戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ression transgenic plants displayed enhanced freezing tolerance.
2 e been shown to control genetic pathways for freezing tolerance.
3  cold acclimatization and the acquisition of freezing tolerance.
4 ng stress whereas its overexpression reduces freezing tolerance.
5 ation of CBF genes and in the development of freezing tolerance.
6 to chilling stress and defective in acquired freezing tolerance.
7 anscription factor required for chilling and freezing tolerance.
8 gulon) that act in concert to increase plant-freezing tolerance.
9 lon, which act to bring about an increase in freezing tolerance.
10 ay present opportunities for improving plant freezing tolerance.
11 s the major process that prepares plants for freezing tolerance.
12 whereas overexpression of PLDdelta increased freezing tolerance.
13 naling has been postulated to play a role in freezing tolerance.
14  that the SFR2 gene product is essential for freezing tolerance.
15 in transgenic tomato plants did not increase freezing tolerance.
16 rgeted genes, the CBF regulon, that increase freezing tolerance.
17 F regulon, resulting in an increase in plant freezing tolerance.
18  significant reduction in plant chilling and freezing tolerance.
19 ecrease in endogenous raffinose and impaired freezing tolerance.
20  genes), which contributes to an increase in freezing tolerance.
21 pression of CBF-targeted genes that increase freezing tolerance.
22 limation, define genes that are required for freezing tolerance.
23 uces COR gene expression and increases plant freezing tolerance.
24 cleus to activate genes needed for increased freezing tolerance.
25 f EGR2 is required for its function in plant freezing tolerance.
26  of several cold-regulated genes involved in freezing tolerance.
27  affected specifically in the development of freezing tolerance.
28 nction of AtPRMT3-RPS2B was found to enhance freezing tolerance.
29 scillator which also plays a crucial role in freezing tolerance.
30 es, confined to warm climates, displayed low freezing tolerance.
31  mta mutant demonstrated hypersensitivity to freezing tolerance.
32 as overexpression of EGR2 exhibits decreased freezing tolerance.
33 sense transcripts severely compromised plant freezing tolerance.
34  acclimation pathways that lead to increased freezing tolerance.
35 nes that are required for the acquisition of freezing tolerance.
36 ance for cold acclimation and acquisition of freezing tolerance.
37 nce, whereas MPK3/MPK6 activation attenuates freezing tolerance.
38   Elevated temperature and CO2 also impaired freezing tolerance.
39  However, this comes at the cost of impaired freezing tolerance.
40 absent under long photoperiod, and increased freezing tolerance.
41 ow that BRs participate in the regulation of freezing tolerance.
42 raising the question of SFR2 function beyond freezing tolerance.
43  regulon, which contribute to an increase in freezing tolerance.
44 han 100 genes, the CBF regulon, which impart freezing tolerance.
45 gene, inducing flowering with a reduction of freezing tolerance.
46 which reprograms gene expression to increase freezing tolerance.
47 e proteins had on global gene expression and freezing tolerance.
48 r subunits, as does cold acclimation-induced freezing tolerance.
49 tional activators of gene pathways imparting freezing tolerance.
50 es showed improved germination and increased freezing tolerance.
51  outside the CBF pathway, and increase plant freezing tolerance.
52 osome underlying important traits, including freezing tolerance.
53 leading from cold perception to chilling and freezing tolerance.
54 olved in cold acclimation and acquisition of freezing tolerance.
55  induction of CBF-targeted genes that impart freezing tolerance.
56 of the CBF regulon results in an increase in freezing tolerance.
57  camta1 camta3 mutant plants are impaired in freezing tolerance.
58 ssion of the CBF gene regulon, which imparts freezing tolerance.
59 ciduous species showed marked variability in freezing tolerance across their broad climatic range, wh
60 superior conductivity, optical transparency, freezing tolerance, adhesion capability, and spontaneous
61  mutant of Arabidopsis displays a deficit in freezing tolerance after cold acclimation.
