individual variation in foraging behaviour is shaped by animal personality trait

80 ty, indicating that guillemots adapted their foraging behaviour to the availability of prey rather th

81 pace, flying animals are predicted to adjust foraging behaviour to variable wind conditions to minimi

82 deployed GPS loggers to examine their at-sea foraging behaviour.

83 y resource type and finer-scale variation in foraging behaviour.

84 oval of highly linked frugivores with unique foraging behaviours.

85 ering resource phenology and diminishing the foraging benefit of migration.

86 ght shapes the green wave and influences the foraging benefits of migration.

87 At the species level, foraging benefits were equivalent between tactics, sugge

88 gnificantly improved lateral root growth and forage biomass under a limited N or P regime.

89 diversity on the abundance and diversity of foraging birds.

90 We find that foraging blue whales sing primarily at night, whereas mi

91 e presented the group with several identical foraging boxes containing food.

92 ined model; instead they had access to eight foraging boxes that could be opened in either of two way

93 Pollinators can transmit diseases during foraging, but the consequences of plant species composit

94 red learning, which together with precocious foraging can lead to increased occurrence of infected be

95 ecies' K(h) was coordinated with their water foraging capacity in shallow soil, the more acquisitive

96 king was also severely altered, with correct foraging choice nearly 40% lower under combined stressor

97 vel aposematic prey and then compared birds' foraging choices in 'a small-scale novel world' that con

98 t grazing strategies in summer and different forage composition in winter.

99 During optimal natural foraging conditions, storks nesting in both urban and na

100 e experimentally manipulated under different foraging conditions.

101 oted in systems dominated by large-eat-small foraging (consumers eating smaller resources) whenever (

102 Trifolium pratense L.) is a highly adaptable forage crop for temperate livestock agriculture.

103 earl millet is a widely cultivated grain and forage crop in areas frequented with hot and dry weather

104 (cultivated cropland), 80-492 km (perennial forage cropland), and 117-799 km (grazing land).

105 3% (cultivated cropland), 39%-94% (perennial forage cropland, 100% for vegan), and 26%-88% (grazing l

106 ons to longer rotations with small grain and forage crops substantially reduced FE use, GHG emissions

107 ry and seed dispersal with bird movement and foraging data from tropical and temperate communities.

108 To make adaptive foraging decisions, predators need to gather information

109 ng these two distinct periods to investigate foraging ecology of the South African population of SRWs

110 potential dietary items to investigate their foraging ecology, specifically focussing on the importan

111 r-lined cheek pouches that allow for greater foraging efficiency and food preservation.

112 d social information to achieve near-optimal foraging efficiency and promote income equality within g

113 our, but the added value it brings to colony foraging efficiency is poorly understood.

114 s, or, alternatively, increase natural enemy foraging efficiency via information or alteration of hab

115 r morphology create functional trade-offs in foraging efficiency, thereby causing individuals to spec

116 The results suggest increasing foraging effort and decreasing foraging success and effi

117 Foraging effort and foraging success were also strongly

118 In the present study, foraging effort and indices of foraging success and effi

119 tion, although weight data indicated greater foraging effort by colonies in blueberries, possibly due

120 climate conditions had a strong influence on foraging effort, foraging success and efficiency.

121 Southern Ground-hornbills concentrate their foraging efforts and whether specific movement behaviour

122 icrophagous filter feeding strategy for fish foraging enables humpback whales to achieve 7x the energ

123 hat individuals will forgo areas of suitable forage encountered en route during migration when they h

124 r aposematic prey after observing a negative foraging experience of a demonstrator.

125 bout prey defences by observing the negative foraging experiences of conspecifics.

126 locating toothed whales, the use of sound to forage exposes them to detection by eavesdropping predat

127 icate dogs predominantly consumed salmon and forage fish (35-65%), followed by nearshore fish (4-40%)

128 Forage fish, in contrast, have been engaged in evolution

129 due to landscape clustering, consumers that forage for clustered foods are susceptible to strong All

130 Alfalfa is a major component of forage for cows and an important ingredient in chicken f

131 y, but can be epigenetically reprogrammed to forage for food analogously to "Minor" workers.

132 jority of subterranean termites continuously forage for new wood resources to expand their nesting ar

133 st fishery in the Southern Ocean and are key forage for numerous predators.

134 f how animals make decisions to move on when foraging for food.

