戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s photography, spectral-domain OCT [SD-OCT], fundus autofluorescence).
2 ral-domain optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence.
3 ation plots), SD-OCT, and sometimes mfERG or fundus autofluorescence.
4 ger wavelengths, a characteristic typical of fundus autofluorescence.
5 n retinal diseases characterized by aberrant fundus autofluorescence.
6 e was measurable by HPLC and by quantitative fundus autofluorescence.
7 iography, indocyanine green angiography, and fundus autofluorescence.
8 ion of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy on fundus autofluorescence.
9 nsistent results for GA growth compared with fundus autofluorescence.
10 fundus photography, spectral-domain OCT, and fundus autofluorescence.
11 t, visibility on funduscopy, ultrasound, and fundus autofluorescence.
12 g the growth of atrophic lesions measured by fundus autofluorescence.
13 cidence of atrophic lesions as determined by fundus autofluorescence.
14  diameter of a paracentral ring of increased fundus autofluorescence.
15 ristic imaging on fluorescein angiography or fundus autofluorescence; (3) absent to mild anterior cha
16                                              Fundus autofluorescence abnormalities were seen in 24 ey
17 tively sparing the fovea; (4) characteristic fundus autofluorescence abnormalities; (5) full-field el
18                                              Fundus autofluorescence (AF) images (55 degrees lens, 48
19 en MIDD and demarcated RPE atrophy on serial fundus autofluorescence (AF) images were included.
20                                              Fundus autofluorescence (AF) imaging allows non-invasive
21 on assessment, color fundus photography, and fundus autofluorescence (AF) imaging.
22            Measures of retinal structure and fundus autofluorescence (AF) were correlated with visual
23 visual acuity (BCVA), widefield angiography, fundus autofluorescence (AF), and wnt signaling pathway
24 surements using two techniques (2-wavelength fundus autofluorescence [AF] and heterochromatic flicker
25 main optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence analysis were performed in patie
26  imaging including color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence and cross sectional and en-face
27                                              Fundus autofluorescence and electrophysiological testing
28                                 Longitudinal fundus autofluorescence and infrared reflectance images
29 and optical coherence tomography (along with fundus autofluorescence and multifocal electroretinograp
30 ence tomography features and staging system, fundus autofluorescence and near-infrared reflectance fe
31 ata, signs and symptoms, visual acuity (VA), fundus autofluorescence and OCT findings, ERG phenotype,
32 of clinical notes, retinal imaging including fundus autofluorescence and OCT, electroretinography (ER
33                                              Fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography
34             Newer imaging modalities such as fundus autofluorescence and spectral domain optical cohe
35 lor fundus photography, automated perimetry, fundus autofluorescence and spectral domain optical cohe
36 derwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus autofluorescence and spectral domain-optical cohe
37                                         Blue fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain OCT were obt
38 e evaluated the multimodal imaging including fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical cohe
39 onal and morphologic examinations, including fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical cohe
40                                              Fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical cohe
41 trophy was delineated on the basis of serial fundus-autofluorescence and infrared-reflectance images.
42 ed the foveal attenuation normally seen with fundus autofluorescence, and a concentric macular rings
43 infrared reflectance, hypoautofluorescent on fundus autofluorescence, and as subretinal deposits on s
44 ptic nerve head (ONH), infrared reflectance, fundus autofluorescence, and color fundus photographs (C
45 with biomicroscopy, OCT and OCT angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and fluorescein and indocyanine
46 rimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence, and fundus photography.
47  color photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and high-resolution optical coh
48 ncluding optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence, and indocyanine green and fluor
49 ndus photography or MultiColor imaging, OCT, fundus autofluorescence, and OCT angiography were includ
50  color photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomograph
51                     Fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomograph
52 l field, and full-field electroretinography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomograph
53                    Color fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain OCT were ob
54 ear interval with near-infrared reflectance, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain OCT.
55 uded change from baseline in microperimetry, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain optical coh
56 nd clinical information, fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain-OCT (SD-OCT
57                                      CFP and fundus autofluorescence are key imaging modalities for t
58 ering) could produce a cross-shaped increase fundus autofluorescence artifact on subsequent imaging.
