戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  measure of autonomic symptoms and autonomic functional status).
2 nterventions on heart failure (HF) patients' functional status.
3 nt in situ technique is lacking for tracking functional status.
4 ered "too ill/old" were advanced age and low functional status.
5 hage removal via alteplase produces gains in functional status.
6 tion about the impact of HF interventions on functional status.
7 uding readmission, primarily due to impaired functional status.
8 e was not associated with downstream patient functional status.
9 s' asthma exacerbations on their caregivers' functional status.
10 r assessing mobility to predict mortality or functional status.
11                          No studies examined functional status.
12 italization for a respiratory condition, and functional status.
13 nt profile, and improved quality of life and functional status.
14 frail populations, because of confounding by functional status.
15 tions, incidence of surgical procedures, and functional status.
16 factors, subclinical CVD, comorbidities, and functional status.
17 tal tool for the evaluation of cognitive and functional status.
18 nied by improvements in peripheral edema and functional status.
19 ve replacement to improve their survival and functional status.
20  patient had an early return to his baseline functional status.
21 mmonly used as an indicator of mitochondrial functional status.
22 n, diabetes, heart disease, and preinfection functional status.
23 omes were in-hospital mortality, independent functional status.
24 nt demographics, comorbidities, and baseline functional status.
25 ithm in detail according to their Child-Pugh functional status.
26 et, age at assessment, SMN2 copy number, and functional status.
27 cription medications, self-rated health, and functional status.
28 essment of European Heart Rhythm Association functional status (1 class improvement and separately 1
29 ed P = .047) and less than fully independent functional status (12% recurrence rate with impaired fun
30      This study examined the distribution of functional status 3 months after stroke, determined whet
31 w of these patients.Objectives: To determine functional status 6 months after severe TBI in older adu
32 tically overlap in rodents, with the 5-HT2CR functional status acting as a neural rheostat to regulat
33 t Walk, Low-Contrast Letter Acuity), general functional status (Activities of Daily Living), and card
34 on, Modified Mini-Mental State Examination), functional status (activities of daily living, instrumen
35 1.14-1.32) and have an unfavorable discharge functional status (adjusted odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI: 1.
36 stment for general (age, sex, comorbidities, functional status, admission source, time to admission)
37 the association of long-term opioid use with functional status, adverse outcomes, and mortality among
38 the association of long-term opioid use with functional status, adverse outcomes, and mortality.
39 he embolism formation/removal affects vessel functional status after sample excision.
40 tions with limited ability to preserve their functional status, aggressive treatments, including surg
41  cannot be ruled out as a source of worsened functional status among patients receiving long-term opi
42                                              Functional status analysis may provide insights on candi
43 d associations between TNFR1 and 1) baseline functional status and 2) change in function over time, a
44         Among the participants, 49% had poor functional status and 76% had musculoskeletal pain.
45 but commonly reported gratitude for improved functional status and a perception of improved symptom b
46        Secondary outcomes included discharge functional status and adverse drug-related effects.
47  different patient profiles according to the functional status and autonomy for activities of daily l
48 d life expectancy derived from evaluation of functional status and comorbidity.
49 mmune cells within tumours may reflect their functional status and correlates with patient prognosis,
50                                              Functional status and dialysis were predictors of posttr
51 ork is important financially, as a marker of functional status and for self-esteem in patients develo
52 e progression in cognitive deficits, overall functional status and gait impairment gradually stabiliz
53 geal cancer, there is an increasing focus on functional status and health-related quality of life in
54 T provided comparable durable improvement in functional status and in quality of life up to 18 months
55 d APOE4 carriers, and performed less well on functional status and learning and memory than N- subjec
56 udinal in vivo imaging approach, we show how functional status and mass of beta-cells adapt in respon
57         Our data showed patients with better functional status and more functionally independent pati
58                                              Functional status and physical quality of life at 6 mont
59 e of the right ventricle (RV) in determining functional status and prognosis in multiple conditions.
60  to be a useful parameter for evaluating the functional status and prognosis of these eyes.
61 r emphasis on the impact of these factors on functional status and psychosocial adjustment.
62                  More comparative studies on functional status and quality of life are needed for inf
63 plane systolic excursion and improvements in functional status and quality of life over 1 year.
64              Data on clinical impact such as functional status and quality of life were not definitiv
65 llness and can have significant effects upon functional status and quality of life.
66 parable short-term (6-month) improvements in functional status and quality of life.
