ライフサイエンスコーパス: genetic distance

1 linkage disequilibrium (LD) as a function of genetic distance.

2 were defined as >/=2 sequences with </=1.5% genetic distance.

3 s, pairwise F(st) (theta) and Nei's standard genetic distance.

4 etermined using taxonomic classification and genetic distance.

5 dussertorum and relate these differences to genetic distance.

6 d Asian) and with respect to interpopulation genetic distance.

7 ormative meioses, a rate consistent with the genetic distance.

8 discriminant analysis and common measure of genetic distance.

9 nucleotides shared MRCA is reciprocal to the genetic distance.

10 eographical distance between populations and genetic distance.

11 atic pressures, and the ratio of physical to genetic distance.

12 sion process that progresses with increasing genetic distance.

13 g to marked distortions between physical and genetic distances.

14 y other organisms, and on the measurement of genetic distances.

15 ts the precision of estimates of four common genetic distances.

16 ecies pairs of Darwin's finches at different genetic distances.

17 yielded HIV sequences, all without increased genetic distances.

18 s that can control gene activity across vast genetic distances.

19 e sequencing identified 33 cases with little genetic distance (0-6 SNPs) between strains, deemed rela

20 rs were identified using 104 combinations of genetic distance (1%-2.5%) and bootstrap (50%-100%) thre

21 sequilibrium and haplotype sharing over long genetic distances (5-15 cM).

22 pared: (i) random split; (ii) split based on genetic distance according to principal component analys

23 significantly higher than the intraspecific genetic distance according to the barcoding gap analysis

24 tion to maximize immunogenicity and minimize genetic distance across circulating strains may enhance

25 , the distance fraction (d(f)), accounts for genetic distance across possible topologies and is desig

26 Genetic distances across a1-sh2 varied twofold among gen

27 Genetic distances across the a1-sh2 interval varied thre

28 When the three loci were removed, genetic distances across the remaining seven loci were m

29 We tested genetic distance against different measures of geographi

30 s far greater than could be accounted for by genetic distance alone.

31 ed/deduced by the comparison of physical and genetic distances along chromosomes and ratios of solo L

32 However, mitochondrial genetic distances also correlate with the distance requi

33 The mean genetic distance among all serovars varied from 0.1% for

34 Genetic distance among Lassa strains was found to correl

35 hropod community phenotype is related to the genetic distance among plants that these arthropods depe

36 For both S. oviceps and S. dussertorum, genetic distance among populations is related to larval

37 t and evaluated results against estimates of genetic distance among populations of anemonefish, Amphi

38 Greater genetic distance among the more common varieties on the

39 For both methods, genetic distances among a set of markers can be estimate

40 Genetic distances among all pairs of populations show a

41 xed individual samples) and by incorporating genetic distances among haplotypes in measures of geneti

42 Genetic distances among HCV variants within recently inf

43 E1-HVR1 sequences demonstrated higher serum genetic distances among HCV/human immunodeficiency virus

44 e polymorphic, and the SINE1 insertion-based genetic distances among populations reflected geographic

45 and mouse metabolomes diverge following the genetic distances among species, we detect remarkable ac

46 a result that was further supported through genetic distance analysis.

47 Based on phylogeny, genetic distance and clustering patterns, we set out pra

48 Intrasubject genetic distance and entropy were highest in hypervariab

49 connectivity, a stronger correlation between genetic distance and geographic distance, and a stronger

50 st showed no significant correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance among A. sutu

51 distance, and a stronger correlation between genetic distance and landscape resistance for lions than

52 icant decline of linkage disequilibrium with genetic distance and low levels of background linkage di

53 p, intrasample hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) genetic distance and nonsynonymous substitutions increas

54 On a global scale, both genetic distance and phonemic distance between populatio

55 s exhibited significant differences in Nei's genetic distance and SBI typing.

