戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  a new chemotherapy regimen, and completed a geriatric assessment.
2  identify those who will benefit most from a geriatric assessment.
3 o recommend their use to inform the need for geriatric assessment.
4 igh; and were fit according to comprehensive geriatric assessment.
5 merging data on the use of the comprehensive geriatric assessment.
6  or in combination with clinical history and geriatric assessments.
7 ndred eighty-five patients were included (no geriatric assessment = 125; reactive geriatric assessmen
8 ded (no geriatric assessment = 125; reactive geriatric assessment = 134; proactive CGA = 326): median
9 n prognostication, (2) increased reliance on geriatric assessment, (3) the use of novel biomarkers su
10 ata, we find that pretreatment comprehensive geriatric assessment accurately predicts survival and tr
11           Baseline abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment (aCGA), including the Mini-Mental S
12 and presence of comorbidities, comprehensive geriatric assessment and individual geriatric metrics ha
13 re was no association between either type of geriatric assessment and length of stay (reactive aHR =
14                                              Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) is a guideline
15 e interventions involved teams that provided geriatric assessment and management according to Veteran
16      These findings suggest that integrating geriatric assessment and patient-defined goals into shar
17 eficits in 2 or more of the 4 domains of the geriatric assessment and were classified as frail.
18 seline variables (demographic, clinical, and geriatric assessment) and low RDI.
19  syndromes, functional status, comprehensive geriatric assessment, and multimodal intervention.
20 , the 2 groups were similar in baseline QOL, geriatric assessment, and patient outcome preferences.
21 gen Frailty Index, abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment, and Physical Performance Test in 2
22 3 cohorts: no geriatric assessment, reactive geriatric assessment, and proactive CGA.
23 ults, including both traditional metrics and geriatric assessment, and the ability of these metrics t
24 on the studies that address the domains of a geriatric assessment applied to the oncology patient, re
25 ly to other criteria, and what components of geriatric assessment are associated with treatment toler
26 propriate.The Panel recommends the Practical Geriatric Assessment as one option for this purpose.Addi
27 eening for frailty, triggering comprehensive geriatric assessment, as appropriate.
28 ve series of 369 patients with HNC underwent geriatric assessment at baseline; a cohort of 283 patien
29         Participants underwent comprehensive geriatric assessments at admission, were reevaluated at
30 validate fitness criteria, determine whether geriatric assessment-based fitness performs superiorly t
31  assessment and treatment (eg, comprehensive geriatric assessment), calcium supplementation, and vita
32                                              Geriatric assessment can facilitate risk-stratification
33                                     Baseline geriatric assessment can help predict the utility of che
34  Geriatric screening tools and comprehensive geriatric assessment can help to identify patients who a
35                        Factors captured in a geriatric assessment can predict morbidity and mortality
36                                              Geriatric assessment captures any variation in multidime
37                                Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can contribute valuable infor
38                                Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has aided the medical communi
39                                Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been associated with impr
40 resolution on the results of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in 150 patients with age >=70
41 in 203 patients who received a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in our Senior Adult Oncology
42 ering hospital-level care with comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in the home is one approach t
43 art failure, a poor score on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is associated with worse prog
44        The increasing use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is one example of this effort
45                                Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended to assess the
46 h 2021 to March 2024 underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).
47  underway to further determine the effect of geriatric assessment combined with management interventi
48 t adding an educational component to include geriatric assessment, discharge planning, in-home rehabi
49   A family-centered care model consisting of geriatric assessment, discharge planning, in-home rehabi
50                           The mean number of geriatric assessment domain impairments was 4.5 (SD 1.6)
51 vanced (ie, incurable) cancer, had 1 or more geriatric assessment domain impairments, and planned to
52 umours or lymphoma and at least one impaired geriatric assessment domain who were starting a new trea
53 [24.8%] with lung cancer; mean [SD] impaired Geriatric Assessment domains, 4.5 [1.6]).
54                                     Although geriatric assessment-driven intervention improves patien
55                           Recommendations on geriatric assessment, ductal carcinoma in situ, screenin
56                                              Geriatric assessment evaluates ageing-related domains an
57 er being considered for chemotherapy receive geriatric assessment (GA) and management (GAM), but few
58 eening is to identify unfit patients needing geriatric assessment (GA) and to prevent unnecessary GA
59 stroesophageal cancer, and explored baseline geriatric assessment (GA) as a tool for treatment decisi
60  was performed in all patients, as well as a geriatric assessment (GA) evaluating social situation, f
61  describe the implementation of preoperative geriatric assessment (GA) in patients undergoing major c
62                                              Geriatric assessment (GA) is a guideline-recommended app
63      We investigated the predictive value of geriatric assessment (GA) on overall survival (OS) for o
64                                  Providing a geriatric assessment (GA) summary with management recomm
65 recommendation from the prior guideline that geriatric assessment (GA), including all essential domai
66 itional studies support the incorporation of geriatric assessment (GA)-driven care to further improve
67 ts with cancer during the first year after a geriatric assessment (GA).