62 olanum cardiophyllum) exhibiting extremes of freezing tolerance and acclimation capacity.
63 ng (DREB1) proteins play a prominent role in freezing tolerance and are highly conserved in higher pl
64 that in Arabidopsis, AtGA2ox9 contributes to freezing tolerance and AtGA2ox10 regulates seed producti
65 eading to cessation of growth, bud dormancy, freezing tolerance and changes in energy metabolism.
66 ions as a negative regulator of constitutive freezing tolerance and cold acclimation in Arabidopsis t
67 ith ET biosynthesis to modulate constitutive freezing tolerance and cold acclimation in Arabidopsis.
68 nd that MYB88 and MYB124 positively regulate freezing tolerance and cold-responsive gene expression i
69 original sfr6-1 mutation, these both disrupt freezing tolerance and COR gene expression.
70 the contribution of phenotypic plasticity to freezing tolerance and demonstrate the integration of ke
71                                              Freezing tolerance and electrolyte leakage assays show t
72 ent of electrolyte leakage to determine leaf freezing tolerance and expression analyses of cold-respo
73 nd vernalization, which respectively lead to freezing tolerance and flowering competence.
74  development, proline and sugar composition, freezing tolerance and gene expression.
75 limate and potential trade-offs between stem freezing tolerance and growth rate in 48 Quercus species
76                      * The trade-off between freezing tolerance and growth rate supports the range li
77 uercus series Virentes) were associated with freezing tolerance and growth rate, and whether species
78 ompetition, resulting in a trade-off between freezing tolerance and growth rate.
79 ng tolerance, precluding a trade-off between freezing tolerance and growth.
80 primary cell wall in determining basal plant freezing tolerance and highlights the specific importanc
81 cold-responsive gene transcription, acquired freezing tolerance and plant resistance to chilling unde
82              The Mvp/- plants showed reduced freezing tolerance and reduced transcript levels of seve
83 that is a major regulator of cold-acclimated freezing tolerance and resides within a locus responsibl
84 ity is that Arabidopsis accessions differ in freezing tolerance and that those collected from colder
85  in Suc solution in the dark at 2 degrees C, freezing tolerance and the incidence of freeze-induced l
86  based on root elongation, quantification of freezing tolerance and the use of electrolyte leakage ex
87 ntrolling gene expression under cold stress, freezing tolerance, and flowering time.
88 ed photosynthetic rates, leaf carbohydrates, freezing tolerance, and proteins involved in photosynthe
89 n, hos1-1 plants acquired the same degree of freezing tolerance as did the wild type.
90 y expression of cold-induced transcripts and freezing tolerance assays.
91 se in CBF expression is sufficient to confer freezing tolerance at temperatures higher than those req
92                                  Analysis of freezing tolerance at the whole plant level and measurem
93 pha-Gal in petunia results in an increase in freezing tolerance at the whole-plant level in nonacclim
94  while 519 DEGs were associated with cold or freezing tolerance based on gene ontology enrichment.
95 mote proper cold-induced gene expression and freezing tolerance before and after cold acclimation.
96 so reduces the capacity of plants to develop freezing tolerance but does not impair the vernalization
97 sis at low temperature did not contribute to freezing tolerance, but had a major role in configuring
98 uction probably accounts for the increase in freezing tolerance by cooling acclimation.
99 ndidate gene for improving plant drought and freezing tolerance by genetic transformation.
100 ts downstream of CBFs to positively regulate freezing tolerance by modulating the expression of stres
101  disordered protein that contributes to leaf freezing tolerance by stabilizing cellular membranes.
102 nt growth and development, and for a part of freezing tolerance, by affecting the activity of genes i
103 ortion of the variance for the nonacclimated freezing tolerance can be best explained by an additive-
104                            Here we show that freezing tolerance can be manipulated in Arabidopsis tha
105 e flowering time (vernalization) and improve freezing tolerance (cold acclimation).