67  colonization on NF admission included lower functional status and recent exposure to glycopeptides (
68 EL who undergo VLNT/LVB demonstrate improved functional status and reduced affected limb volumes post
69  this population demonstrated improvement in functional status and right ventricular size and functio
70 the care of PWH may assist in improvement of functional status and risk stratification for age-relate
71 exia, a condition that significantly impairs functional status and survival.
72  into the systemic RV can be used to improve functional status and to delay the progression of ventri
73                 Key efficacy end points were functional status and ventricular function while tempora
74 ease, cancer, sepsis, ventilator dependence, functional status), and age.
75 propriate (focused initially on symptoms and functional status); and increased FDA and industry train
76 clinical stage 1 disease, 364 (99%) had high functional status, and 353 (96%) delivered vaginally.
77 ic factors such as life expectancy, impaired functional status, and cognitive decline warrant conside
78 ity, laboratory results, quality of life and functional status, and GI tract imaging.
79  lower preoperative serum albumin, had worse functional status, and had higher American Society of An
80 rapy (SET) improves walking ability, overall functional status, and health-related quality of life in
81 nic care facility or nursing home, dependent functional status, and higher American Society of Anesth
82 tilator- and vasoactive-free days at Day 28, functional status, and mortality.
83  sleep apnea, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia), functional status, and patient satisfaction.
84 ing diagnosis, pain severity, pain duration, functional status, and prior resource use.
85 luded ICU admission rate, in-hospital death, functional status, and quality of life (12-Item Short Fo
86 es care include maintenance of independence, functional status, and quality of life by reduction of s
87                 The impact on RV remodeling, functional status, and quality of life over the long-ter
88   Improvements in left ventricular function, functional status, and quality of life were observed in
89    To study 1-year changes in RV remodeling, functional status, and quality of life, we assessed pati
90 asis, other psychopathology, adverse events, functional status, and quality of life.
91 echocardiographic indexes of valve stenosis, functional status, and quality of life.
92 o, 16.273; 95% CI, 12.028-22.016), dependent functional status, and the need for a higher level of ca
93 entilator, ICU, and hospital days; discharge functional status; and mortality.
94 y of life, global change (overall, pain, and functional status), arthritis self-efficacy, coping, and
95  can significantly improve resident pain and functional status as well as clinical practice behaviour
96 strategies separate patients based on age or functional status as well as genetics [presence or absen
97  health, health-related quality of life, and functional status, as assessed with the use of questionn
98 ween 1 h and 24 h-and the primary outcome of functional status, as defined by the distribution of sco
99             For patients undergoing alloHCT, functional status, as measured by instrumental activitie
100 tive was to evaluate the association between functional status, as measured by Karnofsky Performance
101                                              Functional status assessment methods are important as ou
102 se (MELD) >/=12 at a single center underwent functional status assessments at every outpatient visit
103 nt standardized neurological examination and functional status assessments before and every 24 weeks
104 mission, major complications, and decline in functional status at 30 days, and it was measured in all
105 association between frailty and mortality or functional status at 6 months or later in patients aged
106                      The primary outcome was functional status at 90 days measured by shift in modifi
107 no significant effect of the intervention on functional status at 90 days post-discharge.
108                 Outcome assessments included functional status at 90 days using the modified Rankin S
109 ute respiratory failure.Methods: We assessed functional status at baseline, discharge, and 6 months a
110 rolonged intensive care unit stays, and poor functional status at discharge (P < 0.05).
111 ipated in an ICU mobility program had better functional status at discharge from the ICU.
112 ality in patients with marked improvement in functional status at discharge was 64% less than patient
113 We sought to examine the association between functional status at hospital discharge in survivors of
114                                        Lower functional status at hospital discharge in survivors of
115                                              Functional status at hospital discharge may be a risk fa
116 tic regression model, the lowest quartile of functional status at hospital discharge was associated w
117      Results of VA testing and self-reported functional status based on activities of daily living (A
118 , breast-specific symptoms, arm and shoulder functional status (Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale
119 er, long-term opioid therapy did not improve functional status but rather was associated with a highe
120 comprising assessment of cardiac parameters, functional status by 6-minute walk test, quality of life
121 e was also greater improvement in cognition, functional status, caregiver burden, CGI scores, and dep
122     Methylphenidate also improved cognition, functional status, caregiver burden, CGI scores, and dep
123  the following domains be evaluated in a GA: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, mental health
124 icantly reduced residents' pain and improved functional status compared to usual care without access
125 gression, symptom worsening, and decrease in functional status, compared with placebo.
