ライフサイエンスコーパス: freezing behavior

1 tions, resulted in the reduction of the CER (freezing behavior).

2 d-footshock group displayed a fear response (freezing behavior).

3 esentations and diminished at transitions in freezing behavior.

4 positively correlates with the intensity of freezing behavior.

5 lmost clear" stimulus experience, indicating freezing behavior.

6 COs), which have been linked to fear-related freezing behavior.

7 S-specific spine formation and extinction of freezing behavior.

8 nditioned in VR and exhibit context-specific freezing behavior.

9 cond module is described for the analysis of freezing behavior.

10 that CRF(+) neurons serve to inhibit learned freezing behavior.

11 CS was significantly coupled to EMG-related freezing behavior.

12 approach behavior, while 22 kHz USVs lead to freezing behavior.

13 ) was selective to those with high levels of freezing behavior.

14 mory or directly affecting the expression of freezing behavior.

15 hat experienced 2-VO showed no disruption in freezing behavior.

16 ive sensory stimulation but did not regulate freezing behavior.

17 on attenuated the OBX-induced abnormality in freezing behavior.

18 ry of learned fear but not for generation of freezing behavior.

19 and shortened the duration of stress-induced freezing behavior.

20 itioned inhibition or extinction of acquired freezing behavior.

21 iously fear-conditioned rats, as measured by freezing behavior.

22 xpression of social avoidance but not during freezing behavior.

23 the freshness of saliva and the intensity of freezing behavior.

24 om dynamics, which also coincided with mouse freezing behaviors.

25 t increases in baseline and fear-conditioned freezing behaviors.

26 ation coincided with the appearance of mouse freezing behaviors.

27 fear memory retrieval in CA1 during fearful freezing behavior, a process that also reduces fear gene

28 the present study by measuring fear-related freezing behavior after electrolytic and neurotoxic lesi

29 suming more EtOH-gelatin and exhibiting more freezing behavior along with an asymmetric increase in H

30 with BLA lesions expressed normal and robust freezing behavior, although they required at least 10 ti

31 After extinction, freezing behavior (an index of learned fear) to the audi

32 ctivation of multiple sites driving profound freezing behavior and bradycardia that are not elicited

33 first phylogenetic characterization of xylem freezing behavior and dehydrin-like proteins.

34 ty (including reduced exploration, increased freezing behavior and erratic movement), which are quant

35 ery test, mainly characterized by pronounced freezing behavior and increased linear and angular swimm

36 conditioning protocol increased conditioned freezing behavior and induced an IED; this effect was bl

37 S-neuron spiking matches freezing behavior and is required for freezing.

38 timulus reverses the conditioning-associated freezing behavior and odor learning-induced structural c

39 temperature (-10, -15, -20 degrees C) on the freezing behavior and quality attributes of tomato were

40 Our data suggest that both freezing behavior and the accumulation of dehydrin-like

41 mic and basal forebrain projections generate freezing behavior and, unexpectedly, contribute to assoc

42 ing, increases the expression of conditioned freezing behavior, and causes relapse of extinguished fe

43 Footshock-sensitivity, freezing behavior, and corticosterone response to variou

44 pothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity, freezing behavior, and expressive vocalizations.

45 TMT presentation induced freezing behavior, and this effect was attenuated by NBM

46 ed the effectiveness of oxytocin at reducing freezing behavior as compared to vehicle controls.

47 ed threats, we observe a higher incidence of freezing behavior at higher approach rates.

48 icient to depolarize BNST neurons and induce freezing behavior; both responses depended on ASIC1A.

49 ngs indicate that BLA lesions do not disrupt freezing behavior by producing hyperactivity, an inabili

50 behavior correlations between FDG uptake and freezing behavior confirmed that subjects with higher pr

51 However, freezing behavior could also be affected by fatigue, esp

52 dministration of a Cnr1 antagonist increased freezing behavior during a cued fear expression test in

53 ating PFC 2-AG levels preferentially reduced freezing behavior during acquisition without affecting i

54 While freezing behavior during conditioning was reduced by MLA

55 observed 44-kHz calls to be associated with freezing behavior during fear conditioning training, dur

56 locked to the initiation and termination of freezing behavior during fear learning and recall.

57 Freezing behavior during the testing session of the CFC

58 Isoflurane-exposed rats had reduced freezing behavior during the training sessions in the fe

59 ring manner in the expression of conditioned freezing behavior elicited by both olfactory and context

60 In Phase 3, freezing behavior elicited by CS2 was tested without dru

61 Data revealed that the increased freezing behavior elicited by MLA in adult rats could be

62 We applied deep learning to classify mouse freezing behavior, eliminating the need for human scorin

63 rimination task, suggesting that deficits in freezing behavior exhibited by BLA subjects were not due

64 Mice predominantly displaying freezing behavior had preferential neural activity in th

65 d that despite no overall sex differences in freezing behavior, HF and LF phenotypes emerged in male

66 Freezing behavior, however, has previously been induced

67 ested for conditioned stimulus (CS)-elicited freezing behavior in a distinct context.

