ライフサイエンスコーパス: functional trait

1 ralism, we measured host growth benefits and functional traits.

2 species distributions influenced by species functional traits.

3 ical forest and how it correlated with eight functional traits.

4 us species and assessing 96 non-reproductive functional traits.

5 sition that remains after including measured functional traits.

6 ensitivities are random with regard to their functional traits.

7 omes, phylogenetic and functional groups and functional traits.

8 tensity, forest disturbance history and tree functional traits.

9 residual variation after including measured functional traits.

10 elate to plant life histories and associated functional traits.

11 kely related to interspecific differences in functional traits.

12 dient of specialism that can be predicted by functional traits.

13 encompassing 629 communities (plots) and 36 functional traits.

14 minant species are characterized by specific functional traits.

15 entities (FEs): i.e., unique combinations of functional traits.

16 a result of species-specific differences in functional traits.

17 ies comprising tree species with contrasting functional traits.

18 these groups are structured by their species functional traits.

19 unities, but was largely independent of most functional traits.

20 is to define species' niches on the basis of functional traits.

21 an forest plot in relation to field-measured functional traits.

22 ationships between these impacts and species functional traits.

23 ntion to the potential synergy between these functional traits.

24 habitat adaptation, evolutionary history and functional traits.

25 s is coupled to biogeochemical processes via functional traits.

26 hat support for its predictions varies among functional traits.

27 l as subsets of species possessing different functional traits.

28 Knowing that functional traits account for most of the phylogenetic p

29 model for Asclepias syriaca to identify how functional traits affect vital rates and population grow

30 nondestructively identify a number of foliar functional traits affected by drought that can be used a

31 ompounds in litter are potentially important functional traits affecting decomposition, and simple me

32 the genetic basis of plasticity in a classic functional trait, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity i

33 hold comprehensive per-species data on plant functional traits, allowing a detailed functional descri

34 st naturally arising VM cells display unique functional traits, allowing them to form a bridge betwee

35 If not, then measured functional traits alone may be insufficient to explain c

36 We explored trends in invertebrate community functional traits along a gradient of drought intensity,

37 mely community-weighted means (CWM) of plant functional traits, also explained variation in soil micr

38 This may arise from diverse functional traits among species.

39 ability of wood density - an important plant functional trait and environmental proxy - in conifers i

40 Here, we leverage functional trait and long-term demographic data to build

41 ibility of niche classification schemes from functional trait and performance data.

42 ations will depend on research that produces functional trait and performance datasets directly relat

43 urhood models of tree growth to quantify how functional trait and phylogenetic similarities predict v

44 ection driving the evolution of an important functional trait and show that black swan events contrib

45 For each species, we regressed 13 functional traits and 2 ecological constraints to disper

46 , the system can preserve a diverse array of functional traits and also allow for particular traits t

47 nderstanding the functional linkages between functional traits and climate that may improve the recon

48 to analyse relationships between root system functional traits and climate, soil and stand characteri

49 he degree to which g(sn) co-varied with leaf functional traits and daytime gas-exchange rates.

50 ative studies integrating genetic structure, functional traits and dispersal constraints.

51 mographic records and extensive databases of functional traits and distribution patterns to understan

52 sured within- and among-species variation in functional traits and growth and determined stand-level

53 ses to both sensory pollutants linked to the functional traits and habitat affiliations of species.

54 The interplay between functional traits and habitat associations drives specie

55 The functional traits and habitat characteristics of the fun

56 ying the overlap in information derived from functional traits and phylogenies remain underdeveloped.

57 cies and report strong relationships between functional traits and plant life histories.

58 ion, which has a profound influence on plant functional traits and productivity.

59 ted bacteria reveals the loss of many common functional traits and provides insights into possible me

60 oplankton ecophysiology and growth, based on functional traits and resource-allocation trade-offs, to

61 urce-conservative traits, showing that plant functional traits and soil microbial communities are clo

62 port for a mechanistic link between climate, functional traits and species that affects geographical

63 saccharides relies on apparent redundancy in functional traits and the high frequency of lytic polysa

64 processes structuring food webs that include functional traits and their naturally occurring variatio

65 Functional traits and their variation mediate plant spec

66 r unique dataset covered 52 fish species, 15 functional traits, and 3,660 stations sampled during the

67 ntain more taxa are more likely to have more functional traits, and a positive association is therefo