59 ral color fundus and optic disc photography, fundus autofluorescence, automated perimetry, and optica
60 n area of increased autofluorescence on blue fundus autofluorescence (B-FAF).
61 coherence tomography (FD-OCT) and blue-light fundus autofluorescence (bAF).
62 ence (GAF; Clarus, Carl Zeiss Meditec), blue fundus autofluorescence (BAF; Spectralis, Heidelberg Eng
63 hy (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), blue fundus autofluorescence (BFAF), en face OCT, and OCT ang
64  visual acuity with ETDRS charts, blue-light fundus autofluorescence, (BL-FAF), near-infrared fundus
65                                              Fundus autofluorescence correlated with structural alter
66 o short-wavelength light resulted in reduced fundus autofluorescence, decreased HPLC-quantified A2E,
67                                              Fundus autofluorescence demonstrated interposed, reduced
68                                              Fundus autofluorescence demonstrated mild hyperautofluor
69                                              Fundus autofluorescence disclosed hypoautofluorescence (
70                                              Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and color fundus (CF) phot
71 he enlargement of the atrophic lesions using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and color fundus photograp
72 coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-Angiography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and fluorescein-angiograph
73 almoscopy, and fundus photography, including fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and near-infrared reflecta
74 of at least 4 years and had undergone annual fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and OCT imaging using Heid
75  basis of full-field electroretinogram (ERG) Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and spectral domain-optica
76                                   Blue-light fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and spectral-domain OCT (S
77 e of change in GA over 12 months measured by fundus autofluorescence (FAF) at 3 timepoints: baseline,
78                             Monthly BCVA and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) at baseline and every 6 mo
79 jective corroboration for visual fields, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) can show damage topographi
80                                              Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) decays were detected in sh
81 ion algorithm and correlated with SD OCT and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) findings.
82                       Eyes were evaluated on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) for GA.
83                                              Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) illustrated speckled hyper
84                                              Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images from a subset of AR
85 multaneous fundus photographs and SD OCT and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images of eyes affected wi
86              The 200 degrees pseudocolor and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images were captured on th
87 3 weeks and after 6 weeks, respectively, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images were obtained to vi
88 acula volume scans centered at the fovea and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images were obtained.
89                                              Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging and optical cohere
90                                              Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging is crucial to the
91 tinal detachment with gradable postoperative fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging were included in t
92 s photography, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, and audiologic an
93 l-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, full-field electr
94             Electrophysiological assessment, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, fundus fluorescei
95 l-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, Humphrey visual f
96 trawidefield (UWF) color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, OCT, and electror
97 s photography, fluorescein angiography (FA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, optical coherence
98 us photography, near-infrared (NIR) imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spectral domain o
99 logic examination, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spectral-domain (
100                             In all probands, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spectral-domain o
101 thalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spectral-domain o
102 n enlargement from baseline as assessed with fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.
103    Characteristics of GA were examined using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.
104 n optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.
105 n optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.
106 ain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.
107 in optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.
108 sed primarily by color fundus photography or fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.
109                              Most studies of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in geographic atrophy (GA)
110 ots corresponding to focal dots of decreased fundus autofluorescence (FAF) surrounded by increased FA
111 main optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) to confirm a diagnosis.
112 contribution of retro-mode imaging (RMI) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) to the characterization of
113 in optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) underwent testing for best
114 omain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and fluorescein angiograp
115 rimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and fundus photography.
116 omain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and infrared reflectance
117 with conventional multimodal imaging (color, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and infrared reflectance
118 omain optical-coherence-tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and near-infrared-reflect
119 ear-infrared (NIR) and short-wavelength (SW) fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and NIR reflectance (REF)
120  (ICGA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT angiography (OCTA
121 s of TARP on widefield fundus color imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT were described.
122 ompared with automated visual fields (AVFs), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and optical coherence tom
123             Near-infrared reflectance (NIR), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and optical coherence tom
124 ded 35 degrees fundus photography, infrared, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and SD-OCT.
