ライフサイエンスコーパス: freedom

1 latter is due to spin and valley degrees of freedom).

2 ints (available sensory and motor degrees of freedom).

3 ironment and also constrain their degrees of freedom.

4 ulating quantum systems with many degrees of freedom.

5 ows that involve nearly 1 billion degrees of freedom.

6 ndent optically addressable valley degree of freedom.

7 ance of favourable seizure outcomes and drug freedom.

8 etween electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom.

9 rk nodes were less likely to achieve seizure freedom.

10 cost of precisely moving a single degree of freedom.

11 een the spin, charge, and lattice degrees of freedom.

12 neither eliminated all researcher degrees of freedom.

13 optical elements with exceptional degrees of freedom.

14 en studied for systems with a few degrees of freedom.

15 uantum Hamiltonians with internal degrees of freedom.

16 ow versatile control of the valley degree of freedom.

17 tic seizure reduction with months of seizure freedom.

18 lipid identity and conformational degrees of freedom.

19 s the mainstay of therapy to achieve seizure freedom.

20 ations to the electronic 'system' degrees of freedom.

21 dicating that they have less configurational freedom.

22 n about its dynamics and internal degrees of freedom.

23 alization, has high correlation with seizure freedom.

24 of connected pieces and the total degrees of freedom.

25 as 100 sparsely connected quantum degrees of freedom.

26 the loss of head- and body-motor degrees of freedom.

27 energy into different vibrational degrees of freedom.

28 controlling both spin and charge degrees of freedom.

29 issues such as the large number of degree of freedoms.

30 a chi-square distribution with one degree of freedom (1-df).

31 tilation (Wald statistic = 20.08; degrees of freedom = 1; p < 0.001), higher daily Subarachnoid hemor

32 ot quantum state onto a mechanical degree of freedom(1).

33 esults were combined using joint 2 degree-of-freedom (2df) meta-analyses of SNP associations and thei

34 Opportunistic use of "researcher degrees of freedom" aimed at obtaining statistical significance inc

35 alysis of qualitative data is the degrees of freedom analysis (DoFA), published in 1975.

36 ained a planar model containing 9 degrees of freedom and 18 musculotendon actuators to walk using a c

37 on origami patterns to attain new degrees of freedom and achieve enhanced electromagnetic performance

38 novel family of alloys with the geometrical freedom and complexity required by modern designs.

39 This novel twist angle degree of freedom and control should be generalizable to other two

40 for its generalization to various degrees of freedom and even for the implementation in integrated co

41 re the released helicity/vorticity degree of freedom and higher skyrmion density result in intriguing

42 tomic internal levels mimic a spin degree of freedom and interact through long-range interactions tun

43 f a data-driven estimation of the degrees of freedom and scaling parameters for the partial distances

44 c confinement releases the lateral design of freedom, and enables negligible cross-talk and preservin

45 el selection, abuse of researcher degrees of freedom, and hypothesis testing for baseline differences

46 ontrollable deformation, infinite degrees of freedom, and self-assembly, which make them promising ca

47 rule alignment of local magnetic degrees of freedom, and to undergo distinctive changes in local ato

48 Successful chi2 and degrees-of-freedom are computed, allowing null-hypothesis threshold

49 Lattice degrees of freedom are found to be crucially important in stabilizi

50 or which the important electronic degrees of freedom are local rather than itinerant and are conseque

51 more effective therapies to achieve seizure freedom are needed.

52 complex many-body systems, which degrees of freedom are the most informative about their non-equilib

53 correspond to the spin and valley degrees of freedom, are not filled equally.

54 disabling seizures (Engel class 1) and drug freedom at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery.

55 Pain freedom at 2 hours was reported by 101 of 464 participan

56 o led to significantly greater rates of pain freedom at 2 hours with 50-mg and 25-mg doses, and absen

57 ts of which suggests a high degree of steric freedom at the third cytoplasmic loop, which is increase

58 Due to the high level of design freedom available to additive manufacturing, the propaga

59 oled population (n=3380 participants) of the FREEDOM, BEST, and PRECOMBAT trials.