135 etween two persistent internal states during foraging for live prey (Paramecia).

136 Here, we explore new patterns of plant foraging for nutrients as affected by neighbours to impr

137 addicted to cocaine spend much of their time foraging for the drug.

138 nd sitter allelic variants of the Drosophila foraging (for) gene differ in parasitoid wasp susceptibi

139 particular, we review how different types of foraging frameworks (classic optimal foraging theory, nu

140 time away from the nest, experienced reduced foraging gains (64% reduction in mass gained per day) an

141 ot systems of maize and different species of forage grasses remain poorly understood.

142 xamine sea ice concentrations at their known foraging grounds to define the maximum duration of a "fo

143 2) investigated the SST trends at the summer foraging grounds, and (3) assessed the relationship betw

144 associated with 2 main life-history traits: foraging guild and whether the species was solitary or g

145 that the twilight zone constitutes a crucial foraging habitat for these large predators, which had be

146 uently been interpreted as preferred bowhead foraging habitat in analyses that have not assessed pred

147 ecies to relate bird movements to changes in foraging habitat quality in the northern Gulf of Mexico.

148 patches, but exhibited a marked increase in foraging habitat quality over time that outpaced overall

149 (3) bee captures were linked to variation in foraging habitat, but number of bee species and diversit

150 carbon isotope ratios (delta(13)C) indicated foraging habitat.

151 tree mortality from bark beetles impacts bee foraging habitats and populations.

152 vide contexts under which populations should forage in accordance with OFT rather than the NVH.

153 which vary widely in body size and regularly forage in dense vegetation, to investigate whether flyin

154 ements and higher prey consumption, (3) they forage in the marginal ice zones, and (4) they feed on p

155 readth of populations, indicating that moose foraged in accordance with OFT.

156 WTS foraged in restricted areas along their path, while TP p

157 ad significantly lower fat reserves and they foraged in safer parts of the canopy than willow tits in

158 associated with dominance of large-eat-small foraging in 74 well-resolved (primarily aquatic) real-wo

159 dominula was the predominant paper wasp seen foraging in central Kentucky pollinator gardens.

160 to risk could explain this behaviour, since foraging in fields is likely less risky under the cover

161 We adopt ecological theory underlying foraging in herbivorous insects to vector mosquito host

162 results indicate that overwintering godwits foraging in high-quality habitats had comparably better

163 ator-prey simulation, modeling numerous bats foraging in proximity.

164 ch breeding season, pelican cohorts began by foraging in suboptimal habitats relative to the availabi

165 ric cognitive maps to support navigation and foraging in such spaces.

166 omplex dynamic conditions can be achieved by foraging insects and may serve as inspiration for agent-

167 us platyops is distinct from A. anamensis in foraging into more open environments and the coexisting

168 Foraging is a vital behavioral task for living organisms

169 eed yield and biomass production in crop and forage legumes.

170 Initially each rodent species foraged less in the presence of its familiar snake, but

171 its familiar snake, but within a month both foraged less in the presence of the pit-viper (sidewinde

172 Patterns of animal movement associated with foraging lie at the heart of many ecological studies and

173 ocial associations are most prevalent during foraging (local enhancement) and in regions expected to

174 te environments, preventing communication of foraging locations rarely decreases colony food intake,

175 ternal) orientation cues to return home when foraging, making them the first fully aquatic path-integ

176 This change in foraging may have resulted from altered distributions an

177 aracter states of four ecological variables (foraging mode, diet, strata and habitat) have different

178 at would maximize efficiency in these social foraging models depend on group size, but not on food di

179 paratus in fishes forced to employ alternate foraging modes.

180 We tracked foraging movements of breeding adults using GPS, monitor

181 foraging performance deteriorates when bats forage near conspecifics, however, applying a JAR does n

182 rs), and biological networks (such as fungal foraging networks) are all spatially embedded.

183 males, while 30% of females spent most time foraging north of the Polar Front and had significantly

184 Detailed foraging observations coupled with two concurrent studie

185 protein preference, but instead promotes the foraging of other macronutrients primarily by suppressin

186 ch accurately describes individual and group foraging of real fish.

187 from coastal habitats, where they primarily forage on pinnipeds, to oceanic offshore habitats.

