戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ct of stochastic effects or the influence of genetic isolation.
2  to date, presumably because of centuries of genetic isolation.
3 ion as well as changes in gene frequency and genetic isolation.
4 olation (e.g. founder events) contributed to genetic isolation.
5 rier to homologous recombination, suggesting genetic isolation.
6 red to Finns, a population with a history of genetic isolation.
7 stinct biological species despite incomplete genetic isolation.
8 s of genetic exchange, so how do they evolve genetic isolation?
9 erentiate because of increased potential for genetic isolation [1-6].
10 lower levels of genotypic diversity and more genetic isolation among early season collections, indica
11 tric inversion, increases the probability of genetic isolation amongst incipient sympatric species po
12  poses strong barriers to dispersal, driving genetic isolation and creating pockets of diversity to c
13                     The observed patterns of genetic isolation and drift are consistent with the prop
14 omal analyses, and showed strong evidence of genetic isolation and drift.
15                                              Genetic isolation and intrinsic biocontainment would pro
16  in signal transduction pathways can mediate genetic isolation and uncovers a potential speciation ge
17 s high rate of origination was offset by low genetic isolation, and lower F1 hybrid fertility increas
18 d upon the roles of intentional breeding and genetic isolation as fundamental to understanding the pr
19 ations from climatic extremes, together with genetic isolation at such refugial sites, may have allow
20                                         This genetic isolation between ploidy levels is confirmed by
21  beet produced a pruned network within which genetic isolation between populations by distance was ev
22 ictions that this can occur without complete genetic isolation between populations, strengthening the
23 udies have shown a relatively high degree of genetic isolation between the Comoros islands and mainla
24 uded in crosses between T2 and T4 because of genetic isolation between these two virus species.
25 tic lifestyle in soil show similar levels of genetic isolation, but with higher rates of recombinatio
26  is further supported by the weak pattern of genetic isolation by distance at microsatellite loci, an
27 ossess alternative genetic codes that impart genetic isolation by impeding horizontal gene transfer a
28 ylotypes of SC1 show significant (P < 0.003) genetic-isolation by geographic distance patterns, perha
29                                 In landscape genetics, isolation-by-distance (IBD) is regarded as a b
30 uggest that they may have experienced severe genetic isolation caused by habitat fragmentation.
31 d as four distinct giraffe species under the genetic isolation criterion.
32 despite the apparent lack of opportunity for genetic isolation, diversity is prevalent within marine
33                        Evidently, incomplete genetic isolation exists within this single nominal spec
34                                              Genetic isolation first occurred at regions carrying spe
35 enetic code, offering resistance to viruses, genetic isolation from horizontal gene transfer, and pre
36 mic and functional evidence supporting their genetic isolation from marine and surface biomes.
37  island population that exhibits significant genetic isolation from neighboring populations.
38 sent findings on cultivated rye's incomplete genetic isolation from wild relatives, mechanisms of gen
39 lades may thus represent functional units of genetic isolation in Bp, modulating intraspecies genetic
40 e tested for evidence of founder effects and genetic isolation in early season populations, and wheth
41 rences result in a high degree of prezygotic genetic isolation (isolation index=0.43) between the tol
42                                   Therefore, genetic isolation may be established at different times
43 train containing the wild-type ACT1 promoter.Genetic isolation of a genetically modified organism rep
44 a dog that lived in Great Britain before the genetic isolation of breeds by registry (ca. 1873).
45 ents is unclear, although the geographic and genetic isolation of northern New Mexicans with a long a
46 is duplication could have contributed to the genetic isolation of populations, to lineage-specific di
47 ling effect contributes substantially to the genetic isolation of species.
48 vestigated Cambodian ethnic groups indicates genetic isolation of the whole population.
49 hromosome, which may have contributed to the genetic isolation of the Y chromosome.
50 ens of millions of years before the complete genetic isolation of their chromosomes.
51                              Consistent with genetic isolation, previous studies suggested that the g
52  to their constrained behavioral pattern and genetic isolation, they are vulnerable to anthropogenic
53 a model of ecological speciation via gradual genetic isolation triggered by differential habitat-asso
54 tain species differences through Subcellular Genetic Isolation where viral genomes are physically sep
55 ve small size of the Corsica may have caused genetic isolation, which, in turn, might be relevant und
56 roselytism of local populations, followed by genetic isolation with the rise of Christianity and then
57 minimal number) tigers in Similipal, and its genetic isolation, with poor geneflow.