ライフサイエンスコーパス: fund

1 ndation, the Wellcome Trust, and the Fleming Fund.

2 tical Care Trials Group Research Coordinator Fund.

3 can Medical Association and The Commonwealth Fund.

4 Victorian Government Mental Illness Research Fund.

5 e Harvard Humanitarian Initiative Innovation Fund.

6 Melinda Gates Foundation, and Horchow Family Fund.

7 Population Health and internal departmental funds.

8 izure would save significant time and public funds.

9 A and 1B), even when purchased with windfall funds.

10 te of the art performance of venture capital funds.

11 as changes in market conditions and flows of funds.

12 especially when only a few proposals can be funded.

13 cide whether programs of screening should be funded.

14 d team of extramural investigators but never funded.

15 The trial ended early owing to loss of funding.

16 search advances are made possible by federal funding.

17 earch receives the highest percentage of NCI funding.

18 they receive priority in both attention and funding.

19 to starting salary and success with research funding.

20 family lack of access to clinics and clinic funding.

21 entists from countries with limited research funding.

22 bstantial funding gaps and threats to future funding.

23 es and syphilis received the lowest relative funding.

24 , interventionalist education and sufficient funding.

25 Since 1997, PDAC has received lesser funding ($1.41 billion) than other cancers such as breas

26 ural (KL2) or other career development award funding (55% vs 33%, P = 0.03) and more publications [me

27 otropic hypogonadism, the European Union has funded a number of scientific networks.

28 ational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funded a research programme to investigate visual halluc

29 everal decades, historically led by publicly funded academic innovators but in more recent times with

30 , policies need to be created, enforced, and funded across multiple sectors in a coordinated and equi

31 To achieve these goals, funding agencies and training programs must support a ne

32 akeholders, including scholarly communities, funding agencies, and institutions.

33 Innovators, BRAIN funding agencies, and non-Federal partners are working t

34 sults will encourage journals, institutions, funding agencies, and researchers to address this alarmi

35 ross the entire spectrum from investigators, funding agencies, as well as during the peer-review proc

36 ORA) was published in 2013 and described how funding agencies, institutions, publishers, organization

37 s such as healthcare providers, researchers, funding agencies, insurers, and engineers to actively wo

38 Efforts by researchers, funding agencies, journals, equipment manufacturers and

39 entific disciplines and call on researchers, funding agencies, peer-reviewed journals and universitie

40 ence will require a concerted effort between funding agencies, universities, and the public to rethin

41 e, ethnicity, and location from neuroscience funding agencies.

42 mental health researchers, institutional and funding agency officials, and international research col

43 scientific research and global political and funding agendas.

44 nvironmental targets under alternative REDD+ fund allocation options.

45 ethodologically sound trials with deliberate funding allocation.

46 COVID-19.FUNDINGBeatrice Kleinberg Neuwirth Fund and Fast Grant Emergent Ventures funding from the M

47 The Global Fund and Gavi were the largest multilateral donors, disb

48 dicine of University of Florence (the ex-60% fund and the "Excellence Departments 2018-2022 Project")

49 Global Good Fund and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

50 ademic Health Sciences Centre AFP Innovation Fund and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Ca

51 s for the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (publicly funded and initiated before licensure of the HPV vaccine

52 Results show the need for increased funding and evidence-based standard operating procedures

53 vices databases were queried for data on NIH funding and industry partnerships.

54 r, the fast-paced and fierce competition for funding and jobs can present a challenge to the younger

55 ion of genomic data, increased philanthropic funding and malicious uses of neurochemicals) to the env

56 iated with a high rate of subsequent NIH R01 funding and publication metrics.

57 Funding and resources for low prevalent neurodegenerativ

58 ations met to discuss possible solutions for funding and retaining early-stage investigators in resea

59 au: ACTRN12615000656538.FUNDINGPhilanthropic funding and the National Health and Medical Research Cou

60 e reality of structural racism in scientific funding and the widespread denial of its existence.

61 ce Fund, WWTF (Vienna Science and Technology Fund), and Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic.

62 Wellcome Trust, Global Challenges Research Fund, and Health Data Research UK.

63 ily Child and Youth Mental Health Innovation Fund, and The Catherine and Maxwell Meighen Foundation v

64 structural barriers to promotion, NIH grant funding, and academic advancement of Black/AA women as l

65 ctivity, National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, and industry partnerships.

66 niques, as well as difficulties in obtaining funding, and limited education in clinical epidemiology

67 iversity Research Foundation, Intramural NIH funding, and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute.