126 splantation survival with pretransplantation functional status data (physical function [PF] scale of
127       Cognitive function and all measures of functional status declined with age; these changes were
128                                              Functional status declines with aging, thus impeding aut
129                Serum ES correlated with poor functional status, decreased exercise tolerance, and inv
130          The principal outcome was favorable functional status defined as a Cerebral Performance Cate
131                                 Magnitude of functional status deterioration also increased over time
132 surgical critical illness, the prevalence of functional status deterioration and magnitude increased
133                Identifying the prevalence of functional status deterioration and primary etiologies a
134 xamine the prevalence and secular changes of functional status deterioration during hospitalization a
135                      During the past decade, functional status deterioration increased in each diseas
136                                              Functional status deterioration occurred in 38,116 patie
137 ation and primary etiologies associated with functional status deterioration will elucidate vital are
138 categories having the highest odds of severe functional status deterioration.
139                 The exposure of interest was functional status determined at hospital discharge by a
140                             Patient-reported functional status, documented adverse outcomes, and mort
141 evelop and validate a measure of caregivers' functional status during a preschooler's asthma exacerba
142 Few instruments exist to measure caregivers' functional status during a young child's asthma exacerba
143 icant improvement in all-cause mortality and functional status during early and 3-year follow-up.
144            We found that facial expressions, functional status entailing extremity movement and postu
145 kidney transplant recipients with the lowest functional status experienced modest improvements in fun
146 , pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety, functional status, fatigue, and sleep disturbance.
147           We ascertained pre- and postmorbid functional status from survey data.
148        There are limited data describing the functional status (FS) of children after heart transplan
149 National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), functional status (functional independence measure score
150 I components using Harrell ranking, impaired functional status, identified as nonindependent function
151 r primary patency, lower CD-TLR, and similar functional status improvement with fewer repeat interven
152 od pressure was continuously associated with functional status (improvement per 10 mm Hg increase adj
153                  Furthermore, patients whose functional status improves before discharge have decreas
154 at home, managed by dialysis staff, improves functional status in adult patients on dialysis.
155 tivity is a measure of HF-related and global functional status in HF with preserved ejection fraction
156         TAVR resulted in better survival and functional status in inoperable patients with severe aor
157     Older age is an independent predictor of functional status in patients with DCM.
158 liflozin Effects on Biomarkers, Symptoms and Functional Status in Patients with HF with Reduced Eject
159 ept for a shorter time to return to baseline functional status in the short-course therapy arm.
160 othetical scenario that recipients with poor functional status in this cohort experienced modest impr
161 hemodynamics, RV structure and function, and functional status in treatment-naive patients with SSc-P
162             All patients had improvements in functional status, in exercise capacity as evaluated by
163 al impact on the geriatric patients' overall functional status, in particular in euvolemic cases.
164 loyment clinical assessment as well as later functional status, including evaluation of occupational
165 ge and is associated with a major decline in functional status, increased myocardial infarction and s
166 re associated with long-term trajectories of functional status independently of vascular risk factors
167 ars or older, free of cancer, with preserved functional status (Index of Independence in Activities o
168          We sought to develop and validate a functional status instrument to assess asthma exacerbati
169 val analyses recommend possible inclusion of functional status into SRTR's risk-adjusted models.
170                                              Functional status is a key patient-centric outcome, but
171                                              Functional status is an important determinant of posttra
172 Linking of therapeutic targets to individual functional status is mandatory and very tight glucose co
173 ement and Transplantation Network, patient's functional status is measured using the Karnofsky perfor
174 h status (eg, quality of life, symptoms, and functional status) is poorly defined.
175 ost-LT transplant costs were older age, poor functional status (KPS 10%-40%), living donor LT, pre-LT
176 associated with higher mortality and reduced functional status, leading to higher rate of institution
177                                 We evaluated functional status, level of activity, respiratory status
178 ere receiving long-term opioids had multiple functional status markers that were modestly poorer even
179 justed odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.6); no functional status markers were improved by long-term use
180 r, health and strategies to optimize patient functional status may help to reduce unplanned rehospita
181 of frailty preoperatively, such as improving functional status, may improve perioperative outcomes an
182  MSA-C (n=49) had much the same symptoms and functional status: mean UMSARS I 25.2 (SD 8.08) versus 2
183  and outcomes such as social functioning and functional status, measured after hospital discharge.
184 s well as other patient-reported symptom and functional status measures.