106 ited stunted growth, poor yield, and greater freezing tolerance compared to non-transformed 'Golden P
107 also have strong constitutive heat shock and freezing tolerance compared with mountain plants, where
108 nts initiate their reproductive development, freezing tolerance decreases, suggesting a connection be
109 ts native to cold climates acquire increased freezing tolerance during exposure to low nonfreezing te
110 ate climate zones are able to increase their freezing tolerance during exposure to low, above-zero te
111 known strategy employed by plants to enhance freezing tolerance (FT) in winter.
112 zing sensitivity, we have identified a novel freezing tolerance gene, SENSITIVE-TO-FREEZING8, in Arab
113                                   To acquire freezing tolerance, higher plants require a period of lo
114 understanding of the molecular mechanisms of freezing tolerance in apple.
115 1) mediates cold-triggered Ca(2+) influx and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.
116 ions of 51 genes suspected of involvement in freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.
117 igases, PUB25 and PUB26, positively regulate freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.
118 eezing2 (SFR2) gene has an important role in freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.
119 E TO FREEZING 2 (SFR2), a gene essential for freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis, encodes a galactolipi
120  the cold response and consequently enhances freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis.
121 in kinase plays a central role in regulating freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis; however, the mechanis
122 /lhy-21 double mutation resulted in impaired freezing tolerance in both nonacclimated and cold-acclim
123 ve insights into the molecular mechanisms of freezing tolerance in chickpea and offers valuable genom
124 roach can be designed to genetically enhance freezing tolerance in important crops.
125 et COR (cold-regulated) genes and to enhance freezing tolerance in nonacclimated plants.
126                 Despite an evolutionary lag, freezing tolerance in oaks is closely aligned with its o
127 CTOR (CBF) genes and other genes that impart freezing tolerance in plants exposed to cold temperature
128 hich negatively regulates CBF expression and freezing tolerance in plants.
129 -regulation of the CBF pathway and increased freezing tolerance in preparation for coming cold temper
130 rance in response to heat shock and acquired freezing tolerance in response to cold shock.
131   During cold acclimation plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low non-freezing tempe
132 tion, the process whereby plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low nonfreezing temper
133 e process whereby certain plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low nonfreezing temper
134                      Many plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low temperature, a pro
135 y plants, including Arabidopsis, increase in freezing tolerance in response to low, nonfreezing tempe
136                      Many plants increase in freezing tolerance in response to low, nonfreezing tempe
137 s resulted in a 5.5 degrees C improvement in freezing tolerance in the absence of cold acclimation.
138 mponents of this survival in crop plants are freezing tolerance in the nonacclimated state and cold a
139 xpression of the Nicotiana PK1 gene enhances freezing tolerance in transgenic maize plants that are n
140 pression of CBF-targeted genes and increased freezing tolerance indicating that LeCBF1 encodes a func
141 aused a small, but reproducible, increase in freezing tolerance, indicating a role for the ZAT12 regu
142 da') were compared with a goal to reveal how freezing tolerance is achieved in this distinctive overw
143                                     Although freezing tolerance is acquired through cold-induced gene
144  other than CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3, and whether freezing tolerance is dependent on a functional CBF-CRT/
145 mperatures results in cold acclimation where freezing tolerance is enhanced.
146            Here we show that the increase in freezing tolerance is not associated with any increase i
147                                The increased freezing tolerance is the result of a decreased incidenc
148 Species from colder regions exhibited higher freezing tolerance, lower growth rates and higher winter
149 ecotypes that condition local adaptation and freezing tolerance map to a region that includes the C-r
150 t ADA2b may directly or indirectly repress a freezing tolerance mechanism that does not require the e
151 estion thus raised is whether differences in freezing tolerance might contribute to local adaptation
152 2.6 degreesC by cold acclimation whereas the freezing tolerance of 26 mutant lines ranged from -6.8 d
153 We screened for mutations deleterious to the freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. e
154                               The remarkable freezing tolerance of bdelloid rotifers can thus be at l
155 idopsis CBF-targeted genes and increases the freezing tolerance of both nonacclimated and cold-acclim
156 on of CBF3 in Arabidopsis also increases the freezing tolerance of cold-acclimated plants.
