ライフサイエンスコーパス: fuel cell

1 atinum utilization of 0.13 gPt kW(-1) in the fuel cell.

2 uinone redox flow battery and a hydrogen PEM fuel cell.

3 casing are used to construct the paper-based fuel cell.

4 lication conditions in the hydrogen (H2)-air fuel cell.

5 nce and durable non-platinum direct methanol fuel cell.

6 ritical for a cost-effective direct methanol fuel cell.

7 n-exchange membranes in solid-state alkaline fuel cells.

8 ted considerable attention for use in liquid fuel cells.

9 lacing platinum in practical devices such as fuel cells.

10 reaction in acidic proton-exchange membrane fuel cells.

11 precious-metal electrocatalysts for alkaline fuel cells.

12 catalysts for proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells.

13 the design of electrocatalysts for alkaline fuel cells.

14 lds, including water treatment processes and fuel cells.

15 ctrochemistry at the three-phase boundary in fuel cells.

16 urable, and cost effective electrolyzers and fuel cells.

17 rt through biological membranes and hydrogen fuel cells.

18 tting, metal-air batteries, and regenerative fuel cells.

19 al devices such as batteries and solid oxide fuel cells.

20 )Zr(0.1)Y(0.1)O(3-delta) for low-temperature fuel cells.

21 2, 3, 4) as ORR electrocatalysts in alkaline fuel cells.

22 tion of hydroxide-exchange membrane hydrogen fuel cells.

23 ens in cascades of continuous flow microbial fuel cells.

24 icient biocatalyst in METs such as microbial fuel cells.

25 dation is an emerging need of direct alcohol fuel cells.

26 roup-metal-based catalysts at the cathode of fuel cells.

27 c acid compounds employed as electrolytes in fuel cells.

28 fast-ion conductors in super-capacitors and fuel cells.

29 catalysis, emissions control and solid-oxide fuel cells.

30 hance the performance of Nafion membranes in fuel cells.

31 d zirconia, with application for solid oxide fuel cells.

32 talysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells.

33 ne- and mediator-free, transparent enzymatic fuel cells.

34 stage of upgrading H2 reformate streams for fuel cells.

35 g fluorescence emissions and biophotovoltaic fuel cells.

36 t of developed proton-exchange membranes for fuel cells.

37 catalytic performance of electrocatalysts in fuel cells.

38 l utilisation compared to all other types of fuel cells.

39 is significant for proton-exchange membrane fuel cells.

40 catalysis to enable versatile membrane-free fuel cells.

41 rticular allow highly energetic reactions in fuel cells.

42 oxygen permeation membranes, and solid oxide fuel cells.

43 cations such as batteries, smart windows and fuel cells.

44 d environment-related applications including fuel cells.

45 future design of more efficient catalysts in fuel cells.

46 O2 reduction and a source of deactivation in fuel cells.

47 zed chemical synthesis but also enzyme based fuel cells.

48 rial during the oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells.

49 ion for their roles as solid electrolytes in fuel cells.

50 for the design and optimization of microbial fuel cells.

51 and nitrogen, and AOR-related direct ammonia fuel cells.

52 ng in economical hydroxide exchange membrane fuel cells.

53 ly from such complex substrates in microbial fuel cells.

54 applications of many molecular catalysts in fuel cells.

55 significantly limits the development of PEM fuel cells.

56 addressing catalyst poisoning mechanisms in fuel cells.

57 novel metal nitrides as electrocatalysts for fuel cells.

58 tant component of alkaline exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs), which facilitate the efficient conv

59 l devices, including anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs).

60 n order to enable alkaline exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs).

61 Potential application in fuel cells also requires a WGS catalyst to be highly act

62 ed bioanodes in both a two-chamber microbial fuel cell and microbial battery with a solid-state NaFe(

63 de of a miniature flow-through membrane-less fuel cell and showed excellent response to varying conce

64 2O2 reduction with scope for applications in fuel cells and biosensors.

65 ons have been held for technologies, such as fuel cells and electrolyzers, where the performance stro

66 nerative energy conversion devices involving fuel cells and electrolyzers.

67 ng and renewable energy technologies such as fuel cells and electrolyzers.

68 that used in real applications, for example, fuel cells and electrolyzers.

69 fuel cells to proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells and elucidate the sources of various overpote

70 be useful in devices such as electrolysers, fuel cells and flow batteries, as well as in operando st

71 eactions at electrode/membrane interfaces in fuel cells and ion insertion at electrode/electrolyte in

72 on reaction (ORR) is the cathode reaction in fuel cells and its selectivity for water over hydrogen p

73 oxygen reduction and evolution reactions in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, activity descriptors

74 wable energy conversion technologies such as fuel cells and metal-air batteries.

