ライフサイエンスコーパス: genotype frequency

1 (P <0.05) in their allelic distribution and genotype frequency.

2 tionship between nodule numbers and N-fixing genotype frequency.

3 y of tetraploid equilibrium from any initial genotype frequencies.

4 lection can result in stable oscillations of genotype frequencies.

5 for variation in transmission intensity and genotype frequencies.

6 control subjects also was used to determine genotype frequencies.

7 uating selection require time series data on genotype frequencies.

8 , or cytogenetics revealed no differences in genotype frequencies.

9 An analysis of genotype frequencies (896 AA vs. AG and GG) demonstrated

10 (GWAS), often involves statistical models of genotype frequencies across individuals.

11 his gene, rs2736100, varied substantially in genotype frequency across major continental regions.

12 CFLP analysis-derived HCV genotype frequencies also concurred with the national es

13 Genotype frequencies also differ markedly between cases

14 To compare the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 allele and genotype frequencies among 260 Ashkenazi (AJ) and 80 Sep

15 We then compared genotype frequencies among the invasive and in situ grou

16 We derived genotype frequencies and effect sizes from published GWA

17 MBL genotype frequencies and MBL serum concentrations did no

18 The projected RDA ranges were based on TT genotype frequencies and on different effect sizes (5-50

19 ivergence between the actual distribution of genotype frequencies and the corresponding neutral distr

20 t to test the association between allele and genotype frequencies and the severity of gingivitis.

21 between PSMB single nucleotide polymorphism genotype frequency and clinical response to bortezomib o

22 An interaction between genotype frequency and spawning density determines how s

23 e frequencies respond to changes in pathogen genotype frequencies, and vice versa.

24 .5 and Hardy-Weinberg proportions, the three genotype frequencies are often assumed to be 0.25, 0.50,

25 or in fine-mapping applications, allele and genotype frequencies are often assumed to be known when,

26 ctly observing changes in Chlorella vulgaris genotype frequencies as the abundances of these algae an

27 The genotype frequencies assigned by the CFLP method were 44

28 r exact test) was observed regarding the p53 genotype frequencies at codon 72 between the PVR cases a

29 m in this case relies on the assumption that genotype frequencies at each locus are in Hardy-Weinberg

30 n testing for deviations from Hardy-Weinberg genotype frequencies at each site, we analyze the entire

31 Genotype frequencies at eight microsatellite loci showed

32 s of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) based on genotype frequencies at one or more marker loci.

33 Genotype frequency at codon 129 was Met/Met (84.7%) and

34 PIC)--for differences in clinical course and genotype frequency at IL10 and TNF loci, known to be ass

35 only genome-wide association study comparing genotype frequencies between 60,212 general population B

36 ample, significant differences were found in genotype frequencies between cases (RR, 30.59%; RP, 43.2

37 t an analysis method that is used to compare genotype frequencies between cases and controls, accordi

38 mary test of association was a comparison of genotype frequencies between cases and controls, and a t

39 Significantly different genotype frequencies between HPC probands and unaffected

40 no difference in the Hp1-1, Hp2-1, and Hp2-2 genotype frequencies between individuals with or without

41 vely; there were no differences in allele or genotype frequencies between patients and control subjec

42 onents of the immune system, we compared MHC genotype frequencies between pups and adults in the grey

43 al analysis showed significant difference in genotype frequencies between the 'higher' (>150 mg/day)

44 The difference in genotype frequencies between the clinical subgroups was

45 Similar field-based manipulations of genotype frequencies could provide a powerful approach t

46 sistance (MDR) by summing the area under the genotype-frequency curves (AUC) of double- and triple-re

47 iations were found with the A locus: DR3/DR4 genotype frequency decreases with age of onset in this d

48 chi2 Analysis was used to determine whether genotype frequencies deviated significantly from Hardy-W

49 AW with invasive breast cancer (P < 0.0001); genotype frequencies did not differ significantly betwee

50 Genotype frequency did not differ between patients with

51 n the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, genotype frequencies differed between cases and controls