68 ined processes, a clear understanding of GME funding, and strategies for placement of trainees that m

69 he University of Washington Royalty Research Fund; and the University of Washington King K Holmes End

70 avi, the Vaccine Alliance; the UN Population Fund; and UNICEF; for which fixed percentages of aid wer

71 in diverse therapeutic and scientific areas, funded applications, publications, and provided impactfu

72 Much more work, focus and funding are needed for the novel approaches to result in

73 munity in which the vast majority of private funds are redirected towards influencing the prescriptio

74 New funding arrangements for general practitioners will be r

75 Institutes of Health and Burroughs Wellcome Fund/ASTMH Fellowship.

76 NACTRN12614000930684 and ACTRN12616000174482.FUNDING(Australian) National Health and Medical Research

77 elations between the dollar amount of relief funding authorized by the US Congress to fund prevention

78 atories, and those from centres with limited funding available.

79 ked asset allocators to rate venture capital funds based on their evaluation of a 1-page summary of t

80 We recommend that international funding be made available for such efforts, especially c

81 ed, stratified by school-level pupil premium funding (below/above county-specific median) and county

82 nd Blood Institute/National Cancer Institute-funded Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Netwo

83 uable aspect of science and required by most funding bodies and journals.

84 The funding bodies did not have roles in the design of the s

85 ociated with the development of simple tools funded by academic research grants.

86 The survey, funded by Aimmune Therapeutics, included sociodemographi

87 ontrolled superiority study (ISRCTN12562026, funded by Cultech Ltd), 220 Bulgarian participants (30 t

88 hoc manner by academic laboratories that are funded by grants directed towards the investigation of s

89 The STriTuVaD project, funded by Horizon 2020, aims to test through a Phase IIb

90 Other groups (51.6%) were funded by industry, whereas 2.6% were funded by the US N

91 ell as the subtypes of data science projects funded by NHLBI.

92 The studies funded by pharmaceutical industry were less likely to be

93 t season when TIV was relatively ineffective.Funded by Seqirus.

94 rials were less likely to be discontinued if funded by sources other than industry (hazard ratio [HR]

95 Funded by the Dutch Postcode Lottery in the Netherlands,

96 opean cuisine led to cultivation initiatives funded by the European Union.

97 Trials.gov NCT03727646.FUNDINGThis study was funded by the NIH, the University of Washington, and the

98 included use of demonstration project sites funded by the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP), which

99 ) were funded by industry, whereas 2.6% were funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH).

100 We analysed funding by donor for the 20 largest donors, by recipient

101 e Kate Amato Foundations; Burroughs Wellcome Fund CAMS; the Clinical Immunology Society; the American

102 and indeed highlights how foreign assistance funding can be transformative, in reducing the burden of

103 l Science Foundation of China, UN Population Fund, China Social Sciences Foundation, and Hong Kong Re

104 Center Frankfurt, and the Frankfurt Research Funding Clinician Scientist Program.

105 ed by 61 health departments and 150 directly-funded community-based organizations during 2012-2017 we

106 H funding post-award, including 82% with R01 funding, compared to 23% of nonselected applicants (P <

107 unity include maintenance of infrastructure, funding, completion of studies in the predetermined time

108 ying genetic discovery weighs heavily in our funding considerations as does the suitability of the pr

109 have achieved high levels of HIV diagnosis, funding constraints have necessitated greater focus on m

110 we have initiated a network of nine European-funded Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Acti

111 humanity faces, yet the field faces drastic funding cuts as society realigns its priorities in the f

112 Funding data were obtained from the National Cancer Inst

113 for Strategic Research, Independent Research Fund Denmark, Forte Foundation, Swedish Cancer Foundatio

114 Austrian Science Fund, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Koeln Fortune Pro

115 y for Women, Children, and Adolescents Trust Fund; Development and Data Science grant; and the Yemen

116 ause of slower-than-expected recruitment and funding discontinuation.

117 First, the tendency to fund edge science is mostly limited to basic science.

118 dship, including supporting countries to use funds effectively, evaluate results, and hold stakeholde

119 governmental (Finland) competitive research funds (EVO/VTR/TYH).

120 e, then the best way of raising conservation funds excludes the best way of spending it.

121 the economic downturn on available research funding, existing research tools and protocols may not m

122 Prescription drug user fee funding expanded from new drugs and biologics in 1992 to

123 r the randomisation phase and Vital Projects Fund for the follow-up phase.

