戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 2 months and removed with a stent retrieving forceps.
2 joint using 1, 2 and 4 mm diameters grasping forceps.
3 ar was detected that was removed with Magill forceps.
4 g tissue-instrument interaction with the ILM Forceps.
5 Ex+ device and retrieved using vitreoretinal forceps.
6 urther in the funnel using 25 G end-grasping forceps.
7 hrough the sheath by using the endobronchial forceps.
8 ana sclerotomy with intraocular foreign body forceps.
9 and, The Netherlands) using end-gripping ILM forceps.
10 injections, a drill or scalpel, or a pair of forceps.
11 auma (0.4, 0.2-0.7) than babies delivered by forceps.
12 he nerve was crushed using self-closing fine forceps.
13 mbrane peeling procedures with the novel ILM Forceps.
14 traction, 1 of 664 delivered with the use of forceps, 1 of 907 delivered by cesarean section during l
15 entation, 25 by caesarean section, four with forceps, 13 ventouse, 18 failed ventouse leading to forc
16    Sixty polyps (47.2%) were treated by cold forceps, 19 (15%) treated by a mucosal resection and 15
17 e percentages of women requiring delivery by forceps (4 percent vs. 3 percent, P=0.35) and cesarean s
18  the patient (92.8%), and using locally made forceps (88.9%).
19 liveries (risk 6.1%), five were delivered by forceps after an attempted ventouse delivery (27.8%), an
20 biopsies with a flexible endoscope and jumbo forceps after bowel preparation with NaCl solution is a
21 or without submucosal injection, and IRR for forceps and cold snare removal of polyps 1 to 5 mm.
22 controversial, the provision of high-quality forceps and epilation training may be beneficial.
23                             FA reductions in forceps and frontotemporal tracts correlated inversely w
24                  Metallic instruments (e.g., forceps and needles) showed high reflectivity with total
25 pus callosum, signal changes of the anterior forceps and non-specific cortical and cerebellar atrophy
26 eft optic nerve of each rat was crushed with forceps and, immediately after, 4 muL of TCEP (or vehicl
27                         Fine dissection with forceps and/or scissors was required in more cases than
28 l superior-parietal lobe, bilateral anterior forceps, and inferior-frontal fasciculus).
29 -gauge vitrectomy equipment, custom surgical forceps, and operating microscope with or without intrao
30 features, when present in-frame: vitrector-, forceps-, and endolaser tooltips, optic disc, fovea, ret
31                                              Forceps assisted flange creation in PMMA haptics did not
32 haptic end, non-forceps assisted in PVDF and forceps assisted in PMMA haptics.
33 eated by heating 1 mm of the haptic end, non-forceps assisted in PVDF and forceps assisted in PMMA ha
34 or tissue inserted with Charlie II insertion forceps (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) and 50 eyes were random
35 pplementary technologies, such as intranodal forceps biopsy and esophageal ultrasonography, has a hig
36 n, sedation requirement, etc.) of the rectal forceps biopsy procedure from the patients perspective t
37 tern U.S. Variation in the use of hot biopsy forceps by region and provider suggests a potential area
38        To characterize the use of hot biopsy forceps by U.S. Medicare providers over time, identify p
39  rectal biopsy procedure (obtained by biopsy forceps) by patients was carried out by telephone survey
40                                    Caesarean/forceps delivery and delivery conducted by untrained per
41 iation between symptom severity and hypoxia, forceps delivery, or hyperemesis during pregnancy, which
42                                Additionally, forceps-derived biopsies can suffer from difficulty main
43 ch, and duodenum were compared with those of forceps-derived biopsies, and it was found that the muCr
44      Here we show threshold evolution in the forceps dimorphism of the European earwig Forficula auri
45 travascular by using primarily endobronchial forceps for caval fragments and snares for cardiac and p
46 y of the rectal specimens obtained by biopsy forceps for ex vivo bioelectrical and biochemical labora
47        Snare polypectomy should be used over forceps for polyps 1 to 5 mm.
48 fy factors associated with use of hot biopsy forceps from 2012 to 2019.
