ライフサイエンスコーパス: functional residual capacity

1 0.3 mm; alveolar depth, 0.14 mm at 1 L above functional residual capacity).

2 e positive end-expiratory pressure maintains functional residual capacity.

3 nt breath-hold CT at total lung capacity and functional residual capacity.

4 eal tube in an amount estimated to represent functional residual capacity.

5 ived intratracheal perflubron to approximate functional residual capacity.

6 al ventilation to a volume approximating the functional residual capacity.

7 at total lung capacity, and air trapping at functional residual capacity.

8 volume ], functional residual capacity [ FRC functional residual capacity ], 1 L above FRC functional

9 onal residual capacity (16-20 mL/kg) or half functional residual capacity (10 mL/kg) before the initi

10 ron via the endotracheal tube at either full functional residual capacity (16-20 mL/kg) or half funct

11 preinjury gas functional residual capacity (functional residual capacity = 18.6+/-1.5 [SEM] mL/kg).

12 mean temperature) was associated with lower functional residual capacity (-21.9 mL; 95% CI, -42.4 to

13 n temperature) was associated with decreased functional residual capacity (-39.7 mL; 95% CI, -68.6 to

14 45, or 60 mL of perflubron (initial volume = functional residual capacity + additional volume).

15 By measurements of functional residual capacity after endotracheal suctioni

16 e parameters in patients with no decrease of functional residual capacity after suctioning.

17 d oxygenation in patients with a decrease of functional residual capacity after suctioning.

18 y pressure swings, end-expiratory reading at functional residual capacity allows for minimal influenc

19 phy (less than -856 Hounsfield units [HU] at functional residual capacity and -950 HU at total lung c

20 CT was performed at suspended functional residual capacity and at residual volume in t

21 ults from (1)H signal difference between FRC functional residual capacity and FRC+1 L 1 L above FRC (

22 level as the preinjury levels ("normalized" functional residual capacity and respiratory system comp

23 t a mean airway pressure that maintained the functional residual capacity and static respiratory syst

24 ion, compliance, end-expiratory lung volume, functional residual capacity, and deadspace fraction.

25 , midarm circumference, and BMI z score with functional residual capacity, and of WHR with FEV(1)/FVC

26 ad an impact on distribution of ventilation, functional residual capacity, and oxygenation in patient

27 .3 +/- 0.3 [mean +/- SEM] to 7.7 +/- 0.4 L), functional residual capacity, and residual volume.

28 that liquid lung ventilation dosing at full functional residual capacity before bypass is more effec

29 Differences in pulmonary functional residual capacity, blood volume, chest wall a

30 lung strains (ratio between tidal volume and functional residual capacity) but different lung strain

31 (ERV), of neck, midarm, and BMI z score with functional residual capacity, but only of WHR with inspi

32 iratory pressure levels after inflation from functional residual capacity, but peaked at moderate pos

33 e end-expiratory pressure 10) increased mean functional residual capacity by 368 mL when pleural effu

34 ed to improve tidal compliance and increased functional residual capacity by only 77 mL, whereastidal

35 nd 4 weeks after unilateral valve insertion, functional residual capacity decreased from 7.1 (1.5) to

36 density changes from total lung capacity to functional residual capacity (DeltaHU); gradients of Del

37 -volume loops performed after inflation from functional residual capacity demonstrated incremental, c

38 Full functional residual capacity dosing may optimize alveola

39 s improve oxygen delivery compared with half functional residual capacity dosing.

40 tes static respiratory system compliance and functional residual capacity during high-frequency oscil

41 asured by average maximal expiratory flow at functional residual capacity during infancy and at age 6

42 for mild parenchymal destruction, Dlco% and functional residual capacity for severe parenchymal dest

43 above the upper limit of normal (RV-HI) or a functional residual capacity (FRC) >120% predicted (FRC-

44 the effects of tidal volume lung inflation [functional residual capacity (FRC) + 500 ml and FRC + 1

45 pacity (TLC), affects the dependent 11 cm at functional residual capacity (FRC) and almost all the lu

46 Scans were performed at functional residual capacity (FRC) and at the end of a t

47 At predetermined intervals, functional residual capacity (FRC) and forced expiratory

48 entilation at different lung volumes between functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capaci

49 ung density at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC) combined, and the two

50 Rlp); however, within 30 min of sleep onset, functional residual capacity (FRC) fell and Rlp rose mor

51 ethysmographic assessments of lung volume at functional residual capacity (FRC) in infants.