68 , and feedbacks between grass species, their functional traits, and consumers have profound effects o

69 we need to describe both response and effect functional traits, and how they sort within communities,

70 between individual tree performance, species functional traits, and mechanisms of tropical forest suc

71 s to determine whether plant leaf and litter functional traits, and particularly leaf and litter nitr

72 When functional traits are evolutionarily conserved, phylogen

73 Functional traits are frequently used to evaluate plant

74 Fire and herbivore functional traits are generally considered separately, b

75 Functional traits are increasingly being used to predict

76 e, (2) generate hypotheses about which plant functional traits are likely to interact with particular

77 The extent to which phylogeny and functional traits are linked in host-associated microbes

78 litter decay were unrelated, suggesting that functional traits are not phylogenetically conserved acr

79 pical forest, and how species abundances and functional traits are related to interspecific variation

80 Functional traits are the essential phenotypes that unde

81 Plant functional traits are viewed as key to predicting import

82 Foliar functional traits are widely used to characterize leaf a

83 avioral differences, which are in themselves functional traits, are associated with suites of physiol

84 acterize the temporal change in the species' functional trait assemblage.

85 ted a covariance between neutral markers and functional traits associated with a species' ability to

86 microbial and chemical diversity as well as functional traits associated with coral holobionts, toge

87 ful framework for predictions of belowground functional traits at global scales.

88 Phylogenetic and functional trait-based analyses inform our understanding

89 Our functional trait-based approach shows, for the first tim

90 nformation and integrates variation in plant functional traits between and within plant species.

91 Mutualisms evolve through the matching of functional traits between partners, such as tongue lengt

92 he after-life consequences of this key plant functional trait by demonstrating that its effect on dec

93 Changes in this key functional trait can therefore have important implicatio

94 demonstrating that different combinations of functional traits can act to maximize ANPP in a given en

95 Here, we show that plant functional traits can be used as predictors of vegetatio

96 in at least one system of interacting taxa, functional traits can be used to predict consistent, wid

97 Here, we test whether functional traits can explain community responses to sea

98 errestrial plant communities have shown that functional traits can help reveal the mechanisms underly

99 Functional traits can impact population growth and quant

100 ring that linking species responses to their functional traits can increase understanding of ecosyste

101 Our results indicate not only that sperm functional traits can influence the outcome of sperm com

102 Plant functional traits can vary widely as a result of phenoty

103 ther aspects of plant biology, such as plant functional traits, change within the limits of abiotic s

104 semble those of the present, here we analyze functional trait changes in a comprehensive dataset of 3

105 We found that the functional traits characterizing Arctic fish communities

106 d traits, or, alternatively, preservation of functional trait combinations.

107 Functional trait composition had a larger predictive pow

108 lso systematically shifted the taxonomic and functional trait composition of the phytoplankton, favor

109 c, functional and phylogenetic diversity and functional-trait composition.

110 This finding demonstrates that plant functional traits constitute a highly useful concept for

111 insight into the role of climate in driving functional trait coordination, local adaptation and gene

112 Here, we develop a novel approach by linking functional trait data with 7000 years of forest dynamics

113 ary niche width and trophic position are key functional traits describing a consumer's trophic ecolog

114 ng the 147 taxa based on similarity among 21 functional traits describing feeding source, major mouth

115 The changes in functional traits detected in the Arctic can be predicte

116 y understood in terms of the contribution of functional trait differences between species.

117 ults highlight the spectrum of ways in which functional trait differences can shape community dynamic

118 We find that functional trait differences reflect variation in (1) sp

119 els can predict ecosystem processes based on functional trait distributions in a community.

120 t drive variation in community structure and functional trait distributions.

121 We conducted an extensive test of functional trait divergence and plasticity in conferring

122 Our data demonstrate a general suite of functional trait divergences between C3 and C4 species,

123 weighted means of trait values (CWM) and (2) functional trait diversity based on Rao's quadratic dive

124 ributed to differences in community-specific functional trait diversity, as well as community composi

125 Monocytes acquire different functional traits during polarization to the classical p

126 ies and compared them with a series of other functional traits, environmental metrics, and species ab

127 s used in this study, expanding the range of functional traits estimated by hyperspectral data can he

128 his study investigated the mode and tempo of functional trait evolution across 15 species of Sphagnum

129 trophic position and diet breadth influence functional trait evolution in one of the most species-ri

130 ution with symbionts such as ants and fungi, functional trait evolution, hybridization, invasiveness,

131 mechanisms underlying community assembly and functional trait evolution.

