ライフサイエンスコーパス: general surgery

1 (1 in 33 for cardiac surgery vs 1 in 258 for general surgery).

2 ancial outcomes in the delivery of emergency general surgery.

3 e morbidity and mortality of the woman after general surgery.

4 3.2% underwent emergency surgery) undergoing general surgery.

5 All of them are practicing general surgery.

6 entered residency with a desire to practice general surgery.

7 rest of contemporary medical students toward general surgery.

8 rent parts of the world choose not to pursue general surgery.

9 d the perceptions of medical students toward general surgery.

10 splantation and cardiothoracic, vascular and general surgery.

11 hortage of surgeons who practice broad-based general surgery.

12 al critical care, and elective and emergency general surgery.

13 .8% females, and 62% who underwent emergency general surgery.

14 e cohort of patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery.

15 cemic control in patients who have undergone general surgery.

16 fections (POI) in patients who had undergone general surgery.

17 t predictor of perioperative mortality after general surgery.

18 queried for each of the 20 top codes top in general surgery.

19 ors affecting patient safety in laparoscopic general surgery.

20 The median LOS was 1 day (general surgery: 0; upper GI: 2; small and large intesti

21 d: 1,053 acute care emergency surgery, 1,964 general surgery, 1,491 transplant surgery, 995 facial su

22 Of 173643 patients undergoing general surgery (101632 females and 72011 males), 130235

23 The most commonly represented specialty was general surgery (120, 38%), but subspecialty surgery suc

24 for all procedures, 14.7% (580 of 3956) for general surgery, 15.5% (128 of 828) for vascular surgery

25 iety of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class was 2 (general surgery: 2; upper GI: 3; small and large intesti

26 s: acute care emergency surgery 10.8% versus general surgery 4.3%, transplant 6.6%, oral-maxillofacia

27 Overall 30-day readmission was 7.8% (general surgery: 5.0%; upper GI: 6.9%; small and large i

28 Fourteen studies looked at general surgery, 6 at obstetrics-gynecology, 2 at urolog

29 s: acute care emergency surgery 73.4% versus general surgery 64.9%, transplant 63.3%, oral-maxillofac

30 e emergency surgery (13.5 +/- 17.4 d) versus general surgery (8.7 +/- 12.9), transplant (7.8 +/- 11.6

31 left lip or palate repair ($47.74 per DALY), general surgery ($82.32 per DALY), hydrocephalus surgery

32 er study surveyed 21 US program directors in general surgery about their opinions regarding resident

33 ed controlled superiority trial, we included general surgery adult inpatients (age >/=18 years) at tw

34 rom oral anticoagulant studies in orthopedic/general surgery and extrapolation to actual clinical pra

35 A bibliometric review was performed among general surgery and medicine journals to identify the 50

36 However, in general surgery and medicine, the aOR for death favored

37 chemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is common in general surgery and organ transplantation, and in the ca

38 ospectively reviewed operative case-logs for general surgery and orthopaedic cases at both hospitals

39 on included patients treated before or after general surgery and patients admitted to a surgical serv

40 1013 voluntarily participating residents in general surgery and surgical specialties at ACGME-accred

41 e dramatically increased entry of women into general surgery and surgical subspecialties, traditional

42 consider to be essential to the practice of general surgery and then we measured the actual operativ

43 oscopic and robot-assisted surgeries in both general surgery and urology have been performed with tec

44 I COUGH was implemented for all general surgery and vascular surgery patients at our ins

45 hopedic surgery, 92808 procedures (39.2%) in general surgery, and 42801 procedures (18.1%) in vascula

46 fied; 78.9% for trauma and injury, 12.5% for general surgery, and 8.6% for ophthalmology.

47 significant mortality and morbidity risk in general surgery, and should not be underestimated even i

48 n good value for the extra resources used in general surgery, and to some extent vascular surgery, bu

49 eath favored the low FFP:RBC ratio subgroup; general surgery: aOR, 4.27 (95% CI, 1.28-14.22; P = .02)

50 General surgery appears to be as safe for pregnant women

51 The overall rate of interest toward general surgery as a career choice was 24%.

52 e the perceptions of medical students toward general surgery as a career choice with a particular emp

53 Using general surgery as the reference, the Star scores varied

54 24 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic general surgery at a single center in the Netherlands fr

55 ve patients undergoing elective laparoscopic general surgery at an academic hospital during the first

56 e, but they do show that patients undergoing general surgery at hospitals with better nursing environ

57 e reasons behind why medical students choose general surgery between very high HDI countries and medi

58 imbursement while ensuring access to quality general surgery care in the United States.