49 s with the Neusidl group (33%) than with the forceps group (25%) at 6 months (P = .017).
50 thelial cell density between the Neusidl and forceps groups, but there was a higher percentage of cel
51 we evaluate whether diameter of arthroscopic forceps influences histological quality of synovial tiss
52 diagnosis and are obtained using single-bite forceps inserted through the working channel of large en
53 leading to caesarean section, and one failed forceps leading to caesarean section.
54    The lateral periventricular zone received forceps-like process systems from the anterolateral part
55 l anisotropy ( FA fractional anisotropy ) of forceps major ( MNI Montreal Neurological Institute coor
56 oordinates: -10, 49, 24; t value, 3.40), and forceps major ( MNI Montreal Neurological Institute coor
57 erior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) and left forceps major (>/=164mul, p<.01) than age-matched males
58 pital fasciculus (B=0.50, SE=0.18, p=0.006), forceps major (B=0.48, SE=0.18, p=0.009) and anterior th
59 beta = -0.055; 95% CI, -0.081 to -0.028) and forceps major (beta = -0.040; 95% CI, -0.067 to -0.013).
60 nt was associated with higher RSI-RNI in the forceps major (beta = -0.048; 95% CI, -0.077 to -0.020).
61 tion (beta = -0.224, pcorrected = 0.009) and forceps major (beta = -0.193, pcorrected = 0.025) in dep
62  were assessed: forceps minor (bilaterally), forceps major (bilaterally), inferior longitudinal fasci
63 ssociation with fractional anisotropy of the forceps major (effect size [d] = 0.34) and the inferior
64 ts (20+ years) displayed 4% higher FW in the forceps major (p < 0.05).
65  in uncinate fasciculus, cingulum-gyrus, and forceps major and minor, with evidence of female-specifi
66  association of fractional anisotropy in the forceps major with number of fights (P = .03, d = 0.38)
67 clusters with predominant involvement of the forceps major, forceps minor, as well as right and left
68 al anisotropy in a portion the splenium, the forceps major, which provides interhemispheric communica
69 s bitemporal scar-like lesions that resemble forceps marks.
70                     The instruments included forceps, metallic and polyamide subretinal needles, and
71 t superior longitudinal fasciculus, ILF, and forceps minor (>/= 164mul, p<.01).
72 te fasciculus (B=1.82, SE=0.67, p=0.005) and forceps minor (B=0.61, SE=0.19, p=0.001) were additional
73 following regions of interest were assessed: forceps minor (bilaterally), forceps major (bilaterally)
74 erior branches of the corpus callosum, i.e., forceps minor (CCFM), and this neuropathology correlated
75 engagement of two target bundles: either the forceps minor (FM) or cingulum bundle (CB).
76 clude alterations in the corpus callosum and forceps minor (FM) WM that significantly predict tic sev
77 es elicited by electrical stimulation of the forceps minor also consisted of NMDA and non-NMDA compon
78 m, longitudinal fasciculus, optic radiation, forceps minor and frontal aslant were the WM tracts most
79 e bilateral ventromedial frontal cortex (via forceps minor and left uncinate fasciculus) and to the c
80 s, cingulum fibre bundles, external capsule, forceps minor and major, genu, body and splenium of the
81 y control group in multiple tracts including forceps minor and major, superior longitudinal, inferior
82                               Variability in forceps minor and pars triangularis diffusion metrics pa
83 tion volumes to 1) medial frontal cortex via forceps minor and uncinate fasciculus; 2) rostral and do
84 by NMDA and by electrical stimulation of the forceps minor in presumed pyramidal cells of the rat med
85 d was observed suggesting that the FA of the forceps minor tract initially increased following regula
86 erior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) and forceps minor tracts.
87 itry (ie, cingulum, uncinate fasciculus, and forceps minor) and (1) broader diagnostic categories of
88 nnectivity in tracts that innervate the OFC (forceps minor) as measured by fractional anisotropy (FA)
89 nal fasciculus, the uncinate fasciculus, the forceps minor, and in the genu and splenium of the corpu
90 e and frontally located white matter tracts (forceps minor, anterior corpus callosum).