124 l policy decision was made that SDR would be funded for eligible children in England from 2018.

125 We develop methods to link funding for avian breeding habitat conservation and mana

126 hich is vital given the massive shortfall in funding for biodiversity conservation.

127 ughly inspected due to limited personnel and funding for biological invasion prevention.

128 During this period, global funding for childhood cancer research was US$2 billion,

129 deforestation and US$ 7.6 billion in wasted funding for development projects.

130 Funding for Ebola virus ($1.2 billion), Zika virus ($0.3

131 racterizes government, academia, and private funding for gene therapy trials in the United States by

132 The government has since quadrupled its funding for health.

133 Key issues include funding for ID/HIV programs; the protection of public he

134 conservative despite initiatives to increase funding for innovative projects.

135 The US Congress approved $130 million funding for the 2019 fiscal year to support the developm

136 prudently selected flagships can both raise funds for conservation and help target where these resou

137 Children's Investment Fund Foundation and Swedish Research Council.

138 pment, Wellcome Trust, Children's Investment Fund Foundation, and London Centre for Neglected Tropica

139 Gates Foundation, The Children's Investment Fund Foundation, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)

140 anization recommendation and the approval of funding from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (Gavi), for the

141 , lions, and elephants, successfully attract funding from individuals and corporate donors.

142 uwirth Fund and Fast Grant Emergent Ventures funding from the Mercatus Center at George Mason Univers

143 k in the de Bono laboratory was supported by funding from the Movember Foundation/Prostate Cancer UK

144 Funding from the National Institutes of Health and use o

145 of the Acknowledgements: 'X.C. also received funding from the Shenzhen Basic Research Program JCYJ201

146 The trial ended early because of loss of funding from the sponsor.

147 In 2014 and with funding from the United Nations High Commissioner for Re

148 uPont-Warren Fellowship, Portuguese national funds from FCT and Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regi

149 echanisms.FUNDINGThis study was supported by funds from the Department of Experimental and Clinical M

150 ncome countries still experience substantial funding gaps and threats to future funding.

151 f modeling approaches that link conservation funding, habitat delivery, and population response to be

152 In this regard, NIH funding has become more conservative despite initiatives

153 stitutes of Health, foundation, and industry funding have provided important opportunities to advance

154 In the 4 federally funded health centers studied, cost-of-care conversation

155 h advanced open angle glaucoma in a publicly funded health service.

156 ancial assets under management across mutual funds, hedge funds, real estate, and private equity, few

157 ers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded HIV testing data submitted by 61 health departmen

158 A total of 19 739 857 CDC-funded HIV tests were conducted during 2012-2017.

159 ents between 2005 and 2015 from 6 government-funded hospitals participating in a multicenter registry

160 Publicly funded HPV vaccination of female adolescents began in Au

161 This study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH

162 (Funded in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.).

163 ilateral donors, disbursing 46% of all RMNCH funding in 2017 (including shares of their core contribu

164 nspire new research directions and stimulate funding in this field.

165 ors' programmes and in the prioritisation of funds in resource-constrained settings.

166 Jason Farber Foundation, Will Power Research Fund Inc., the Isabella Kerr Molina Foundation, the Park

167 Funding innovative science is an essential element of th

168 f investigation, rather than because the NIH funds innovative papers within research areas.

169 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Global Good Fund, Institute for Disease Modeling, Swiss National Sci

170 Thus, NIH-funded institutions should develop and prioritize integr

171 advancing the science, including inadequate funding, insufficient knowledge to develop appropriate a

172 One of the aims of the European Union-funded "Integrated Approaches to Food Allergen and Aller

173 World Cancer Research Fund International, Cancer Research UK, Tehran Universit

174 assembly, once the exclusive domain of well-funded international consortia, have become increasingly

175 Among NIH-funded investigators, the median grant funding was $1.6M

176 celebrating the contributions of these BRAIN-funded investigators, the Mini-Symposium will illustrate

177 Future research and programmatic funding investments must be aligned with the geographica

178 The final allocation of this funding is not yet clear, and it is likely that addition

179 We found little evidence that funding is proactively guided by global burden or pandem

180 At a time when federal WIC funding is threatened, this study provides some of the f

181 by robust political support and sustainable funding, is the key to reducing this burden.

182 growing financial requirements, and shifting funding landscape, the global health community must acce

183 ot only a pipeline problem, and second, that funds led by people of color might paradoxically face th

184 ecause of the plan for its own trial, had no funds left for an investigator-initiated proposal.