56 Using measures of genetic distance and spatial autocorrelation, we compare

57 te the maximum among-population variation to genetic distance and then examine the remaining variatio

58 We compared several types of genetic distances and calculated a threshold, using mini

59 A strong association between genetic distances and lake-level changes suggests that h

60 l is supported by the results of analyses of genetic distances and lineage sharing.

61 With correlation of genetic distances and nearest genetic distances with pre

62 ps of OlVs were distinguished based on their genetic distances and on the inversion of a central 32-k

63 the depiction of adaptive landscapes showing genetic distances and probabilities of travel along thei

64 e Chinese swine breeds were used to estimate genetic distances and times of breed divergence.

65 tic clustering, shared resistance mutations, genetic distance, and estimated infection dates.

66 unt was positively correlated with HCV load, genetic distance, and Ka.

67 nificantly higher CD4+-cell count, HCV load, genetic distance, and Ka/Ks than those infected with gen

68 tly increased number of HCV clones, entropy, genetic distance, and ratio of nonsynonymous substitutio

69 correlations between caste rank distance and genetic distance are demonstrated for Tamil castes using

70 r analysis, and find that mutation rates and genetic distances are estimated under bias when gBGC is

71 The direct effects of genetic distances are negligible and only their common e

72 Large genetic distances are observed among African populations

73 d nine different phylogenetic subtypes whose genetic distances are similar to those reported for the

74 which is inferred from the data, just as the genetic distances are.

75 ustering, principal components, and pairwise genetic distance as converging approaches, we identified

76 Hadzabe and Jumid R:'hoansi are separated by genetic distance as great or greater than that between a

77 than the traditional molecular evolutionary genetic distance), as estimated from the HGC.

78 al regions of deletions, one spanning a 5 cM genetic distance at 6p25 and a second site of 10.3 cM de

79 whereas landscape barriers better predicted genetic distance at higher elevations.

80 analyses showed that there was a significant genetic distance at zero divergence times.

81 pecies are strongly isolated in testcrosses, genetic distances at 108 microsatellite loci and 14 sequ

82 ulation) are necessary to precisely estimate genetic distances at loci with high levels of polymorphi

83 allowed precise mapping and determination of genetic distances at the 0.1-cM level in several of thes

84 The genetic distance averaged 0.3911, ranging from 0.016 to

85 irus populations in their blood, with median genetic distances averaging 1.08% in the env C2V5 region

86 or soft sweeps-even those occurring a large genetic distance away from the simulated locus.

87 Correlations between genetic distances based on Alu and nuclear RSPs, short t

88 the previous study, phylogenetic analyses of genetic distances based on the microsatellite loci indic

89 A multidimensional scaling analysis of genetic distances, based on mtDNA lineage-cluster freque

90 urpose, we fitted a statistical model of the genetic distance between 37 tsetse populations sampled i

91 the strength of divergent selection, and the genetic distance between a marker and the QTL on the per

92 There was evidence of genetic distance between different geographic regions by

93 The sizeable genetic distance between DRC60 and ZR59 directly demonst

94 The genetic distance between each isolate, as estimated by W

95 analysis of 1205 F2 plants to determine the genetic distance between each of these S -linked genes a

96 ngth of this association and the substantial genetic distance between FY and AT3 emphasize the import

97 parasite beta diversity and geographical or genetic distance between host populations.

98 The genetic distance between hybridizing parents affects het

99 Analysis of genetic distance between isolates was consistent with th

100 use of whole genome sequencing to determine genetic distance between isolates, a common solution to

101 crosatellite data, we document a substantial genetic distance between Kryptolebias marmoratus and K.