157                                          The freezing tolerance of isolated protoplasts (LT(50) of -9
158 nduced COR gene expression and increased the freezing tolerance of nonacclimated Arabidopsis plants.
159 vides an additional method for improving the freezing tolerance of plants.
160 The minimum source temperature predicted the freezing tolerance of populations under temperate condit
161                                Moreover, the freezing tolerance of SD plants was greater than that of
162        Based upon electrolyte leakage tests, freezing tolerance of the antisense lines increased from
163                      During cold acclimation freezing tolerance of the Hv-CBF2A overexpressing lines
164 T CBF2 protein also contributes to the lower freezing tolerance of the IT plants compared with the SW
165  of the CBF regulon in the cold and improves freezing tolerance of the transgenic plants.
166  that of 'Golden Promise' and paralleled the freezing tolerance of the winter hardy barley 'Dicktoo'.
167                                              Freezing tolerance of wild-type Arabidopsis was increase
168 nto the effects of symbionts on the cold and freezing tolerances of plants, concluding that further s
169                                              Freezing tolerance plays a pivotal role in shaping the d
170 ut those that evolved in warm latitudes lost freezing tolerance, precluding a trade-off between freez
171  suggesting that quantitative trait loci for freezing tolerance previously mapped on this chromosome
172 of function of AtANN1 substantially impaired freezing tolerance, reducing the cold-induced [Ca(2+) ](
173 iciency but impaired dehydrin expression and freezing tolerance similar to ETAC seedlings.
174 mated conditions, sfr4 protoplasts possessed freezing tolerance similar to that of wild type, with th
175 lay central roles in low-temperature-induced freezing tolerance, spike architecture and hormone metab
176 s (FROST RESISTANCE-1), as proposed in early freezing tolerance studies.
177 ession strongly correlated with increases in freezing tolerance, suggesting its involvement in the de
178 -1 is sufficient to determine differences in freezing tolerance, suggesting that quantitative trait l
179 ezing temperatures results in an increase in freezing tolerance that involves action of the C-repeat
180 hly interconnected; and that the increase in freezing tolerance that occurs with cold acclimation is
181    Mutations in the ESK1 gene provide strong freezing tolerance through genetic regulation that is ap
182 ER OF CBF EXPRESSION1, a master regulator of freezing tolerance, thus implicating a potential link be
183 n activate many downstream genes that confer freezing tolerance to plants.
184 ny downstream genes that confer chilling and freezing tolerance to plants.
185 F7, act to down-regulate the CBF pathway and freezing tolerance under LD conditions.
186 l conditions were negatively correlated with freezing tolerance under temperate conditions.
187 e process whereby certain plants increase in freezing tolerance upon exposure to low temperature.
188 ragaria x ananassa) cultivars that differ in freezing tolerance was conducted.
189                               Differences in freezing tolerance were apparent only upon cold acclimat
190 uble carbohydrates, dehydrin expression, and freezing tolerance were impaired.
191 cts of growth temperature and photoperiod on freezing tolerance were most pronounced in plants grown
192 eins, all of which negatively regulate plant freezing tolerance, were destabilized by cold stress in
193 plants like Arabidopsis thaliana increase in freezing tolerance when exposed to low nonfreezing tempe
194 dditionally, CAMTA3(334) was able to restore freezing tolerance when expressed in a camta23 double mu
195 mutant plants are less capable of developing freezing tolerance when treated with low non-freezing te
196 creased expression of CBF genes and enhanced freezing tolerance, whereas constitutive activation of t
197 d the mpk3 mpk6 double mutants show enhanced freezing tolerance, whereas MPK3/MPK6 activation attenua
198  revealed that the WXP1 plants had increased freezing tolerance while the WXP2 plants were more sensi
199 on of one pathway can result in considerable freezing tolerance without activation of other pathways.

 
Page Top