59 A survey about student perceptions of a general surgery career was distributed to 9 medical scho

60 General surgery cases at a single tertiary care center r

61 Additionally general surgery cases from the ACS NSQIP 2008 PUF data w

62 Improvement Program database to capture all general surgery cases performed at 435 hospitals nationw

63 cal outcomes for both emergency and elective general surgery cases using a national database.

64 Ten general surgery cases were observed and assessed using O

65 Ninety general surgery cases were observed in real time.

66 an factors analysis of elective laparoscopic general surgery cases, this study provided a quantitativ

67 Bedrock general surgery cases-trauma, vascular, pediatrics, and

68 e General Surgery Qualifying Examination and General Surgery Certifying Examination of the American B

69 ournals to identify the 50 most highly cited general surgery clinical research studies from 4 consecu

70 o visited the Obstetrics and Gynaecology and General Surgery Clinics of University of Malaya Medical

71 General surgery department pilot projects were then impl

72 All patients evaluated by the general surgery department through outpatient clinics, c

73 atient was admitted to our hospital, and the general surgery department was consulted.

74 The patient was hospitalized by general surgery department with the diagnosis of jejunal

75 tudinal follow-up, and scholarly focus after general surgery education.

76 on and fellowships will impact the future of general surgery education.

77 o assess the seasonal variation in emergency general surgery (EGS) admissions.

78 0% of elderly patients who require emergency general surgery (EGS) die in the year after the operatio

79 patients undergoing 1 of 10 common emergency general surgery (EGS) operations?

80 Compare emergency general surgery (EGS) patient outcomes following index a

81 Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients have a disproportionate b

82 rivers of care discontinuity among emergency general surgery (EGS) patients.

83 -64 yr) and older adult (>/=65 yr) emergency general surgery (EGS) patients; (2) vary by diagnostic c

84 ital or a different hospital after emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures do not exist.

85 Emergency general surgery (EGS) represents 11% of surgical admissi

86 ular trends in the epidemiology of emergency general surgery (EGS), by analyzing changes in demograph

87 al crisis in access to high-quality care for general surgery emergencies.

88 ival rates were improved for all 10 types of general surgery emergency operations when performed at h

89 Forty-four residents (51.8%) left general surgery for another surgical discipline, 21 (24.

90 s the most common subject (26%), followed by general surgery/gastrointestinal (24%).

91 Nationally, general surgery GME-research participation was independe

92 -school graduates who completed >=5 years of general surgery graduate medical education (GME) and bec

93 ons, most studies reported low confidence in general surgery graduates.

94 tality, 59.1%); among the 12 patients in the general surgery group who required 7 or more days of CRR

95 ency serves 2 purposes-prepare graduates for general surgery (GS) practice or postresidency surgical

96 his study evaluates the current state of the General Surgery (GS) residency training model by investi

97 andate was expected to reduce attrition from general surgery (GS) residency.

98 0 graduating CR residents with 10 graduating general surgery (GS) residents from across North America

99 ity and individual career goals has led most general surgery (GS) residents to pursue fellowship trai

100 ify and clarify the causes and extent of the general surgery (GS) workforce shortfalls.

101 < 0.05).We studied 86,751 pairs admitted for general surgery (GS), 214,302 pairs of patients admitted

102 , and surgical specialization-categorized as general surgery (GS), surgical oncology (SO), and transp

103 rauma, surgical critical care, and emergency general surgery) has been developed to increase interest

104 geographic and socioeconomic regions toward general surgery, has been broadly disseminated.

105 ately obese patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery have paradoxically "lower" crude and adj

106 Dialysis patients undergoing nonemergent general surgery have significantly elevated risks of pos

107 r inflation, Medicare reimbursement rates in general surgery have steadily decreased from 2000 to 201

108 erns for vascular surgery outcomes resembled general surgery; however, orthopedics outcomes did not s

109 eases the likelihood that they will practice general surgery in a similar setting despite initial spe

110 Emergency general surgery in elderly patients with preoperative DN

111 surgical outcomes among patients undergoing general surgery in participating Michigan hospitals.

112 omplete understanding of financial trends in general surgery in the United States is lacking.