75 idespread development of polymer electrolyte fuel cells and metal-air batteries.

76 for sustainable large-scale applications of fuel cells and metal-air batteries.

77 a brief introduction of some fundamentals of fuel cells and ORR catalysts with performance metrics is

78 ising strategy in developing high-performing fuel cells and other electrochemical systems via the int

79 ysts for a variety of applications including fuel cells and oxygen separation membranes.

80 ts the performance and economic viability of fuel cells and sensors.

81 tional design of, for example, catalysts for fuel cells and solar fuel formation, which operate in st

82 uding advanced water electrolyzers, hydrogen fuel cells, and ammonia electrosynthesis and utilization

83 of two-electrode systems, including sensors, fuel cells, and energy storage devices.

84 and degradation in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells, and fundamental investigations of new energy

85 ys a pivotal role to boost the efficiency of fuel cells, and hence focused research in this area is h

86 chargeable metal-air batteries, regenerative fuel cells, and other important clean energy devices.

87 hromic smart windows, batteries, solid oxide fuel cells, and sensors.

88 ergy devices such as rechargeable batteries, fuel cells, and solar cells are central to powering a re

89 In this approach, fuel cell anode catalysts are modified with a molecularl

90 (iNPs) have sparked considerable interest in fuel cell applications by virtue of their exceptional el

91 d aircraft to hydrogen storage materials for fuel cell applications.

92 dercoordinated and enhanced active sites for fuel cell applications.

93 s promising new anode catalysts for alkaline fuel cell applications.

94 y promising HOR electrocatalyst for hydrogen fuel cell applications.

95 Alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells are a class of fuel cells that enable the use

96 ure directions of Pt-based ORR catalysts for fuel cells are also presented.

97 Mediated fuel cells are electrochemical devices that produce powe

98 lectrochemical ammonia synthesis and ammonia fuel cells are presented, and perspectives in the techni

99 Proton-exchange membrane fuel cells are promising energy devices for a sustainabl

100 Direct ammonia fuel cells are suitable for a broad range of mobile and

101 ction, and including MOF-based membranes for fuel cells, are summarized and highlighted.

102 Fuel cells as an attractive clean energy technology have

103 ics as compared to the drop-coated enzymatic fuel cell, as a result of the higher nanostructured surf

104 Equipped with Nano-Fe(3)C@PGC, the microbial fuel cells based on a mixed bacterium culture yields a p

105 r determining the power density of microbial fuel cells based on dimensional analysis.

106 Direct comparisons of microbial fuel cells based on maximum power densities are hindered

107 ion protocol for laboratory scale (10 cm(2)) fuel cells based on ultrasonic spray deposition of a sta

108 industrially important applications such as fuel cells, batteries, sensors, and catalysis.

109 sceptibility testing and advent of microbial fuel cell biosensors, cell-based biosensors have evolved

110 On the contrary, micro fuel cells can achieve much higher energy density becaus

111 r implanted devices, both abiotic and biotic fuel cells can utilize the dissolved glucose in the body

112 oped and characterized a series of enzymatic fuel cells capable of oxyfunctionalization while simulta

113 tive polymers have been increasingly used as fuel cell catalyst support due to their electrical condu

114 r surface engineering and design of advanced fuel cell catalysts with atomic-scale platinum decoratio

115 In anion exchange membrane fuel cells, catalytic reactions occur at a well-defined

116 n reduction reaction, ORR), which makes them fuel-cell cathode catalysts with exceptional potential.

117 ding of only 2.4 wt% for the use in alkaline fuel cell cathodes.

118 rticles for the oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cell cathodes.

119 t interest for their diverse applications in fuel cells, chemical sensors, and bio-electronic devices

120 suggests the operability in direct methanol fuel cell configuration.

121 bioelectrochemical systems such as microbial fuel cells, corrosion-resistant metals uptake current fr

122 A direct carbon fuel cell (DCFC) can produce electricity with both super

123 Direct carbon fuel cells (DCFCs) are highly efficient power generators

124 oxides are thought to play a crucial role in fuel cell degradation, their nature remains unclear.

