戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 hisker pad, the ipsilateral or contralateral forepaws).
2 ermal nociception of the hindpaw but not the forepaw.
3 alateral forepaw and ipsilateral whisker and forepaw.
4 ated by cutaneous noxious stimulation of the forepaw.
5 on of the glabrous skin on the contralateral forepaw.
6 ght septa outline the palm and digits of the forepaw.
7 ring unimodal and bimodal stimulation of the forepaw.
8  of MS with somatosensory stimulation of the forepaw.
9 e of thermal hyperalgesia in the ipsilateral forepaw.
10 p and consume food pellets with the affected forepaw.
11 e or of its head and tail, not of individual forepaws.
12  with healthy ankles (1.4 +/- 0.3 %ID/g) and forepaws (1.5 +/- 0.5 %ID/g), as early as 1 d after the
13 rcentage injected dose per gram [%ID/g]) and forepaws (2.1 +/- 0.3 %ID/g), compared with healthy ankl
14                                         Such forepaw adjustments put the pup's center of gravity belo
15 ccupied by physiologically active CTB traced forepaw afferents that had been spared by the initial co
16 entral pads of either contra- or ipsilateral forepaws also evoked OIS activation in the posteriorly l
17 n cervical and lumbar regions ipsilateral to forepaw and hindpaw inflammation, respectively.
18  normal cytochrome oxidase barrel pattern in forepaw and hindpaw regions of S1.
19  is affected by stimulation of contralateral forepaw and ipsilateral whisker and forepaw.
20            We located the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representation (forepaw/lower jaw
21 gate this, we located the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representation of SI in vivo, and
22 which the location of the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representations in rat S1 was dete
23 dritic arbor close to the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representations.
24 d shoulder to VPL, and (c) from sites in the forepaw and shoulder representation in VPL to forelimb a
25 ation in VPL with particular emphasis on the forepaw and shoulder representations and showed that VPL
26 he forelimb and shoulder to SI, (b) from the forepaw and shoulder to VPL, and (c) from sites in the f
27 creased connectivity between impaired (left) forepaw and the contralesional (left) motor cortex after
28 t are normally present in the regions of the forepaw and the hindpaw representations were absent, whe
29 d the connection between the impaired (left) forepaw and the ipsilesional (right) motor cortex.
30  peripheral targets such as the whisker pad, forepaw, and heart explants.
31 li on the back, belly, tail, whisker, dorsal forepaws, and dorsal hind-paws do not significantly affe
32                                  We measured forepaw- and hindpaw-evoked sensory responses in rat, be
33 omedial nucleus of the thalamus (POm) to the forepaw area of the mouse primary somatosensory cortex (
34             In contrast to the contralateral forepaw area, where neuronal activity, blood oxygenation
35  substrate for large-scale reorganization in forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) cortex.
36 r large-scale cortical reorganization in the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) of primary somatosensory c
37 ble to support the normal development of the forepaw barrels.
38  of 12 neurons with tactile RFs on the volar forepaw began firing toward the end of swing, with peak
39                   With lateral grasping, the forepaw below the grasping position points downward and
40 njections and after the onset of symptomatic forepaw bias.
41 cal allodynia occurred in both hind paws and forepaws by 7 d postlesion and were maintained >31 d.
42 orepaw, hindpaw, or on both the hindpaw plus forepaw concurrently.
43 en the ipsilateral whisker and contralateral forepaw conditioning stimuli preceded the contralateral
44 o evidence of abnormal connections of VPM to forepaw cortex.
45 significantly effective for promoting distal forepaw cortical representation.
46 eurons in the reorganized region of S1 after forepaw denervation.
47 tal level T1/T2, capsaicin injected into the forepaw did not depress bradykinin-induced plasma extrav
48    The same mechanical stimulus applied to a forepaw did not produce NK1R or MOR internalization in t
49                    We selected the Achilles, forepaw digit flexor, patellar, and supraspinatus tendon
50 ated with the representation of the glabrous forepaw digits and pads and adjacent non-cluster zones t
51  (CTB) tracer injection into the ipsilateral forepaw digits and pads.