185 pers that build on very recent ideas are NIH funded less often than are papers that build on ideas th

186 chrane Library, Health Business Elite, Kings Fund Library, HMIC, Medline, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Web of S

187 udies have illuminated racial disparities in funding, likely because of implicit bias in the review p

188 For full funding list see Acknowledgments.

189 Using a three-wave NSF-funded longitudinal survey of 559 engineering and comput

190 Discrepancies in research funding may contribute to stagnant survival rates in pan

191 to seek transparency in physician scientist funding mechanisms, and to encourage efforts to improve

192 ion, narrower margins, and decreased federal funding, medical schools are becoming increasingly invol

193 e Resources website, the joint portal of NIH-funded model organism databases.

194 ght, the Sun Yat-Sen University 5010 Project Fund, Moorfields Eye Charity, and the National Natural S

195 Second, novel papers tend to be NIH funded more often because there are more NIH-funded pape

196 ying historical disadvantages, disseminating funding more equitably across recipients would be an emp

197 vaccine (4CMenB, Bexsero) into its publicly funded national immunization program at a reduced two-do

198 p exists between available financing and the funding needed to achieve global HIV/AIDS goals, and sus

199 The FDA funding needed to implement and manage these programs ha

200 Ludwig Center, Weiss Family Kidney Research Fund, Novartis, The Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate an

201 used to measure research success - including funding, number of publications or journals published in

202 etenschappelijk Onderzoek, Clinical Research-Fund of the University Hospitals Leuven, and Research-Fo

203 he findings make a strong case for long-term funding of free well testing on a massive scale with pip

204 Funding of PDAC research is significantly less than othe

205 Funding of research towards early diagnosis of PDAC has

206 ty of literature in the scientific world, on funding opportunities across countries and institutions,

207 -income nation without universal, government-funded or -mandated health insurance employing a unified

208 ress or mitigate them, before commencing the funding or starting of the project.

209 set to guide policy makers, governments, and funding organisations to develop and implement action pl

210 es provide a unified guide for policymakers, funding organizations and researchers to strategically d

211 isions, and governmental and nongovernmental funding organizations to reinvigorate a vision for nurtu

212 The prize money will be used to fund outreach activities aimed at increasing inclusion i

213 funded more often because there are more NIH-funded papers in innovative areas of investigation, rath

214 Third, the NIH's tendency to have funded papers that build on the most recent advances has

215 he National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry have shown that

216 Based on funding per 2017 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs),

217 on and leadership and 'other' factors (i.e., funding, planning for role integration).

218 All JPIA recipients received new NIH funding post-award, including 82% with R01 funding, comp

219 blished papers, the results reflect both the funding preferences of the NIH and the composition of th

220 ief funding authorized by the US Congress to fund prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus

221 cts shifts in social science scholarship and funding priorities over half a century, take stock of th

222 CIRM has created a unique funding process and structure aimed to make a meaningful

223 Cellular Signatures (LINCS) is an NIH Common Fund program with the goal of generating a large-scale a

224 ribe an National Institutes of Health Common Fund program with the major goal of culture change for b

225 d Immunity (MI4) Emergency COVID-19 Research Funding program.

226 In this context, the EU and Indian DBT funded project STriTuVaD-In Silico Trial for Tuberculosi

227 nd Allergy Risk Management (iFAAM) was an EU-funded project that aimed to improve the management of f

228 reness and lobbying are required to increase funding, promote research, and improve survival.

229 nvestigator-sponsored neoadjuvant trial with funding provided by Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline (TRIO-US

230 t of ADAP clients who were eligible for ADAP-funded QHPs were studied (2014-2015).

231 ate cohort of ADAP clients eligible for ADAP-funded QHPs were studied (2014-2015).

232 Once enrolled in ADAP-funded QHPs, ADAP clients stay enrolled.

233 tor-initiated, National Institutes of Health-funded, randomized, single-blinded trial conducted in 12

234 under management across mutual funds, hedge funds, real estate, and private equity, fewer than 1.3%

235 The Hospitals Contribution Fund Research Foundation.

236 Two NIH-funded research consortia, the Clinical Genome Resource

237 , methods, and resources emerging from BRAIN-funded research.

238 Newton Fund, Research Councils UK, and Conselho Nacional das Fu

239 ch and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund: Research for Health in Conflict-Middle East and No

240 , conflict and war, scarce institutional and funding resources, inadequate publishing opportunities,

241 he crisis creates a perfect storm of reduced funding, restrictions on the operations of conservation

242 ner (White or Black) and the strength of the fund's credentials (stronger or weaker).