132 w that, in contrast with established theory, functional traits evolve fastest in trophic specialists

133 pic change within a lineage is shaped by how functional traits evolve.

134 As the range of studies on macroecology and functional traits expands, integration of traits into hi

135 Functional traits explained some of the variation in dro

136 orth America, and explore the linkages among functional trait expression, climate and phylogeny.

137 We measured 16 functional traits for 16 congeneric species from six fam

138 biology to simultaneously optimise multiple functional traits for biofuel productivity and resilienc

139 We use global species distributions and functional traits for birds and mammals to identify the

140 Our results illustrate the value of functional traits for understanding patterns of drought-

141 Considering a plant species as a set of functional traits greatly increases our possibilities fo

142 ugh local adaptation and plasticity in plant functional traits have been documented for many species,

143 eplaced by species with resource-acquisitive functional traits (high specific leaf area, tall stature

144 tches, their costs and the relationship with functional traits highlight the nuanced relationships be

145 orm influences avian reassembly directly via functional traits (i.e. behavioral adaptations), or indi

146 ses, on the importance of flexibility in key functional traits in adapting to new environments, on fa

147 ach may be extended to other metabolites and functional traits in diverse ecosystems.

148 The growing use of functional traits in ecological research has brought new

149 association studies (GWASs) of quantitative functional traits in much larger cohorts of more careful

150 he cytoplasmic membrane, resulted in loss of functional traits in N. meningitidis and E. coli Our stu

151 les of plant species identity, phylogeny and functional traits in shaping rhizosphere fungal communit

152 titative disease resistance and quantitative functional traits in the wild model plant species, Medic

153 eas later phenophases were best explained by functional traits including overwintering stage and nest

154 ependent from astrocytes and showed superior functional traits (increased polarity and calcium flux).

155 Trait-based approaches assume that simple functional traits influence fitness and life history evo

156 rates differ among global biomes and whether functional traits influence the risk of drought-induced

157 the dominance, diversity and range of plant functional traits, influence N uptake and retention in t

158 ors that shape macroevolutionary patterns in functional traits is a central goal of evolutionary biol

159 such as Ellenberg indicator values and plant-functional traits is also discussed.

160 ntifying the apparent and true plasticity in functional traits is important because the allometric re

161 demography on changes in the composition of functional traits is not well known.

162 However, its coordination with key plant functional traits is poorly understood, and prevents dev

163 n ancestry, monophyletic groups, and derived functional traits-is explicitly based on Darwin's "desce

164 th elevation, with solar radiation and plant functional traits (leaf dry mass per area, leaf nitrogen

165 We analyzed the distribution of three functional traits - leaf dry matter content, specific le

166 s such as dynamic root distribution and root functional traits linked to resource extraction.

167 Plant species with resource-conservative functional traits (low specific leaf area, short stature

168 rive large-scale, multivariate forest canopy functional trait maps of the Peruvian Andes-to-Amazon bi

169 individuals across their distributions, and functional trait matching at sympatric sites.

170 thern populations show the highest degree of functional trait matching despite possessing the least e

171 Plant functional traits may be altered as plants adapt to vari

172 Elucidation of functional traits may enable the microbial complexity to

173 Focusing on 10 root functional traits measured on 76 woody species, we exami

174 DWTs - water tables), together with species functional traits, mediated climate effects on trees.

175 en community abundance, species richness and functional trait metrics with oilseed rape yield, a glob

176 We show how such functional traits models can be integrated with spatial

177 )), and M cell size; a second group included functional traits, net photosynthetic rate, transpiratio

178 cies from 8100 stream locations with species functional traits, nutrient excretion, and land remote s

179 We studied photosynthetic, hydraulic and functional traits of 11 plant species with photosyntheti

180 of channel gating but also reveals distinct functional traits of a beta-barrel outer membrane protei

181 The number of functional traits of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP)

182 t tolerance and in drought avoidance-related functional traits of a widespread gymnosperm (ponderosa

183 Castes are defining functional traits of adaptive phenotypic change in compl

184 Combining species distribution models and functional traits of Andean Amazon fishes, coupled with

185 We measured morphological functional traits of collected spores and assessed aeria

186 We argue that the functional traits of each woody flora, specifically the

187 ng fern community diversity, we investigated functional traits of fern sporophytes and gametophytes a

188 nd exposure therapy effects, to identify the functional traits of individuals most likely to benefit

189 in unimmunized mice, display phenotypic and functional traits of memory cells and provide essential

190 xperienced cells that display phenotypic and functional traits of memory cells.