188 ce cell activity from CA1 and CA3 while rats foraged on a circular track or square platforms with inh

189 n contrast, in the 2010s, South African SRWs foraged on prey isotopically consistent with the waters

190 st that during the 1990s, South African SRWs foraged on prey isotopically similar to South Georgia/Is

191 o fragment into smaller components and begin foraging on previously unused food sources.

192 n that prolonged tentacle retraction reduces foraging opportunities and can negatively impact respira

193 cross ecological barriers with no or limited foraging opportunities.

194 onsequently, induce migratory, reproductive, foraging, or escape behaviors.

195 ocks to regulate critical behaviors, such as foraging orientation and navigation, time-memory for foo

196 ngs, which are consistent with adjustment of foraging patch use in response to increased energetic ne

197 Understanding the foraging patterns is critical for optimizing nutrient ma

198 We found that foraging performance deteriorates when bats forage near

199 etween two congeneric charr that compete for foraging positions, which strongly influence density-dep

200 aringness predicted greater success in risky foraging, possibly due to better exploitation of low-ris

201 ic approaches to managing trade-offs between forage, predation risk and severe winter conditions.

202 no evidence that infection treatment shifted foraging preferences.

203 de range of behaviors, including navigation, foraging, prey capture, and conspecific interactions, wh

204 aregiver interaction can be characterised as foraging processes.

205 nd trends in ecosystem properties, including forage production, biogeochemical cycling, and biodivers

206 led when elk abundance was high and when the forage productivity they experienced in utero was poor.

207 The scenarios explored improvements in forage quality (Fo), feed conservation (Fe) and concentr

208 components, particularly lignin, to improve forage quality and biomass properties for processing to

209 community compositions, while cereal rye and forage radish monocultures had unique Core OTU compositi

210 ting in nearby roots and reducing their root foraging range.

211 iological strategies to conserve energy when forage resources are low.

212 rought reduced the opportunity to accumulate forage resources during rapid spring migrations.

213 This may be related to improved forage resources, as warming air temperatures have been

214 owever, mechanisms underlying this so-called foraging response remain poorly understood.

215 tion in BR synthesis contributes to the root foraging response, complementing the impact of enhanced

216 often seeking safer habitats at the cost of foraging rewards.

217 Eighty milk samples and 91 forage samples were collected from 40 farms (19 organic,

218 nducted from 2002-2017 during the gray whale foraging season off northeastern Sakhalin Island, Russia

219 grounds to define the maximum duration of a "foraging season".

220 These results imply that shorter foraging seasons are associated with reduced energy inta

221 Foraging signals (buzzes and bray calls) were recorded i

222 For instance, some individuals show higher foraging site fidelity (spatial specialization) than oth

223 e and so extended their journeys to maintain foraging site fidelity.

224 raging sites in order to quantify individual foraging site fidelity.

225 enerally maintain tight fidelity to specific foraging sites after extended (up to almost 10,000 km) m

226 hidden Markov model to identify locations of foraging sites in order to quantify individual foraging

227 The lack of knowledge of new foraging sites means there is risk associated with a dec

228 Plants forage soil for water and nutrients, whose distribution

229 g strategies: 70% of females spent most time foraging south of the Polar Front and had similar delta(

230 an females, indicating males spent more time foraging south of the Polar Front in maritime Antarctica

231 d with age, suggesting males spent more time foraging south throughout ontogeny.

232 imal populations are often comprised of both foraging specialists and generalists.

233 ch widely reported individual differences in foraging specialization may emerge.

234 oastal upwelling, changes in availability of forage species (krill and anchovy), and shoreward distri

235 Low catch limits for forage species are often considered to be precautionary

236 es in "wait times" for the four early season forage species indicated that "wait times" were lessenin

237 limits that are considered precautionary for forage species simply because the limit is a small propo

238 it time" estimates for four key early season forage species.

239 iod, and examined gregariousness across four foraging states using multilayer social network analysis

240 Understanding the interaction between foraging strategies and pheromone signals will help unco

241 ers are present, (2) grazing or sit-and-wait foraging strategies are common, and (3) species engage i

242 By linking reproductive decline to changing foraging strategies for the first time in SRWs, we show

243 he first time in SRWs, we show that altering foraging strategies may not be sufficient to adapt to a

244 ge) of krill foraging, allowing for flexible foraging strategies that may underlie their ecological s

245 females delta(13)C values revealed two main foraging strategies: 70% of females spent most time fora

246 logy and body-size structure) and behaviour (foraging strategy and spatial dimensionality of interact

247 plant growth, but how neighbours shape root-foraging strategy for nutrients is unclear.