243 their evaluation of a 1-page summary of the fund's performance history, in which we manipulated the

244 , corresponding to 10% of the current Global Fund's yearly contribution in Peru.

245 Funding:Sanofi Pasteur.

246 proposals, representing a broad range of NIH-funded science.

247 tes of Health (NIH) plays a critical role in funding scientific endeavors in biomedicine.

248 cle [1], it is requested the grant ID in the Funding section should be corrected from NSF grant IIS-7

249 Therefore, the correct 'Funding' section in this article should read: We thank t

250 remains largely unmet because of inadequate funding, shortage of essential medical expertise, and th

251 nues to propose legislative, regulatory, and funding solutions to address this escalating crisis.

252 The NIH remains the primary public funding source for surgical research in the United State

253 icantly associated with year of publication, funding source, disclosure information, or the type of s

254 version of this paper, the authors omitted a funding source.

255 Full funding sources are listed at the end of the paper (see

256 ast decade reveal heterogeneity across study funding sources.

257 by the Luke's Army Pediatric Cancer Research Fund St.

258 Comparative analyses of survival and funding statistics in cancers with high mortality were p

259 cies, programmes, governance structures, and funding streams.

260 Funded studies showed greater improvement in depression

261 al scientific value of the research that the funding supports, especially when only a few proposals c

262 novel clinical ideas are not more often NIH funded than are papers that build on well-established cl

263 We find that edge science is more often NIH funded than less novel science, but with a delay.

264 nd newborn health receives considerably less funding than reproductive health or child health, which

265 such as site significance and allocation of funding that the modern social environment ascribes to i

266 Coordinated support, including grant funding, that addresses the challenging nature of multi-

267 The National Science Foundation has funded the creation of the Alliance to Catalyze Change f

268 Eisemann Pediatric Research Fund, the Banbury Foundation, the Edith Robertson Founda

269 H grants CA23766 and R21CA162002, the Aubrey Fund, the Claire Tow Foundation, the Major Family Founda

270 T02365194)Conflict of Interest and Source of Funding: This work was supported by grants awarded to Dr

271 Malaria in Pregnancy Consortium, which is funded through a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Fou

272 This work was partly funded through the International Project on Cardiovascul

273 , the majority of businesses planned to seek funding through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economi

274 d even benzene rings of spicy compounds were fund to be critical in the spicy sensing process.

275 atics and computational biology research and funding to date has been concentrated predominantly on c

276 Funding to DoS has doubled in the last 10 years ($22,983

277 majority of government hydrogen storage R&D funding to materials development.

278 This burden could be vastly reduced with new funding to scale up cost-effective interventions.

279 managing the workload of implementation, and funding to support initiatives.

280 or governments to devote additional domestic funds to HIV/AIDS.

281 er clinical work, if not otherwise linked to funding, training, research, or building partnerships).

282 Funding, type of mindfulness interventions, individual c

283 il, Open Society Foundation, WHO, the Global Fund, UNAIDS, National Institute for Health Research Hea

284 Extended follow-up was funded under NIH contract HHSN261201600007I.

285 tion (WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) recommend that children initiate breastfee

286 t Fund Foundation, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), and WHO.

287 WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Program of Research,

288 WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Program of Research,

289 onal Development, and the UNDP/UN Population Fund/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research

290 1 AI152318, and AI152078), Schwab Charitable Fund, United Health Group, National Basketball Associati

291 The study began in 2015 and is funded until at least 2023.

292 g NIH-funded investigators, the median grant funding was $1.6M (IQR $2.2M) for females and $1.2M (IQR

293 $1.6 billion (77.7%) of funding was awarded from, and to, institutions based in

294 onal Development, Global Challenges Research Fund, Wellcome Trust.

295 of responsibility and 'other' factors (i.e., funding), were also frequently reported barriers.

296 The entire system could be funded with less financial outlay than is incurred by em

297 CI 1.08-3.21], p = 0.03) and availability of funding with being controlled (OR, 2.26 [95% CI 1.09-4.6

298 (e.g., decision-making) and resources (e.g., funding) within institutions and organizations.

299 cles, we measure whether the NIH succeeds in funding work with novel ideas, which we term edge scienc

300 Austrian Science Fund, WWTF (Vienna Science and Technology Fund), and Min