191 ata about the evolutionary relationships and functional traits of microbial communities that regulate

192 This finding links the functional traits of mycorrhizal fungi to carbon storage

193 Here, we examine the similarity of functional traits of native and nonnative submersed aqua

194 cologists have studied how the diversity and functional traits of plant and animal communities vary a

195 r results is that the apparent plasticity in functional traits of plants determines their response to

196 d to predictable shifts in the taxonomic and functional traits of soil microbial communities, includi

197 We compared functional traits of stingless bee species found in past

198 Robust links were established between the functional traits of taxa and their trophic interactions

199 s allows for replicating both structural and functional traits of the coral-algal symbiosis.

200 ngal habitats across a rainfall gradient and functional traits of the fungi related to stress toleran

201 metabolism, and membrane transport were the functional traits of the level 2 pathways.

202 is response on the particular structural and functional traits of the species.

203 defining ecosystem processes in terms of the functional traits of their constituent taxa across large

204 nts, determining the spatial distribution of functional traits of trees which are, in turn, correlate

205 tle is known about corresponding patterns in functional traits on islands and how, for example, they

206 lnerability to drought mortality and whether functional traits or climate mediate mortality patterns.

207 mation should spur the search for additional functional traits or other processes underlying communit

208 We find that climate and plant functional traits, particularly those related to maximum

209 The functional trait perspective we employed enabled capturi

210 Rates of diversification of three functional traits (plant height, leaf size, and seed siz

211 e we introduce and test a scoring scheme for functional traits present on the worn surfaces of large

212 shuffling of Arctic species compositions and functional trait profiles and diversity, thereby affecti

213 Plant functional traits provide a link in process-based vegeta

214 ently measured traits, our results show that functional traits provide a strong mechanistic foundatio

215 associated microbial communities in terms of functional traits rather than specific organisms.

216 We measured functional traits reflecting leaf metabolism and associa

217 Plant functional traits regulate ecosystem functions but littl

218 chanistically associated with soil bacterial functional traits related to carbon (C), nitrogen (N) an

219 tgrass prairie, we measured plant abundance, functional traits related to growth rate and drought tol

220 The study of leaf functional trait relationships, the so-called leaf econo

221 The magnitude of change in functional traits relative to normal temporal fluctuatio

222 by quantifying hypervolumes constructed from functional traits representing major axes of plant strat

223 in adult plants, but not for seeds, yet the functional trait seed life span underpins global agricul

224 Here, we explore whether five key plant functional traits (seed mass, wood density, specific lea

225 Theory indicates that if covariance among functional traits sets a limit on the number of viable t

226 With the identification of phenotypic and functional traits shared in different settings of T cell

227 lation5 (Crpgr5) mutant shows phenotypic and functional traits similar to mutants in the Arabidopsis

228 or of natural co-occurrence than measures of functional trait similarity and phylogenetic relatedness

229 ronments they had to gain new structural and functional trait solutions; our results suggest that man

230 rom the bolide impact resulted in a shift in functional trait space that likely had broad consequence

231 mbined as indigenous), and exotic species to functional-trait space across the nine islands of the Az

232 how the timing of flowering relates to other functional traits, species abundance, and average enviro

233 work on relative growth rate, recent work on functional trait spectra, and metabolic scaling theory,

234 Our study does not imply that functional trait spectra, such as the leaf economics spe

235 iochemistry and anatomical structure along a functional trait spectrum from fast, resource-acquisitiv

236 Here we quantify the phylogenetic and functional trait structure of 515 tropical and subtropic

237 s have explicitly tested the response of the functional trait structure of communities following clim

238 Recent functional trait studies have shown that trait differenc

239 d their distributions are closely related to functional traits such as biomass allocation patterns.