52 eate nucleus of rats partially denervated of forepaw dorsal column axons was examined.
53 in the four limbs during locomotion when the forepaw dorsum contacts an obstacle.
54 , such as cats, cutaneous afferents from the forepaw dorsum signal external perturbations and send in
55 aneously tracking the movement of individual forepaws during spontaneous grooming in multiple freely-
56  deprived S1, activity in response to intact forepaw electrical stimulation was significantly increas
57  (EEG) studies conducted in a rat model with forepaw electrical stimulation.
58  water nor isotonic saline infusion affected forepaw escape latencies.
59 rease in the somatosensory-evoked potential (forepaw-evoked potential, reflecting cortical synaptic t
60 ons grew heavily into the same age heart and forepaw explants and to a lesser extent into the whisker
61 get-specific patterns in the whisker pad and forepaw explants.
62 r of the most studied tendons, the Achilles, forepaw flexor, patellar and supraspinatus tendons of bo
63 s differentially regulated between Achilles, forepaw flexor, patellar and supraspinatus tendons withi
64  rarely seen in the absence of toxin, namely forepaw fluttering.
65 uring somatosensory stimulation of the right forepaw, fMRI demonstrated that cortical reorganization
66 ivity was also produced in the contralateral forepaw for all injuries, but only the combined insult w
67              In addition to injecting the MI forepaw (Fp) region in both hemispheres, we injected the
68  Rats were trained to lift the contralateral forepaw from the floor to press a lever in the presence
69                                              Forepaw function was assessed for 10 weeks after injury
70 ri-infarct regions, and improved recovery of forepaw function.
71 provements in other measures of sensorimotor forepaw function.
72 ces a profound increase in the length of the forepaw grooming trajectories.
73 d with water at 50 degrees C either on their forepaw, hindpaw, or on both the hindpaw plus forepaw co
74 f either the dorsal or ventral region of the forepaw in the injured limb, with or without concurrent
75 he grasping position points downward and the forepaw lateral to the grasping position points upward a
76 e reminiscent of the raccoon cortex with its forepaw-like somatosensory forepaw-representation.
77 o, a short segment of the border between the forepaw-lower jaw representations in rat S1 was mapped u
78 horizontal axonal projections that cross the forepaw/lower jaw border as compared to projections rema
79 ulations of neurons in layer II/III near the forepaw/lower jaw border in rat somatosensory cortex, co
80 en the forepaw and lower jaw representation (forepaw/lower jaw border,(1) FP/LJ border) in SI of adul
81 thdrawal latency of the hindpaw, but not the forepaw, measured with a radiant heat stimulus.
82 CKII(-/-) mice recovered use of the affected forepaw more quickly than did controls.
83  led to faster and more complete recovery of forepaw motor function (P < 0.05).
84 e platform to perform trajectory analysis of forepaw movement during distinct grooming episodes.
85  Hz spindle burst activity reliably elicited forepaw movements.
86 ty, whereas 23.7% of the M1 bursts triggered forepaw movements.
87 V muscle afferents as assessed by an ex vivo forepaw muscles/median and ulnar nerves/dorsal root gang
88  Injection of a MOMIA intradermally into the forepaw of rats provided spatially and temporally coregi
89 ns and no transplanted cells did not use the forepaw on the lesioned side for directed reaching.
90                                       Murine forepaw ossification occurred sequentially.
91 hemia showed better symmetry of movement and forepaw outstretching, and reduced infarct volumes, comp
92                       Relative to hind paws, forepaws performed ~4 times more steps, they were ~20% l
93                   Significant dysfunction in forepaw placement test persisted up to day 1 and correla
94 onnection of the redirected afferents to the forepaw processing region of S1.
95 ng in rats that underwent an excision of the forepaw radial, median, and ulnar nerves.