125 g including near-infrared reflectance (NIR), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain optic
126 rom near-infrared reflectance (NIR) imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain-optic
127                    Color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral-domain OCT (
128 tion together with color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral-domain optic
129 ude color fundus photography (CFP), confocal fundus autofluorescence (FAF), confocal near-infrared re
130 plete ophthalmological examination including fundus autofluorescence (FAF), dynamic simultaneous fluo
131  (BCVA), ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (
132 undus examination, color fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (
133 y (PAM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (
134  and recurrent CSCR were reviewed, including fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (
135  static perimetry, fundus color photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fundus fluorescein angiog
136 ct ophthalmoscopy, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), high-resolution optical c
137 thalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), infrared imaging, and spe
138  chart, fundus photography, ultrasonography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), infrared reflectance (IR)
139 ng best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), blue fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared autofluores
140 uding color and red-free fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared reflectance
141 fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared reflectance
142  faster-growing lesions from 2 eyes based on fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared reflectance
143 s who underwent serial ultrawide-field (UWF) fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OCT, and Macular Integrit
144  visual acuity of 20/25 or better and normal fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OCT, multicolor, near-inf
145  to assess the correlations between standard fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomogra
146 sual acuity (BCVA), color fundus photograph, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomogra
147 omain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), or multifocal electroreti
148 uscin accumulation, as measured by increased fundus autofluorescence (FAF), precedes progression or d
149  visits for at least 1 examination modality: fundus autofluorescence (FAF), spectral-domain (SD) opti
150 ng was completed for each patient; including fundus autofluorescence (FAF), spectral-domain optical c
151 gment epithelium (RPE) is the main source of fundus autofluorescence (FAF), the target of an imaging
152 ected visual acuity (BCVA) determination and fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
153 y (FP), OCT, fluorescein angiogram (FA), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
154 rimetry, full-field electroretinography, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
155 omain ocular coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
156 in all 7 patients, corresponding to abnormal fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
157 in optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
158  ellipsoid zone (EZ) area, and total area of fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
159 eutic effects in GA compared to conventional fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
160 ment epithelium (RPE) is the major source of fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
161 al RPE area in untreated eyes with CHM using fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
162       Eyes were examined longitudinally with fundus autofluorescence (FAF; excitation wavelength, 488
163 [SD] optical coherence tomography [OCT], and fundus autofluorescence [FAF]) then were reviewed.
164  growth rates per disease, imaging modality (fundus autofluorescence [FAF], optical coherence tomogra
165             Optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence findings suggest that group V ph
166 ng system of SC lesions based on SS-OCTA and fundus autofluorescence findings.
167 fundus imaging, including color photographs, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and in
168 ld imaging included pseudocolor photography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and in
169 r detachments based on clinical examination, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and op
170 ubmaculopathy based on clinical examination, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and sp
171 ation, fundus photography, infrared imaging, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and sp
172                          Fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, indocy
173                                              Fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, optica
174                                              Fundus autofluorescence (fundus AF) changes were monitor
175                                              Fundus autofluorescence, fundus color photography, and s
176 erence tomography (angiography) (SD-OCT(A)), fundus autofluorescence, fundus photography, infrared im
177 uding near-infrared reflectance (NIR), green fundus autofluorescence (G-FAF), confocal pseudocolor, a
178  (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering), green fundus autofluorescence (GAF; Clarus, Carl Zeiss Meditec
179                                          The fundus autofluorescence generally represents the status
180 reen angiography, near-infrared reflectance, fundus autofluorescence, high-resolution OCT, and ultraw
181          Presence of RPD was from grading of fundus autofluorescence images (AREDS2) and deep learnin
182 nt epithelium (RPE) atrophy was performed on fundus autofluorescence images and OCT scans.
183 east 1 eye at the most recent visit, and (2) fundus autofluorescence images for at least 2 visits wit
184                                              Fundus autofluorescence images obtained from patient vis
185                                              Fundus autofluorescence images of 30 degrees and 55 degr
186                                              Fundus autofluorescence images of eyes with GA were obta
187                                A series of 3 fundus autofluorescence images using 3 different acquisi
188 ain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) and fundus autofluorescence images were acquired every 6 mon
189                                      OCT and fundus autofluorescence images were analyzed to identify
190                                              Fundus autofluorescence images were not available.
191 rophic regions detected on serial registered fundus autofluorescence images were semiautomatically de
192  these patients, 215 had at least 2 gradable fundus autofluorescence images with atrophic lesion(s) p
193 aluated, including color fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence images, and spectral-domain OCT
194 tofluorescent AZOOR line in short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence images, delineating the peripapi
195 papillary sparing is a consistent feature on fundus autofluorescence images, whereas the same region
196 ripapillary sparing as consistent feature on fundus autofluorescence images.