68                              At diagnosis, a geriatric assessment had been performed.
69 h is needed to determine relevant aspects of geriatric assessments, identify effective intervention s
70 re considerations and the potential role for geriatric assessment in facilitating decision making for
71  or hematologic malignancies and underwent a geriatric assessment in one of two French teaching hospi
72  outcomes as well as the predictive value of geriatric assessment in the context of treatment with co
73                                              Geriatric assessment included scoring of the Adult Comor
74                                 Preoperative geriatric assessments included: Mini-Cog Test (cognition
75  from pretreatment abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment, including ADL, Instrumental ADL (I
76 discuss strategies to broaden the utility of geriatric assessment, including in chronologically young
77                        We examined whether a geriatric assessment intervention can reduce serious tox
78                                            A geriatric assessment intervention for older patients wit
79 tudy was a secondary analysis of the GAP70+ (Geriatric Assessment Intervention for Reducing Toxicity
80 PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis of the Geriatric Assessment Intervention for Reducing Toxicity
81                                          The geriatric assessment is a fundamental tool for the evalu
82 es of daily living' profile, a more detailed geriatric assessment is needed to define the benefit/ris
83 ligatory integration of a comparable form of geriatric assessment is recommended in future studies, a
84                                   Although a geriatric assessment is recommended to inform care, the
85                                              Geriatric assessment markers for frailty, disability and
86            (1) Determine the relationship of geriatric assessment markers to 6-month postoperative mo
87                                   Therefore, geriatric assessment may aid decision-making, indicate i
88  prehabilitation, coupled with comprehensive geriatric assessment may be important future strategies
89                                              Geriatric assessment may help identify older patients at
90                     Using tools, such as the geriatric assessment, may help to elucidate the physiolo
91 ht available evidence to support the role of geriatric assessment measures to enhance quality of care
92 ol therapy, consisting of valid and reliable geriatric assessment measures which are primarily self-a
93 n high-risk populations: discharge planning, geriatric assessment, medication management, clinical pa
94 rking Group (IMWG), that detailed systematic geriatric assessment of elderly myeloma patients might b
95    At baseline, we completed a comprehensive geriatric assessment of enrolled patients; survival and
96 ent our Fondazione Italiana Linfomi original geriatric assessment (oGA) (age, Cumulative Illness Rati
97                      To assess the impact of geriatric assessment on treatment outcomes and the patie
98                   A simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment or easily performed assessments suc
99 medication (EU[7]-PIM) for older people, and geriatric assessment parameters.
100 ot be driven by age alone but should involve geriatric assessments plus careful consideration of life
101 o identify variables in other domains in the geriatric assessment predicting for severe toxic effects
102                                Comprehensive geriatric assessment provides an overarching method of a
103                                          The geriatric assessment questionnaire was completed by 245
104 ty was developed (N = 500) that consisted of geriatric assessment questions and other clinical variab
105     Patients were divided into 3 cohorts: no geriatric assessment, reactive geriatric assessment, and
106   Formal determinations of fitness including geriatric assessments remain critical, but there is less
107 apist, nutritionist, and pharmacist reviewed geriatric assessment results and implemented interventio
108                              In the SOC arm, geriatric assessment results were sent to treating oncol
109                                              Geriatric assessment revealed 2 or more comorbidities in
110 ed on prespecified thresholds built into the geriatric assessment's domains.
111 ore, we evaluated the use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment score, the multidimensional prognos
112        The relationship between distress and geriatric assessment scores was examined.
113                                              Geriatric assessment should include at minimum measures
114 h ovarian cancer should include expertise in geriatric assessment, should carefully identify medical
115 ntervention (oncologists received a tailored geriatric assessment summary and management recommendati
116 anagement recommendations) or usual care (no geriatric assessment summary or management recommendatio
117 determine physiologic age is a comprehensive geriatric assessment to be performed in all individuals
118 ention among older adults, and comprehensive geriatric assessment to identify the current state of pl
119                                   The use of geriatric assessment to inform tailored decision making
120                             They completed a geriatric assessment tool before initiation of protocol
121                       To determine whether a geriatric assessment tool can be implemented in a preope
122 This study evaluated the implementation of a geriatric assessment tool in the cooperative group setti
123      This brief, primarily self-administered geriatric assessment tool met the protocol specified cri
124              The median time to complete the geriatric assessment tool was 22 minutes, 87% of patient
125 was prospectively defined using a simplified geriatric assessment tool.
126                                Incorporating geriatric assessment tools in the care of older adults w
127                    Novel instruments such as geriatric assessment tools may facilitate these aims.
128                                              Geriatric assessment variables independently predicted t
129 o 5 toxicity was developed that consisted of geriatric assessment variables, laboratory test values,
130                                            A geriatric assessment was performed before therapy initia
131                                            A geriatric assessment was performed, and the treating onc
132      In multivariate analysis, both types of geriatric assessment were associated with reduced mortal
133 identify older adults with cancer who need a geriatric assessment were eligible for inclusion.
134 apy with curative or palliative intent and a geriatric assessment were included.
135  (30-item) Quality of Life Questionnaire and geriatric assessment were used to measure patient-report
136                                              Geriatric assessment with management should be integrate
137                              A comprehensive geriatric assessment with the MPI score provides additio

 
Page Top