60 e opportunistic use of researcher degrees of freedom better (Cliff's Delta = 0.49) than the "unstruct

61 is a mechanism for reducing such degrees of freedom by specifying designs and analysis plans before

62 at a variety of reconfigurational degrees of freedom can be achieved through micro-architecture desig

63 al electron gases where the charge degree of freedom can be actively controlled by chemical doping, i

64 at a body with significantly more degrees-of-freedom can be controlled by the human nervous system wi

65 of quantum phases, in which rich degrees of freedom can be used to encode information and strong int

66 Our demonstration introduces a new degree of freedom, cavity deformation, to the microcomb studies, a

67 trol of spin, charge, and orbital degrees of freedom, central pillars of future solid state science.

68 nontrivial interplay of different degrees of freedom: charge, spin, lattice, and also orbital ones.

69 (5), owing to their rich internal degrees of freedom compared to atoms, and to facilitate precision m

70 d macroscopic picture of emergent degrees of freedom constraining mechanisms provides a step towards

71 ystem where internal and external degrees of freedom cooperate to maximize a selective exchange and d

72 ssignment of constraints, and the degrees of freedom depend on constraint density in a scale-invarian

73 ions were evaluated using both a 1 degree of freedom (DF) interaction term and a 2DF joint test of ge

74 These include the 1-degree-of-freedom (df) test of G x E interaction, the 2-df joint t

75 levels in serum (chi(2) = 65.84; degrees of freedom [df] = 2; P < .0005).

76 etween the electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom (DoF) during the excitation energy transfer (EET

77 a self-generated torque during a 2-degree-of-freedom (DOF), multi-joint task is largely influenced by

78 typical hand muscle spans over 3 degrees of freedom (DOF), wrapping over complex geometrical constra

79 greater utilization of redundant degrees of freedom (DoFs) supported by the greater task-irrelevant

80 d independent control of multiple degrees of freedom (DOFs), including wrist and digit artificial joi

81 electronic, magnetic, and lattice degrees of freedom drive an array of novel physical properties in o

82 y originating from the additional degrees of freedom due to atomic composition and ordering comes alo

83 lity in many systems with orbital degrees of freedom due to the directional character of orbitals, wi

84 p, and controlling the structural degrees of freedom during assembly and in the final COF.

85 These additional degrees of freedom enable new strategies and yield better solutions

86 nction is a quadratic form of the degrees of freedom, entropy and all other derived information quant

87 patients were invited to participate in the FREEDOM Follow-On study.

88 e is the most important predictor of seizure freedom following surgery for cortical dysplasia.

89 bending behavior via displacement degrees of freedom for a triangular element.

90 We introduce a degree of freedom for each marker effect obtained from ORR and use

91 ty of metal oxides offer numerous degrees of freedom for enhancing catalytic activity by tailoring th

92 thus in principle providing many degrees of freedom for modelling complex objects of defined 3D shap

93 long the frequency and pseudospin degrees of freedom for photons propagating in the ring.

94 r momentum of light are important degrees of freedom for processing and encoding information in optic

95 demonstrated increased survival and greater freedom from adverse cardiovascular events after complet

96 revealed that HDM was not superior regarding freedom from AF (mean follow-up of 494.7 +/- 26.2 days),

97 rence, 10.4% [95% CI, 2.9%-17.9%]; P = .01), freedom from AF after multiple procedures (65.2% vs 53.8

98 12 secondary outcomes, including AF burden, freedom from AF after multiple procedures, perimitral bl

99 Endpoints comprised freedom from AF and procedural parameters.

100 3% single procedure and 93% second procedure freedom from AF at 12 months.

101 The primary outcome was freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia for longer than 30

102 al strategies are needed to ensure long-term freedom from AF recurrences in these high-risk patients.