197  fundus examination, Goldmann visual fields, fundus autofluorescence imaging (FAF), optical coherence
198 hanges visible upon clinical examination and fundus autofluorescence imaging (occult retinopathy).
199                                              Fundus autofluorescence imaging and optical coherence to
200 responded to hyperautofluorescent lesions on fundus autofluorescence imaging and subretinal hyperrefl
201                                              Fundus autofluorescence imaging can reveal the extent of
202  a normal retinal appearance, although their fundus autofluorescence imaging demonstrated foci of inc
203 optical coherence tomography and to describe fundus autofluorescence imaging in this condition.
204                                              Fundus autofluorescence imaging is abnormal in children
205 ity, fundus-tracked microperimetry, OCT, and fundus autofluorescence imaging performed.
206                 The electrophysiological and fundus autofluorescence imaging presented here should fa
207                                              Fundus autofluorescence imaging remained normal.
208                                 Quantitative fundus autofluorescence imaging revealed characteristic
209                                              Fundus autofluorescence imaging showed a parafoveal annu
210 elength reduced-illuminance and conventional fundus autofluorescence imaging showed good concordance
211 l patients underwent spectral-domain OCT and fundus autofluorescence imaging using the Spectralis HRA
212                                              Fundus autofluorescence imaging was not used.
213                           In selected cases, fundus autofluorescence imaging was performed.
214                                              Fundus autofluorescence imaging was used to evaluate GA
215 l coherence tomography (OCT), and blue light fundus autofluorescence imaging were performed for all p
216 graphy (CFP), near-infrared reflectance, and fundus autofluorescence imaging were performed in all pa
217 uorescein and indocyanine green angiography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and corresponding eye-t
218 l-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence imaging, and electroretinogram (
219 eld electroretinography, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and optical coherence t
220  clinically by wide-field color photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and spectral-domain opt
221 linical examination, fundus photography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging, and visual function was
222  and detailed retinal imaging was performed: fundus autofluorescence imaging, digital color fundoscop
223 tance, red-free images and blue reflectance, fundus autofluorescence imaging, indocyanine green angio
224  molecular genetic testing, retinal imaging (fundus autofluorescence imaging, optical coherence tomog
225 erations on optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence imaging, retinal function assess
226  fundus examination, wide-field photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, sedated electroretinogr
227  including fundus photography, infra-red and fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral-domain optical
228 ectral-domain OCT, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, visual field testing, f
229 ated with marked loss of autofluorescence on fundus autofluorescence imaging.
230 ve on NIR reflectance and hypofluorescent on fundus autofluorescence imaging.
231 ded by a continuous hyperfluorescent ring on fundus autofluorescence imaging.
232 ral-domain optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging.
233 tral domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence imaging.
234 ral-domain optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging.
235    Area and growth of GA were measured using fundus autofluorescence imaging.
236 T and corresponding hyperautofluorescence on fundus autofluorescence imaging.
237 aser ophthalmoscopy infrared reflectance and fundus autofluorescence imaging.
238        The dots were hyperautofluorescent on fundus autofluorescence imaging.
239 main optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence imaging.
240 ents with Stargardt disease as determined by fundus autofluorescence imaging.
241  produced a striking leopard-spot pattern on fundus autofluorescence imaging.