113 anesthesiology, cardiology, family practice, general surgery, internal medicine, pediatrics, and psyc

114 Today's general surgery interns are faced with increased duty ho

115 A total of 249 categorical general surgery interns from 10 general surgery residenc

116 A cross-sectional survey of categorical general surgery interns was conducted between June and A

117 A significant proportion of academic general surgery is composed of bariatric surgery, yet su

118 aluation of trends in reimbursement rates in general surgery is important for defining the specialty'

119 General surgery is unique among graduate medical educati

120 oard gender composition among 10 high-impact general surgery journals in 1997, 2007, and 2017.

121 vel malpractice risk was measured using mean general surgery malpractice insurance premiums; paid cla

122 gnificantly higher among hospitals with high general surgery mortality (mortality quartile >/= 50%; o

123 the availability of chemotherapy, radiation, general surgery, neurosurgery, or ophthalmic surgery, re

124 tive, obstetric fistula, neurosurgery, burn, general surgery, obstetric emergency procedures, anaesth

125 ctive field observations during 148 elective general surgery operations using standardized intake for

126 with a traditional counting protocol in 300 general surgery operations.

127 for patients who underwent major vascular or general surgery operations.

128 Reduced general surgery operative experience in GS+ residencies

129 A subset of 1013 residents training in general surgery or a surgical subspecialty was identifie

130 al transfers for tertiary care services than general surgery or transplant (24.5% vs 15.5% and 8.3% r

131 were histologically confirmed; controls were general surgery, orthopedic, and trauma patients who wer

132 uded 284 098 ambulatory surgical procedures (general surgery, orthopedic, neurosurgical, gynecologic,

133 lass scores were similar across departments (general surgery, orthopedics, urology, etc), race, or ag

134 standard of care in dermatology and surgery (general surgery, otolaryngology, plastics, oculoplastics

135 has brought to the critically ill trauma and general surgery patient in the past few years.

136 Quasi-experimental study of general surgery patient outcomes 2 years before (academi

137 r reform was not associated with a change in general surgery patient outcomes or differences in resid

138 prospectively collected among 202 trauma and general surgery patients admitted to a level I trauma ce

139 gned to compare ICU utilization of emergency general surgery patients admitted to an acute care emerg

140 ICU needs of nontrauma emergency general surgery patients are poorly described.

141 urgical residents and program directors, and general surgery patients from July 1, 2014, to June 30,

142 All general surgery patients from the National Surgical Qual

143 Emergency general surgery patients have increased ICU needs in ter

144 This study included 25752 elderly Medicare general surgery patients treated at focal hospitals and

145 r hypothesis is that tertiary care emergency general surgery patients utilize more ICU resources than

146 emia was associated with adverse outcomes in general surgery patients with and without diabetes.

147 The study population consisted of 470,108 general surgery patients.

148 sociated with DVT formation among trauma and general surgery patients.

149 te care emergency surgery service with other general surgery patients.

150 ter AAA repair, although hospitals with poor general surgery performance (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.63

151 ociation has been seen with common emergency general surgery performed at safety-net hospitals.

152 d by patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, general surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and urolog

153 e DVT rate did not differ between trauma and general surgery populations or in patients receiving onc

154 yet DVT rates remain high in the trauma and general surgery populations.

155 ghty-five residents matched into categorical general surgery postgraduate year 1 spots from July 1, 1

156 ted the rural year were more likely to enter general surgery practice (10 of 11 [91%]) than those who

157 ersity program for the entire 5 years are in general surgery practice (P = .04).

158 As the scope of general surgery practice continues to evolve, general su

159 The scope of general surgery practice has evolved tremendously in the

160 points included completion of a fellowship, general surgery practice, and practice setting populatio

161 all non-Hispanic white and African American general surgery, private sector patients included in the

162 To examine opioid prescribing patterns after general surgery procedures and to estimate an ideal numb

163 A substantial portion of general surgery procedures currently are performed by GS

164 ied 141,010 patients who underwent emergency general surgery procedures in the 2005-2010 Surgeons Nat

165 Inpatient general surgery procedures with National Surgical Qualit

166 luding 90% of obstretric surgeries, 38.5% of general surgery procedures, and 43% of non-obstetric lap

167 ed with improved surgical outcomes following general surgery procedures, apart from existing temporal

168 patients who underwent nonemergent inpatient general surgery procedures.

169 resources can overcome the WE seen in urgent general surgery procedures.

170 ssociated with adverse outcomes in emergency general surgery procedures.

171 care reimbursement rates for the most common general surgery procedures.

172 GS+ surgeons performed 15% to 33% of all general surgery procedures.

173 d readmission rates across 4 common elective general surgery procedures.

174 ive and postoperative utilization for common general surgery procedures.

175 y selected patients across 4 common elective general surgery procedures.