102 nd although BLD was significantly related to genetic distance between markers it was not spread unifo

103 n was supported by the fact that the average genetic distance between members of AluYb8 in each GC wi

104 .621), but Na(+) was correlated with greater genetic distance between milk and blood HIV-1 population

105 ociation between milk Na(+) and the pairwise genetic distance between milk and blood viral sequences

106 netically unique among known PNPs with equal genetic distance between PNPs and uridine phosphorylases

107 ncrease the probability of transmission with genetic distance between previously immunizing virus and

108 These rates increase with the genetic distance between sequences, the length of conver

109 wo or more markers with extraordinarily high genetic distance between subpopulations were identified

110 than in either Asians or Europeans, and the genetic distance between the Asian and the European popu

111 The genetic distance between the markers was twofold smaller

112 han a universal reference due to the reduced genetic distance between the subject (tumor genome) and

113 distance between incident case subjects and genetic distance between their HCV variants were uncorre

114 This approach revealed that the genetic distance between these hepaciviruses likely prev

115 The genetic distance between these two loci is approximately

116 The analysis of the observed genetic distances between adjacent genes vs. the theoret

117 Genetic distances between American Indians and HapMap po

118 To decrease the genetic distances between candidate immunogens and field

119 enetic markers that depend critically on the genetic distances between compared "reference strains."

120 d strong phylogeographic monophyly and large genetic distances between N. n. nebulosa (mainland) and

121 were no significant differences in pairwise genetic distances between ordered and disordered sequenc

122 f HIV pol sequences and Bayesian analysis of genetic distances between pol sequences from index-partn

123 the proportion the variation in a matrix of genetic distances between populations that is explained

124 hic Ancestry Positioning (GAP) relates local genetic distances between samples to their spatial dista

125 gnment techniques are used here to calculate genetic distances between sequence pairs.

126 than those that relied solely upon pairwise genetic distances between sequences.

127 isolates from all patients indicated smaller genetic distances between than within patients in most c

128 cept gp41, nef, and the 3' half of pol), the genetic distances between the infecting viruses and the

129 pairs) were assumed to be identical, and the genetic distances between the strains were calculated.

130 We first calculated pairwise genetic distances between the subjects' nasal wash sampl

131 in these categories revealed unusually high genetic distances between the two most diverged populati

132 gn these probabilistic sequences and compute genetic distances between them.

133 Genetic distances between these hybrids and their offspr

134 hen the nucleotides are separated by a large genetic distance, but share MRCA, the genealogies will s

135 y suicide also increased alongside narrowing genetic distance, but was only significant in parents (O

136 rst with geographic distances, and then with genetic distances, but not at all with ethnohistoric dis

137 Nei's genetic distance calculated from core genome single nucl

138 Benefits of such genetic distance calculations are illustrated by an anal

139 Genetic distances can also compensate for varying inform

140 Graphical representation of genetic distances can assist in determining if the disap

141 Here we report that this genetic distance correlates with natural variation and e

142 fied by maximum-likelihood phylogeny using a genetic distance cutoff of </= 1.5%.

143 t patients (63%) had small QS diversity with genetic distance (d) less than 0.2.

144 Haplotype analysis results, genetic distance data, and epidemiological data were use

145 to analyze the successes and failures of the genetic distances (delta(mu))(2) and D(SW) when used to

146 ission routes using both shared variants and genetic distance, demonstrating that shared variants can

147 Both sequence entropy and genetic distances during the hepatitis E acute phase wer

148 First-degree relatives at similar genetic distances (eg, parents, siblings, and offspring)

149 We compare genetic distances estimated from mitochondrial DNA with

150 ared by any given pair of isolates and their genetic distances estimated from the MLEE data.

151 Genetic distance estimates revealed that Gujjars were cl

152 ity to Europeans than to eastern Asians, and genetic distance estimates to the Europeans are ordered

153 resolving power and produce more consistent genetic distance estimates.

154 e sufficient to obtain accurate and reliable genetic distance estimates.

155 ociations among SNPs over great physical and genetic distances, even in African populations.

156 (-5) per year, respectively) and the minimal genetic distances existing between these and historical

157 ial changes in genetic diversity (theta) and genetic distance (F(ST)) over the last three generations

158 8 sampling localities using population-based genetic distance (F(ST)).