103 -time ablation generally had higher rates of freedom from AF than the re-do group.

104 Freedom from AF was 42% at 1 year, and 40% underwent fut

105 After 1 or 2 procedures, freedom from AF was 93.2% (95% CI, 87.1%-97.0%).

106 high rates of AF termination and subsequent freedom from AF.

107 Primary effectiveness was freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia absent

108 d 12 months, the proportion of patients with freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia after a single proced

109 nated in a majority of patients, with a high freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia off antiarrhythmic dr

110 Rates of freedom from all-cause mortality between the 3 groups th

111 y other patient-reported response variables: freedom from angina (P(interaction)=0.116), physical lim

112 R, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.45-0.92]) and increase in freedom from angina (RR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.15]) was a

113 ocedural MI and unstable angina with greater freedom from angina at the expense of higher rates of pr

114 heart failure, stroke, unstable angina, and freedom from angina.

115 ed the magnitude of absolute improvements in freedom from any recurrence across a continuous, composi

116 Through 6 years, freedom from any stroke was 82%, while freedom from seve

117 The 12-month Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from arrhythmia was 87.4 +/- 5.6%.

118 Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was 79.6% (39/

119 Single-procedure 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 65.3% (95% CI, 57.7%-

120 e, significantly increased the likelihood of freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12 months.

121 The primary end point was freedom from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atr

122 Freedom from atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardi

123 One-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia defined by continuou

124 Freedom from autograft reoperation at 10 years was 82% (

125 ery achieves superior long-term survival and freedom from autograft reoperation compared with primary

126 re may provide better long-term survival and freedom from autograft reoperation.

127 The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from cardiovascular hospitalization was 84.2% (9

128 d a sustained treatment effect with superior freedom from clinically driven target lesion revasculari

129 as target-lesion primary patency, defined as freedom from clinically driven target-lesion revasculari

130 pg/ml by 90 days was associated with longer freedom from CV/HF hospitalization or all-cause mortalit

131 Safety end points were freedom from device- or system-related complications at

132 Freedom from device- or system-related complications was

133 The primary safety outcome was freedom from device/procedure-related major adverse even

134 RS] score; range, 0-6); mRS score of 0 to 1 (freedom from disability) or no change from baseline at 9

135 The primary outcomes were freedom from disabling seizures (Engel class 1) and drug

136 The 6-month and 12-month freedom from distant brain metastases rates were 74.1% a

137 The primary outcome measure was freedom from distant metastases, designed with 80% power

138 The primary end point was the rate of freedom from distant metastasis at 3 years (DMF3).

139 The overall rate of 8-year freedom from distant recurrence was 91.1% and ranged fro

140 Kaplan-Meier estimates of 8-year freedom from distant recurrence were analyzed using subp

141 a 10% to 15% absolute improvement in 8-year freedom from distant recurrence with exemestane plus OFS

142 motherapy had a more than 97% rate of 8-year freedom from distant recurrence, and improvements with e

143 ian follow-up of 11.6 years, 10- and 20-year freedom from Fontan conversion, transplantation, or deat

144 In patients without valve failure, freedom from Fontan failure at 10 and 20 years post-Font

145 TVI was associated with greater survival and freedom from HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.

146 Eighteen-month freedom from IAS was 95.9% (lower confidence limit, 94.8

147 The primary endpoint, freedom from immunosuppressive therapy without resumptio

148 end point was treatment success (defined as freedom from initial failure of the procedure or atrial

149 Freedom from intervention was 73.9% for aortoiliac disea

150 Estimated rates of freedom from lead failure at 5 years ranged from 97.7% t

151 The 6-month and 12-month freedom from local failure rates were 97.0% and 88.2%.

152 ciated with improved long-term mortality and freedom from MACCEs compared with PCI.

153 The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events (cardia

154 The primary safety endpoint of the 30-day freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events was 92.

155 predictor of worse primary patency rate and Freedom from major adverse limb events (F-MALE).