52 Genotype frequencies differed markedly in the four count

53 Allele and genotype frequencies differed significantly between the

54 Allele and genotype frequencies differed significantly between the

55 d, 12 located in 10 genes showed allelic and genotype frequency differences between hypertriglyceride

56 Unexpectedly, we noted significant genotype frequency differences between male and female c

57 ingly predictable frequencies, with striking genotype frequency differences between sexes and between

58 Allele and genotype frequency distributions were not significantly

59 uncertainties in population incidence rates, genotype frequency, effect sizes, and models of joint ef

60 ked loci only if selection is so strong that genotype frequencies evolve deterministically.

61 undance fluctuations can lead to substantial genotype frequency fluctuations if different genotypes i

62 Allele and genotype frequencies for 16 SNPs in DNA repair genes ERC

63 tudy (864 AA and 650 EA women) we found that genotype frequencies for 35 of 42 tested SNPs (18 candid

64 Genotype frequencies for all of the polymorphisms show m

65 The AT genotype frequencies for CFB was non significantly lower

66 We compared genotype frequencies for each subgroup to those from cog

67 -control population study and the allele and genotype frequencies for polymorphism rs11671784 in miR-

68 Genotype frequencies for rs762551 (260 participants [43.

69 between cases and controls in allele and/or genotype frequencies for six SNPs in Block I and two SNP

70 The primary study outcome was genotype frequency for the five SNPs.

71 gn of the slope between absolute fitness and genotype frequency for the genotype that was the weaker

72 ethnicity and either allelic distribution or genotype frequency for the tumor necrosis factor-alpha o

73 uid of patients with Lyme arthritis, and the genotype frequencies found in joints reflected those in

74 ach that assess differences in covariance of genotype frequencies from single nucleotide polymorphism

75 ic genetic parameters like allele frequency, genotype frequency, heterozygosity, Hardy-Weinberg equil

76 ic variant was investigated by comparison of genotype frequencies in a registry of 66 cases with defi

77 ignificant (p <or= 0.05) differences between genotype frequencies in aggressive and controls (IL-1B +

78 The set of possible postselection genotype frequencies in an infinite, randomly mating pop

79 Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared

80 Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared

81 When MTHFR C677T genotype frequencies in MSS CRC cases were compared to c

82 We compared the genotype frequencies in patients and controls and also c

83 Genotype frequencies in patients were compared with heal

84 We compared genotype frequencies in subjects with type 2 diabetes wi

85 Analysis of the genotype frequencies in the separated T. b. brucei and T

86 Importantly, the F304S genotype frequency in 55 CDG-Ia patients classified as m

87 We determined the Arg6Trp genotype frequency in a healthy population and its effec

88 n genotype- and age-specific HPV prevalence, genotype frequency in precancer and cancer, and age-spec

89 by Bradyrhizobium genotypes and their local genotype frequencies - indicating that selection favours

90 m Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of marker-genotype frequencies is a crucial first step in almost a

91 ered the slopes between absolute fitness and genotype frequency more negative for the stronger compet

92 The genotype frequencies of each variant were determined in

93 keup of mixed populations, using cytonuclear genotype frequencies of first- and second-generation off

94 To test this hypothesis, we compared the genotype frequencies of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) cl

95 Genotype frequencies of p.D19H were established using MA

96 ses and 73.2% in controls (p=0.045), and the genotype frequencies of p53 Arg/Arg, Arg/Pro, and Pro/Pr

97 morphims (SNPs) in ARHGEF11 and compared the genotype frequencies of subjects with type 2 diabetes (n

98 There were no differences in the allele and genotype frequencies of the APOE gene between PD groups

99 We found that the genotype frequencies of the inversion, estimated from 13

100 d not observe any significant differences in genotype frequencies of the SHMT1 and RFC polymorphisms

101 The APOE genotype frequencies of the study population were approx

102 It is noteworthy that no differences in genotype frequencies of the VDBP polymorphisms were asso

103 Next, typical genotype frequencies of those polymorphisms in the gener

104 d a recessive risk component with a combined genotype frequency of 1.7% (95% CI: 0.3%-5.4%) and a pen

