ライフサイエンスコーパス: fundamental difference

1 talline metals, and others indicating strong fundamental differences.

2 spatial navigation, while highlighting some fundamental differences across species in these oscillat

3 Due to this fundamental difference, acupuncture may circumvent adver

4 This editorial discusses fundamental differences among 3 models in current use.

5 Our results thus uncover fundamental differences among animal methylomes and sugg

6 olonocyte gene expression profiles discerned fundamental differences among animals treated with n-3 P

7 Hence, gene expression profiling can discern fundamental differences among SERMs and provides insight

8 here that these discrepancies are not due to fundamental differences among the site-specific transcri

9 These structures illustrate fundamental differences among various mechanisms of inhi

10 Technical aspects, fundamental differences, and pros and cons of these nove

11 However, fundamental differences are observed in the properties o

12 tment of FOG-1 and Med1 to chromatin, with a fundamental difference being the quantitatively greater

13 g-specific T cell expansion and highlights a fundamental difference between Ag presented by an infect

14 This suggests that there exists either a fundamental difference between auditory and visual stimu

15 detected in sciatic nerves, thus revealing a fundamental difference between central and peripheral ax

16 s in LYRATE expression may contribute to the fundamental difference between compound and simple leave

17 Our kinetic studies highlight the fundamental difference between EGP- and P-bodies and ref

18 A fundamental difference between enzymes and small chemica

19 This study uncovers a fundamental difference between haplophase and diplophase

20 A fundamental difference between models is the presence/ab

21 in, is necessary and sufficient to explain a fundamental difference between native and recombinant Kv

22 these binuclear Ni complexes highlights the fundamental difference between Ni and Pd in mediating bo

23 in cancer because its alteration provides a fundamental difference between normal and cancer cells.

24 plex and thus provide further evidence for a fundamental difference between photoreceptor ribbon syna

25 receptor ribbon synapses, which represents a fundamental difference between photoreceptor ribbon syna

26 One fundamental difference between plants and animals is the

27 Our results also uncover a fundamental difference between populations in which gene

28 ructural and thermodynamic data highlights a fundamental difference between protein recognition of ss

29 t splicing factors in Arabidopsis reflects a fundamental difference between protein-facilitated group

30 ns critical for virus assembly and suggest a fundamental difference between Sindbis virus assembly in

31 and robotics to demonstrate that there is a fundamental difference between steady swimming and forwa

32 In human populations, a fundamental difference between the CD1 and major histoco

33 This observation highlights a fundamental difference between the essential and the non

34 These observations reveal a fundamental difference between the mechanisms of ring-sh

35 inversely correlated, which may highlight a fundamental difference between the processes that influe

36 Our results illustrate a fundamental difference between the ssRNA organization in

37 ction with increasing oligomer size and show fundamental differences between 1D and 2D "band gap engi

38 ar PM and organelle membranes to demonstrate fundamental differences between active (nonlinear) and p

39 These results reveal fundamental differences between acute and long-term modu

40 veral risk factors and mechanisms, there are fundamental differences between arteries and the aortic

41 Knowledge of fundamental differences between breast cancer subtypes h

42 To address fundamental differences between bulk and 2D materials, s

43 However, previous work has revealed fundamental differences between Caco-2 cells and in vivo

44 This specificity stems from fundamental differences between cancer cells and their n

45 It is shown that there are also more fundamental differences between catalysts based on these

46 sleep in these mice but also that there are fundamental differences between control of sleep in huma

47 ther analyses of biological samples revealed fundamental differences between DMRfinder and another so

48 These findings point to fundamental differences between FcgammaRIA and FcgammaRI

49 e considered, it is not clear that there are fundamental differences between form priming effects in

50 Thus, this study uncovered fundamental differences between HDAC1 and HDAC2.

51 Together, these results demonstrate fundamental differences between hESC-derived hematopoiet

52 These observations imply fundamental differences between HIV-1 and HTLV-1 Gag tra

53 Fundamental differences between hMSH2-hMSH6 and hMSH4-hM

54 ansmembrane signalling in malaria and reveal fundamental differences between host and parasite ionic

55 hese results are discussed in the context of fundamental differences between in vitro brain slice sup

56 ts, attesting to the persistence, if any, of fundamental differences between in vivo and in vitro par

57 Identifying fundamental differences between intercalation in bulk an

58 Our results reveal fundamental differences between intracellular elasticity

59 These data highlight fundamental differences between memory CD8(+) T cells en

60 ely, the gene expression results reflect the fundamental differences between metal and non-metal resp

61 However, there are fundamental differences between mouse and human tumors i

62 The data reveal fundamental differences between natural ACR and CCR cond

63 Our findings demonstrate fundamental differences between NR2A and NR2B that help

64 Fundamental differences between perception and cognition

65 These results imply fundamental differences between primates and carnivorans

66 genetics of PsA that could begin to explain fundamental differences between psoriasis and PsA.