125 The fuel cell delivered a linear power output response to gl

126 ging performance in proton exchange membrane fuel cell, demonstrating great potential for practical a

127 nificantly improved performances in terms of fuel cell design, bioelectricity generation, oxygen prod

128 ion is a critical half reaction in renewable fuel cell development and a key step in the development

129 e many types of fuel cells, direct hydrazine fuel cells (DHFCs) are of particular interest, especiall

130 vity of the polymer electrolyte membranes in fuel cells dictates their performance and requires suffi

131 uctivity of polymer electrolyte membranes in fuel cells dictates their performance, but requires suff

132 Among the many types of fuel cells, direct hydrazine fuel cells (DHFCs) are of p

133 The key in designing efficient direct liquid fuel cells (DLFCs), which can offer some solutions to so

134 ary (TPB) layer of a passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) as biosensor transducer is herein propo

135 the electrical circuit of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC), working in passive mode and used herei

136 ficient cathode materials in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs).

137 Good fuel cell durability is also observed.

138 tlined to minimize the detrimental effect on fuel cell durability.

139 tion (ORR) catalysts is crucial to boost the fuel cell economy.

140 cular hydrogen (H2 ) results in an enzymatic fuel cell (EFC) that is able to produce NH3 from H2 and

141 (RVC-Au) sponge as a scaffold for enzymatic fuel cells (EFC).

142 Enzymatic fuel cells (EFCs) are devices to convert chemical energy

143 0 EW Nafion ionomer in glucose/air enzymatic fuel cells (EFCs), EFCs with laccase air-breathing catho

144 ive survey of historical and recent mediated fuel cell efforts, including applications using chemical

145 lutant emissions and high fuel efficiency in fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs).

146 ompact hydrogen storage system could advance fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs).

147 A sediment microbial fuel cell electro-Fenton (SMFC-E-Fenton) system was prop

148 method for other binary or ternary alloys as fuel cell electrocatalysts.

149 re their applications may include batteries, fuel cells, electrocatalytic water splitting, corrosion

150 improved catalytic activity as a solid oxide fuel cell electrode and in the dry reforming of methane.

151 oxides are increasingly used in solid oxide fuel cells, electrolysis and catalysis, it is desirable

152 eloping advanced low-temperature solid oxide fuel cell electrolytes.

153 ructures designed for use in next-generation fuel cells, electrolyzers, or flow batteries.

154 Potential candidates include batteries, fuel cells, energy harvesters and supercapacitors, each

155 vironmental benefits from range-extended and fuel-cell EVs over ICVs and standard EVs.

156 first acetylcholine/oxygen hybrid enzymatic fuel cell for the self-powered on site detection of ACh

157 rochemical technologies, including microbial fuel cells for power production and bioelectrosynthesis

158 igh cost of noble metals are hindering these fuel cells from finding large-scale practical applicatio

159 cept device, comprising an enzymatic glucose fuel cell, glucose sensor and a LED indicator, does not

160 Microbial fuel cells harness electrical power from a wide variety

161 This includes (bio)fuel cells harvesting chemical energy, (bio)solar cells

162 s for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in fuel cells has been the objective worldwide for several

163 Microbial fuel cells have advantages over conventional fuel cells

164 Alkaline anion-exchange membrane (AAEM) fuel cells have attracted significant interest in the pa

165 Proton exchange membrane fuel cells have been regarded as the most promising cand

166 Alkaline fuel cells have drawn increasing attention as next-gener

167 Hydrogen fuel cells have emerged as promising, potentially renewa

168 s for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in fuel cells; however, their active site structures remain

169 fuel cells have advantages over conventional fuel cells in terms of being sustainable whilst producin

170 plementation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells in vehicles, high-performance electrocatalyst

171 zymatic biofuel cells (EBFCs), a subclass of fuel cells in which enzymes replace the conventional cat

172 the challenges associated with conventional fuel cells, including managing complex multiphase reacti

173 ctions of a CO(2) electrolyzer and a formate fuel cell is a new option for carbon-neutral energy stor

174 ucing the working temperature of solid oxide fuel cells is critical to their increased commercializat

175 in low-temperature operation of solid oxide fuel cells is growing.

176 f cost-effective hydroxide exchange membrane fuel cells is limited by the lack of high-performance an

177 tion of proton exchange membranes (PEMs) for fuel cells is of great significance.

178 Thermal management of SOFCs (solid oxide fuel cell) is important for helping to minimise high tem

179 A@ZIF-8 hybrid membrane into direct methanol fuel cells, it exhibits a power density of 9.87 mW cm(-2

180 an improve the performance and efficiency of fuel cells, lithium-ion batteries, organic radical batte

181 that, only in high demand scenarios and when fuel cell market penetration is high compared to the exp

182 ansmembrane proton pump proteins or hydrogen fuel cell materials.

183 ich the integration of the sensor inside the fuel cell may be a subsequent direction.