176 riability in opioid prescriptions for common general surgery procedures.

177 parting residents often relocated to another general surgery program (20%; 95% CI, 15%-24%) or switch

178 ough 5 training in a single university-based general surgery program from July 1, 2011, through June

179 pothesized that visa sponsorship policies of general surgery programs (GSPs) may be discordant with t

180 General surgery programs coexisted with 35 colorectal (C

181 General surgery programs have relatively high attrition,

182 nt to residency program directors at the 254 general surgery programs in the US accredited by the RRC

183 The general surgery programs were chosen on the basis of the

184 Attendings in 14 General Surgery programs were trained to use a) the 5-le

185 that reported on residents (n = 19821) from general surgery programs.

186 ars) as well as first-time pass rates on the General Surgery Qualifying Examination and General Surge

187 ypothesized that fellowships coexisting with general surgery residencies do not negatively impact GSR

188 Survey sent to all 239 program directors of general surgery residencies participating in the Nationa

189 Residency Application Service applicants to general surgery residencies, 26,237 first year matricula

190 icant pool, the relative competitiveness for general surgery residency (GSR) is undefined.

191 participation in >=1 year of research during general surgery residency and each of full-time academic

192 nship between such dedicated research during general surgery residency and surgeons' career paths has

193 Electronic Residency Application Service to General Surgery Residency and the Graduate Medical Educa

194 ulation, graduation, and attrition rates for general surgery residency exists for URMs.

195 , 26,237 first year matriculants, and 24,893 general surgery residency graduates.

196 was to identify a group of operations which general surgery residency program directors believed res

197 neral surgery residents in a single academic general surgery residency program over a 10-year period.

198 y requesting residents within a large single general surgery residency program to rate their understa

199 aduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved US general surgery residency programs (n = 118), their affi

200 lected using stratified random sampling from general surgery residency programs across the United Sta

201 These findings serve as benchmarks for general surgery residency programs aiming to prepare tra

202 A total of 118 general surgery residency programs and 154 hospitals wer

203 General surgery residency programs are facing multiple p

204 To evaluate and financially reward general surgery residency programs based on performance,

205 ragmatic, noninferiority trial involving 117 general surgery residency programs in the United States

206 categorical general surgery interns from 10 general surgery residency programs in the western United

207 c noninferiority cluster-randomized trial of general surgery residency programs with 2 study arms.

208 We analyzed (1) operative cases for general surgery residency programs with and without coex

209 e clinical outcomes achieved by graduates of general surgery residency programs.

210 procedures performed by 454 surgeons from 73 general surgery residency programs.

211 General surgery residency training among accredited prog

212 However, clinical experience in general surgery residency training has undergone relativ

213 eneral surgery practice continues to evolve, general surgery residency training will need to better i

214 cal Education Survey of residents completing general surgery residency were retrospectively analyzed

215 Shortening general surgery residency would not necessarily limit ex

216 To address concerns related to shortened general surgery residency, the American Board of Colon a

217 c review of the PubMed indexed literature on general surgery resident confidence was performed in Mar

218 General surgery resident performance on the annual in-tr

219 Survey of all graduates of an academic general surgery resident program from 1990 to 2005 (n =

220 measured the eye movements of members of the general surgery resident team at St.

221 Nearly 80% of general surgery residents (GSR) pursue Fellowship traini

222 of appendectomies performed by unsupervised general surgery residents (GSRs) with those performed in

223 All general surgery residents (n = 49) and surgical patients

224 A cross-sectional national survey of general surgery residents administered with the 2018 Ame

225 rams, an anonymous survey of 371 categorical general surgery residents and 10-year attrition rates fo

226 as administered to 141 internal medicine and general surgery residents and 497 RNs in a single academ

227 Hazardous driving events are prevalent among general surgery residents and associated with frequent d

228 rdous driving events in a national cohort of general surgery residents and determine the associations

229 he surgical community, there is concern that general surgery residents are choosing subspecialty trai

230 US General Surgery residents are not universally ready to i

231 ell-being are risk factors for MVCs, placing general surgery residents at risk.