185  hazards models (adjusted for age, sex, PSI, functional status, medications) to determine rates and i
186          A summary measure of health such as functional status might enable transplant professionals
187 ar Study; 2002-2014), we examined changes in functional status (modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Rivermea
188 mary outcome was hospital survival with good functional status (modified Rankin Score, 0-3) at hospit
189                                              Functional status (mRS score distribution) at 90 days di
190 ver time and is predictive for the patient's functional status, muscle strength and mortality risk.
191 ility program in the ICU performed better on functional status, muscle, mobility, and respiratory ass
192 d 313 (92.6%) of surviving patients had good functional status (New York Heart Association class I/II
193 ility of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the ava
194 se cardiac arrest survivors, improvements in functional status occur over the first 6 months after th
195 was 64% less than patients with no change in functional status (odds ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.24-0.53];
196  these conditions; however, except for worse functional status (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.8),
197 lity compared with patients with independent functional status (odds ratio, 7.63 [95% CI, 3.83-15.22;
198 se findings suggest that xerC may impact the functional status of agr.
199   Our findings provide new insights into the functional status of antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells mai
200 ed a convolutional neural network to predict functional status of CYP2D6 haplotypes, called Hubble.2D
201          We also discuss their impact on the functional status of each receptor.
202  (Ago1) and Argonaute 2 (Ago2) to assess the functional status of individual miRNA species.
203  potential use of tf-fMRI to investigate the functional status of language networks in patients for w
204 n is lacking on the morphologic features and functional status of mesenteric lymphatics in CD.
205 exercise was the most effective in improving functional status of obese older adults.
206 , such as the location of irradiation or the functional status of organs at risk.
207 elomerase activity but is independent of the functional status of p53 and Rb.
208  of septic acute kidney injury and impact on functional status of PICU survivors are unknown.
209                              We assessed the functional status of platelets by performing ELISA, west
210 nformative diagnostic tool for assessing the functional status of spinal and supraspinal circuits.
211                        We concluded that the functional status of T cells before and after liver tran
212            This is determined in part by the functional status of the donor and donor organ, function
213 l and morphological parameters to assess the functional status of the endocrine pancreas.
214 olecular cochaperone that contributes to the functional status of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) an
215 ide real-time assessment of the anatomic and functional status of the human carotid artery bifurcatio
216  previous TIRADS publications considered the functional status of the nodules.
217 keletal muscle were highly correlated to the functional status of the patients and provided additiona
218 ctional status of the donor and donor organ, functional status of the recipient, and conduct of the o
219 tail the different cell constituents and the functional status of the vasculature, and discuss prospe
220 g a widely used approach to characterize the functional status of transcriptional regulatory circuits
221 ial information regarding the dimensions and functional status of xylem conduits during dehydration.
222 evelopment of noninvasive tools to study the functional status of xylem networks in planta.
223 ween AF and exercise training on measures of functional status or clinical outcomes (all p > 0.10).
224 9; 95% CI, 3.46-3.71), and totally dependent functional status (OR = 2.27; 95% CI, 2.11-2.44).
225 ctional status, identified as nonindependent functional status (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.21; P < .01)
226 dverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, in functional status, or in quality of life at 12 months.
227 ticomponent instruments predicted mortality, functional status, or MACCEs, but the quality of evidenc
228 ailty instruments used to predict mortality, functional status, or major adverse cardiovascular and c
229 erebrovascular events, deaths, readmissions, functional status, or quality of life at 1 year.
230 t experiences with care, including symptoms, functional status, or quality of life.
231 tory measures of ventricular performance and functional status over time.
232 ment evaluation were not predictive of later functional status (P = .12-.8).
233 ies, decreased cognitive function, decreased functional status, parenteral nutrition, and pressure ul
234 t long-term survival and maintenance of good functional status post-PEA.
235 pensity matching to control for comorbidity, functional status, postoperative complications, and stag
236 id conditions, which might negatively affect functional status, quality of life, and survival.
237 s survival, quality-adjusted life-years, and functional status; receipt of social support, nutritiona
238                              The benefits to functional status remained during follow-up.
239 lly evaluated prior to LT, considering their functional status, renal function, and cardiovascular ri
240 18 years old or older, prearrest independent functional status, resuscitation from cardiac arrest, an
241 ymptoms (RRR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12, 2.17), lower functional status (RRR 2.46, 95% CI 1.21, 4.98) and self
242 ect or underlying disease/substrate, and the functional status (S) of the disease using both the Amer
243 attern (G), etiological information (E), and functional status (S).
