ライフサイエンスコーパス: genome size

1 ch isolate, representing ~64% of the average genome size.

2 assembly representing 90.7% of the predicted genome size.

3 rming to constraints associated with maximum genome size.

4 ble elements, the primary factor determining genome size.

5 assembly reaching over 86% of the estimated genome size.

6 ed rare beneficial insertions that increased genome size.

7 and functions that are under the control of genome size.

8 synonymous substitution rates, and microbial genome size.

9 in particle length, reflecting the increased genome size.

10 etitive DNA versus its deletion in governing genome size.

11 ld, to ensure the maintenance of their large genome size.

12 tory bowel disease and diabetes) and average genome size.

13 ) whose length enigmatically correlates with genome size.

14 total number of genomes for a given maximum genome size.

15 g evolutionary pressures to maintain a small genome size.

16 ors to the observed differences in millipede genome size.

17 cations, incurring up to 7%-10% increases in genome size.

18 ximately 98% of known variation in organelle genome size.

19 factors leading to their drastically reduced genome size.

20 arriers that scale as the square root of the genome size.

21 between the length of conserved segments and genome size.

22 ew mutation and of potential rapid change in genome size.

23 hat the benefit of LGT declines rapidly with genome size.

24 of 2.20 Gb representing 97% of the estimated genome size.

25 ly follows family-specific scaling laws with genome size.

26 oan life at the limits of small physical and genome size.

27 cting TE expansion is a major determinant of genome size.

28 in size and to analyze any correlation with genome size.

29 that for multicellular species with similar genome sizes.

30 approaches have been hampered by their large genome sizes.

31 effective to use on organisms with different genome sizes.

32 agation, comprising 37 species with variable genome sizes (0.158-1.88 Gbp).

33 agineum was widespread and exhibited a small genome size (1 C = 0.34 pg), an annual life cycle, and g

34 In contrast, E. vulgare exhibited a larger genome size (1 C = 0.43 pg), a perennial lifecycle, less

35 contains a smaller capsid and has a reduced genome size (146 kb) compared to the CbK-like phages (20

36 Additionally, because of its large genome size (17 Gb), re-sequencing at sufficient depth o

37 me sequencing, due in part to their enormous genome size (20-30 Gb) and the highly repetitive nature

38 C-DNA value of 3.8 +/- 0.6 pg (1Cx monoploid genome size 919.1 +/- 62.9 Mbp).

39 ntal processes have been hampered by a large genome size, a lack of available mutants, and an inabili

40 expansion is the result of both variation in genome size across fungal species and diversifying selec

41 The Average Genome Size (AGS) and the 16S rRNA gene Average Copy Num

42 We studied Cucurbitaceae because their small genome size allows cost-efficient genome skimming, and m

43 Coronaviruses (CoVs) have the largest genome size among all RNA viruses.

44 ry limited for Caudata, due to their largest genome sizes among terrestrial vertebrates.

45 l unique characteristics including the small genome size, an ethylene-independent fruit ripening proc

46 nctional relationship between stomatal size, genome size and atmospheric CO2 may contribute to the di

47 explore three hypotheses: the correlation of genome size and chromosome number, the origin of modern

48 Genome size and complexity vary tremendously among eukar

49 However, because of genome size and complexity, these tools have yet to be a

50 ncreased mutational burdens favoring reduced genome size and complexity.

51 ich tool or parameters to use for a specific genome size and complexity.

52 ecies differences stem from the diversity of genome size and composition among eukaryotes.

53 , as well as their role in shaping bacterial genome size and composition.

54 orhabditis species and reveal the changes in genome size and content that have occurred during its ev

55 nce, Chlamydia has significantly reduced its genome size and content, as it relies on the host cell f

56 n panicoid grasses with >5-fold variation in genome size and different histories of polyploidy.

57 e with observed positive correlation between genome size and effective population size.

58 act particularly of transposable elements on genome size and evolution of virtually all eukaryotic or

59 rk that was a challenge because of its large genome size and few chromosomes (1C 9.76 pg; n = 8).

60 rian was accompanied by extreme reduction in genome size and gene content.

61 ctional categories outlined in (i) and (ii), genome size and gene density, indicating that these numb

62 Increases in genome size and gene losses are the consequences of this

63 s that are characterized by major changes in genome size and genome structure, such that these traits

64 etween symbiont function, transmission mode, genome size and host dependence.

65 The growing interest in genome size and increasing rate of data accumulation has

66 The rate is proportional to the genome size and inversely proportional to transposase ex

67 n of increased chemical stability, increased genome size and irreversibility.

68 d, in part, by a trade-off between bacterial genome size and local variation in climatic conditions.