96                                              Forepaw rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors innervating Me
97 oral apparatus specifically designed to test forepaw reach-and-grasp skills relying on striatal funct
98 measuring successful performance of directed forepaw reaching (DFR), expressed as percentages.
99  bridge across the lesion exhibited directed forepaw reaching on the lesioned side.
100  the cuneothalamic pathway from shoulder and forepaw receptive field zones in CN to determine whether
101 he shoulder was observed in the deafferented forepaw region in VPL.
102 nted FBS is relayed from cells in the former forepaw region in VPL.
103 to horseradish peroxidase were placed in the forepaw region of granular S1 and surrounding dysgranula
104 eiving smaller proportion of inputs from the forepaw region of S1 compared with CFA, and receiving fe
105 gm was used to trigger BOLD responses in the forepaw region of the somatosensory cortex (SSFP) of an
106 veral nuclei in the thalamus, whereas the MI forepaw region projects almost exclusively to the ipsila
107                                 While the MI forepaw region projects mainly to the ipsilateral basila
108                          By contrast, the MI forepaw region sends few projections to the claustrum of
109                          By contrast, the MI forepaw region sends virtually no projections to the con
110 ross both hemispheres than those from the MI forepaw region.
111 n, whereas others received tracers in the MI forepaw region.
112           We found that both the whisker and forepaw regions in MI project most strongly to the basal
113 ribution of projections from the whisker and forepaw regions in the primary motor (MI) cortex.
114                           The neurons in the forepaw regions of S1 either did not respond to the stim
115                           Connections of the forepaw regions of somatosensory cortex (S1) were determ
116 teral tracer injections in the MI whisker or forepaw regions revealed robust projections to the corre
117 sker regions were injected, but not when the forepaw regions were injected.
118 bilateral coordination of the left and right forepaws remain unaltered during the execution of distin
119 ermore, in adult rats subjected to perinatal forepaw removal, (1) the patterns of SYN-IR in the middl
120  recordings were then used to map the former forepaw representation in forelimb amputated young adult
121 n cortex with its forepaw-like somatosensory forepaw-representation.
122 d-induced analgesia in inflamed hindpaws and forepaws, respectively.
123 hemical staining of the arthritic ankles and forepaws revealed a strong correlation with the in vivo
124 he activity of POm axonal projections within forepaw S1 during expert and chance performance in two t
125 a of the mouse primary somatosensory cortex (forepaw S1).
126 hotothrombosis of left primary somatosensory forepaw (S1FP) cortex, mice either recovered spontaneous
127 ucing an expansion of trunk motor cortex and forepaw sensory cortex into the deafferented hindlimb co
128                                        This "forepaw" SII region also exhibited significant although
129               Cervical spinal cord, DRG, and forepaw skin were removed from C57Bl/6 mice and multiple
130                                        Thus, forepaw steps were classified as exploratory, hind paw m
131 atosensory cortex due to periodic electrical forepaw stimulation (4 s in duration) before and during
132 atosensory cortex for both resting state and forepaw stimulation before and following cocaine adminis
133                      Remarkably, ipsilateral forepaw stimulation evokes a beam-like response in Crus
134  high and low energy, respectively, in which forepaw stimulation excited the contralateral primary so
135  measured in the somatosensory cortex during forepaw stimulation from two different baselines.
136 usion markedly increased escape latencies to forepaw stimulation in both CFA-treated and control rats
137 y (Deltanu/nu) of a neuronal ensemble during forepaw stimulation in the alpha-chloralose anesthetized
138 aining results, neurons responding to intact forepaw stimulation in the deprived cortex were identifi
139                                              Forepaw stimulation induced release of ATP in the SSFP r
140 S1) and M1 in vivo, we observed that tactile forepaw stimulation induced spindle bursts in S1 and gam
141                       With alpha-chloralose, forepaw stimulation induced strong and reproducible fMRI
142  by underlying neuronal activity using a rat forepaw stimulation model under different conditions of
143 li by applying a step-wise graded electrical forepaw stimulation paradigm, with comparison to healthy
144 RI, neuronal activation following electrical forepaw stimulation revealed somatotopic signal enhancem
145 the somatosensory cortex and used electrical forepaw stimulation to evoke neural and vascular activit
146 have implemented a rat model with electrical forepaw stimulation under alpha-chloralose anesthesia us
147     At each level of CBF reduction, electric forepaw stimulation was conducted, and signal-averaged l
148 upling (AFC) response to periodic electrical forepaw stimulation was investigated using signal averag
149 el, and the cerebral hemodynamic response to forepaw stimulation was measured.