91 porting emotional regulation relevant to BD: forceps minor, anterior thalamic radiation(ATR), cingulu
92 redominant involvement of the forceps major, forceps minor, as well as right and left anterior thalam
93 le power had higher axial diffusivity in the forceps minor, the anterior corpus callosum, fascicles i
94 nnectome of converging white matter bundles (forceps minor, uncinate fasciculus, cingulum and fronto-
95  fronto-occipital and uncinate fasciculi and forceps minor.
96 SCs) evoked by electrical stimulation of the forceps minor.
97 inal tract, the uncinate fasciculus, and the forceps minor.
98 ngitudinal and u-fibers, the corpus callosum forceps minor/anterior commissure, and the left middle c
99 ll 63 filters were removed successfully with forceps (n = 61), a cone (n = 1), or a snare (n = 1).
100 uracy and reliability with a metallic sponge-forceps needle holder was equal to or greater than those
101 as did the infants delivered with the use of forceps (odds ratio, 3.4; 95 percent confidence interval
102 , 13 ventouse, 18 failed ventouse leading to forceps, one failed ventouse leading to caesarean sectio
103 n who had a vaginal delivery with the use of forceps or vacuum (115 of 304 women [38%] and 104 of 314
104                      Infants born by vaginal forceps or vacuum delivery had a higher risk of CNS tumo
105       pdhC1INH prophylaxis is advised before forceps or vacuum extraction or cesarean section.
106 mong infants delivered by vacuum extraction, forceps, or cesarean section during labor than among inf
107 val of the implant with a 20-gauge alligator forceps over a 2.75-mm long clear corneal tunnel is impo
108 as significantly higher in the 2 versus 4 mm forceps (p = 0.009).
109 er number of vessels in the 4 mm versus 2 mm forceps (p = 0.01) was found among the 3 groups.
110 y of spectacular weapons, including antlers, forceps, proboscises, stingers, tusks and horns [1].
111                                  The IRR for forceps removal of polyps 1 to 5 mm was 9.9% (95% CI 7.1
112 issue occluding the airway were treated with forceps resection, laser ablation, or balloon dilatation
113 mi-quantitative score seemed affected by the forceps size.
114 .9%, glycerol 12%, mannitol), and two biopsy forceps (standard and jumbo) in 580 rectal specimens fro
115                            The endobronchial forceps technique can be safely used to remove tip-embed
116  108,232/year in 2019, while the cold biopsy forceps technique increased from 482,862/year in 2000 to
117                               The hot biopsy forceps technique peaked in 2003 (412,165/year) and decl
118                            The endobronchial forceps technique was used to successfully retrieve 109
119 he comparative advantages of the cold biopsy forceps technique.
120 nd biopsy forceps used, being NaCl and jumbo forceps the most compatible methods with the electrophys
121 roup of zonules 180 degrees apart with tying forceps (three lenses), or with micrometers by clamping
122  to in front of the optic of the IOL using a forceps tip through a sclerotomy.
123 ter Neusidl tissue insertion than that after forceps tissue insertion.
124 rking-channel dimensions, restricting biopsy forceps to sizes that may yield insufficient or nondiagn
125         Transabdominal needle and endoscopic forceps upper and lower intestinal sampling were conduct
126 ffer significantly from that associated with forceps use (odds ratio for the comparison with vacuum e
127 by the bowel preparation solution and biopsy forceps used, being NaCl and jumbo forceps the most comp
128                Complicated delivery (breech, forceps, vacuum extraction) predicted a higher risk of i
129                            Use of hot biopsy forceps was more common by non-gastroenterologists and i
130  in the posterior thalamic radiation and the forceps was nominally reduced.
131                           Rigid bronchoscopy forceps were used to dissect the tip or hook of the filt
132  membrane peeling procedures using novel ILM Forceps with laser ablated surface with the help of intr
133 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Monopolar hemostatic forceps with low-voltage coagulation can be an effective
134                        The use of hot biopsy forceps (with electrocautery) is no longer routinely rec
135 reased complications compared to cold biopsy forceps (without electrocautery).

 
Page Top