69 Intriguingly, variation in genome size and many quantitative traits are significant

70 by the strongly inverse relationship between genome size and mutation rate across all replication sys

71 hotosynthetic organism to date, based on the genome size and number of genes in the reconstruction.

72 th positively selected sites was a result of genome size and number of mutations and positively selec

73 atic monocot with highly reduced morphology, genome size and number of protein-coding genes.

74 The small genome size and number of proteins encoded by these viru

75 e) 5S and 35S rDNA units, chromosome number, genome size and ploidy level.

76 going LGT which includes two new parameters, genome size and recombination length, neglected by previ

77 r the inverse relationship between microbial genome size and temperature in a diverse, free-living co

78 sure mutation rates in microbes with unusual genome sizes and life cycles.

79 s are host specific and have a wide range of genome sizes and open reading frames.

80 chment of Prochlorococcus, predicted smaller genome sizes and shifts in the importance of several fun

81 earliest land plants had exceptionally large genome sizes and that a predicted overall trend of incre

82 imilar, despite the huge difference in their genome sizes and the different number of WGDs each genom

83 The evolution of mutation rate, genome size, and chromosome structure can therefore be e

84 f nucleocytoplasmic ratios is independent of genome size, and instead it appears linked to the averag

85 ast differences in taxonomic classification, genome size, and radioresistance between cell types stud

86 eveal important changes in genome structure, genome size, and replication/gene regulation strategy du

87 Vertebrates exhibit substantial diversity in genome size, and some of the largest genomes exist in sp

88 proliferation likely contributed to a large genome size, and suggest that differences in copy number

89 C reliably estimated the species number, the genome size, and the relative abundance of each species,

90 re, small size, short generation time, small genome size, and wide geographic distribution make it an

91 es, low Guanine-Cytosine (GC) content, small genome sizes, and lower gene numbers.

92 he accuracy of the estimated species number, genome sizes, and percentages of correctly assigned read

93 divergent B. heracleifolia population with a genome size approximately 10% larger than the species me

94 nthus annuus L.), especially given its large genome size ( approximately 3.5 Gb) and the well-documen

95 Genome sizes are 4.13 Gb in aardvark, 4.01 Gb in African

96 ions fit the model that differences in plant genome sizes are largely explained by transposon inserti

97 microbial genomes, including GC content and genome size, are known to vary widely among different ba

98 Our results support genome size as a broad indicator of the growth behavior

99 A; this loss was followed by an expansion of genome size as a consequence of activity of transposable

100 f invaders of more open habitats, supporting genome size as a robust indicator of invasiveness.

101 also prompted the evaluation of lineage and genome size as predictors of gene structure evolution.

102 n recombination length, to the same order as genome size - as occurs in meiosis.

103 green plant tree of life and a diversity of genome sizes, as well as both short- and long-read-based

104 er (Rodrigues et al. 2016) they reported the genome size based on 2C values (diploid genome) when it

105 Despite a small genome size, bats have comparable diversity of retrovira

106 not all, display marked increases in overall genome size because of a proliferation of retrotransposo

107 predicted to cause substantial variation in genome size between species.

108 active enzymes, despite a large expansion in genome size, both of which are consistent with what is s

109 Domain superfamily diversity correlated with genome size, but a diversity of around 200 superfamilies

110 They contained duplications that increased genome size by as much as 3.8%.

111 earrangements, but most of the difference in genome size can be attributed to hundreds of thousands o

112 yploidy) in angiosperms, although subsequent genome size change and diploidization (returning to a di

113 As genome size changes from megabases to gigabases, we pred

114 r cytogenetic research were to determine the genome size, chromosome number, and organization of ribo

115 the three organisms have markedly different genome sizes, chromosome architecture and gene organizat

116 ts significant challenges due to their large genome sizes, complexity, and high chromosome numbers.

117 Finally, genome size constraints have driven the evolution of res

118 In this study, we analyse genome size data and chromosome numbers in a phylogeneti

119 atter include (i) a tool to visually compare genome size data between species, (ii) the option to exp

120 Genome size data have numerous applications: they can be

121 respectively, in the number of species with genome size data, compared with previous releases.

122 respectively, in the number of species with genome size data, compared with previous releases.

123 To achieve this, we generated new genome size data, increasing the percentage of fern spec

124 Two plant genome size databases have been recently updated and/or

125 However, the simulation of genome-size datasets as produced by next-generation sequ

126 high levels of neopolyploidization, follows genome size decrease, stabilization, and genetic diploid

127 Advantages range from increasing genome size despite high mutation rates, faster replicat

128 consistent with our observed distribution of genome size determined by flow cytometry, which is skewe

129 s (TEs) are often the primary determinant of genome size differences among eukaryotes.