159 Roger's genetic distance for about 64% of the pairs of lines fel

160 If the null hypothesis that the genetic distances for isolates within and between source

161 e computer-generated sequences are a shorter genetic distance from any two contemporary virus sequenc

162 mission, the authors calculated the smallest genetic distance from each patient sample to all other s

163 xample, height is predicted to decrease with genetic distance from Europeans, despite robust anthropo

164 eport that whereas this ratio increases with genetic distance from genes across populations, it is lo

165 H. acinonychis ' modest genetic distance from H. pylori, its ability to infect m

166 ion that are explained by differences in the genetic distance from the colony nucleus.

167 The ratio of sex-average genetic distance from the Genethon and CHLC genetic link

168 stinct subset, held at a relatively constant genetic distance from the majority of the population thr

169 the strength of a species' response and its genetic distance from the pheromone sequence source geno

170 o far and that X-Y divergence increases with genetic distance from the pseudoautosomal region.

171 iciency virus (HIV) infections and a similar genetic distance from the SIV239 vaccine as intraclade H

172 ophilum as a monophyletic lineage with large genetic distances from any other ITS2 C3 type found outs

173 ture of linkage disequilibrium (LD) by using genetic distances from LD maps and provides a location f

174 ; 2 of 10 by viral evolution with increasing genetic distances from the most recent common ancestor (

175 stant mutants; and 6 of 10 by maintenance of genetic distances from the MRCA.

176 ork we present here, investigators calculate genetic distances from their samples to reference sample

177 We find that genetic distances (FST and population branch statistics)

178 transmission pairs from FCs were found at a genetic distance (GD) <1.5% than in the GP (Fisher's exa

179 The study estimated a moderate genetic distance (GD) that will facilitate transfer of u

180 Genetic distances (GDs) among parents were estimated wit

181 thera leo), and to test correlations between genetic distance, geographic distance and landscape resi

182 the population structure of N. meningitidis (genetic distance, >0.425), whereas exl2 and exl3 were fo

183 Relatives at similar genetic distances had similar risks for OCD, despite dif

184 Estimates of genetic distance have proven accurate, but previous calc

185 st two examples, as does the fact that these genetic distances have large stochastic variance.

186 unity among viruses is correlated with their genetic distance in the phylogenetic tree of the paramyx

187 We find that the lowest genetic distance in this dataset is between modern Armen

188 ine-scale correlation between geographic and genetic distance in this population.

189 en shown to more accurately reflect accurate genetic distances in highly variable regions of rRNA gen

190 lineages occurring across the gradient with genetic distances in the range of 0.036 and 0.44 (mt gen

191 Estimates of genetic distance indicated that the controls and the cla

192 This difference was greater at shorter genetic distances, indicating that breeder selections ha

193 Phylogenetic analysis and genetic distance indices resolved a single genotype of N

194 r results suggest that the optimal choice of genetic distance is based upon splitting a DNA sequence

195 the efficiency is not limiting even when the genetic distance is maximized.

196 The average intermarker genetic distance is ~1.7 cM.

197 nd the sharp decline in risk with increasing genetic distance, it cannot fully explain the geographic

198 Besides the genetic distance, LD is also affected by many factors, s

199 imposed a P. falciparum life cycle time on a genetic distance likelihood model to determine transmiss

200 The group of patients with genetic distance located in the decay region (d>0.53) ha

201 th bootstrap or posterior support >/=90% and genetic distance </=4.5%).

202 zed for clustering of their viral sequences (genetic distance, <2%).

203 The genetic distance (mean +/- standard deviation) between i

204 a very general multivariate method, based on genetic distance methods, (ii) illustrate it for multial

205 cell functions are conserved across varying genetic distance, much of a given organism's essential g

206 Large genetic distance, multiple genetically fixed nucleotide

207 strain divergence for each gene approaching genetic distances observed for FIV between different spe

208 c analysis of sampled HIV pol genotypes at a genetic distance of <1.5%.