244 nadjusted morbidity rates (measured with the Functional Status Scale and defined as an increase of >/
245         New morbidity was assessed using the Functional Status Scale and defined as worsening by two
246                                              Functional Status Scale and POPC/PCPC scores determined
247 ed as increase greater than or equal to 3 in Functional Status Scale from baseline.
248                Admission body mass index and Functional Status Scale scores at admission, PICU discha
249 mission source, diagnostic factors, baseline Functional Status Scale, and the Pediatric Risk of Morta
250 uality of Life Inventory or the Stein-Jessop Functional Status Scale.
251 ic Quality of Life Inventory or Stein-Jessop Functional Status Scale.
252 g >/=1 year post-HT from 2005 to 2014 with a functional status score (FSS) available at 3 time points
253                         The unadjusted Short Functional Status score (GC group only) declined from 4.
254 y condition, an income <$35 000, and a lower functional status score (P < .01 for all).
255 ositive correlations (r = 0.30-0.95) between Functional Status Score for the ICU and other physical f
256                                          The Functional Status Score for the ICU and the ICU Mobility
257                                              Functional Status Score for the ICU at ICU discharge pre
258 % and specificity of 73.6% CONCLUSIONS:: The Functional Status Score for the ICU at ICU discharge pro
259                                          The Functional Status Score for the ICU at ICU discharge was
260             The area under the curve for the Functional Status Score for the ICU at ICU discharge was
261                                          The Functional Status Score for the ICU demonstrated good to
262                                          The Functional Status Score for the ICU has good internal co
263                                            A Functional Status Score for the ICU score at ICU dischar
264 ity was demonstrated by significantly higher Functional Status Score for the ICU scores among patient
265   Responsiveness was supported via increased Functional Status Score for the ICU scores with improvem
266 % confidence interval 0.70-9.74; P=0.02) and functional status scores (+5.65, 95% confidence interval
267 isit 3: 70.8, 95% CI 65.3-76.3; P=0.016) and functional status scores (visit 1: 62.2, 95% CI 58.5-66.
268 ion; therefore, standardized measurements of functional status should be considered to optimize candi
269                          Measures of patient functional status should be included in trials to better
270 associated with resident's gender, dementia, functional status, staffing level, or the level of depen
271                      The primary outcome was functional status (Stroke Impact Scale-16); secondary ou
272 uretic peptide (NT-proBNP)) and a measure of functional status (such as exercise capacity).
273 ated the adverse impact of housing damage on functional status, suggesting a buffering mechanism.
274                                    The Short Functional Status survey of 5 activities of daily living
275  serves as a robust biomarker for tumor LKB1 functional status that can be integrated into clinical t
276  2 clinically relevant factors (symptoms and functional status) that may predict TAVR outcomes.
277               Depending on visual acuity and functional status, this may have implications for injury
278 ature-derived functional studies to assign a functional status to CYP2D6 haplotypes.
279 ents but 1 demonstrated improvements in NYHA functional status (to class II) with pronounced reductio
280 ts; however, the independent contribution of functional status towards costs is understudied.
281 rm survivors were assessed for cognitive and functional status (using Cerebral Performance Category a
282 al status (12% recurrence rate with impaired functional status vs 7% for fully independent; adjusted
283                     Across a wide age range, functional status was an independent predictor of posttr
284                                        Renal functional status was analyzed by levels of serum creati
285                                              Functional status was assessed by 6-minute walk test at
286                                              Functional status was assessed with Glasgow Outcome Scal
287                       Survival with improved functional status was better with HMII LVAD compared wit
288                                     Physical functional status was categorized as fully independent,
289 ssessment of enrolled patients; survival and functional status was determined 12 months later.
290                         The association with functional status was independent of age, sex, World Fed
291 physical frailty at baseline, although their functional status was similar to men at 12 months.
292              To systematically resolve their functional status, we performed a massively parallel scr
293                         Symptom severity and functional status were also assessed.
294                                   Safety and functional status were assessed over 3 weeks of follow-u
295                   Higher motor and cognitive functional status were associated with lower hospital re
296 eumonia over 5 years and those with impaired functional status were at particularly high risk.
297  than 3-month or incomplete data on previous functional status were excluded in the stringent analyse
298 ects on cosmetic status and arm and shoulder functional status, which might inform shared decision ma
299 nd that Hubble.2D6 predicts CYP2D6 haplotype functional status with 88% accuracy in a held-out test s
300 amined the relationship between survival and functional status with multivariable Cox regression, adj

 
Page Top