戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 anar impaired gait (both in the sagittal and frontal planes).
2 nce on a platform periodically tilted in the frontal plane.
3 ce on a platform periodically tilting in the frontal plane.
4 ation in these patients, particularly in the frontal plane.
5 ectional rotation of the visual scene in the frontal plane.
6 ) displacement and trunk acceleration in the frontal plane.
7  limb leads, and VAQRS was calculated in the frontal plane.
8 is sample, we measured forefoot and rearfoot frontal plane alignment using photographs of a non-weigh
9  radial distribution around the fovea in the frontal plane and a "Z-shaped" course in the axial plane
10              Serial sections were cut in the frontal plane and light microscopy used to count the num
11 by 46.9% in the sagittal plane, 55.3% in the frontal plane, and 15.6% in the transverse plane.
12                                              Frontal plane angular momentum ranges and the minimum ho
13             Group-level analysis showed that frontal plane angular momentum ranges were smaller durin
14 predicted higher heels would lead to greater frontal plane ankle torques due to the increased vertica
15     This study aimed to quantify and compare frontal plane arm kinematics and their relationship with
16                         These characteristic frontal-plane aspects of bipedalism likely play a role i
17 VS always produced a tilt of the body in the frontal plane but the response was larger and more prolo
18 oM) excursion and restore balance within the frontal plane during slip perturbations.
19 ependent on active neural control, while the frontal plane dynamics are less stable and require great
20             The higher neural demands of the frontal plane dynamics are reflected in a more variable
21 ctive strategy for ensuring stability in the frontal plane dynamics.
22 g these puncta were not often evident in the frontal plane examined.
23                 No significant difference in frontal plane [Formula: see text] was found between the
24 ighted sequences in sagittal, transverse and frontal planes in all patients, images obtained using th
25 nt asymmetries in ankle dorsiflexion-ROM and frontal plane knee control are present in female basketb
26  parameters, significantly impacting patient frontal plane knee kinematics.
27                                              Frontal plane knee loads were compared between the diffe
28                                              Frontal plane laxity was measured from stress radiograph
29                                     Although frontal plane loading at the knee contributes to OA, pro
30  penguins appear to have excessive amount of frontal plane motion in their gait that is characterized
31                                 If excessive frontal plane motion requires additional neural control
32 ectional, full-field visual rotations in the frontal plane of standing subjects.
33 s its normal relationships to the median and frontal planes or whether new relationships (and thus, n
34 angle produced curves demonstrating that the frontal plane position lies along the flatter portions o
35            Acrylic prisms can be held in the frontal plane position with acceptable amounts of error
36         The ECG prognosis score included (1) frontal plane QRS-T angle, and (2) heart rate corrected
37 ased so that the body was more stable in the frontal plane, response direction became biased toward t
38                                       In the frontal plane, the rate of head and trunk tilt in space
39 d of a lateral tilt of the upper body in the frontal plane through an angle of about 8 deg.
40                                  Bias in the frontal plane was strongly directionally affected by vis
41 al layers of the central complex bend in the frontal plane, which produces the characteristic shape o
42       Head movements were constrained to the frontal plane with the use of a bite plate and a forehea