67 not critical for budding and that there are fundamental differences between PTAP-containing viruses

68 ts from repeated retrieval, and they suggest fundamental differences between repeated study and repea

69 However, fundamental differences between reprogramming processes

70 Fundamental differences between reversible suicide inact

71 e centuries-old problem of understanding the fundamental differences between silver and gold in terms

72 reported experiments using glycerol exposes fundamental differences between small and macromolecular

73 n in aquatic tests, and (iii) discussing the fundamental differences between solvent spiking, water-a

74 hese historical differences are reflected in fundamental differences between species in the scale and

75 We address whether 2 fundamental differences between studies of decedents and

76 erties in the denatured ensembles as well as fundamental differences between the denatured and native

77 bserved in terrestrial analogues, suggesting fundamental differences between the dominant sulphur che

78 We found fundamental differences between the dorsal (dCA3) and th

79 ue functions of a secreted protein highlight fundamental differences between the export mechanism of

80 his Symposium Review we discuss how, despite fundamental differences between the G-C model and the ne

81 Despite the fundamental differences between the gestural communicati

82 Moreover, there do not appear to be fundamental differences between the magnitude of the for

83 mutual solubility allows us to report on the fundamental differences between the mechanisms controlli

84 DAT blockers is consistent with the idea of fundamental differences between the mechanisms of abused

85 These results suggest fundamental differences between the mechanisms of resist

86 We describe the fundamental differences between the model peak-based and

87 Fundamental differences between the mouse and human exis

88 has been questioned by claims that there are fundamental differences between the parietal cortex in h

89 The findings illustrate and explain the fundamental differences between the properties of single

90 Together, these data point to fundamental differences between the role(s) of RpoS in B

91 AD) in a SMAD-dependent manner, highlighting fundamental differences between the species.

92 hough there are broad similarities, we found fundamental differences between the species.

93 However, there are fundamental differences between the spontaneous disease

94 Our results reveal fundamental differences between the synaptic organizatio

95 These data demonstrate fundamental differences between the target-specific and

96 Our results demonstrate that there are no fundamental differences between the transposition mechan

97 pounds that were synthesized highlighted the fundamental differences between their electronic propert

98 vents, and the possibility that there may be fundamental differences between their roles in human and

99 We conclude that some of the fundamental differences between these 2 fields, such as

100 Here, we show fundamental differences between these ascending pathways

101 RNA-Seq across infection time courses reveal fundamental differences between these pathogens.

102 -specific resistance (R) genes, highlighting fundamental differences between these two resistance for

103 While there are fundamental differences between these types of transmiss

104 appropriate for cardiology, but there remain fundamental differences between trauma and other emergen

105 CANCE STATEMENT The current study identifies fundamental differences between two commonly used models

106 culture situation, only briefly alluding to fundamental differences between utilization in animals v

107 t kinetochores early in mitosis and suggests fundamental differences between yeast mitosis and mitosi

108 These results reveal fundamental differences by which the systemic, mucosal,

109 Understanding these fundamental differences enables several different practi

110 rily conserved, recent studies indicate that fundamental differences exist between Drosophila and ver

111 the antiviral activity of MX2, implying that fundamental differences exist between the antiviral mech

112 We conclude that fundamental differences exist in the upstream regulatory

113 Fundamental differences exist, however, in the regulatio

114 They also implicate that no fundamental difference exists between charge transport i

115 These findings suggest fundamental differences for the function of the ER in ce

116 phorolysis of class II enzymes establishes a fundamental difference from class I enzymes, and it is a

117 temporal cortex involvement has suggested a fundamental difference from humans.

