ライフサイエンスコーパス: glenohumeral

1 iautomated segmented 3D MRI models to assess glenohumeral anatomy, glenoid bone loss (GBL), and their

2 ractice to provide rapid and accurate 3D MRI glenohumeral bone models and GBL measurements.

3 opposite direction to that of the center of glenohumeral contact area during external rotation to in

4 The center of glenohumeral contact area translated from anterior to po

5 ase in anterior translation of the center of glenohumeral contact area was associated with the increa

6 ranslation of the center of humeral head and glenohumeral contact area were associated with the incre

7 ate the glenohumeral contact area, center of glenohumeral contact area, and center of humeral head du

8 The glenohumeral contact area, center of glenohumeral contac

9 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the glenohumeral contact area, center of glenohumeral contac

10 The glenohumeral contact area, center of glenohumeral contact area, center of humeral head, and o

11 Glenohumeral instability encompasses a broad spectrum of

12 of shoulder pain, variability in mechanics, glenohumeral internal rotation deficit, and accordance w

13 Although MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint clearly delineates the biceps-labral

14 Consistent patterns of glenohumeral joint deformity in brachial plexus birth pa

15 he software for bone surface modeling of the glenohumeral joint enabled quantitative assessment of gl

16 inflammatory arthritis, frozen shoulder, or glenohumeral joint instability), received corticosteroid

17 Dynamic MR imaging of the glenohumeral joint is possible over a wide range of phys

18 profiling of a bolus administration into the glenohumeral joint space reveals the brief systemic and

19 ommon injury sites include the rotator cuff, glenohumeral joint, acromioclavicular joint, biceps tend

20 one is posterior to the coronal plane of the glenohumeral joint, and with the contraction of this two

21 ewed arthrograms and in consensus classified glenohumeral joints in one of four categories: concentri

22 gliding occurs at the acromion-clavicle and glenohumeral joints, is different from and convergent to

23 o the dysfunction of the cervicothoracic and glenohumeral joints.

24 eglumine was performed in 10 adult cadaveric glenohumeral joints.

25 ic glenohumeral joints; seven children, flat glenohumeral joints; 19 children, biconcave glenoid; and

26 Twenty-one children had concentric glenohumeral joints; seven children, flat glenohumeral j

27 nvisibility or discontinuity of the superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL), presence of biceps tendino

28 best position for evaluation of the inferior glenohumeral ligament and anterior capsular attachment.

29 otation imaging best delineated the inferior glenohumeral ligament but did not improve assessment of

30 mprove assessment of the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments in comparison with findings in ne

31 rly delineates the biceps-labral complex and glenohumeral ligaments, external rotation of the shoulde

32 ral joint enabled quantitative assessment of glenohumeral micromotion and be used for kinematic evalu

33 from May 2014 to April 2019 to create 3D MRI glenohumeral models by transfer learning using Dixon-bas

34 tic subjects to establish normal patterns of glenohumeral motion during abduction and adduction and i

35 These preliminary measurements of normal glenohumeral motion patterns begin to establish normal r

36 capsulitis (frozen shoulder) and to restore glenohumeral ROM in shoulder arthrofibrosis.

37 e of procedure, from 0.6% (0.5% to 0.8%) for glenohumeral stabilisation to 1.7% (1.5% to 1.8%) for fr

38 t risk, ranging from 2.7% (2.5% to 3.0%) for glenohumeral stabilisation to 5.7% (5.4% to 6.1%) for fr

39 ff repair, acromioclavicular joint excision, glenohumeral stabilisation, and frozen shoulder release.