156 139 deaths, and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from mortality was 76.8%.

157 The secondary endpoint was freedom from mortality, stroke, and device dysfunction (

158 Freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy at 5 years was

159 rt on biochemical progression-free survival, freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy, safety, and p

160 tegrating tablet was superior to placebo for freedom from pain (21% vs 11%, p<0.0001; risk difference

161 The coprimary endpoints were freedom from pain and freedom from the most bothersome s

162 The coprimary efficacy end points were freedom from pain at 2 hours after the initial dose and

163 The percentage of participants who had freedom from pain at 2 hours was 11.8% in the placebo gr

164 Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from PGTCS at end of the 24-week treatment perio

165 line in PGTCS frequency/28 days, or observed freedom from PGTCS during treatment (27.5%/13.2%) (n=119

166 system-related complications at 2 years and freedom from pressure sensor failure at 2 years.

167 system-related complications was 99.6%, and freedom from pressure sensor failure was 99.9% at 1 year

168 e the predictive value of PSMA PET for a 3-y freedom from progression (FFP) in men with BCR after RP

169 the predictive value of PSMA PET for 3 year freedom from progression (FFP) in men with BCR post RP u

170 The two primary end points were freedom from recurrence of atrial fibrillation (after a

171 s safety, effectiveness in PV isolation, and freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias.

172 The main outcome measure was freedom from recurrent biliary obstruction (within the s

173 ldren with complete thrombus resolution, and freedom from recurrent venous thromboembolism and venous

174 Median freedom from reintervention was 89% (95% CI, 80%-96%) at

175 ents with nonsyndromic SVAS also had a lower freedom from reinterventions (P=0.054 by log-rank test).

176 ed expression of FcgammaRIIB correlated with freedom from rejection following withdrawal from immunos

177 re no significant differences in survival or freedom from reoperation in the unmatched cohort.

178 Freedom from revascularization was estimated with Kaplan

179 etic models were developed to predict 5-year freedom from SCD.

180 f patients achieving the primary endpoint of freedom from severe hypoglycemic events and HbA(1c) <= 6

181 ears, freedom from any stroke was 82%, while freedom from severely disabling stroke was 89%.

182 Freedom from surgical and catheter interventions and rei

183 with WBS (1.3 [0.2-3.0] years) and had lower freedom from surgical/catheter interventions compared wi

184 The secondary end points included freedom from symptomatic arrhythmia, the atrial fibrilla

185 One-year freedom from symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia defined

186 Freedom from symptomatic recurrent biliary obstruction r

187 Safety was met with 96.7% freedom from system-related complications (n = 30).

188 lloon (DCB) angioplasty, primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization remained su

189 0.0001; risk difference 10, 95% CI 6-14) and freedom from the most bothersome symptom (35% vs 27%, p=

190 primary endpoints were freedom from pain and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at 2 h postdose

191 The percentage of participants who had freedom from the most bothersome symptom at 2 hours was

192 t least partially decoupled these degrees of freedom from the population dynamics associated with the

193 Freedom from TLR occurred in 97.2% (95% CI: 89.1%, 99.3%

194 points were progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from transformation, and overall survival (OS) w

195 with sustained remission from heart failure (freedom from transplant/ventricular assist device/death)

196 astolic pathway was associated with a higher freedom from VT recurrence as compared with partial dias

197 At a mean of 12.8 months, freedom from VT recurrence was 67% in the overall cohort

198 At a mean of 12.8 months, freedom from VT recurrence was 88%, 50%, and 55% in pati

199 The FREEDOM (Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients

200 ltivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), the FREEDOM (Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients

201 angular momentum of light, as this degree of freedom has an unbounded set of orthogonal helical modes

202 cognized, and abuse of researcher degrees of freedom has received little attention in the nursing res

203 Magnetic degrees of freedom have been extensively investigated in this syste

204 es, oscillator strength and valley degree of freedom, have emerged as a very attractive platform to r

205 In particular, using Freedom House's coding and terminological classification

206 coupling between spin and charge degrees of freedom in a crystal gives rise to magneto-optical effec

207 tity indicative of the accessible degrees of freedom in a system.