209 iously fine-mapped the kat(2J) mutation to a genetic distance of 0.28 +/- 0.12 centimorgan between D8

210 n the proximal region of the X chromosome, a genetic distance of 0.57 cM exists between markers that

211 e of approximately 300 kb corresponding to a genetic distance of 0.9 cM.

212 distinct subregions separated by a variable genetic distance of 15-30 cM.

213 The linkage map covered a genetic distance of 1811 cM with an average marker inter

214 cal interval between D11S4205 and D11S913, a genetic distance of 2.9 cM, equivalent to approximately

215 a cellular senescence gene, SEN16, within a genetic distance of 3 - 7 cM, at 16q24.3.

216 .28 cM (P = 0.002) and a pair of loci with a genetic distance of 3.68 cM (P = 0.0004).

217 ial chromosome contig was constructed over a genetic distance of 5 cM that includes both alpha7 loci

218 D10S585 (or D10S1172) and D10S1664, within a genetic distance of 5-11 cM.

219 vidence for LD between a pair of loci with a genetic distance of 5.28 cM (P = 0.002) and a pair of lo

220 which the critical linkage interval spans a genetic distance of 5.41 cM and a physical distance of 1

221 LD (P = 0.02) between a pair of loci with a genetic distance of 5.51 cM.

222 es, >/=80% local branch support, and maximum genetic distance of all sequence pairs in the cluster </

223 atellite markers on chromosome 6q spanning a genetic distance of approximately 11 cM in males and 20

224 rphic markers D2S119 and D2S378 and covers a genetic distance of approximately 16 cM, is underreprese

225 ing from DXS8026 to ELK1, corresponding to a genetic distance of approximately 5.5 cM.

226 When analyzing phrase dissimilarity and genetic distance of both sexes, we found significant res

227 Here, we assessed the genetic distance of geographically segregated viruses th

228 timates of three genetic distances (standard genetic distance of Nei, chord distance, FST) was examin

229 The median genetic distance of the imputed most recent common ances

230 re was a significant correlation between the genetic distance of the lines and the activities of enzy

231 The overall genetic distance of the parents had no influence on muta

232 The interspecific genetic distance of the stored-product psocids was signi

233 ositive correlation was observed between the genetic distance of the two inbred parents and the numbe

234 exl2 and exl3 were found in clonal groups at genetic distances of <0.2.

235 ss than 0.3% of identical repeat values when genetic distances of 27% or more were examined.

236 ker with a clade support of >90% and maximum genetic distances of 4.5% or 1.5%, the latter to limit d

237 The genetic distances of A-V and B-V were estimated to be 9.

238 nt correlations were still found between the genetic distances of anther-smut and host populations.

239 h isolation by distance correlating with the genetic distances of B. terrestris, suggesting the latte

240 Bioinformatic analysis found equivalent genetic distances of monotypic and nonmonotypic sequence

241 assing cultural and genetic attributes), and genetic distances of the populations in the areas studie

242 to a 6-cM region between 123.5 and 129.5 cM genetic distance on chromosome 11, identifying the site

243 The results of genetic distances, phylogenetic trees and principal comp

244 Principal component analysis of the genetic distances, population structure, and the materna

245 Thus the poor correlation of physical to genetic distance previously observed in M. grisea appear

246 emed relapses, and three cases for which the genetic distance ranged from 1306 to 1419 SNPs, deemed r

247 In addition, we examined genetic distance relationships between SI and SC populat

248 of Yucca, the effect of host specificity on genetic distance remains significant after accounting fo

249 es with the eBURST algorithm and analyses of genetic distances revealed that genetic clusters represe

250 Previously, we observed that genetic distance significantly decreased with the number

251 We look at how to choose genetic distance so as to maximize the power of detectin

252 , the potential for covarions increases with genetic distance so that highly divergent proteins may h

253 efficient of variation of estimates of three genetic distances (standard genetic distance of Nei, cho

254 fferent geographic regions by Nei's Standard Genetic Distance, suggesting parasite populations vary l

255 An analysis of heterozygosity versus genetic distance suggests that African populations have

256 roughly 2-fold-higher patristic (tip-to-tip) genetic distances than historic sequences, with HLA pres

257 results in recombination across far greater genetic distances than mendelian genetic exchange.