118 Subjects with BDD demonstrate fundamental differences from controls in visually proces

119 f nonoverlapping sets of loci highlights the fundamental differences implicit in the use of either me

120 ls but not Gram-negative cells, suggesting a fundamental difference in DNA metabolism between these t

121 Our results suggest a fundamental difference in how dopamine release is regula

122 it is an open question whether there is any fundamental difference in how humans and other good visu

123 Thus, our findings reveal a fundamental difference in IL-18 and IL-1beta regulation

124 chromatids in homologous recombination is a fundamental difference in meiotic versus mitotic cells.

125 This suggests a fundamental difference in pathogenesis between head/neck

126 strong in both litter and soil, without any fundamental difference in plasticity between these two c

127 This fundamental difference in RAF isoform regulation explain

128 These results suggest a fundamental difference in the antigen-binding mechanisms

129 ce is independent of charges, and point at a fundamental difference in the codes for folding and inte

130 The fundamental difference in the electrostatic surface pote

131 These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in the fate of live S. aureus aft

132 These findings reveal a fundamental difference in the innate antiviral strategie

133 This fundamental difference in the isotopic character of CAIs

134 The fundamental difference in the mechanisms of oral toleran

135 e manner as the control animals, revealing a fundamental difference in the nature of the requirement

136 These findings demonstrate a fundamental difference in the neural mechanisms underlyi

137 s that the polymorphism is associated with a fundamental difference in the neurophysiology of food th

138 crystalline (commercial) Li2O2, revealing a fundamental difference in the OER process depending on t

139 togenetic energy constraints rather than any fundamental difference in the overall pace of growth in

140 n it affects H3K4me2, suggesting a potential fundamental difference in the recruitment of methyltrans

141 These results imply a fundamental difference in the substrate of cortical proc

142 taining nonpathogenic bacteria, uncovering a fundamental difference in the trafficking of phagosomes

143 eral ABC exporters and possibly represents a fundamental difference in the transport mechanism betwee

144 This suggests a fundamental difference in the way bees process visual in

145 This study demonstrates a fundamental difference in the way idebenone affects mito

146 domain mutations, implying that there was no fundamental difference in the way these forms of activat

147 y of these two groups of bacteria suggests a fundamental difference in their ability to either exploi

148 The fundamental difference in their probe selection strategi

149 These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in these memory systems in their

150 These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in visual processing between ON a

151 Finally, our studies revealed that, despite fundamental differences in alloreactive B cell fates in

152 Despite fundamental differences in assumptions, both categories

153 extrafollicular B cell responses, revealing fundamental differences in autoimmune- and infection-ind

154 This assay displays fundamental differences in binding preferences for PG by

155 the site of blood-brain interface suggesting fundamental differences in brain iron acquisition in ind

156 Given the fundamental differences in carrier generation and device

157 Thus, fundamental differences in CD44 function between these l

158 s concerted expression of gene sets, despite fundamental differences in cell division.

159 Collectively, our results help to clarify fundamental differences in cell envelope ultrastructure

160 iac remodeling in ICM are largely related to fundamental differences in cellular remodeling rather th

161 se that this unwillingness could result from fundamental differences in conservatives' and liberals'

162 the product categories may be attributed to fundamental differences in design and mode of operation

163 There follow fundamental differences in design principle in respect t

164 rganoids have proven valuable to demonstrate fundamental differences in duodenal derived organoids be

165 We highlight the fundamental differences in dynamics between systems with

166 In addition, these studies demonstrate the fundamental differences in early aggregation events betw

167 Fundamental differences in EC coupling distinguish HFrEF

168 strikingly diverse binding modes, suggesting fundamental differences in gammadelta T cell recognition

169 ational differences might correlate with the fundamental differences in gene and promoter organizatio

170 Our data indicate that fundamental differences in gingival immune cell function

171 in addition to similarities, there are also fundamental differences in global gene expression as pat

172 These findings suggest fundamental differences in global RNA regulation between

173 Our data highlight fundamental differences in glucose use by pathogen-speci

174 ut T cell glycoproteins were not, suggesting fundamental differences in glycosylation machinery or me

175 These findings reveal fundamental differences in GSDMD trafficking between neu

176 d elderly populations after sepsis is due to fundamental differences in host-protective immunity and

177 Comparative analyses reveal fundamental differences in how skull shape evolved in bi

178 Therefore, we show that there are fundamental differences in how stem cells maintain their

179 Taken together, these results highlight fundamental differences in immunodominance of CD4(+) and

180 These suggest fundamental differences in imprinting control mechanisms

181 Fundamental differences in interactions with posterior a

182 eart failure (HF) patients, but there may be fundamental differences in LA properties between HF with