208 oneycomb lattices possess a valley degree of freedom in addition to charge and spin.

209 les, which could introduce another degree of freedom in controlling the spin transport, remains so fa

210 The valley degree of freedom in crystals offers great potential for manipulat

211 strong interaction with fermionic degrees of freedom in kagome-net materials.

212 ide in the plane, leaving limited degrees of freedom in manipulating light at the nanoscale.

213 for measuring difficult-to-access degrees of freedom in materials science.

214 Our results thus suggest that mutational freedom in mt tRNA genes is an adaptation to increased m

215 of biopolymers allows additional degrees of freedom in photonic bandgap design through directed prot

216 act design makes use of the valley degree of freedom in photonic crystals(10,11), analogous to two-di

217 Freedom in QD design to isolate and control the quantum

218 t effective way to achieve long-term seizure freedom in selected individuals with drug-resistant foca

219 Li-ion conductors, allowing for much greater freedom in structure, chemistry, composition, and Li sub

220 upling between charge and lattice degrees of freedom in superconducting cuprates.

221 using alpha-MoO(3) to extend the degrees of freedom in the design of IR photonic components exploiti

222 This allows for a substantial degree of freedom in the engineering of transgenes capable of simu

223 ition metal dichalcogenides provides unusual freedom in the selection of components for vertical van

224 the quads decreases the number of degrees of freedom in the system, first linearly and then nonlinear

225 oitation of entanglement in other degrees of freedom, in this work we demonstrate control over the tr

226 ar weight (MW) and conformational degrees of freedom into the dynamic covalent network.

227 We find that the photonic degrees of freedom introduce extra electron-electron correlations o

228 eumatic soft robots with multiple degrees of freedom is bulky and unpractical.

229 ay between electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom is essential to achieve a full understanding of

230 This nanomechanical degree of freedom is normally invisible and ignored in electrical

231 harge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom is the key to boosting device performance.

232 cal path length equation and a two-degree-of-freedom model, we can simultaneously extract the viscoel

233 ultaneous control of the two comb degrees of freedom (modes spacing and frequency offset) at a metrol

234 al ablations that either resulted in seizure freedom (N = 11) or did not result in seizure freedom (N

235 reedom (N = 11) or did not result in seizure freedom (N = 16) in over 1,000 normative connectomes.

236 ext], the availability of orbital degrees of freedom needed for the hidden order in [Formula: see tex

237 rapid quenching and rotational/translational freedom of (*)CH(3) shows that enzymes would be unable t

238 nctional activity out of the many degrees of freedom of a body.

239 explicitly capture the electronic degrees of freedom of a molecule, which limits their applicability

240 leytronics-the study of the valley degree of freedom of charge carriers to store and control informat

241 The valley degree of freedom of dark excitons is accessed through the valley-

242 Resolving momentum degrees of freedom of excitons, which are electron-hole pairs bound

243 net access at this time, not only to promote freedom of expression, but also to promote public health

244 1 August 2014 and 31 July 2015, obtained by Freedom of Information (FOI) from the Department of Immi

245 e papers used SME data collected with a 2014 Freedom of Information Act request and concluded that SM

246 coated blade spray (CBS) was used to provide freedom of instrumental choice for a multiresidue panel

247 Such linkages limit freedom of movement for individual immune parameters, th

248 pulations indicates an increase in molecular freedom of movement in the presence of MCP.

249 fied aminoglycosides influence the essential freedom of movement of the decoding site of the ribosome

250 ter mixing of genre characteristics; greater freedom of player experience) calls for a paradigm shift

251 real space, manifest in external degrees of freedom of quantum states.

252 dy valve and SPVR provides similar survival, freedom of reinterventions, and infective endocarditis w

253 n hidden in the space of internal degrees of freedom of subatomic particles.