52 Forced expiratory flows (FEFs) at functional residual capacity (FRC) increase with increas

53 Functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements made usi

54 orced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), and functional residual capacity (FRC) were measured in 20 p

55 g PaO2, PaCO2, ventilation efficiency index, functional residual capacity (FRC), and pressure-volume

56 ealthy subjects (n = 7) in the right lung at functional residual capacity (FRC), FRC+500 ml, and FRC+

57 phenomenon may be related to an increase in functional residual capacity (FRC); however, no previous

58 EEVL was altered from approximated functional residual capacity ("FRC") to 1.5 and 0.5 "FRC

59 mes (residual volume [ RV residual volume ], functional residual capacity [ FRC functional residual c

60 unctional residual capacity ], 1 L above FRC functional residual capacity [ FRC+1 L 1 L above FRC ],

61 tal lung capacity [TLC], or inspiration, and functional residual capacity [FRC], or expiration) from

62 [TLC]; -1.55 g/L per year [0.24] at TLC plus functional residual capacity [FRC]; and -1.60 g/L per ye

63 a volume equal to the measured preinjury gas functional residual capacity (functional residual capaci

64 functional residual capacity value (group A: functional residual capacity >94% of baseline; group B:

65 ty before bypass is more effective than half functional residual capacity in minimizing the lung inju

66 ffect, if any, on maximal expiratory flow at functional residual capacity in uninfected infants.

67 e improved and then peaked before declining, functional residual capacity increased, and blood gas im

68 Full functional residual capacity liquid lung ventilation adm

69 r bypass compared with both control and half functional residual capacity liquid lung ventilation ani

70 Full functional residual capacity liquid lung ventilation res

71 residual capacity >94% of baseline; group B: functional residual capacity <94% of baseline).

72 iding the recruitment strategy on changes of functional residual capacity may improve patient care.

73 Despite its insensitivity to changes in functional residual capacity, measuring transpulmonary p

74 a more likely need for intubation due to low functional residual capacity, more difficult intravenous

75 to receive cardiopulmonary bypass with full functional residual capacity perflubron (n = 7), cardiop

76 on (n = 7), cardiopulmonary bypass with half functional residual capacity perflubron (n = 7), or card

77 MR imaging (at functional residual capacity plus 1 L), CT (at full insp

78 ing the same breath hold at a lung volume of functional residual capacity plus 1 L.

79 = -0.61, P < .005) and percentage predicted functional residual capacity (r = 0.47, P < .05).

80 ignificant increased inspiratory resistance, functional residual capacity, right ventricular hypertro

81 months in measures of forced vital capacity, functional residual capacity, serum vascular endothelial

82 ean airway pressure and achieve "normalized" functional residual capacity, static compliance, and gas

83 Due to their lower tidal volumes and functional residual capacities the deposited mass is sma

84 uring surfactant administration by measuring functional residual capacity, tidal volume, the alveolar

85 ung density at expiratory CT and CT-measured functional residual capacity-to-total lung volume ratio.

86 l HIV have normal maximal expiratory flow at functional residual capacity (V'max,(FRC)).

87 Maximal flow at functional residual capacity (V'maxFRC) was measured in

88 tified into two groups by the postsuctioning functional residual capacity value (group A: functional

89 Functional residual capacity values were inversely assoc

90 tube in an amount estimated to represent the functional residual capacity, ventilating the animal for

91 Measurements of maximal flow at functional residual capacity (Vmax(FRC)) from partial fo

92 We measured maximal expiratory flows at functional residual capacity (Vmax(FRC)) in 169 of these

93 Maximal flow at functional residual capacity was measured using rapid th

94 yses, age-adjusted forced expiratory flow at functional residual capacity was not related to birth we

95 Functional residual capacity was significantly reduced b

96 ng lavage, respiratory system compliance and functional residual capacity were measured.

97 Changes in functional residual capacity were not significantly diff

98 abbits were killed, the lungs were filled to functional residual capacity with perflubron, followed b