コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s photography, spectral-domain OCT [SD-OCT], fundus autofluorescence).
2 ral-domain optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence.
3 ation plots), SD-OCT, and sometimes mfERG or fundus autofluorescence.
4 ger wavelengths, a characteristic typical of fundus autofluorescence.
5 n retinal diseases characterized by aberrant fundus autofluorescence.
6 e was measurable by HPLC and by quantitative fundus autofluorescence.
7 iography, indocyanine green angiography, and fundus autofluorescence.
8 ion of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy on fundus autofluorescence.
9 nsistent results for GA growth compared with fundus autofluorescence.
10 fundus photography, spectral-domain OCT, and fundus autofluorescence.
11 t, visibility on funduscopy, ultrasound, and fundus autofluorescence.
12 g the growth of atrophic lesions measured by fundus autofluorescence.
13 cidence of atrophic lesions as determined by fundus autofluorescence.
14 diameter of a paracentral ring of increased fundus autofluorescence.
15 ristic imaging on fluorescein angiography or fundus autofluorescence; (3) absent to mild anterior cha
17 tively sparing the fovea; (4) characteristic fundus autofluorescence abnormalities; (5) full-field el
23 visual acuity (BCVA), widefield angiography, fundus autofluorescence (AF), and wnt signaling pathway
24 surements using two techniques (2-wavelength fundus autofluorescence [AF] and heterochromatic flicker
25 main optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence analysis were performed in patie
26 imaging including color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence and cross sectional and en-face
29 and optical coherence tomography (along with fundus autofluorescence and multifocal electroretinograp
30 ence tomography features and staging system, fundus autofluorescence and near-infrared reflectance fe
31 ata, signs and symptoms, visual acuity (VA), fundus autofluorescence and OCT findings, ERG phenotype,
32 of clinical notes, retinal imaging including fundus autofluorescence and OCT, electroretinography (ER
35 lor fundus photography, automated perimetry, fundus autofluorescence and spectral domain optical cohe
36 derwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus autofluorescence and spectral domain-optical cohe
38 e evaluated the multimodal imaging including fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical cohe
39 onal and morphologic examinations, including fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical cohe
41 trophy was delineated on the basis of serial fundus-autofluorescence and infrared-reflectance images.
42 ed the foveal attenuation normally seen with fundus autofluorescence, and a concentric macular rings
43 infrared reflectance, hypoautofluorescent on fundus autofluorescence, and as subretinal deposits on s
44 ptic nerve head (ONH), infrared reflectance, fundus autofluorescence, and color fundus photographs (C
45 with biomicroscopy, OCT and OCT angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and fluorescein and indocyanine
47 color photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and high-resolution optical coh
48 ncluding optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence, and indocyanine green and fluor
49 ndus photography or MultiColor imaging, OCT, fundus autofluorescence, and OCT angiography were includ
50 color photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomograph
52 l field, and full-field electroretinography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomograph
55 uded change from baseline in microperimetry, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain optical coh
56 nd clinical information, fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain-OCT (SD-OCT
58 ering) could produce a cross-shaped increase fundus autofluorescence artifact on subsequent imaging.
59 ral color fundus and optic disc photography, fundus autofluorescence, automated perimetry, and optica
62 ence (GAF; Clarus, Carl Zeiss Meditec), blue fundus autofluorescence (BAF; Spectralis, Heidelberg Eng
63 hy (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), blue fundus autofluorescence (BFAF), en face OCT, and OCT ang
64 visual acuity with ETDRS charts, blue-light fundus autofluorescence, (BL-FAF), near-infrared fundus
66 o short-wavelength light resulted in reduced fundus autofluorescence, decreased HPLC-quantified A2E,
71 he enlargement of the atrophic lesions using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and color fundus photograp
72 coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-Angiography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and fluorescein-angiograph
73 almoscopy, and fundus photography, including fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and near-infrared reflecta
74 of at least 4 years and had undergone annual fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and OCT imaging using Heid
75 basis of full-field electroretinogram (ERG) Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and spectral domain-optica
77 e of change in GA over 12 months measured by fundus autofluorescence (FAF) at 3 timepoints: baseline,
79 jective corroboration for visual fields, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) can show damage topographi
85 multaneous fundus photographs and SD OCT and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images of eyes affected wi
87 3 weeks and after 6 weeks, respectively, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images were obtained to vi
91 tinal detachment with gradable postoperative fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging were included in t
92 s photography, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, and audiologic an
93 l-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, full-field electr
95 l-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, Humphrey visual f
96 trawidefield (UWF) color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, OCT, and electror
97 s photography, fluorescein angiography (FA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, optical coherence
98 us photography, near-infrared (NIR) imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spectral domain o
99 logic examination, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spectral-domain (
101 thalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spectral-domain o
110 ots corresponding to focal dots of decreased fundus autofluorescence (FAF) surrounded by increased FA
111 main optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) to confirm a diagnosis.