242 ultrawide-field color fundus photography and fundus autofluorescence imaging; and spectral domain-OCT
243        We assessed the utility of quantified fundus autofluorescence in (FAF) the evaluation and foll
244 We assessed the utility of quantification of fundus autofluorescence in the evaluation and follow-up
245   Most importantly, we also observed reduced fundus autofluorescence in the eyes injected with NP and
246 tudies that monitored atrophy progression by fundus autofluorescence in untreated eyes with STGD1 for
247  chart, fundus photography, ultrasonography, fundus autofluorescence, infrared reflectance (IR) imagi
248 he retina included color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, intravenous fluorescein angiogr
249 ield and pattern), visual evoked potentials, fundus autofluorescence IRR, and optical coherence tomog
250                                              Fundus autofluorescence is a helpful, fast, and noninvas
251                                              Fundus autofluorescence is a noninvasive technique for e
252                                              Fundus autofluorescence is a valuable imaging tool in th
253                                              Fundus autofluorescence is the most important tool for a
254 n area was larger than both the ONL-slab and fundus autofluorescence lesion areas.
255      In Stargardt disease with DDAF lesions, fundus autofluorescence may serve as a monitoring tool f
256 etinal fluid on OCT, hypoautofluorescence on fundus autofluorescence, middle to outer retinal hyperva
257 pectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, multifocal electroretinography,
258                                              Fundus autofluorescence, near-infrared reflectance, and
259                     Other methods, including fundus autofluorescence, near-infrared reflectance, and
260 dal retinal imaging, including near-infrared fundus autofluorescence (NIR-AF), blue autofluorescence
261 us autofluorescence, (BL-FAF), near-infrared fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF), and RMI.
262 pectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), fundus autofluorescence, OCT angiography (RTVue XR Avant
263 , retinal imaging (color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, OCT), electrophysiologic assess
264 graphy (OCT), en face near-infrared imaging, fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography an
265 ross studies using color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, or OCT (P = 0.35-0.99).
266         Interestingly, no changes in macular fundus autofluorescence pattern were evident after optic
267                                 Quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) and spectral-domain optica
268  110 control subjects underwent quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) imaging using a confocal s
269 articipants were examined using quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) imaging with a modified co
270  SW-AF intensities, measured as quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF), indicated chronic impairm
271 length fundus autofluorescence (quantitative fundus autofluorescence [qAF]) and spectral-domain optic
272 ndus lesions by quantifying short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (quantitative fundus autofluores
273 domain OCT results, OCT angiography results, fundus autofluorescence results, ultra-widefield fluores
274                                              Fundus autofluorescence showed little or no change excep
275                                              Fundus autofluorescence showed zonal areas of hypoautofl
276 y evaluations, GA lesion area as measured by fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain optical coheren
277 ite 10-2 visual field pattern density plots, fundus autofluorescence, spectral-density optical cohere
278 acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, fundus autofluorescence, spectral-domain optical coheren
279  included short-wavelength and near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, spectral-domain optical coheren
280                          In short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-AF) images, speckled hyperau
281 e symmetry that presents on short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-AF) imaging with hyperautofl
282 tical coherence tomography, short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-AF), quantitative autofluore
283 nce tomography (SD-OCT) and short wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-AF).
284 ctional back-scattering and short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) to study disease-relate
285 erized clinically and imaged with short-wave fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF), spectral-domain optica
286  the hyperautofluorescent ring on short-wave fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF).
287                       In vivo measurement of fundus autofluorescence, the source of which is bisretin
288 idenced by HPLC analysis and quantitation of fundus autofluorescence; this effect is consistent with
289 pth imaging (EDI)-OCT, swept source OCT, and fundus autofluorescence using a fundus camera.
290 aluate the disease extent on ultra-widefield fundus autofluorescence (UWF-FAF) in patients with ABCA4
291 CI, 0.42-0.61 mm2/y), and of total decreased fundus autofluorescence was 0.35 mm2/y (95% CI, 0.28-0.4
292 f patients exhibiting annular RPE lesions on fundus autofluorescence was included for chart review an
293                                       Repeat fundus autofluorescence was obtained at 12, 24, 36, and
294                                              Fundus autofluorescence was quantified (qAF) in subjects
295                  No significant increases of fundus autofluorescence were detected by SLO imaging of
296 uding optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence were evaluated at the baseline a
297 tients, and optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence were performed in 4 patients.
298                  Fluorescein angiography and fundus autofluorescence were useful in determining lesio
299 ral OCT, near-infrared reflectance, and blue fundus autofluorescence, were investigated.
300 ncluding near-infrared (NIR) reflectance and fundus autofluorescence with a confocal scanning laser o

 
Page Top