コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 were identified in the inferior frontal and fusiform gyri.
2 ut was specific for areas in the lingual and fusiform gyri.
3 king on clear speech activated both anterior fusiform gyri.
4 in visual areas, particularly the bilateral fusiform gyri.
5 egated area, including the right lingual and fusiform gyri.
6 parahippocampal gyrus and in the lingual and fusiform gyri.
7 al cortex extending to inferior temporal and fusiform gyri.
8 ges in the early visual cortex, lingual, and fusiform gyri.
10 ition elicited activation in the lingual and fusiform gyri and in the Brodmann areas 22 and 38 in sup
11 d enlarged GMV in the caudate, thalamus, and fusiform gyri and reduced GMV in the cerebellar vermis i
12 ial frontal gyri, bilateral middle occipital/fusiform gyri, and bilateral cerebella for both the rhym
13 the right posterior parahippocampal and mid-fusiform gyri, and in the hippocampal body in healthy yo
14 ding the hippocampus and parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, and increasing activation in the posterom
16 ore by regions in the inferior occipital and fusiform gyri, and perception of eye gaze was mediated m
17 t posterior hippocampus, parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, and predominantly left hemisphere extra-t
18 Studies with functional MRI confirm that the fusiform gyri are involved in color and face perception,
19 xperiments have clearly established that the fusiform gyri are preferentially responsive to faces, wh
20 ial/pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus, and the fusiform gyri, as well as the medial and lateral dorsal
21 ons, including the primary visual cortex and fusiform gyri bilaterally were activated while the secon
23 l gyri), visual (posterior inferior temporal/fusiform gyri comprising the visual word form area) and
24 ipital complex, the parahippocampal, and the fusiform gyri did not predict target presence, while hig
25 p deprivation caused decreased activation in fusiform gyri for angry faces and decreased ratings of h
26 amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal, and fusiform gyri in 30 of 31 subjects compared with normal
27 d lexical (anterior-middle inferior temporal/fusiform gyri in the basal temporal language area) infor
29 -wise differences in the cuneus, lingual and fusiform gyri, middle occipital lobe, inferior parietal
33 ream of activation involving the lingual and fusiform gyri, perirolandic cortex, thalamus and anterio
34 stimuli resulted in greater deactivation in fusiform gyri, possibly reflecting greater suppression o
35 eam, particularly the inferior occipital and fusiform gyri, remained selective despite showing only 9
36 in other brain regions, including MT or V5, fusiform gyri, right premotor cortex, and the intraparie
37 within the inferior occipital gyri, lateral fusiform gyri, superior temporal sulci, amygdala, and th
38 rior parietal cortices, inferior frontal and fusiform gyri, superior temporal sulcus, amygdala, and s
39 the inferior frontal, inferior parietal, and fusiform gyri; the precuneus; and the dorsomedial prefro
40 icularly strong in the inferior temporal and fusiform gyri, two areas important for object recognitio
41 mary visual cortex, superior occipital gyri, fusiform gyri, ventral premotor area, superior parietal
42 er in the left and right parahippocampal and fusiform gyri were assessed with a stereological point-c
43 -famous) are the right lingual and bilateral fusiform gyri, while the areas specialized for famous st
44 orhinal cortex and the inferior temporal and fusiform gyri, with an indirect effect of HT on cognitiv