248 tic northward shift, and diversification, in foraging strategy from 1990s to 2010s.

249 The foraging strategy of maize roots is an integrated functi

250 Here, we investigated the spread of another foraging strategy, "shelling" [17], whereby some dolphin

251 ch behavior, suggesting a more opportunistic foraging strategy.

252 st increasing foraging effort and decreasing foraging success and efficiency under anticipated enviro

253 resent study, foraging effort and indices of foraging success and efficiency were investigated in 138

254 s had a strong influence on foraging effort, foraging success and efficiency.

255 ent to which an individual's body condition, foraging success and habitat quality during the nonbreed

256 Reduced foraging success coupled with increased metabolic demand

257 Foraging effort and foraging success were also strongly influenced by winter

258 ecological behaviours (locomotion speed and foraging success) and metabolic rate of a keystone marin

259 relationship between reproductive output and foraging success.

260 >+/-25% from mean values, to represent major forage surplus and deficit years, for a historic referen

261 t evidence of non-vertical transmission of a foraging tactic in toothed whales.

262 e monkeys navigating a virtual maze during a foraging task and a context-object associative memory ta

263 On a novel foraging task based on an ecological account of animal b

264 the mechanisms of inference, we establish a foraging task that is naturalistic and easily learned ye

265 ts performing suboptimally on a naturalistic foraging task, this method successfully recovers their i

266 Using a risky foraging task, we investigated individual differences in

267 (MEG) in humans who made choices in a risky foraging task.

268 , like other organisms, mechanisms for water foraging that allow them to find water in the absence of

269 uning of sensorimotor transformations during foraging that leads to marked changes in both the motiva

270 In complex tasks such as foraging, the internal state is dynamic(5-8).

271 Niche Variation Hypothesis (NVH) and Optimal Foraging Theory (OFT) offer contrasting views about how

272 framework that unites concepts from optimal foraging theory and landscape ecology, which can be used

273 Optimal foraging theory states that animals should maximize reso

274 we adapt a classic prey selection task from foraging theory to examine how individuals keep track of

275 The study represents a novel application of foraging theory, demonstrating how infant behaviour and

276 ypes of foraging frameworks (classic optimal foraging theory, nutritional ecology, heuristics) concep

277 on plant recruitment consistent with optimal foraging theory, with intermediate seed sizes most stron

278 This tactic sacrifices 35% of foraging time but reduces by an order of magnitude the r

279 an extreme synchronicity, overlapping vocal foraging time by 98% despite hunting individually, there

280 ost animals, feeding includes two behaviors: foraging to find a food patch and food intake once a pat

281 an acoustic signature of the transition from foraging to migration in the Northeast Pacific populatio

282 etection of the life history transition from foraging to migration remains challenging.

283 rd when there was little to lose and reduced foraging to the same level as females when potential los

284 Its foraging tools show clear signs of diversification and p

285 We estimated the repeatability of foraging trips and used a hidden Markov model to identif

286 Using GPS loggers we tracked 385 incubation foraging trips of wandering albatrosses Diomedea exulans

287 their inconspicuous nest after far-reaching foraging trips using path integration, and whenever avai

288 e investigated in 138 adult female AUFS (970 foraging trips) during the winters of 1998-2019.

289 dividuals in the distance and range of their foraging trips, and during the incubation period (but no

290 odulated to variation in winds over extended foraging trips, and whether males and females differ.

291 During their foraging trips, GPS-tagged birds doubled their time away

292 crops differed significantly from all other forage types.

293 eas along their path, while TP predominantly foraged using extensive search behavior, suggesting a mo

294 e hypothesis that infants and caregivers are foraging vocally for social input.

295 n both spring activity date and early season forage "wait times" were assessed using non-parametric r

296 C, an indicator of marine versus terrestrial foraging, was positively correlated with some long-chain

297 nchovy), and shoreward distribution shift of foraging whales.

298 e and has been causally linked to precocious foraging, which itself has been linked to colony loss.

299 f spinal V2a neurons as well as swimming and foraging, while systemic or V2a neuron-specific blockage

300 Our results indicate that foraging worker termites produce a multi-component aggre