183 Here we report fundamental differences in long-term potentiation (LTP)

184 Moreover, with few exceptions, the quest for fundamental differences in male and female brain structu

185 and to degradation in the knee, resulting in fundamental differences in matrix turnover in these lesi

186 Fundamental differences in mechanisms of action and use

187 We recently identified fundamental differences in mitochondrial responses of pe

188 comparison of two similar models identified fundamental differences in model behavior, and revealed

189 Our results point to fundamental differences in motility characteristics betw

190 We suggest that fundamental differences in movement kinematics in autism

191 Despite fundamental differences in organismal complexity and lif

192 e functionally different and soils exhibited fundamental differences in P cycling.

193 ical condition of synaesthesia--which causes fundamental differences in perception and cognition thro

194 on of the environment or whether it reflects fundamental differences in perceptual processing between

195 These data suggest fundamental differences in peroxisome composition, devel

196 Due to fundamental differences in physiology and swimming strat

197 These results emphasize fundamental differences in population dynamics under dif

198 Our analysis reveals fundamental differences in programs of gene expression b

199 Our results show fundamental differences in regulatory architectures of g

200 Fundamental differences in scale raise the possibility t

201 Regardless, possible fundamental differences in SCCHN between ever smokers an

202 tes but are not found in rodents, indicating fundamental differences in selective connectivity that s

203 We report fundamental differences in size distributions of marine

204 Species' range sizes are shaped by fundamental differences in species' ecological and evolu

205 s but not at excitatory synapses, suggesting fundamental differences in spontaneous neurotransmission

206 lth risks, and societal benefits, as well as fundamental differences in stakeholder priorities, compl

207 Fundamental differences in structure between MutS2 and o

208 We conclude that there are fundamental differences in sympathetic neuroeffector mec

209 They also indicate that fundamental differences in synapse function may occur wi

210 trA, and demonstrate its role in determining fundamental differences in T3SS phenotypes among Bordete

211 similar passive whisker stimulation revealed fundamental differences in tactile signal processing dur

212 These findings emphasize fundamental differences in the 2 HF phenotypes and sugge

213 Together, this work uncovers fundamental differences in the activation kinetics, mech

214 )) and supports previous observations of the fundamental differences in the activities of nitroreduct

215 Over the past decades, several methods with fundamental differences in the analytical approach have

216 This divergence of COTTOT is likely due to fundamental differences in the biomechanical determinant

217 representation in the spinal cord and reveal fundamental differences in the coding of heat and cold.

218 erimental data, we have found that there are fundamental differences in the conducting properties of

219 In this study, fundamental differences in the considerations for RNA in

220 Fundamental differences in the distribution of oceans an

221 These results suggest fundamental differences in the dominant pathogenic mecha

222 ween bacterial and archaeal viruses with the fundamental differences in the envelope compositions of

223 These results reveal fundamental differences in the function and organization

224 This study also shows that there were no fundamental differences in the gene expression patterns

225 Our data suggests that fundamental differences in the germinal center microenvi

226 th the termite hindgut microbiome, there are fundamental differences in the glycoside hydrolase conte

227 These data indicate fundamental differences in the hydrogen transfer step fr

228 d effector function profile in both species, fundamental differences in the IgG2 and IgG4 Ab subclass

229 of metabolism at the subcellular level, and fundamental differences in the importance of other varia

230 effect on receptor affinity, as a result of fundamental differences in the interactions of halogen a

231 erent product distributions that result from fundamental differences in the ionic character of these

232 Our findings, along with the fundamental differences in the life histories between Fl

233 (vs. single-species biofilms) demonstrating fundamental differences in the matrix assembly, survival

234 stem cells mobilized with G-CSF, suggesting fundamental differences in the mechanism of AMD3100-medi

235 al substrate specificity, presumably reflect fundamental differences in the mechanisms of antiviral s

236 The results reveal some fundamental differences in the mechanisms of the two pro

237 n conserved in higher eukaryotes, indicating fundamental differences in the mechanisms of TOR signali

238 volution of NagA and suggests that there are fundamental differences in the mechanistic details for s

239 ition modes of T and B cells could be due to fundamental differences in the methods by which TCRs and