254 ile retaining a certain degree of rotational freedom of the intersegmental D-A axes that is crucial f

255 ntricate mechanisms and the large degrees of freedom of the multielement systems impede an effective

256 e critical role played by the two degrees of freedom of the sigma-conjugated bridge on the chromophor

257 thermore find that changes in the rotational freedom of the tagged protein can lead to artifactual tr

258 l statistics, but also reduce the degrees of freedom of the test statistic.

259 es of molecules or ions with reorientational freedom, offer both exceptional mechanical plasticity an

260 ence and AVL risk factors in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) deployers during 2002-11.

261 specially those in which multiple degrees of freedom or energy scales are delicately balanced-is of f

262 lenging to identify the essential degrees of freedom or, equivalently, the proper order parameters fo

263 ity and favoring individual independence and freedom over communalism and interdependence.

264 ng the behavior of the electronic degrees of freedom, parity-breaking quasiparticles are revealed.

265 Using patient-level data from 1,900 FREEDOM patients, the authors developed models to predic

266 between spin, charge, and lattice degrees of freedom plays an important role in a wide range of funda

267 on the couplings of the internal degrees of freedom, relaxation can be ultrafast, converting electro

268 d by manipulating a single quantum degree of freedom, remains to be verified.

269 ure) and after a period of sustained seizure-freedom (seizure-free, >1 year without seizure), using s

270 umber of connected pieces and the degrees of freedom show percolation transitions as a function of th

271 trolling all of light's classical degrees of freedom simultaneously.

272 sk mandates involve a tradeoff with personal freedom, so such policies should be pursued only if the

273 er, and security; and individualism embraces freedom, speed, and external incentives.

274 rovskites with greater structural degrees of freedom that define the electronic structures of the het

275 g among charge, spin, and lattice degrees of freedom that differs not only from the single-layer mate

276 With their additional degree of freedom, the vorticity, they have been widely investigat

277 ed material provides an additional degree of freedom through which the resulting exotic quantum state

278 der Waals structures offers a new degree of freedom through which to tailor their electrical and opt

279 t the solution lay in people "abandoning the freedom to breed." That human attitudes and practices ar

280 Rich designs in origami offer great freedom to design the performance of such origami materi

281 en observed, suggesting a possible degree of freedom to dynamically control this in high dielectric m

282 can be engineered with the necessary design freedom to facilitate arbitrary form and unprecedented a

283 Furthermore, ProVision allows the freedom to interface with the data analysis pipeline whi

284 nanoscale curvature provides a new degree of freedom to manipulate 3D graphene electrical properties,

285 timate realization of molecular editing: the freedom to modify organic molecules at any site, in any

286 This provides the freedom to produce a wide array of designs and demonstra

287 lation, we directly map fermionic degrees of freedom to spin ones, and then use neural-network quantu

288 ons are coupled to the electronic degrees of freedom to varying extents.

289 These include a large number of degrees of freedom, transannular interactions such as hydrogen bond

290 undergoing coronary revascularization in the FREEDOM trial.

291 of Daily Oral therapy in Multiple Sclerosis (FREEDOMS) trial.

292 ." The patient had years of reported seizure freedom until 2010 when she was evaluated for intractabl

293 histopathology and seizure outcome and drug freedom up to 5 years after epilepsy surgery, to improve

294 accepted species must not constrain academic freedom, (vi) the set of criteria considered sufficient

295 ed, and it is demonstrated on an 8-degree-of-freedom walking robot where each limb comprises two actu

296 In contrast, ablations that led to seizure-freedom were more functionally connected to prefrontal c

297 ing of vibrational and electronic degrees of freedom-were observed in ultrafast time-resolved absorpt

298 ors have led to addressable valley degree of freedom, which is the cornerstone for emerging valleytro

299 interface a macroscopic mechanical degree of freedom with a single two-level system such as a single

300 considerable impact of researcher degrees of freedom with respect to exclusion of participants in par