130 andem repeats) are primarily responsible for genome size differences between species.

131 ive analysis of these elements suggests that genome size differences between Vigna species are mainly

132 lements are one of the major contributors to genome-size differences in metazoans.

133 Here, by fitting the genome size distributions in multiple groups of prokaryo

134 In contrast, genome size divergence between allopolyploids is manifes

135 For genome-size DNA, individual single T4 DNA is visualized

136 , the effects of crowding on the dynamics of genome-sized DNA are poorly understood.

137 dely debated effects of cellular crowding on genome-sized DNA.

138 olved in pathogenesis and shows an increased genome size due to transposable elements proliferation.

139 The duplicated genome size enlarged bark and wood layers in twigs sampl

140 ing mammal and avian evolution, resulting in genome size equilibrium.

141 creasing the percentage of fern species with genome sizes estimated to 2.8% of extant diversity, and

142 r effective gas diffusion [3], as well as to genome size evolution [5, 6], major questions persist co

143 ere, we use digital evolution to investigate genome size evolution by tracking genome edits and their

144 Such extreme contrasting profiles of genome size evolution illustrate the key role of transpo

145 tutions, insertions, and deletions influence genome size evolution in asexual organisms.

146 dings support a unified "accordion" model of genome size evolution in eukaryotes whereby DNA loss cou

147 ansposable elements (TEs) in relation to the genome size evolution.

148 size, we still do not understand what drives genome size evolution.

149 enomic transposon exchanges that equilibrate genome size, evolutionary rate heterogeneities and posit

150 ding sequences between genes, likely driving genome size expansion in the latter.

151 e gene dynamics, most likely associated with genome size expansion when the Fabeae diverged from its

152 lion years ago contributed compellingly to A-genome size expansion, speciation and evolution.

153 organization caused by DNA rearrangements or genome size expansion.

154 ionally hazardous, but weakly enough so that genome-size expansion passively emerges in species exper

155 the mitochondrion was not a prerequisite for genome-size expansion.

156 itative PCR approach, we estimated a haploid genome size for Basidiobolus at 350 Mb.

157 The core genome size for the B. cereus s.l. group was approximate

158 blies cover 91.6% and 82.2% of the estimated genome sizes for C. olitorius and C. capsularis, respect

159 st decade have made it possible to construct genome-size fragments from oligonucleotides.

160 Mean bacterial genome size, GC content, total number of tRNA genes, tot

161 f the four groups has its own characteristic genome size, GC ratio, and greatly expanded core gene co

162 that the endosymbionts are variable in their genome size, gene composition, and compounds they synthe

163 viral genomes with diverse genome structure, genome size, gene content and hosts.

164 r of errors becomes significantly higher for genome sizes greater than approximately 10 gigabases.

165 nome assembly, as coverage of sequencing and genome size growing, most current softwares require a la

166 model for studying the evolution of nuclear genome size (GS) given the tremendous GS variation that

167 It is still an open question as to whether genome size (GS) variation is shaped by natural selectio

168 Angiosperm genome sizes (GS) range c. 2400-fold, and as nucleic aci

169 iversity between these STs in terms of their genome sizes, guanine-cytosine (GC) content, intron numb

170 lative, Prochlorococcus - wherein decreasing genome size has coincided with a strong decrease in GC c

171 During eukaryotic evolution, genome size has increased disproportionately to nuclear

172 Genome sizes have evolved to vary widely, from 250 bases

173 erall characteristics of a genome, including genome size, heterozygosity rate and repeat content from

174 ed and 16 real datasets with a wide range in genome sizes, heterozygosity levels and error rates.

175 ect the combined selective pressure of large genome sizes, high repeat content, high long-intersperse

176 compared to animal genomes due to the large genome sizes, high repetitive sequence content, and ramp

177 iverse microbial clades trend towards larger genome size, higher genomic GC content, and proteins wit

178 The massive variation in genome size identified by flow cytometry seems largely t

179 t mutation rate is inversely correlated with genome size in asexual populations.

180 e Plant DNA C-values database, and GSAD, the Genome Size in Asteraceae database.

181 ot appear to correlate with the reduction in genome size in bats.

182 sitive relationship evident between cell and genome size in both animals and plants forms the basis o

183 All studied tick cell lines had a larger genome size in comparison to the genomes of the parental

184 sponsible for lineage-specific expansions of genome size in eukaryotes, especially in multicellular s

185 ecise environmental pressures that constrain genome size in free-living microorganisms are unknown.