240 However, the understanding of the fundamental differences in the mode of action of bacteri

241 Thus, fundamental differences in the mode of antigen engagemen

242 Together, these data suggest that fundamental differences in the motivational properties o

243 This disparate behavior stems from fundamental differences in the nature of 3d versus 4d an

244 Our study reveals fundamental differences in the nature of local-scale bio

245 ecent developments in the field demonstrated fundamental differences in the neonatal immune system as

246 These findings highlight fundamental differences in the neural substrates of oxid

247 However, our results revealed that fundamental differences in the organization and constitu

248 Fundamental differences in the organization of the membr

249 mould, insect wings) and show that there are fundamental differences in the organization of urban and

250 tantial phenotypic differences might reflect fundamental differences in the pathogenesis of B-cell ly

251 imbs; mutant hindlimbs are normal, revealing fundamental differences in the patterning mechanisms gov

252 ns from Australia and New Zealand, we reveal fundamental differences in the phylodynamics of the two

253 Moreover, our findings reveal fundamental differences in the phytochrome-phototropism

254 ed by ER Ca2+ release in particular revealed fundamental differences in the properties of UPR signali

255 The results highlight fundamental differences in the reactivity of nucleophili

256 ion frequency of these VH1 antibodies reveal fundamental differences in the regulation and maturation

257 We further uncover fundamental differences in the regulation of different t

258 Our findings reveal opportunities for fundamental differences in the regulation of Dyn1, which

259 These results imply that there are fundamental differences in the regulation of plasma fVII

260 Our findings indicate fundamental differences in the regulation of spontaneous

261 yza sativa) and maize (Zea mays), suggesting fundamental differences in the regulation of vitamin B6

262 Our analyses reveal fundamental differences in the replication of DNA struct

263 elicited in adults by the two vaccines imply fundamental differences in the respective B-cell populat

264 ansmembrane protein TNF-alpha, demonstrating fundamental differences in the respective shedding by AD

265 With that, our data reveal fundamental differences in the response regulation of B-

266 These distinct morphologies reflect fundamental differences in the role of the SAM and the p

267 This observation highlights fundamental differences in the signaling controlling IL-

268 Thus, these data reveal fundamental differences in the signaling pathways used b

269 This suggests that there may be fundamental differences in the social preferences that m

270 There are fundamental differences in the structures of outer segme

271 bserved in vivo and in vitro, there are thus fundamental differences in the underlying mechanisms.

272 These results suggest fundamental differences in the way chemotherapy is handl

273 us but not murine leukemia virus, suggesting fundamental differences in the way different retroviral

274 enzymes have revealed a complex regulon and fundamental differences in the way S. mutans manages ala

275 erns contrast with those on land, suggesting fundamental differences in the ways that industrial fish

276 between the two species and did not reflect fundamental differences in the wiring between the two sp

277 on that span plants and animals, despite the fundamental differences in their biology.

278 Because of the fundamental differences in their formulations and coding

279 force and fluorescence microscopy, revealing fundamental differences in their morphology, protein org

280 f these two tricyclization processes and the fundamental differences in their reaction mechanisms are

281 hibition indicates that RGS proteins exhibit fundamental differences in their responses to small-mole

282 al behavior of the antibodies and illustrate fundamental differences in thermodynamic characteristics

283 ults from laboratory experiments that reveal fundamental differences in three-dimensional mantle circ

284 rences between PI and DRL tasks, rather than fundamental differences in timing.

285 C and monocytes and indicates that there are fundamental differences in TLR signaling pathways betwee

286 strength or mean firing rates and indicates fundamental differences in variability quenching between

287 A fundamental difference is that desmosomes have a highly

288 However it remains to be determined whether fundamental differences may exist between blast-related

289 There was a fundamental difference observed between three-dimensiona

290 A fundamental difference of detection tasks in contrast to

291 starvation-induced autophagy, uncovering the fundamental difference of these autophagic modes.

292 -WASP by cellular activators that highlights fundamental differences of response at the protein-prote

293 These findings indicate fundamental differences of the Ca(2+) dependence of spon

294 which this phenotypic heterogeneity reflects fundamental differences or similarities in the underlyin

295 Does this fundamental difference reflect the existence of a lower

296 The neural basis for this fundamental difference remains unknown.

297 se two widely used FRET pairs highlights the fundamental differences that can arise between direct op

298 This analysis reveals fundamental differences to conventional DYRK family regu

299 1 and 2 (Per1 and Per2) in the SCN revealed fundamental differences under these two entrainment mode

300 c referential, iconic, or deictic content, a fundamental difference versus human gestures and spoken