150 A characteristic flow response to electrical forepaw stimulation was reliably recorded from the somat
151 y and postexcitatory inhibitory responses to forepaw stimulation were enhanced when preceded by phasi
152  Post-MTBI fMRI responses to hypercapnia and forepaw stimulation were significantly impaired and show
153 al signatures (p < 0.001) to 2 mA electrical forepaw stimulation, found to be innocuous in the contro
154 tiunit activity (MUA) from the cortex during forepaw stimulation, in which stimulus number and freque
155  coincident with the partial recovery of the forepaw stimulation-evoked current sinks in layer IV/V 3
156                        Spontaneous, ChR2, or forepaw stimulation-evoked electroencephalogram (EEG) or
157                             In contrast, the forepaw stimulation-evoked neuronal activity was not cha
158 ng inhibition at the lumbar cord level after forepaw stimulation.
159 onal MR imaging of rat sensory cortex during forepaw stimulation.
160  cortex of rat brain both at rest and during forepaw stimulation.
161 RI responses triggered in the SSFP region by forepaw stimulation.
162 losotomy immediately disrupted SBs evoked by forepaw stimulation.
163 y autoradiography, in response to unilateral forepaw stimulation.
164 airing of TH(VTA) neuronal activation with a forepaw stimulus of a particular frequency expanded the
165  jaw-opening reflex in the anesthetized rat; forepaw subdermal capsaicin also elevated the mechanical
166 n following stimulation of the contralateral forepaw suggests the possible involvement of extracortic
167 ntidromically-activated a cell in the former forepaw territory in VPL; however, similar stimulation f
168 level of skilled reaching using the impaired forepaw to preoperative levels.
169 ging agent (MOMIA) during transport from the forepaw to the axillary lymph node region of a rat.
170 s of acute FEN, namely flat body posture and forepaw treading, were also blunted in FEN-pretreated ra
171  food deprivation and produced a syndrome of forepaw treading.
172 aviors, including reduced wet-dog shakes and forepaw tremor after naloxone injection (10 mg/kg i.p.).
173  including jumping, wet-dog shakes, rearing, forepaw tremor, increased locomotion, grooming, diarrhea
174 rst-occupancy analyses in rats involved in a forepaw vibrotactile detection task.
175                   These results suggest that forepaw VPL also receives input from shoulder receptive
176   In addition, microstimulation delivered to forepaw VPL antidromically-activated cells in shoulder r
177 r the new shoulder input in the deafferented forepaw VPL projected to a new shoulder site in the deaf
178 , in SI did not activate cells in the former forepaw VPL.
179 ovide a possible source of shoulder input to forepaw VPL.
180 also gave off small collateral branches into forepaw VPL.
181 The innervation of the digits on the raccoon forepaw was examined by using immunochemistry for protei
182             The inhibition elicited from the forepaw was larger than that from the hindpaw.
183       The (18)F-FLT uptake in the ankles and forepaws was quantified on the basis of the PET images b
184 ion from body extremities, including ear and forepaws, was ablated.
185 l stimulation of both hindpaws and the right forepaw were recorded under urethane anaesthesia in thre
186                        Normal neonatal mouse forepaws were imaged by micro-computed tomography and ex
187 ral deficits in sensorimotor function of the forepaw, which could not be rescued by chronic insulin t
188 ral pad of either the contra- or ipsilateral forepaw with a 25-Hz sinusoidal vertical skin displaceme

 
Page Top