105 We found that the genotype frequency of two sequence variants (11657A/G an

106 s been made to identify emergence of new RSV genotypes' frequency of infection and how the combinatio

107 o or more biogeographic provinces, shifts in genotype frequencies often align with biogeographic boun

108 clusters and, instead, calculating expected genotype frequencies on the basis of inbreeding or selfi

109 No significant differences in genotype frequency or allele frequency were observed bet

110 lleles at each of n loci is described by 22n genotype frequencies, or equivalently, by allele frequen

111 nificant differences in either the allele or genotype frequencies, or haplotype frequencies, between

112 We analyzed HLA class II genotype frequencies over time in two large populations

113 ation under study by tracking the changes in genotype frequencies over time.

114 e effect burden was associated with L(A)L(A) genotype frequency (P = .03) or L(A) allele frequency (P

115 ffect burden in the entire sample (P = .004 [genotype frequency]; P < .001 [allele frequency]).

116 The ratio of genotype frequencies provides a measure of genetic varia

117 In contrast to diploids, where genotype frequencies remain constant after a single epis

118 virulence are genotype specific so that host genotype frequencies respond to changes in pathogen geno

119 The differences in allele and genotype frequencies seen in the Asian APS patients were

120 The genotype frequency, seroconversion rates, and vaccine-re

121 Observed genotype frequencies strongly reflect the directional as

122 The only germline genotype frequency that differed between the two cluster

123 stically evolving populations toward states (genotype frequencies) that would be unlikely under neutr

124 imates of power over the distribution of the genotype frequencies to calculate the true estimate of p

125 timates are based on fitting the equilibrium genotype frequencies under continent-island models of pl

126 The TT genotype frequency varied from 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7, 2.0) i

127 Genotype frequencies vary by geography and race.

128 significant difference in MTHFR 677 and 1298 genotype frequencies was observed between 237 cases and

129 The DEL homozygous genotype frequency was also enriched in patients with HF

130 The genotype frequency was arg/arg (54%), arg/pro (33%), and

131 y ethnicity, a significant difference in KIR genotype frequency was demonstrated in Hispanic cases (3

132 DD genotype frequency was increased in the patients with AR

133 KIR A/A genotype frequency was significantly increased in cases

134 The AA genotype frequency was significantly reduced in black ca

135 Using these estimates and modelled genotype frequencies we map SP protection across Africa.

136 Genotype frequencies were 37.8% for -/-, 47.8% for +/-,

137 Differences in allele and genotype frequencies were analyzed using chi-square test

138 Allele and genotype frequencies were compared between the 120 parti

139 Allele and genotype frequencies were compared between the cases and

140 Genotype frequencies were compared by 2 x 2 contingency

141 Allele and genotype frequencies were compared using Fisher's exact

142 Genotype frequencies were consistent with other populati

143 Allele and genotype frequencies were evaluated for association with

144 E3/2 and E4/4 genotype frequencies were higher in patients with hyperl

145 All observed genotype frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

146 trated significant associations, though some genotype frequencies were low.

147 Observed and expected genotype frequencies were not significantly different, a

148 Genotype frequencies were RR 62.5%, RW 34.0%, and WW 3.5

149 No significant differences in allele or genotype frequencies were seen in comparisons of the Cau

150 PPARA genotype frequencies were significantly different betwee

151 Genotype frequencies were similar to those previously ob

152 Genotype frequencies were: AA 89.9%, AG 9.7%, and GG 0.4

153 No significant differences in allele or genotype frequency were observed in pooled cases when co

154 r sets out methods for estimating multilocus genotype frequencies which are appropriate for unlinked

155 encies, and 8 were associated when comparing genotype frequencies with a dominant model.

156 lculated in two ways: first, from population genotype frequencies, with account being taken of the no

157 ng genetics, focusing on changes in gene and genotype frequencies within populations and the fixation

158 irst is that experimental inbreeding changes genotype frequencies without changing allele frequencies