184 adation of low-PGM and PGM-free catalysts in fuel cell MEAs and materials-based solutions to address

185 loping renewable energy technologies such as fuel cells, metal-air batteries, and water electrolyzers

186 ractive energy conversion and storage (e.g., fuel cells, metal-air batteries, water splitting), envir

187 Microbial fuel cell (MFC) biosensors are self-sustainable device f

188 We built a flexible, stretchable microbial fuel cell (MFC) by laminating two functional components:

189 designed and created a co-culture microbial fuel cell (MFC) system for electronic reporting.

190 ich exploits high sensitivity of a microbial fuel cell (MFC) to variations in concentrations of elect

191 lectron recovery is competition in microbial fuel cells (MFC) between anode-respiring bacteria and mi

192 several types of cells, from basic microbial fuel cells (MFC) to photosynthetic MFCs and from plant M

193 Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are novel bio-electrochemical device f

194 icrobial electricity, generated by microbial fuel cells (MFCs) arranged in a large-capacity disposabl

195 bioelectrochemical reactors, like microbial fuel cells (MFCs), make accurate predictions of performa

196 nhance electrogenic performance in microbial fuel cells (MFCs).

197 oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in microbial fuel cells (MFCs).

198 Microliter-scale photosynthetic microbial fuel cells (micro-PMFC) can be the most suitable power s

199 le and double-cell membraneless microfluidic fuel cells (MMFCs) that operate in the presence of simul

200 witch between the CO(2) electrolyzer/formate fuel cell modes and can stably operate for 12 days.

201 embrane (PEM) electrolyzers, ORR-related PEM fuel cells, NRR-driven ammonia electrosynthesis from wat

202 Ceramic fuel cells offer a clean and efficient means of producin

203 for storage of CO2 in deep saline aquifers, fuel cells, oil recovery, and for the remediation of oil

204 Notably, this methane microbial fuel cell operates at high Coulombic efficiency.

205 cesses of trimetallic oxides under real-time fuel cell operating conditions.

206 ed under a practical alkaline direct ethanol fuel cell operation condition for its potential applicat

207 s initial proof-of-concept, in a non-passive fuel cell operation environment.

208 the critical steps for both electrolysis and fuel cell operation, especially at reduced temperatures.

209 ) may be used to generate electric power via fuel cells or combustors, O(2) may be used as a componen

210 (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in fuel cells or metal-air batteries.

211 bly (MEA)-the power generation unit of a PEM fuel cell-or when PGM-free catalysts are integrated into

212 e rapidly developing field of proton ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs).

213 Rapid improvements in polymer-electrolyte fuel-cell (PEFC) performance have been driven by the dev

214 t)-based counterparts in polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) but still face some major challenges,

215 high-cost issue of proton-exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technologies, particularly for transpo

216 he cathode, or in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) using Pt/C at the cathode.

217 pplication in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) with a maximum r(H(2)O(2)) of 2.26 mmo

218 ed in the practical proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), which converts the energy stored in h

219 the construction of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) reaching values up to 12.95 mW cm(-2)

220 ices, such as proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells (PEMFCs) and redox flow batteries (RFBs).

221 Proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are of considerable interest for dir

222 ommercialization of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) relies on highly active and stable e

223 Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) running on hydrogen are attractive a

224 des of development, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) still lack wide market acceptance in

225 n reaction (ORR) in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs).

226 dia are crucial for proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs).

227 scale deployment of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs).

228 ad dissemination of proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs).

229 hat of conventional proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs).

230 ectrodes," followed in decreasing amount by "fuel cell performance and durability," "membranes and el

231 Such modification increases fuel cell performance due to the proton conductivity and

232 arch roadmap for further improvement in AAEM fuel cell performance is delineated here within the purv

233 ee electrocatalysis, demonstrating increased fuel-cell performance, as well as efforts aimed at under

234 a mainstream proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, platinum-group-metal (PGM)-based catalysts ac

235 im, we here report the first paper microbial fuel cell (pMFC) fabricated by screen-printing biodegrad

236 its advantages of low overpotential and high fuel-cell power density.

237 been a challenge in proton exchange membrane fuel cells, preventing their widespread adoption.

238 al for maximizing proton conductivity within fuel-cell proton-exchange membranes (PEMs).

239 nductivity membrane used for direct methanol fuel cells, providing bright promise for such hybrid mem

240 the enzyme active site of biocathodes under fuel cell reaction conditions.

241 4H(+)/4e(-) reduction of O2 to water, a key fuel-cell reaction also carried out in biology by oxidas

242 in superior electrocatalytic performance for fuel cell reactions, but still remains arduous.

243 ncy via direct electrochemical conversion in fuel cells, releasing water as the sole byproduct.

244 s shown to enhance the electrocatalysis of a fuel-cell-relevant reaction.