258 nic) revealed patterns of gene diversity and genetic distance that reflected population history.

259 We have determined the marker separations (genetic distances) that maximize the probability, or pow

260 At 4.5% genetic distance, the UK was more clustered and MSM and

261 d clearance rates has been to assume a fixed genetic distance threshold below which isolates are cons

262 TRAnsmission Cluster Engine (with a pairwise genetic distance threshold of 0.015 substitutions per si

263 For species delimitation, interspecific genetic distance threshold values of 0.4% and 0.55% were

264 ClusterPicker (90% bootstrap threshold, 0.05 genetic distance threshold).

265 xplore the effect of different bootstrap and genetic distance thresholds on clusters identified in a

266 he ordering process is demonstrated with the genetic distance to a genotype with high catalytic activ

267 Ancestral sequences, which minimize the genetic distance to circulating strains, provide an oppo

268 on its distinct structural elements and the genetic distance to other picorna-like viruses we propos

269 eference-mapped MTBC genomes, and calculated genetic distance to previously sequenced UK MTBC isolate

270 and ranked them according to their predicted genetic distance to the main tsetse population.

271 a statistically significant decrease in the genetic distance to the MRCA was detected in three, indi

272 g filters for selection, recombination rate, genetic distance to the nearest gene, percent overlap wi

273 f LD that can be interpreted as the expected genetic distance to which the ancestral haplotype is pre

274 o homoeologous subgenomes based on different genetic distances to melon, cucumber, and watermelon in

275 uthors propose a quantitative approach using genetic distances to study the degree of similarity betw

276 led "centralized" sequences) that have equal genetic distances to the circulating viruses.

277 the use of HMA for quantitative inference of genetic distances under the conditions we describe is of

278 The female:male ratio of genetic distance varied across individual chromosomes in

279 The average physical distance per genetic distance was estimated at 350 kb/cM.

280 stronger correlation between geographic and genetic distance was found among animals in the north th

281 the coefficient of variation of estimates of genetic distances was shown to be approximately determin

282 ng, pairwise population differentiation, and genetic distance, we found that the Libyan Jewish group

283 erved between complement fixation titers and genetic distance, we propose a system for classification

284 of weighted LD between pairs of sites whose genetic distance were larger than a certain starting dis

285 opulation gene diversity and interpopulation genetic distance were seen in the case of SNPs located w

286 Pairwise genetic distances were calculated for the regions analyz

287 HIV genetic distances were calculated using the polymerase r

288 more rapidly than ordered protein, pairwise genetic distances were compared between the ordered and

289 ag regions of the genome were sequenced, and genetic distances were estimated by using the true tree

290 Pairwise genetic distances were estimated from aligned nucleotide

291 ated recombination decreases with increasing genetic distance when the two endpoints are on the same

292 a good indicator of how precise estimates of genetic distance will be.

293 organization and function, as they correlate genetic distance with cytological structures, and are an

294 ith high mutation rates produce estimates of genetic distance with lower coefficients of variation th

295 Patiria miniata, the bat star, and correlate genetic distances with a model based on flow rates and p

296 and contrast traditional PAUP(*) Nei-Li AFLP genetic distances with a recently proposed method utiliz

297 correlation of genetic distances and nearest genetic distances with previously understood notions of

298 t criteria for bootstrap support and maximum genetic distance within large phylogenetic trees.

299 H. capsulatum var. capsulatum group A clade, genetic distances within clades were an order of magnitu

300 The genetic distances within CRF07_BC and CRF55_01B groups w