186 Genome size in mammals and birds shows remarkably little

187 nomes confirm the reconstructed white spruce genome size in the 20 Gbp range, and show broad synteny.

188 enth.) Hartog & Plas, which has the smallest genome size in the genus at 357 Mb and has a reduced set

189 Large genome size in these subspecies is driven by the accumul

190 elation between host dependence and symbiont genome size in vertically, but not horizontally, transmi

191 Genome sizes in plants are remarkably diverse, with a 23

192 s resulted in allotetraploids with divergent genome sizes, including Nicotiana repanda and Nicotiana

193 garithmic reduction in titre was observed as genome size increased.

194 ansposable elements are the major drivers of genome size increases in plants.

195 As the genome size increases, the J protein's length and charge

196 iers are related to intraspecific changes in genome size, indicating major genome restructuring betwe

197 The draft mango cp genome size is 151,173 bp with a pair of inverted repeat

198 verse relationship between mutation rate and genome size is a result of the tradeoff between evolving

199 iploid, leading us to believe that the final genome size is at least 700 Mb.

200 The genome size is ca. 163 Mb with 19,222 predicted protein-

201 Prokaryotic genome size is constrained by bioenergetics.

202 We investigated the novel hypothesis that genome size is related to forest invasions through its a

203 Afrotheria genome size is reported to be over 50% larger than that

204 This remarkable variation in genome size is the outcome of complex interactions betwe

205 icum aestivum) has had a massive increase in genome size largely due to recent WGDs.

206 scribed to the Parcubacteria include reduced genome size, limited metabolic potential and exclusive r

207 een difficult to locate as a result of large genome sizes, limited power of genetic identification sc

208 Due to its limited genome size, many genes conserved in other bacteria are

209 We complement these data with genome size measurements, comprehensive analysis of S-ph

210 nomic analyses to investigate the diversity, genomes sizes, metabolic capacities, and potential roles

211 ral features potentially related to cell and genome size minimization include tightly packed spirals

212 ver 'cabals' of a few genes, irrespective of genome size, mutation rate and the sophistication of tra

213 networks among six bacteria that have varied genome sizes (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Treponema pallidum,

214 ther directly associated with an increase in genome size nor is there a general lineage-specific cons

215 ameters are discussed here, number of bases (genome size), number of chromosomes (karyotype), number

216 Reduction in the AtDt genome size occurred after allopolyploidization.

217 oybean accession W05, with a final assembled genome size of 1013.2 Mb and a contig N50 of 3.3 Mb.

218 67 core proteins and a paralog-collapsed pan-genome size of 11,694 proteins.

219 contigs, closely approximating the estimated genome size of 140 Mb.

220 ly totaling 227.6 Mb of the estimated almond genome size of 238 Mb, of which 91% is anchored to eight

221 8000 Mb for Entomophaga aulicae, with a mean genome size of 37 Mb.

222 bp, compared to the predicted effective mean genome size of 4.74 Mbp for soil bacteria.

223 With a genome size of 4248 bp and only four putative open readi

224 N50 scaffold size of 464 955 bp (based on a genome size of 606 Mbp), 221 640 contigs and a GC conten

225 ighly divergent (15.1 megabases of the total genome size of 61.1 megabases).

226 An estimate of nuclear genome size of 640.6 Mbp based on cytometry is presented

227 r data suggest an abundance that exceeds the genome size of Arabidopsis.

228 With an estimated genome size of around 1.5 Mbp, the genomes of Hadesarcha

229 Moreover, we find that the small genome size of fungi situates them as a relatively simpl

230 feration contributed to the relatively large genome size of ICE-L when compared to other chlorophytes

231 the white lupin genome, using the predicted genome size of Lupinus angustifolius as a reference.

232 The large genome size of many species hinders the development and

233 The genome size of P. spumarius was estimated by flow cytome

234 homoeologous genes, together with the large genome size of polyploid wheat, had hindered genomic ana

235 The small genome size of rice relative to wheat and barley, togeth

236 The limited genome size of small viruses has driven the evolution of

237 We show that an extraordinarily large genome size of tea tree is resulted from the slow, stead

238 The genome size of the hot pepper was approximately fourfold

239 lyploidize the egg cell, while rendering the genome size of the ploidy-sensitive central cell unaffec

240 present study, we investigated karyotype and genome size of tick cell lines.

241 e observed to have approximately doubled the genome size of Zea luxurians relative to Zea mays and Ze

242 use nutrient additions decreased the average genome sizes of the bacterial community members and elic

243 The genome sizes of these prophages range from 22.6-33.0 Kbp

244 CATC quantity correlates with the increasing genomes sizes of these beta-herpesviruses.

245 However, the effect of vector genome size on titre has not been determined.

246 s differ dramatically in relative abundance, genome size, organization, and gene content.