240 trategy and that adaptive plasticity in leaf functional traits such as LMA contributed to post-warmin

241 Endosymbiosis allows hosts to acquire new functional traits such that the combined host and endosy

242 proved by incorporating information on plant functional traits suggesting that the most commonly meas

243 ally differences among families) rather than functional traits, suggesting that it may eventually be

244 bacterial communities on tree leaves and the functional traits, taxonomy, and phylogeny of their plan

245 facilitated by the measurement of many more functional traits than have been examined in previous st

246 Predator hunting mode is thus a key functional trait that can help to explain variation in t

247 terplay with their environment through their functional traits that can be a response or an effect on

248 The identification of plant functional traits that can be linked to ecosystem proces

249 Yet, little is known about the key functional traits that determine the distribution of pop

250 Here, we identified functional traits that drive microbial survival and comm

251 l test of this idea and evaluate whether the functional traits that drive the well-known relationship

252 concept that secondary metabolites represent functional traits that help define Salinispora species.

253 derpin habitat specialization and associated functional traits that influence differences in biogeoch

254 genotypic variation may reflect variation in functional traits that influence the acquisition of envi

255 ersity and ecosystem-level processes through functional traits that link environment with individual

256 e root lifespan in temperate trees and plant functional traits that may reduce uncertainty in predict

257 el habitat preferences may indicate that the functional traits that underpin ecological adaptation of

258 icrobiomes harbor a wealth of as yet unknown functional traits that, in concert, can protect the plan

259 Here, we explore how a functional trait-the decomposition of organic matter, ca

260 fer unique thermal environments in which two functional traits-thermal tolerance and reproductive pho

261 and even the direction of plant responses in functional traits to climate change.

262 from the most extensive studies of Sphagnum functional traits to date and phylogenetic comparative m

263 antitatively linking individual variation in functional traits to demography is a necessary step to a

264 Using functional traits to explain species' range limits is a

265 We used functional traits to explore how dispersal limitation, m

266 to partition intraspecific variation in leaf functional traits to genotypic variation and phenotypic

267 ecies argue against the simple use of single functional traits to infer community assembly processes

268 hallenges of broadening the applicability of functional traits to macroecology.

269 Linking functional traits to plant growth is critical for scalin

270 he minimum dimensionality required for avian functional traits to predict subtle variation in trophic

271 ampling of leaf, seed, root, and whole-plant functional traits to relate phenotypic differences to st

272 ote diversity, empirical evidence connecting functional traits to the niche differences that stabiliz

273 We found that the functional-trait trade-off scales to the entire communit

274 ld a retina that displays the structural and functional traits typical of primate macula and fovea.

275 e Mongolian steppe, we examined whether leaf functional traits under ambient conditions and whether p

276 ted important drivers of the change in plant functional traits under warming climate, but studies on

277 onclude that herbivore diet breadth is a key functional trait underlying the trophic effects of carni

278 Bioluminescence is a prominent functional trait used for visual communication.

279 ng reported measurements, we developed grass functional trait values (physiological, structural, bioc

280 rrelations between species sensitivities and functional trait values can thus help to identify when e

281 e first to formally test the extent to which functional trait variation among Sphagnum species is a r

282 Large intraspecific functional trait variation strongly impacts many aspects

283 asses of coexistence mechanisms could act on functional trait variation, but some mechanisms will be

284 s. local adaptation-underlying intraspecific functional trait variation.

285 the 2000s across Europe by two dimensions of functional trait variation: the first dimension was main

286 uisition, yet understanding of how fine-root functional traits vary along environmental gradients, wi

287 Plant functional traits vary in direct dependence of light ava

288 ied, and correlated evolution of several key functional traits was demonstrated.

289 ophic linkages between multiple taxa sharing functional traits was tested within multivariate and log

290 Among leaf functional traits, we detected divergence in trait means

291 Single functional traits were often well correlated with averag

292 In contrast, single functional traits were poorly correlated with the stabil

293 logies and can contribute to the gain of new functional traits when transformed into competent bacter

294 pecies can impose selection on plasticity in functional traits, which may feed back through trait div

295 ese observations suggest that RbsABC2 shares functional traits with both type I and type II importers

296 argue that such predictions require linking functional traits with recognised coexistence mechanisms

297 studies suggest considering phenology as one functional trait within a plant's life history strategy.

298 ty of metrics describing the distribution of functional traits within a tropical forest community to

299 plots across the world to show how three key functional traits--wood density, specific leaf area and

300 ironmental variation often induces shifts in functional traits, yet we know little about whether plas