245 on (ORR) cathode in proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells remains a grand challenge.

246 inating the contribution of water in a micro fuel cell sensor system.

247 The limit of detection of the fuel cell sensor was 10muM, with an average response tim

248 ectrolyte membranes employed in contemporary fuel cells severely limit device design and restrict cat

249 nd selectivity of the bioreceptor inside the fuel cell showed a clear and selective signal from the b

250 ll phone battery based on sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs).

251 nstrated real-time monitoring of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) operations with 5-mm spatial resolution

252 ct-conducting oxides find use in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and oxygen-deficient high-temperature

253 lectrocatalysis in the fields of biosensors, fuel cells, solar cells, catalytic mechanism studies, an

254 Experimental data from various microbial fuel cell studies operating over a wide range of system

255 ical reactions involved in electrolyzers and fuel cells, such as the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER

256 urrent review epitomizes the above-mentioned fuel cell systems and elucidates their electrical perfor

257 Compared with other fuel cell systems, this technology is still in its incep

258 (ORR) has been a key challenge for advancing fuel cell technologies.

259 can pave a way for the commercialization of fuel cell technologies.

260 (ORR) has been a key challenge for advancing fuel cell technologies.

261 their potential as imperative components of fuel cell technology.

262 can benefit the widespread commercial use of fuel cell technology.

263 t, promising to significantly reduce overall fuel-cell technology costs.

264 One important drawback to current fuel-cell technology is the high content of platinum-gro

265 Furthermore, the recent progress of full fuel cell tests of novel electrocatalysts is summarized.

266 f our knowledge none have outperformed Pt in fuel-cell tests.

267 aper-based enzymatic microfluidic glucose/O2 fuel cell that can operate using a very limited sample v

268 lectrons from acetate, to create a microbial fuel cell that converts methane directly into significan

269 sh a membrane-free, room-temperature formate fuel cell that operates under benign neutral pH conditio

270 This study reports alkaline membrane fuel cells that can be operated continuously for over 10

271 olymer electrolyte fuel cells are a class of fuel cells that enable the use of non-precious metal cat

272 r electrochemical devices, such as microbial fuel cells that generate electricity or microbial electr

273 rolyte for intermediate-temperature hydrogen fuel cells that may enable operation at temperatures as

274 ons include the oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells, the oxygen evolution reaction in metal-air b

275 oxides are candidate materials in catalysis, fuel cells, thermoelectrics, and electronics, where elec

276 of applications, ranging from batteries and fuel cells to chemical sensors, because they are easy to

277 ccess previously as a substrate in microbial fuel cells to generate electrical current.

278 the potential of the hydrogen environment in fuel cells to hydrocrack the hydrocarbon lubricant in hi

279 performance of current state of the art AAEM fuel cells to proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells

280 inspired nanomaterial either in an enzymatic fuel cell together with a multicopper oxidase at the cat

281 tand the water dynamics of alkaline membrane fuel cells under various operating conditions to create

282 gle MMFC was tested in a hybrid microfluidic fuel cell using Pt/C as the cathode.

283 pecially important for unitized regenerative fuel cells using polymer electrolyte membranes.

284 l scale and low cost ceramic based microbial fuel cell, utilising human urine into electricity, while

285 regarded as the most promising candidate for fuel cell vehicles and tools.

286 the kinetic region of cathode operation, at fuel cell voltages greater than 0.75 V, were the same as

287 The peak power generated by the fuel cell was 4nW at a voltage of 260mV and with a curre

288 The enzyme fuel cell was connected with a 100 muF capacitor and a p

289 e can be applied to a range of applications (fuel cells, water splitting, and redox flow batteries) t

290 ediators are also commonly used in enzymatic fuel cells, where direct electron transfer from the elec

291 r advantage over more conventional microbial fuel cells which require the input of organic carbon for

292 is paper reports on a miniaturized microbial fuel cell with a microfluidic flow-through configuration

293 )Zr(0.1)Y(0.1)O(3-delta) can be applied in a fuel cell with good electrolyte functionality, achieving

294 On this basis, a H(2)-powered fuel cell with hyper-thermostable hydrogenase (SHI) as t

295 The hydroxide exchange membrane fuel cell with Ru(7)Ni(3)/C anode can deliver a high pea

296 further studied in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells with encouraging performance.

297 This work provides proton exchange membrane fuel cells with enhanced power performance, improved dur

298 n, we herein report proton exchange membrane fuel cells with significantly enhanced power performance

299 removal of free iron, but provides microbial fuel cells with superior performances.

300 erformance in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell, yielding a maximal power density of 820 mW cm