112 contribution of retro-mode imaging (RMI) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) to the characterization of
113 in optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) underwent testing for best
114 omain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and fluorescein angiograp
115 rimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and fundus photography.
116 omain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and infrared reflectance
117 with conventional multimodal imaging (color, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and infrared reflectance
118 omain optical-coherence-tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and near-infrared-reflect
119 ear-infrared (NIR) and short-wavelength (SW) fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and NIR reflectance (REF)
120 (ICGA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT angiography (OCTA
121 s of TARP on widefield fundus color imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT were described.
122 ompared with automated visual fields (AVFs), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and optical coherence tom
125 g including near-infrared reflectance (NIR), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain optic
126 rom near-infrared reflectance (NIR) imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain-optic
128 tion together with color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral-domain optic
129 ude color fundus photography (CFP), confocal fundus autofluorescence (FAF), confocal near-infrared re
130 plete ophthalmological examination including fundus autofluorescence (FAF), dynamic simultaneous fluo
131 (BCVA), ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (
132 undus examination, color fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (
133 y (PAM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (
134 and recurrent CSCR were reviewed, including fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (
135 static perimetry, fundus color photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fundus fluorescein angiog
136 ct ophthalmoscopy, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), high-resolution optical c
137 thalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), infrared imaging, and spe
138 chart, fundus photography, ultrasonography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), infrared reflectance (IR)
139 ng best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), blue fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared autofluores
140 uding color and red-free fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared reflectance
141 fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared reflectance
142 faster-growing lesions from 2 eyes based on fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared reflectance
143 s who underwent serial ultrawide-field (UWF) fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OCT, and Macular Integrit
144 visual acuity of 20/25 or better and normal fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OCT, multicolor, near-inf
145 to assess the correlations between standard fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomogra
146 sual acuity (BCVA), color fundus photograph, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomogra
147 omain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), or multifocal electroreti
148 uscin accumulation, as measured by increased fundus autofluorescence (FAF), precedes progression or d
149 visits for at least 1 examination modality: fundus autofluorescence (FAF), spectral-domain (SD) opti
150 ng was completed for each patient; including fundus autofluorescence (FAF), spectral-domain optical c
151 gment epithelium (RPE) is the main source of fundus autofluorescence (FAF), the target of an imaging
164 growth rates per disease, imaging modality (fundus autofluorescence [FAF], optical coherence tomogra
167 fundus imaging, including color photographs, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and in
168 ld imaging included pseudocolor photography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and in
169 r detachments based on clinical examination, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and op
170 ubmaculopathy based on clinical examination, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and sp
171 ation, fundus photography, infrared imaging, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and sp
176 erence tomography (angiography) (SD-OCT(A)), fundus autofluorescence, fundus photography, infrared im
177 uding near-infrared reflectance (NIR), green fundus autofluorescence (G-FAF), confocal pseudocolor, a
178 (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering), green fundus autofluorescence (GAF; Clarus, Carl Zeiss Meditec
180 reen angiography, near-infrared reflectance, fundus autofluorescence, high-resolution OCT, and ultraw
183 east 1 eye at the most recent visit, and (2) fundus autofluorescence images for at least 2 visits wit
188 ain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) and fundus autofluorescence images were acquired every 6 mon
191 rophic regions detected on serial registered fundus autofluorescence images were semiautomatically de
192 these patients, 215 had at least 2 gradable fundus autofluorescence images with atrophic lesion(s) p
193 aluated, including color fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence images, and spectral-domain OCT
194 tofluorescent AZOOR line in short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence images, delineating the peripapi
195 papillary sparing is a consistent feature on fundus autofluorescence images, whereas the same region
197 fundus examination, Goldmann visual fields, fundus autofluorescence imaging (FAF), optical coherence
198 hanges visible upon clinical examination and fundus autofluorescence imaging (occult retinopathy).