247 lthough GH28 copy number was correlated with genome size, our findings suggest that ecological strate

248 atment were negatively correlated with total genome size (Pearson r < -0.9; p < 0.0001) and adjacent

249 Due to their small genome size, picornaviruses must utilize host proteins t

250 t duplication to loss ratio, correlates with genome size, potentially explaining increased abundance

251 an intron spliced out of these greater-than-genome-size primary transcripts.IMPORTANCE The BK polyom

252 Genome size, protein content, %GC, and repetitive DNA al

253 Their smaller genome sizes provide an opportunity to interrogate evolu

254 Genome sizes ranged from 1.491 to 1.716 Mb; GC contents

255 Owing to the very large genome sizes ranging from 18 to 35 gigabases, sequencing

256 Ancestral genome size reconstruction revealed that the most recent

257 ptional by themselves because of their small genome size, reduced metabolic flexibility, and high wor

258 eir nonmangrove relatives; as a consequence, genome size reduction happens independently in all six m

259 ae has been characterized by a trend towards genome size reduction, with just one episode of dramatic

260 ae has been characterized by a trend towards genome size reduction, with just one episode of dramatic

261 ) that the vast majority of the variation in genome size reflects the dynamics of proliferation and l

262 strated to reliably predict species numbers, genome sizes, relative species abundances, and k-mer cov

263 anner.IMPORTANCE Constraints placed on viral genome size require that these pathogens must employ sop

264 Estimations of genome size reveal that myxozoans have one of the smalle

265 e eukaryotic--and plant and algal--lineage a genome-sized sample of genes from the proteobacterial an

266 pontaneously produce variants that differ in genome size, sequence, and biological activity.

267 resistance to Hessian fly, and with a small genome size, short life cycle, vast genetic resources an

268 were identified, and the distribution of the genome size showed three 'overlapping' trends.

269 As a consequence of an expansion in genome size, some microbial eukaryotes with large N(e) a

270 However, maximum genome size steadily increases from the Mississippian (c

271 ecies-specific biases such as differences in genome size, strength of signal enrichment and co-occurr

272 trast, genic CHG methylation correlates with genome size, suggesting that the host epigenetic respons

273 ations via transposition and contributing to genome size, TEs play key roles in chromosome architectu

274 as they produce high yields and have a small genome size that facilitates their genetic manipulation.

275 anochromosomes ( approximately 50 Mb haploid genome size) that vary from 469 bp to 66 kb long (mean a

276 d cells as a proxy to track changes in plant genome size through geological time.

277 ength and use these data to infer changes in genome size through the evolutionary history of land pla

278 We estimate the genome size to be 728 Mb with 19,362 protein-coding gene

279 We used new measurements of genome size to evaluate its association with spring budb

280 Examination of the significance of genome size to plant invasions has been largely restrict

281 e of encoded transposases (>650) relative to genome size, together with the RAGEs and other MGEs, com

282 In contrast, intraspecies genome size variation seems to be controlled by chromoso

283 By investigating the drivers of genome size variation, we find that the larger Tripsacum

284 Plants exhibit an extraordinary range of genome sizes, varying by > 2000-fold between the smalles

285 rve as substrates for packaging the shorter, genome-sized viral DNA into phage heads.

286 The genome size was 32.57 Mb, and 14 contigs ranging from 0.

287 Genome size was correlated with chromosome number across

288 some of these evolutionary factors influence genome size, we still do not understand what drives geno

289 Genome sizes were assessed using flow cytometry in 79 sp

290 * Genome sizes were assessed using flow cytometry in 79 sp

291 (1.5% versus 53 to 59%), and differences in genome sizes were mainly due to variations in intergenic

292 itive organisms also possessed smaller total genome sizes, which could also have reduced their suscep

293 ions offset the costs associated with larger genome size while retaining adaptive substitutions.

294 Potential CUE is negatively correlated with genome size, while taxa with larger genomes are able to

295 sequencing and analysis suggested a 9.47 Mb genome size with 42 predicted biosynthetic gene clusters

296 because of high heterozygosity, a very large genome size with a high level of repetitive DNA and a bi

297 ceae are the most diverse family in terms of genome size, with C-values ranging more than 230-fold.

298 ceae are the most diverse family in terms of genome size, with C-values ranging more than 230-fold.

299 content showed a quadratic relationship with genome size, with the decreases in GC content in larger

300 that a predicted overall trend of increasing genome size within individual lineages through geologica