232 D PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of all general surgery residents completing a survey in January

233 Nearly 1 in every 4 categorical general surgery residents does not complete training.

234 Among 7391 general surgery residents from 260 programs (response ra

235 General surgery residents from US programs were surveyed

236 Retrospective review of all categorical general surgery residents in a single academic general s

237 General surgery residents in our program do not report b

238 All categorical general surgery residents matriculated from July 1, 1999

239 Trained raters observed General Surgery residents performing laparoscopic cholec

240 Nearly 80% of graduating general surgery residents pursue additional training in

241 After performing a baseline TEP in the OR, general surgery residents randomized to mastery learning

242 A majority of categorical general surgery residents seriously consider leaving res

243 using the following criteria: A--graduating general surgery residents should be competent to perform

244 medical specialties, a significant number of general surgery residents spend 1 to 3 years in dedicate

245 ncy of MIS relative to open operations among general surgery residents using the Accreditation Counci

246 e for the overall attrition prevalence among general surgery residents was 18% (95% CI, 14%-21%), wit

247 General surgery residents' attitudes, experiences, and e

248 Of 5345 categorical general surgery residents, 4402 (82.4%) responded, repre

249 th male (25% vs 15%, respectively; P = .008) general surgery residents, and most residents left after

250 ehaviors included university-based surgeons, general surgery residents, and preclinical student obser

251 Mistreatment occurs frequently among general surgery residents, especially women, and is asso

252 ted to quantify and measure it in graduating general surgery residents.

253 rmine promotion and fellowship candidacy for general surgery residents.

254 ectional survey involving all US categorical general surgery residents.

255 family and children affect the experience of general surgery residents.

256 y In-Training Examination to all categorical general surgery residents.

257 owship is a common and costly practice among general surgery residents.

258 -sectional survey was administered to all US general surgery residents.

259 Outcome and Measure: Attrition prevalence of general surgery residents.

260 e the estimate of attrition prevalence among general surgery residents.

261 st median eGJS score was colorectal, whereas general surgery scored lowest (median: 33 vs 7, respecti

262 and categorical interns pursuing careers in general surgery scoring in the top quartile on the Ameri

263 cluding all patients undergoing surgery at a general surgery service during the 1-year study period.

264 Consecutive patients admitted to a busy general surgery service from January 2000 to January 200

265 service within 30 days of discharge from the general surgery service to characterize index and readmi

266 ctive chart review of deaths that occur on a general surgery service.

267 of all consecutive patients discharged from general surgery services at a tertiary care, university-

268 Patients discharged by general surgery services were prescribed 1.23 (95% CI =

269 General surgery showed a decrease in volume in some oper

270 e volume, fewer surgeon years of experience, general surgery specialty, and preference for more exten

271 Original research in the 25 highest-impact general surgery/subspecialty journals were included (1/2

272 ernia repair is the most common procedure in general surgery, thus improvements in surgical technique

273 horacic-cardiovascular surgery, and 15.3% in general surgery to 5.2% in family medicine, 3.1% in pedi

274 rgery, urology, ENT, craniofacial, burn, and general surgery) totalled revenue of US$2.67 billion and

275 ectronic anonymous survey was distributed to general surgery trainees in participating program; all g

276 sident Education web portal was designed for general surgery trainees in the United States, and the S

277 gramme and the eLogbook databases for all UK General Surgery trainees registered from August 1, 2007

278 ported to the RRC by all residents finishing general surgery training in June 2005 was reviewed.

279 Broad-based general surgery training may be jeopardized by reduced c

280 e consistent across class years and types of general surgery training program.

281 General surgery training programmes are often responsive

282 We identified descriptions of general surgery training programmes in 52 countries.

283 Attrition of residents from general surgery training programs is relatively high; ho

284 rgery trainees in participating program; all general surgery training programs nationally were invite

285 Sixteen general surgery training programs participated, yielding

286 ation application (SIMPL), residents from 13 general surgery training programs were evaluated perform

287 attrition rates remain a great challenge for general surgery training programs.

288 stics and destinations of residents who left general surgery training programs.

289 998, and Dec 31, 2013, describing a national general surgery training system.

290 ) is a health care model combining emergency general surgery, trauma, and critical care.

291 he first half of 2007 was set up in a 56-bed general surgery unit in Lyon University Hospital, France

292 ve log data for 3 specialties were examined: general surgery, urology, and plastic surgery.

293 ttending surgeons in cardiothoracic surgery, general surgery, vascular surgery, pediatric surgery, ob

294 , the most important reason for not choosing general surgery was found to be due to perceptions of an

295 groups and initial intent to practice rural general surgery were compared.

296 factors affecting the delivery of emergency general surgery were included.

297 Fifty patients undergoing major elective general surgery were observed for a total of 659 days of

298 lar between acute care emergency surgery and general surgery, whereas transplant had fewer.

299 who completed the rural year are practicing general surgery, while only 13 of 45 (29%) who stayed at

300 of 118,707 patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery who were included in the National Surgic