68 erts bi-directional control over conditioned freezing behavior in an experience- and context-specific

69 in wild-type subjects, but had no effect on freezing behavior in CCKBR knockout littermates.

70 However, analysis of freezing behavior in different contexts indicated that t

71 e examined in the present study by comparing freezing behavior in exercising and nonexercising rats t

72 cific changes are likely to alter contextual freezing behavior in males but not in females.

73 ked some of the effects of OBX; it decreased freezing behavior in response to mild footshock and prod

74 an threat cues, and activity correlated with freezing behavior in rodents.

75 Reduced freezing behavior in Tg2576 mice during fear conditionin

76 g, contextual fear was assessed by measuring freezing behavior in the conditioned context (in the abs

77 zapine selectively decreased anxiety-related freezing behavior in the human intruder paradigm in hM4D

78 ited spike firing in the MGN and conditional freezing behavior in vehicle-treated rats receiving pair

79 mans and the innate anxiety- and conditioned freezing behaviors in rats.

80 r conditioning in rats, measured by lack of "freezing" behavior in the presence of cues previously pa

81 suggesting that exposure to AAS may override freezing behavior induced by low serotonin.

82 Here we show that acquisition of conditioned freezing behavior is associated with dynamic remodeling

83 an fear conditioning paradigms focus only on freezing behavior, obscuring the contributions of associ

84 is important to understand the often complex freezing behavior of solutions of biomolecules.

85 Freezing behavior of the NON rats declined significantly

86 ect link between tetrahedral entropy and the freezing behavior of water in Zn(2+)-based electrolytes

87 ne responses in PL that were correlated with freezing behavior on a second-to-second basis during the

88 of fear ensembles in the BLA did not affect freezing behavior or astrocytic calcium dynamics.

89 LA fear ensembles does not have an impact on freezing behavior or calcium dynamics.

90 viously active during memory formation drove freezing behavior, place avoidance, and place preference

91 n aversive footshock in a novel chamber, and freezing behavior served as an index of conditional fear

92 he extinction context or in another context; freezing behavior served as the index of conditional fea

93 nt and remote memory at the same time point; freezing behavior served as the index of learned fear.

94 ed footshock in a novel observation chamber; freezing behavior served as the measure of conditional f

95 Freezing behavior served as the measure of fear.

96 were exposed to isoflurane 30 min later had freezing behavior similar to that of control animals.

97 These data suggest that learning-induced freezing behavior, structural alterations, and enhanced

98 Lesioned mice exhibited a higher level of freezing behavior than controls on each of the 3 session

99 r only those from the left dHb, prolongs the freezing behavior that follows shock.

100 redator threat and modulate the intensity of freezing behavior through the VNO in mice.

101 lowed by assessment of cue fear by measuring freezing behavior to the conditioned tone presented in a

102 No differences in freezing behavior to the discrete auditory cue were obse

103 e foot shock demonstrated robust conditioned freezing behavior to the stressor environment and defici

104 were decreased in the EPM and acquisition of freezing behavior to the tone was increased in a fear-co

105 ning amygdala lesions blocked stress-induced freezing behavior, ultrasonic vocalizations, adrenocorti

106 at V1 corticotectal projections may initiate freezing behavior via uniform activation of the WFV cell

107 Neither context nor tone freezing behavior was altered by this manipulation durin

108 During cued fear conditioning, freezing behavior was enhanced in female, but not male,

109 ssociated with these individual differences, freezing behavior was examined in infant rhesus monkeys

110 No effects on freezing behavior were observed following preproENK gene

111 the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) and freezing behavior were recorded during tests in which ea

112 1 month or 1 h before CFC, exhibited reduced freezing behavior when compared with mice administered s

113 ed behavior when exposed to a snake and less freezing behavior when confronted by a human intruder.

114 Freezing behavior when presented with the conditioned to

115 xtual fear memory, as evidenced by increased freezing behavior when rats are returned to a training e

116 ed 2-VO exhibited a significant reduction in freezing behavior whereas estradiol-treated mice that ex

117 We also uncover a correlation-induced freezing behavior, which could be a generic feature of p

118 or the acquisition and recall of conditioned freezing behavior, which has been used as an index of de

119 es including autonomic arousal, anxiety, and freezing behavior, while thalamic and basal forebrain pr