200 responded to hyperautofluorescent lesions on fundus autofluorescence imaging and subretinal hyperrefl
202 a normal retinal appearance, although their fundus autofluorescence imaging demonstrated foci of inc
210 elength reduced-illuminance and conventional fundus autofluorescence imaging showed good concordance
211 l patients underwent spectral-domain OCT and fundus autofluorescence imaging using the Spectralis HRA
215 l coherence tomography (OCT), and blue light fundus autofluorescence imaging were performed for all p
216 graphy (CFP), near-infrared reflectance, and fundus autofluorescence imaging were performed in all pa
217 uorescein and indocyanine green angiography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and corresponding eye-t
218 l-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence imaging, and electroretinogram (
219 eld electroretinography, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and optical coherence t
220 clinically by wide-field color photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and spectral-domain opt
221 linical examination, fundus photography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging, and visual function was
222 and detailed retinal imaging was performed: fundus autofluorescence imaging, digital color fundoscop
223 tance, red-free images and blue reflectance, fundus autofluorescence imaging, indocyanine green angio
224 molecular genetic testing, retinal imaging (fundus autofluorescence imaging, optical coherence tomog
225 erations on optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence imaging, retinal function assess
226 fundus examination, wide-field photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, sedated electroretinogr
227 including fundus photography, infra-red and fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral-domain optical
228 ectral-domain OCT, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, visual field testing, f
242 ultrawide-field color fundus photography and fundus autofluorescence imaging; and spectral domain-OCT
244 We assessed the utility of quantification of fundus autofluorescence in the evaluation and follow-up
245 Most importantly, we also observed reduced fundus autofluorescence in the eyes injected with NP and
246 tudies that monitored atrophy progression by fundus autofluorescence in untreated eyes with STGD1 for
247 chart, fundus photography, ultrasonography, fundus autofluorescence, infrared reflectance (IR) imagi
248 he retina included color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, intravenous fluorescein angiogr
249 ield and pattern), visual evoked potentials, fundus autofluorescence IRR, and optical coherence tomog
255 In Stargardt disease with DDAF lesions, fundus autofluorescence may serve as a monitoring tool f
256 etinal fluid on OCT, hypoautofluorescence on fundus autofluorescence, middle to outer retinal hyperva
257 pectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, multifocal electroretinography,
260 dal retinal imaging, including near-infrared fundus autofluorescence (NIR-AF), blue autofluorescence
262 pectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), fundus autofluorescence, OCT angiography (RTVue XR Avant
263 , retinal imaging (color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, OCT), electrophysiologic assess
264 graphy (OCT), en face near-infrared imaging, fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography an
268 110 control subjects underwent quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) imaging using a confocal s
269 articipants were examined using quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) imaging with a modified co
270 SW-AF intensities, measured as quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF), indicated chronic impairm
271 length fundus autofluorescence (quantitative fundus autofluorescence [qAF]) and spectral-domain optic
272 ndus lesions by quantifying short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (quantitative fundus autofluores
273 domain OCT results, OCT angiography results, fundus autofluorescence results, ultra-widefield fluores
276 y evaluations, GA lesion area as measured by fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain optical coheren
277 ite 10-2 visual field pattern density plots, fundus autofluorescence, spectral-density optical cohere
278 acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, fundus autofluorescence, spectral-domain optical coheren
279 included short-wavelength and near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, spectral-domain optical coheren
281 e symmetry that presents on short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-AF) imaging with hyperautofl
282 tical coherence tomography, short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-AF), quantitative autofluore
284 ctional back-scattering and short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) to study disease-relate
285 erized clinically and imaged with short-wave fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF), spectral-domain optica
288 idenced by HPLC analysis and quantitation of fundus autofluorescence; this effect is consistent with
290 aluate the disease extent on ultra-widefield fundus autofluorescence (UWF-FAF) in patients with ABCA4
291 CI, 0.42-0.61 mm2/y), and of total decreased fundus autofluorescence was 0.35 mm2/y (95% CI, 0.28-0.4
292 f patients exhibiting annular RPE lesions on fundus autofluorescence was included for chart review an
296 uding optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence were evaluated at the baseline a
297 tients, and optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence were performed in 4 patients.
300 ncluding near-infrared (NIR) reflectance and fundus autofluorescence with a confocal scanning laser o